topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday December 17, 2025, 3:27 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 ... 404next
8376
Living Room / Re: Downloadsquad shutting down - Another one bites the dust
« Last post by wraith808 on April 15, 2011, 10:06 AM »
They appear to have landed here: Browser Scene

I wish them the best- but their narrowed focus unfortunately means I won't have as much of a reason to keep track of them.
8377
Living Room / Re: Salaries of Charity CEOs
« Last post by wraith808 on April 15, 2011, 10:04 AM »
But this does not mean that no money is required for the internal/external upkeep. You would not believe (no pun intended) the cost involved to keep those old buildings standing. And how much the work of the required level of expertise in masonry/woodworking/metalworking costs nowadays.

That's all very true BUT there is also a huge amount of wealth inside the church (beyond the buildings and land) - esp. the Roman Catholic Church which has billions in art treasures.

Personally I think all the old buildings should be given to communities to use for community purposes (then there would be a reason for people to pay to maintain the buildings). The point of the church is (or at least should be) religious belief - not land and building management. They can always rent a hall for services and then focus on what is important rather than fund raising for ancient stones.
-Carol Haynes (April 15, 2011, 03:03 AM)

Who is to say that this is what would happen?  I've seen when this is done- then the building becomes either (a) dilapidated, or (b) dilapidated and a home for unsavoury activities.  It's not space that charitable and community organizations hunger for- it's money.
8378
Living Room / Re: Salaries of Charity CEOs
« Last post by wraith808 on April 14, 2011, 08:06 PM »
This is why I almost always donate to charities where 100% of the money goes to the cause, and all work is done by unpaid volunteers.

You can't have people fully devoted to the cause if they're unpaid volunteers- it's just the way of the world that they have to have money for essentials, so they have to work for someone else, and those influences can spill over (not necessarily intentionally).  That's why I'm in favor of them getting decent salaries- so they have some other sort of incentive to make sure that the funds are distributed well.
8379
General Software Discussion / Re: SpiderOak - very nice people =)
« Last post by wraith808 on April 13, 2011, 09:49 AM »
I have my own S3 account also (I use it for other stuff), and mine was with the original JD (now Personal Desktop Edition).  I did create a new 'disk', but it was on my own account.  I use CloudBerry on S3 and see my files, so I'm not sure what the difference is- but it works.  I also use explorer to browse it also, and that works also.

Hmmm... Cloudberry shows me this for my JD account on S3:
 (see attachment in previous post)
And this for my mapped drive:
 (see attachment in previous post)
Then it's not S3 compatible.  I have two on S3 - one is compatible (it doesn't have as many features that way) and the other one isn't.  The differences in the naming of the buckets is even obvious...

s3cloudberry.png

I did find out that they're trying to decide 'what to do about perpetual accounts.'  I hope that isn't as ominous as it sounds.

I heard something also. I'm sure it's not good - for us, anyway. Like "lifetime" licenses, these things never last.  :'(

You take a chance on them and pay a higher price to support the service- and when they become solvent, they forget who helped them get to that point.  And at this point, all they're providing me for free is the software.  I pay for the web interface.  And I pay amazon for my storage.  So I don't know how they could justify charging me a monthly fee for *that*.
8380
Living Room / Re: Downloadsquad shutting down - Another one bites the dust
« Last post by wraith808 on April 13, 2011, 09:45 AM »
^ Has windows secrets become bad?  I stopped my subscription long ago, but at that point thought they were going downhill... not there(!)
8381
General Software Discussion / Re: SpiderOak - very nice people =)
« Last post by wraith808 on April 13, 2011, 08:37 AM »
I have my own S3 account also (I use it for other stuff), and mine was with the original JD (now Personal Desktop Edition).  I did create a new 'disk', but it was on my own account.  I use CloudBerry on S3 and see my files, so I'm not sure what the difference is- but it works.  I also use explorer to browse it also, and that works also.

I did find out that they're trying to decide 'what to do about perpetual accounts.'  I hope that isn't as ominous as it sounds.
8382
Living Room / Re: Help with new computer build
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 11:31 PM »
Well, after a day of having the settings in place (I had to fix my wife's computer last night... my first time installing one of those huge CPU coolers- AIEEEE!!!) it seems that your advice helped!  It's at least a lot better... I don't know why they would put something so disruptive in there under the aegis of "power saving" and "green".  Sigh.  :-\

Thanks for your help!  :Thmbsup:
8383
... and I just upgraded to Windows 7  :huh:
8384
General Software Discussion / Re: SpiderOak - very nice people =)
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 11:25 PM »
I have Jungle Disk also but I am thinking of sending my files to Amazon S3 another way, perhaps via SFFS. Two problems I have with Jungle Disk: They can't seem to get a clean build out the first time around. Each time I updated there were problems that required a subsequent release to fix. Secondly, I have my S3 data storage mapped to a virtual drive on my PC but that is the only way I can view my files real time. If I use another S3 browser (E.g., Cloudberry Explorer) my data is encoded in a way that you can't browse it. If I use another upload method I will be able to see my data's file/folder hierarchy online.

I haven't had that problem with Jungle Disk- and I use it on 7 different computers/OSes!  That would be a pain... what type of account are you using?  And you can use S3 in compatibility mode with Jungle Disk, though I just map my drive to my computer using Jungle Disk's facility.

http://help.jungledi...nderstanding_buckets

8385
Living Room / Re: Downloadsquad shutting down - Another one bites the dust
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 10:27 PM »
I, too, followed that blog. Was there any warning this was coming? Caught me quite off guard today. . .

The Huffington bit was a bit of a giveaway that *something* was going to happen.  But this...?
8386
Living Room / Re: Amazon Clouddrive Sync Clients
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 10:27 PM »
Food for thought... No privacy on Amazon's cloud drive.

Less so than other cloud storage?

The primary purpose for this is most likely deduping.  They don't actually give each person 5GB- if you and I upload the same song, it's only on the server once.  There are other ramifications beyond this, but I don't believe that the intent *right now* is nefarious.  Of course, who knows what the future holds...
8387
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 10:14 PM »
Nope. With your example any corporation or company is made up of people. Doesn’t get them into my definition of people. Corporations and many companies are entities totally separate from the people who make professional mistakes within them. Doesn’t count at all as far as I am concerned. Investmant companies throw money at them (Apparently they just received $3.5M from one) which they would not do if it was just people. Incorporation takes away the liability from those people, so no, that corporation does not qualify for redemption IMO.
But the lack of redemption that is being talked about in this context is for the people, not the company.  OpenCandy has people from Divx, who did a bad thing.  So by association, OpenCandy is not to be trusted.  That's referring to the people.


C'mon, folks, this horse has been beaten entirely too much.  Let's agree to disagree and just move on.

I'm actually enjoying the debate... it's been spirited, but not mean-spirited.  But if people want to let it drop, then... /me shrugs
8388
I was going to copy your template, but then I thought that would ruin the whole "No Time To Explain" theme. :D

LOL :)  And anyone that wants to help out... do!  There's so much on there that one person can't plumb the depths (at least not without more time than I have :))
8389
DC Gamer Club / Re: Humble Indie Bundle (pay what you want sale)
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 06:30 PM »
Yeah, a not so stellar line-up this time compared to previous bundles. But I'm still so fond of the idea that I donated anyway.

Besides, it's charity, too. :Thmbsup:

There is that... thanks for the reminder :)
8390
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 04:26 PM »

In mine they are.  I did some things out of ignorance when I was younger professionally, so I'm apt to give second chances, as I wouldn't be where I am without one.  And I know people who've had criminal records for quite innocuous mistakes... the difference a criminal record makes in things you take for granted until you have one is pretty staggering!

I think you misunderstand. I have no problem with redemption for people; but that has absolutely nothing to do with software developers. My moral code allows forgiveness for people. It doesn’t work the same way for software companies. Nor for banks, investment companies, etc. See the difference? People, yes. Software companies, no.


No... I don't misunderstand.  My professional mistakes were as a software developer, so it's very relevant.  I'm sure *many* software developers have made mistakes, and have regrets, just as many people in other fields do.  Does that make them ineligible to make money in their chosen profession?

The people at OC are just that... people.  Yet it's guilt by association, no matter what changes they may have made, no matter what revelations they may have gleaned.  It's easy to demonize companies while holding the company to some standard- but no matter what the legal definition is, a company is not an entity.  And even if it were, that wouldn't hold water either, as OC is not Divx; it just has some of the same people.  So it's not redemption for even Divx as a company.  We're talking about people here, truthfully, and their actions and history.
8392
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 02:57 PM »

And is there a point where there's no redemption?  I should hope not.  The lack of the possibility of redemption removes hope, and removes the one thing that can make people choose the right path.  It reminds me of people with criminal records.  Do you trust them outright and give them the keys to the safe?  No.  But if you don't give them a chance to prove themselves, then how are they ever going to be rehabilitated?  And isn't it just as much your fault when given the lack of a means to make a living they resort to the only thing they can still do?

This comparison just don’t work for me. People with criminal records and software companies (and/or their founders) that have done serious wrong aren't in the same realm with regard to rehabilitation, second chances, etc. At least in my universe!


In mine they are.  I did some things out of ignorance when I was younger professionally, so I'm apt to give second chances, as I wouldn't be where I am without one.  And I know people who've had criminal records for quite innocuous mistakes... the difference a criminal record makes in things you take for granted until you have one is pretty staggering!
8393
DC Gamer Club / Re: Humble Indie Bundle (pay what you want sale)
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 02:52 PM »
Eh... I'll donate to help out... I already have Trine and Shadow Grounds, so won't pay as much as usual...
8394
Living Room / Re: Downloadsquad shutting down - Another one bites the dust
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 02:51 PM »
It would seem to make more sense for HuffingtonPost Tech to shut down.  I've never even heard of, let alone visited the HuffingtonPost Tech blog... I always thought of them as more esoteric.
8395
A template- if anyone else wants to get in on the bandwagon... :)

<Name/Link>
<Image>
Goal
End Date
Project Creator(s)
Location
Minimum Pledge
Description
8396
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 12:53 PM »
@SJ - Note: this is how it works in CT at least. It may be different where you live.

Yeah, I'm in the south ... Our version of the "Three Step Rule" is never be more that Three Steps away from your gun... :)   (Seriously) The last stats I saw on the news for FL was 1 in 10 for armed license holders ... And I think half the other 9 just do it anyway.

When I used to live in the south, there was a county that had a gun requirement law- you were required by law to have a gun in your house.
8397
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by wraith808 on April 12, 2011, 09:23 AM »
That's cool... but does an individual's right to choose not to consume make the company's right to exist and operate moot?  Does an opinion not based in current facts surrounding the company make the company evil?

Pardon me, but it s a known fact that I have trust issues (I don't believe in 3 strikes and you'd be lucky if you were allowed 2), so help me out here...

When does a current fact stop being current and become old news, worthy of forgetting? If they do something seriously questionable today, do we immediately forgive and forget tomorrow, if they stop, change the way they do things, apologize, make promises, etc?

Where do YOU draw the line? At what point do you say enough is enough and now I am not going to trust you until you have proven yourselves worthy of that trust? How long does it take to win that trust back? How many infractions are they allowed during that period? How serious are those infractions allowed to be? At what point do you write them off and never trust again?

Well, no, I didn't know that, but despite that- does a mistake made rob you of your right to make a living?  They weren't convicted of any crime- what they did was wrong, and it seems from the quote of DrApps that you posted, that they are aware of it.  One strike and you're out is very unforgiving, especially in a world where *everyone* makes mistakes.  Sure, there is a point where you don't trust... but I don't think that OC as a company is at that point.  They've made some course corrections and had some defects- even those were benign- just traces of what they had done.  A dll by itself, or registry settings by themselves are not smoking guns- and to me point to the fact that there were some growing pains more than malign intent.  An executable or anything that ran out of process, or any sort of network traffic to the contrary of what they're saying would be more evidence than these missteps.

And is there a point where there's no redemption?  I should hope not.  The lack of the possibility of redemption removes hope, and removes the one thing that can make people choose the right path.  It reminds me of people with criminal records.  Do you trust them outright and give them the keys to the safe?  No.  But if you don't give them a chance to prove themselves, then how are they ever going to be rehabilitated?  And isn't it just as much your fault when given the lack of a means to make a living they resort to the only thing they can still do?
8398
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by wraith808 on April 11, 2011, 08:51 PM »
But while he has forgiven them and think they deserve another chance, especially since they are willing to give him a paycheck...I am not ready to forgive them or trust them, and can't bring myself to touch their money. You can't pay me to change my mind about them. I can't be that easily bought.

That's cool... but does an individual's right to choose not to consume make the company's right to exist and operate moot?  Does an opinion not based in current facts surrounding the company make the company evil?  I don't think anyone would force you to install software you don't want to install or participate in a program you don't want to participate in.  But people aren't just choosing not to participate, they are actively campaigning against them.  Is that right in the face of a lack of bad actions or proof of bad intent?  And if the same people go to another company in the computer industry- does that make that company evil by association, since apparently this company is evil by their association?
8399
Living Room / Kickstarter and Indie2GoGo Projects Spotlight - April 11, 2011
« Last post by wraith808 on April 11, 2011, 02:34 PM »
(I wasn't sure where to put this....)

Support your favorite indie project through a safe and convenient outlet through Kickstarter or IndieGoGo.  The projects are all or nothing - they set their goal, and if it's reached, you pay your pledge.  If not, you pay nothing.  It's not about investment, but instead about patronage.  If funded, the project creators own 100% of their work, and you get the satisfied feeling of being a patron of the arts.  And there are a variety of endeavors to fund, from the worlds of music, film, art, technology, design, food, publishing and other creative fields.

Below are some highlights from the sites:
TweetLand
TweetLand-Kick3.png
Goal$7000
End Date2011-05-04
Project Creator(s)Villalobos, Espinoza, Vasquez, Cartin(s)
LocationSan José, Costa Rica
DescriptionSocial networks meet social gaming with Tweet Land, a series of games where gameplay is determined by the real-time actions of Twitter users. With a dash of retro-styling and a super-catchy soundtrack, behold the twitterverse as it becomes a real place you can race through.

Matthew Stover's Overworld
overworld.png
Goal$8500
End Date2011-04-18
Project Creator(s)Moe Suliman
LocationSt Petersburg, FL
Description I want to create an "origin story" comic book series titled: OverWorld, featuring the art of T J Halvorsen (formerly an Inker for Marvel's Incredible Hulk and currently a Penciler for DC's Batman and Robin, Wonder Woman) based on New York Times Best Selling Author Matthew Stover's books "Heroes Die", "Blade of Tyshalle", "Caine Black Knife", his up and coming novel, "His Father's Fist" and their beyond brutal anti-hero Caine. Matthew will also write the story.

Do: Pilgrims of the Flying Temple
DO.png
Goal$4000
End Date2011-05-24
Project Creator(s)Daniel Solis
LocationOklahoma City, OK
DescriptionDo: Pilgrims of the Flying Temple is a storytelling game about helping people and getting into trouble.

You tell the story of young travelers who mean well, but spend most of their time getting into trouble. You use your creativity and strategy to create a humorous coming of age story. It's like a comedic crossover between Avatar: the Last Airbender, the Little Prince and Kino's Journey.

The Cosmonaut: A Wide-Grip Stylus for Touch Screens
cosmonaut.png
Goal$50000
End Date2011-04-20
Project Creator(s)Dan Provost & Tom Gerhardt
LocationNew York, NY
DescriptionThe Cosmonaut was born out of our desire to have a really great stylus for our iPads. We love to sketch out quick ideas or doodle on our tablets, and using a stylus is much better than a finger for such tasks. We bought several different models currently available on the market but they all suffered the same problem: they were designed to look and feel like a pen. But why? Writing or drawing on the iPad feels nothing like using a pen or pencil. For one, tablets are ideal for low fidelity sketching. Also, it is pretty awkward to rest your palm on the screen of the device because it throws off the capacitive detection. Writing on a tablet feels like writing on a dry erase board: fast, simple, low fidelity. The perfect tablet stylus is one that feels like a dry erase marker.


Record Monsters (Laser Cut Vinyl Record Puzzles)
recordmonsters.png
Goal$500
End Date2011-04-16
Project Creator(s)Andrew Hyde
LocationLower East Side, NY
DescriptionWe make 3d models out of old vinyl records.  We have 20 designs, from Ants to Velociraptor to Pteranodon.  We ship out a vinyl record, you get to pop out the pieces and assemble the model.  

Our 'real goal' is $15k and will allow us to cut these at a much faster rate!

There are several other projects out there- these are just the ones that caught my eye!  I'll try to post these updates at least once a month, but there are new projects appearing every day, so take a look at the sites, and see what interesting things are out there!

8400
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by wraith808 on April 11, 2011, 10:55 AM »
A couple of questions before we get off this topic:

1. If they did change their business model to be obtrusive and glaring as you suggest, what do you think would be the effect on their bottom line?  It would seem at that point that OC would be the focus of the software, rather than the software.  Sort of like an advertisement for a product where another product is prevalent detracting from the subject.

2. I really like project wonderful and what they stand for, and their stated goals of bringing 'fairness, transparency, and profitability to the advertising process'.  But if you ask yourself the same questions about OC (i.e. are you tracked before you have a chance to opt out), the answer would be yes.  As soon as you go to a page with the PW ads installed, you are tracked as a necessity for payment.  Even thing such as tickers at the bottom of the web page track visitors, and they don't ask you before they do so.  Is the only difference between these and OC the fact that OC has to be bundled into software that you use to install other software on your machine?  

I'm really trying to see the difference... unlike Renegade, the reason that I'm involved in the discussion is for the discussion's sake, and the fact that I like to operate from a logical perspective- and looking at it in that manner, it's not operating any differently from other things that we take for granted- other than the fact that it's bundled into an installer.  There doesn't seem to be a way that they could change their business model in a way to stay viable in the market.  I know that if I were selling/giving away software and had to blare the business model that I was using so that it outshined my product, I wouldn't really be too keen on utilizing it.

Thoughts?
Pages: prev1 ... 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 ... 404next