topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 25, 2025, 8:04 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 42next
826
Another option would be to assign a static ip to the laptop on the alternate config, and leave the default config on auto. The problem with this approach is that sometimes it won't work as expected and you have to disconnect/connect a few times until it figures out it should be using the static ip.
I was under the same impression as jgpaiva - that the server was not on the laptop.  In your case, I think the above option is the way to go.  I have never had issues with multiple profiles on my laptops, but they are using the Intel 2200bg wireless card that is VERY GOOD compared to any other card I have seen.  They came with this card and the software (IntelPROSet Wireless) with it allows me to order the profiles.  If it finds the connection for the top profile it stops; if not, it goes to the next to try.  It prevents the issues mentioned.  If you can find a wireless package similar to the PROSet Wireless package and use it in place of Windows wireless services, I think you can avoid the unexpected issues jgpaiva mentioned.

Oh, and if anyone knows of a package as good as Intel's PROSet Wireless package that works on windows with Broadcom wireless cards - PLEASE LET ME KNOW.  I have SO many clients that want wireless on their laptops, and I always direct them to the Intel cards because they work.  The Broadcom cards work fairly well too, but are not 100% Cisco compatible (required for many enterprise wireless setups), and they do not have a good package to manage it.  It is a bit cheaper than the Intel cards though.  I will checkout the NetSetMan, but if others know of any, I am listening.

Thanks.
827
General Software Discussion / Re: Cracked while installing Linux :)
« Last post by steeladept on September 23, 2007, 07:25 PM »
I think you sorta just answered your own question - at that point you either switch or hope you know enough to modify it as you need.  :P

Seriously though, since I am not using it as my server (it is my desktop on my alternate machine), I will just switch to another distro.  I am not exactly a fan of any one distro, but I do have a vested interest in finding the best distro for me and then telling everyone about it so they will become big enough to stand on their own.
828
Funny!  I am not even a programmer (though I occasionally play one at school, when I go), and I still find it hilarious. ;D
829
Assign the PC a static IP address outside that range, (say 192.168.1.99 for example) and it should stay there. 
I had no idea about that! Thanks a lot, i think i'm going to do that at home :D
Yeah, that is how I am setup too.  It makes life easier when you have all the desktops attached.  When you have friends over they can still connect, and if you don't and you see people on it, you know they are taking bandwidth.  Of course that is what the security is for, but you can see how this can be useful for various reasons...
830
General Software Discussion / Re: Cracked while installing Linux :)
« Last post by steeladept on September 23, 2007, 10:57 AM »
Sorry to hear about the issue with the CD, but it is great that you are doing this.  Keep us informed on how it goes.  I keep hearing how good SUSE is, but I haven't played much with it.  I found I like LinuxMint which is a distro based off Ubuntu.  However, Clem (the creator of Mint) takes it where many would like to see Ubuntu go and adds proprietary drivers.  He also creates and provides his own set of tools and does things like implementing the SLAB interface from SUSE and install it on a basically Ubuntu platform.  I have no doubt that he (if not Ubuntu itself) will be supporting Mono if he isn't already.

For any who want to check it out, it can be found at www.linuxmint.com
831
patteo: you need to disable DHCP (which is what assigns those ips) and configure static ips on the computers, one per computer.
Actually, while that will work, it is not quite true that it must be disabled.  That router allows you to define a range for DHCP.  Assign the PC a static IP address outside that range, (say 192.168.1.99 for example) and it should stay there.  You may have some other minor things you need to setup - it has been a while since I did that - but you should be able to set it up fine.  All that said, it may be easier to just disable the DHCP if it is only for 3 computers and no one else ever will connect.  It can be another step to improve security that way.
832
Just because and for a very long shot - Did you check the BIOS settings?  Perhaps something changed there/Got reset?  Just a thought.  It shouldn't make a difference, but....

As for slipstreaming SP2, I know you can, we have a copy at work.  I just don't know how to do so myself as I have never had the need to learn.  Of course in the 9 months since, you probably already learned that :) .
833
Living Room / Re: All your info in one place
« Last post by steeladept on September 21, 2007, 10:11 PM »
I don't know of any that will FTP like that - sounds like a good coding snack...
834
DcUpdater / Re: Installed programs not recognized
« Last post by steeladept on September 21, 2007, 09:47 PM »
Don't know if this will help you Mouser, but I am having the same problem.  Some observations, though:

  • It doesn't appear to affect plug-ins, just the application installers.
  • It didn't install anything unless all the supported programs were closed. (This may be coincidence though, since I didn't try the next thing until they were all closed).
  • It DID install Process Tamer when I installed it by itself through the DCU.
  • DCU STILL did not recognize Process Tamer after installation.
  • Shutting down and restarting DCU allowed it to recognize ALL installed programs. (After that worked for Process Tamer I did individual updates for the other programs installed as well)
  • Once in the "installed" list, they APPEAR to work right, though I can't be certain until another update is listed.

Hope this helps with the Troubleshooting.
835
Living Room / Re: Need a small, closed (!) forum
« Last post by steeladept on September 16, 2007, 03:04 PM »
You are right, it is Windows dependent.  I guess that could make it a deal breaker.  It is part of certain packages of Office 2007, so if/when I get that, I will see exactly what it is all about.  At least they would give you a fairly long free trial if you want to consider it.
836
Living Room / Re: Show us your (physical) desktop
« Last post by steeladept on September 16, 2007, 02:59 PM »
Scancode:  Looks alot like my computer room, only more domestics and not quite enough opened up hardware  :P .  Don't know if it is good or bad, but since I moved into my mom's house to take care of her, I never got my computer room setup again.  She passed away 6 months after we moved in, and that was about 7 months ago, so I guess it has been about a year since I had that.  Since then I have been stuck (lucky enough, depending on your outlook) to have a laptop that works on the kitchen table when we don't eat there.  :D  If it weren't for that, I would have posted a picture just so you don't feel so bad.
837
For those in the US Military, go to https://ascp.monmout...scp/software/hup.jsp and login with your AKO account. Full details are there. You can get Office 2003/2007 and other associated office apps for $20 each (Visio, Project, etc).

Sorry, no go Josh.  It is apparently only Army.  Air Force and Navy/Marine component members are apparently out of luck on this one.  Please prove me wrong, but I haven't seen the equivalent anywhere except at some universities.  I would love to upgrade from 2000 to 2003/7 on my machines.  OpenOffice is nice, but compatibility (with work) forces me to stay with M$ and their "wonderful" new formats.  I have been putting off the upgrade at home trying to get the company to buy it for me, but so far that has not worked out.  OO has worked fine otherwise.
838
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« Last post by steeladept on September 16, 2007, 11:49 AM »
;D
steeladept, did you know that Toronto was not part of Quebec (the frenchy province)?
Toronto is actually very English.
But who cares anyway : he was speaking French and so you were absolutely entitled to tease him.
J'aurais fait la même chose.  ;)

Yes, I was well aware of that...That is why it was so fun to tease him about it.  He was proud to not be from Quebec province, and so (of course) we had to act like he was - ALWAYS.  It was fun, and he got pretty good at returning the harassment.  Oh, that and we had to duck a lot!  ;D ;D ;D
839
Just thought you might like to know there are actually quite a few subscribers here.  And if you are a supporting member of this site, you can even subscribe to the Premium version at a discount.   :-*

That being said, I loved the way Briard wrote that up.  I followed each article as they were written and feel they are mostly right on the money.  However, there is a lot to learn there, and if anyone is willing to take the time, the learning curve is not that steep anymore, comparatively.  As he stated, "Linux is not ready, but some distributions are".  Thanks to Briard, I found LinuxMint and have loved it ever since.
840
Living Room / Re: Need a small, closed (!) forum
« Last post by steeladept on September 16, 2007, 11:03 AM »
If you have or are willing to buy it, from my understanding that is what Microsoft Groove is all about.  It is sort of like Sharepoint but for workgroups; and though there is a server option, it doesn't appear to be required.  The only question here is the forum-like posting ability.  I don't know how well it does that.
841
General Software Discussion / Re: GemX - missing in action
« Last post by steeladept on September 15, 2007, 10:57 PM »
Akk...A bunch of French Canadians at that  :P.  Actually, one of my best friends from High School was from Toronto, so we used to tease him a bunch about being French Canadian. He would always get flustered saying not all Canadians were French Canadians!  We knew that, but it was fun to tease him anyway.  Sorry about the aside, the thread just reminded me of that.  Good Times....</memory>
842
Living Room / Re: Before I head to the computer shop... (Memory slot problem)
« Last post by steeladept on September 14, 2007, 08:22 PM »
I am glad to hear it worked, but you also want to be careful that you can actually use that much memory.  I have no doubt you were fine with the amount you had, but I have often seen (usually with older boards) where there is 3 or 4 slots, but a max memory addressable of only 2 GB.  You have to look at the board manufacturer's manual to see what (and in what order) to place the memory.  With older (pre-DDR) boards, there were often 3 slots that may have a max size configuration of 1gb in slot 0, 512mb in slot 1, and 512mb in slot 2.  I haven't seen DDR boards in any strange configurations, but I wouldn't rule it out.  Everything I have seen so far would be something like max 1gb/slot or 2gb/slot.  However, I could imagine situations where it might be a matched pair 2gb chips in the first pair slot and 1gb chips in the second pair slot for a max capacity of 6gb.

Other good troubleshooting techniques include swapping memory in the slot to determine if one or more chips are bad, and swapping the configuration to see if the slot is bad - but by the sounds of it, that is what you did.  One last good thing to do if you suspect bad chips and you want to test it for certain (assuming you don't have issues that force you to determine the issues through beep-codes), you can use Memtest++.  This is a very good and very small program that you boot into and it will run several tests on every memory address in every chip that the motherboard recognizes.  All you need is one good chip plugged into the motherboard for it to load the program into memory.  The program will test them all after that.
843
Yacht_boy beat me to it, but really all you need to do is reassociate the file types to the correct package.  It is a pain, but not all that uncommon after an uninstall.  Programmers miss things on occasion, and this is one of them.  Another way to do this in XP is to open Explorer (don't know for all those replacements, but I am pretty certain they have a similar feature) and then go to Tools>Folder Options>File Types and browse down to your file extension (.avi for example).  Once there click on the file extention and in the box below, click on the "Change" button by "Opens With:" (It may or may not have an entry there already).  Now just browse to the application executable that you want to open that file type with and it is associated.

This is basically the GUI interface to changing file types in the registry without the chance of screwing up the registry itself.  You still have to be careful to not screw up the file types too much, or program dependencies can get broken; but it won't screw up the registry.
844
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: AcroLiminator 2.01
« Last post by steeladept on September 03, 2007, 04:13 PM »
Very nice and easy to add and delete acronyms, but I thought of one instance that might be a problem.  If you enter a typo and (therefore) the acronym doesn't take, how can you determine what you did put in so it can be removed?

Also, there should be a check to verify that a space is not an acronym.  I did that by accident, and it got very annoying popping up to ask if "   " wanted to be expanded.  It took me a bit to figure out what I did and then be able to remove it.
845
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by steeladept on August 21, 2007, 12:42 PM »
Missed my 100th, but here is number 200.  ak_ is immortalized (or is that demoralized?  :P )

846
Living Room / Re: Does my future pc suck ?
« Last post by steeladept on August 21, 2007, 12:38 PM »
About SLI : well, hum, i didn't even know what it was before you told me about it :) My choice of components is based on what i've read on multiple websites. Soooo yeah, maybe i don't need a SLI motherboard. Which one then ? What about this one ? Seems to be the same as my original choice without the SLI feature. What do you think ? If you think it's not a good choice, can you please suggest something else ? (considering that price is REALLY important).

Actually no, that motherboard is not what I meant.  The companion non-SLI motherboard is this.  Also, for $10US cheaper, there is this alternative.  What you loose in the cheaper one is a slightly less capable north bridge (don't know what that means without more research though), 2 SATA connectors, a serial connector (not essential any more), and a few other odds and ends.  The cheaper one has a few more features that make up for the difference though, so it really depends on what your needs are.  Both save you $30-40US off the original board you told us about and both have comparable, though not exact, specs.

847
Living Room / Re: Does my future pc suck ?
« Last post by steeladept on August 21, 2007, 11:24 AM »
I have not seen a major difference between AMD and Intel personally, so given the cost difference, I think you went the right route.  However, unless there is a good reason to stick with the ATI card, I do follow the suggestion of an NVidia card instead.  Or, given your graphics needs, maybe consider Matrox.  I haven't dealt with them in a long time, though, so I am not certain they still hold the edge for graphics.  NVidia is definitely the game leader though with great graphics capabilities.  Though the SLI board is a bit of overkill if you won't use it.  Look for non-SLI boards if you are sticking with one card.  They are usually cheaper, and most vendors offer an SLI board and a non-SLI board that is otherwise the same.  Also, due to the Photoshop and cheap memory, I definitely think you should stick with your 4GB Memory. 

Lastly, if you have the money for it, the bigger hard drive is a good choice.  Be careful though, you can frequently get multiple smaller drives for the same total size for a smaller price.  As long as heat and case space is not an issue, find that sweet spot and buy multiple drives as appropriate.  You then can do several things with it that you wouldn't otherwise be able to do, such as mirror the drives, stripe them in a raid, or partition them separately to minimize rebuild times as appropriate to your goals.  Personally, I suggest getting 3 or 4 (if possible) and make them a striped array.  This gives a small (though not insignificant) performance boost especially with photoshop, while giving you a better chance at recovery if one goes bad (if two go at the same time you are still screwed though, so never use this in place of a good backup strategy!)

EDIT:  BTW - Just wanted to say I like your choice of components.  Seagate drives in particular seem a cut above to me.  The Western Digital ones work very well too, but are much louder in my experience.  Sticking with these quality components will help ensure that you will get good support if needed as well.  As to your original question, No, it doesn't suck, even as written, the comments made are just to help you tweak your thoughts from our own opinions.  Good luck.
848
johi's reminder prompted me to remind you about proxy server settings as well.  At work, we use .pac files for configuring our proxies, and I haven't found a workaround for that yet.  Therefore, unless I bring in the updates on a USB stick, I can't get them at work, and that makes DCU a little pointless there (e.g. where that configuration file points to).  Could you set it to get the proxy settings from the default browser?  That seems like the easy way to do it, though I don't know if that is easy to code.
849
I agree with Josh.  I would reinstall from scratch the way he suggests.  However, I would create just the C:\ partition. Once created and everything is working in the C: drive (yes, boot into it and verify installation was successful - indeed, I even patch the machine to current first), right click on "My Computer" and choose "Manage".  From there, you can go to "Disk Management" under "Storage".  Then right click on the "RAW" drive space and proceed with creating a new simple partition.  This method guarantees the partition loaded is the C: drive, and it also allows you to worry about only one partition at a time.  The only down side is you must know how big you want your C: partition to be.  Determining size for Windows, any updates, and any programs can be tricky if you are trying to maximize your space.
850
Living Room / Re: Help with concepts.
« Last post by steeladept on August 14, 2007, 11:39 AM »
I'm not clear with the some of the concepts regarding computer such as :
The Processor line i386,i486,i586,i686 etc.What is the meaning of this ?Please somebody brief me.
Also  :
1) Why term " IBM compatible PC " is used in the market? What standards IBM set for the PC ?
2) is it possible to get voltage at the USB port ? that means how USB transfers information in-terms of voltage or light(fiber optic) ? What are the contents inside the USB drive? is USB static or dynamic storage media ?
3) What is the role of RAM for the operating system?

Tried Google/Wikipedia but confused with someterms,so i thought it will be good idea to post here.Post your views

This is almost all history, so circle around boys and girls while we give you this little lesson in computer history.  Now before I go explaining what I know, just be forewarned I am certainly no expert, but I have lived through this history and remember much of it from a personal perspective.

Way back when, there was this tiny company called Intel.  They were known for making VLSI integrated circuits (now more commonly known as computer chips).  One of the most popular chips was known simply by it's model number, the 8086 chip.  This was little more than a calculator chip, but for many engineers who designed such systems based on the chip, they were able to make computers. 

Back then, many different manufacturers made many different computers in many different ways.  There were no standards, even between lines within the same company in many cases.  Companies such as Apple Computers, Acer, Hewlett Packard, Tandy Computer Corp, and others burst on to the scene to create these machines.  They were, however, completely incompatible with one another, and the hardware and software associated with the machine was custom made for that model only.

Around this time, established companies like IBM were determining how to utilize this new technology to leverage their existing systems.  IBM in particular had been around for a long time custom making (mainframe) computers from whatever was most appropriate at the time - vacuum tubes, integrated circuits, wire, you name it.  With the advent of the 8086 processor, IBM started making mainframes and other distributed computing systems with this cheaper technology.

Now IBM was long established within corporate America, and indeed around the world, long before computers came about.  They created ticker-tape machines, typewriters, lithograph machines, etc.; so you name it, and IBM probably made it.  This gave IBM a strong competitive advantage when they started selling their own version of a personal computer to bring the mainframe to the desktop (also known as the dumb terminal).  However, business pressures and technology advances pushed them to selling what we would now recognize as a PC instead.  With all this technology and selling power at their hands, IBM started cashing in on the very lucrative business market - really, it was the only real market at the time.

Many of the other makers were trying to break into IBM's market share as the only other market was for the hobbyist, who would not buy prebuilt machines anyway.  The cost was just too high for the average person (for reference, I remember my buddy's father coming home with a low end i286 based IBM machine with a green screen that cost his company almost $6,000 in the early to mid 1980's).  Therefore with IBM's dominance in business, and the makers chasing the business market, a standard arose from the dominant player.  In essence, it was a might makes right situation.  Everyone wanted to play with IBM, so they had to play by IBM's rules.  Machines that were certified (or claimed to be certified) compatible with IBM software and machines were labeled "IBM Compatible".  As this became more standard more machines acquired the title, and it became a defacto standard.

It is interesting to note that at least one company was trying to differentiate itself at the time by NOT being IBM compatible.  That company was Apple Computers.  After IBM more or less won the standard-setting war, most computers were seen as belonging to one of two oligarchies, Either it was an IBM Compatible, or an Apple.  IBM's were just too expensive for the name brand, so the "compatible" moniker grouped all non-Apple machines.  UNIX machines still existed at the time, but they were not a player on the desktop front, so it is not part of this story.

Back to Intel.  From this little war between customers, Intel profited greatly.  They continued to refine the 8086 chipset architecture and developed new technologies based off of it.  Each new major change kept the 86 ending and it sort of became a new naming standard within Intel to define the decendants of the 8086 chipset.  Each new number represented a major change (such as a version number in software).  So 286 was a major change to the 8086 chip design, 386 was a major change to the 286 design, etc.   Minor updates were designated by a step number.  These numbers often accompanied marketing names such as MMX as f0dder mentioned.  They were extension of the existing architecture in that chip family. 

Frequently an x86 family change (early in its life) meant you needed completely new software.  8086 software did not run on 286 machines, 286 software did not run on 386 machines, etc.  But then something happened with the 386 line.  A standard was set with an upgrade path.  Suddenly 386 software would generally run on 486 machines.  Even today, on the newest Intel x86 processors, software made for a 386 machine will happily run - though much faster than intended, so don't 386 run games on them if you want to see what is going on  ;D

Enough of the history lesson, your other questions are best answered by others, and some of them have been quite nicely already.  I have said too much already though I do think you will have to be a bit more specific about your questions on the USB. USB is a standard interface, not just a thumbdrive or a printer or other piece of hardware.  When you say a USB drive, do you mean a thumbdrive or a hard drive with a USB interface?  When you ask is it static or dynamic storage, what do you mean by this?
Pages: prev1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 ... 42next