8101
General Software Discussion / Re: Dot Net - a wrong step by MS?
« Last post by wraith808 on August 04, 2011, 07:11 AM »I guess I have to be the first to disagree. First, though .NET is language agnostic to a large degree, the large development with .NET was C#, and though they try not to say it, it is the defacto language for .NET. I think that, more than anything else, is why the support for C++ in the managed world has languished. And I don't look at it as a bad thing. A lot of our legacy applications are built in C++/COM, and everyone dreads having to get them set up to debug, let alone actually work in them. Don't get me wrong; I think C++ will always have its place. I just don't see it becoming a major player in the standard Windows business application market again. All you have to do is look at the jobs available ads to see what a fallacy that thought is.
HTML5 is a browser based technology. No matter how robust they become, desktop applications won't disappear, which is why the second part is fallacy. Even Silverlight has its place in Microsoft's strategies. HTML5 is the language of choice in Microsoft for internet applications; Silverlight is still Microsoft's language of choice for intranet applications. There is a big difference.
A lot of the article seems to be based on concepts that are not competing, and arguments that don't hold water IMO.
HTML5 is a browser based technology. No matter how robust they become, desktop applications won't disappear, which is why the second part is fallacy. Even Silverlight has its place in Microsoft's strategies. HTML5 is the language of choice in Microsoft for internet applications; Silverlight is still Microsoft's language of choice for intranet applications. There is a big difference.
A lot of the article seems to be based on concepts that are not competing, and arguments that don't hold water IMO.

Recent Posts


...too far?)