9126
Living Room / Re: U.S. Intelligence Analyst Arrested in Wikileaks Video Probe
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2010, 10:33 AM »Whistle-blowers should be protected if by releasing classified documents they prove that somebody has done something wrong (from the law point of view). I know this is the law in some countries.-bgd77 (June 09, 2010, 02:18 AM)
I don't think so. This puts too much of a nebulous status on the word classified. There should be some process (which I think there is) for shedding light on classified documents. Someone with the classification to see them that these things can be reported to. And I think that does exist (especially in this age of senate oversight).
How do you allow someone in an analyst position to make the call that something is wrong enough to make classified documents public? And what about the collateral damage if what they release isn't sanitized enough to protect the identities of those peripherally involved?
When something is marked classified, it should be black and white IMO... especially considering operational security for those who put their lives on the line based on the fact that this is so.