topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 5:07 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 ... 404next
801
Mini-Reviews by Members / Mini-Review: GIFExplainer
« Last post by wraith808 on March 25, 2020, 10:20 PM »
GIF Explainer Review
DISCLAIMER: Note that I was given a review copy of GIF Explainer in exchange for an unbiased, honest review.

Basic Info

App NameGIFExplainer
App URLhttps://www.gifexplainer.com/
App Version Reviewedv1.1
Test System SpecsWindows 10 64-bit
Supported OSesWindows 7/10
Support MethodsRegistered users: http://www.majormind.com/helpdesk.  Sales support: [email protected]
Upgrade Policyhttps://www.gifexpla...om/order.html#hprlic
Trial Version Available?Yes, adds watermarks.  You have to give your e-mail address to get trial link.
Pricing SchemeLifetime license: $149.00.  Subscription Price: 29.95USD
Author Donation Linkwraith808

Introduction
I must admit starting off, I went into GIF explainer with certain preconceived notions.  When I see GIF Explainer, I think that it's going to record video and turn it into a GIF for sharing.  That brings to mind certain questions- how about audio?  How large are these things going to be?  We've all seen the huge many megabyte GIF files that struggle to load in the browser as they download the image.

I'm happy to say that this isn't that.

If you've seen programs like ScreenSteps or Clarify, this is a similar concept- it documents processes in steps.  Once these processes are documented, it saves them to a GIF image instead of a PDF.

Who is this app designed for
I could see this being useful to explain a series of steps to someone remotely instead of a screenshare or a screen recording.

The Review
GIF Explainer 1.png

The first screen you're treated to after you install the program is this one.  It immediately made me question what I'd thought, and open my mind to what it is.

I'll take the documentation for one of my own programs, and recreate it in GIF Explainer to see how straightforward it is.

The first step is to Start a new project, so I clicked the link, and the following dialog appeared.

GIF Explainer 2.png

So it looks like the project will start with a tabbed dialog wizard- the first thing I did was set the width and height to a size that I thought would encompass the pages.  I left everything else at their defaults, and moved to the next tab.

GIF Explainer 3.png

Some basic information about the settings of the slides- appears pretty straightforward, and without other notice, I assume that the time scale is in seconds (at least I hope so).

There are several options for effects in the drop down.

GIF Explainer 4.png

I choose slide in from left.  What I didn't notice until later that the default for the transition duration is 0, and so it won't show up.  It would be nice if you selected an effect, it changed that, as it is easy to miss.

GIF Explainer 5.png

I didn't realize you'd actually be adding the slides in the wizard.  The button on the highlighted line allows you to select a single file, or the Add files button allows you to select more than one at a time.  I choose that way and end up with this.

GIF Explainer 6.png

It seems as if there would be some interface here to rearrange other than deleting and adding, but trying to drag and drop only opens the file selection dialog.  I hope that it's there later...

GIF Explainer 7.png

Some standard GIF optimizations- I choose none of them and click OK.

GIF Explainer 8.png

The slides appear, but there's no way to drag and drop them.  I see that there is a button to allow arrangement of a single slide at a time.  A bit clunky, but it works.

You can also add files, but only one at a time in this view, and add blank slides or screen shots.

The large area below is just to show you what your main background will look like.

I'm actually not sure what the Screenshot tab is for.  I do know that when I try to do anything with the interface at this point, it is non responsive- Seems to be a problem with the rect clipping?  But I can click the tabs so go quickly to the next one.

GIF Explainer 9.png

This tab allows you to edit your image and add callouts or other images or other graphical enhancements to the image.  I add a callout arrow, and click on it which allows me to add text to it.  There's quite the variety of different graphical artifacts to add to the image.

GIF Explainer 10.png

The next tab is a text tab which is a full featured text processing implementation, complete with tables and equation editing and the ability to insert more images.  However, the one thing that it's missing that would be nice for a text based slide is the ability to vertically justify the text.  Maybe the text is automatically justified to the center of the slide?  I guess we'll see.

GIF Explainer 11.png

There are several options as to what you can do- create a GIF of course, but you can also export your images from the project, create a PDF, and create several a couple of different wrappers for your GIF.  You can also export the slide's image or screenshot.  Not sure what each if these is... I export the image and it seems to allow me to save it to a file, but doesn't enforce a type, so I'd guess it was the same format as the image itself?  But the size of it is a lot larger than the image; the image was 35k and the exported slide is 1.6MB(!) 

When I export it, even though the program is registered, it has a watermark that says Unregistered. 

exportslide.jpg

Exporting a screenshot throws an error.  I suppose that those functions need a bit of clarification.

I created the final GIF, and it weighs in at 524KB- reasonable. The PDF of the same process was 1.15MB originally.. the exported PDF comes in at 1.14MB- so right about the same as the original!

reference_overlay_tool_docs.gif

Taking a look at the GIF, I notice that the swipe transitions that I put in aren't there- and it's because of the transition duration above.  I ended up making the images differing sizes beceause I had to chop up a page- and those images are centered vertically.  The text I put on the new slide is not centered vertically.

How does it compare to similar apps
I'm not sure that there really is a similar app.  In concept, it's quite similar to ScreenSteps or Clarify, but the implementation is quite different as it is an autoadvancing presentation.  It's also a lot smaller (at least on my limited sample) than a comparable PDF.

Conclusions
It is a simple application with a simple purpose- but it packs quite a punch into the implementation of that purpose.  It could use a bit of polishing in the user experience area, but it gets the job done ably.  I've gone through the trouble of documenting steps for clients for a simple task- and the overhead in doing this seems quite smaller.  I can also host this in a web page or just send a link to a gif that opens in a browser rather than being concerned about their capabilities to view it.  If you have a need for something like this, it will prove useful.  However, the use case that I put it to is not the best use case for it- it won't replace documentation, and though one of the stated uses was for guides, I don't think it would be meant for that with the static transition times.  The target audience will either be waiting for the next slide, or won't have enough time to digest it.  I'm also a bit confused on the licensing option- it appears that the $29.95 license is for a perpetual license with expiring updates, and the $149.00 license is a lifetime license with lifetime upgrades.  But the mentions of subscriptions is a bit offputting.  If it is true that the license key is perpetual, I think that it could be stated more plainly, as subscription has certain negative connotations.  At $29.95 for a license with 1 year of upgrades, I think it's a fair price.  However, if that's a subscription, I'm a bit more skeptical.
802
Last one was in January.  You can see all of the newsletters by going to https://www.donation...index.php?board=63.0.
803
Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Importing from old version
« Last post by wraith808 on March 25, 2020, 08:43 AM »
What kind of error did you get?  That might help mouser when he sees this.
804
Other options that you might consider are liberapay and stripe.  I use both of those, and they are pretty easy to integrate.
805
@panzer:
Many thanks for the games link (above).   :Thmbsup:
It's going to be war in our house in lockdown now - 3 kids (me and my 2 kids) all competing for use of the same laptop, so as to play games.

806
Not sure.  I have it on three machines (all of them are at my sit down work station, and on one of them I get them consistently.  The other two, not so much.  But I pay less attention to the other two, so chalked it up to that. 
807
Something that I think might be comforting- words from the epidemiologist who helped defeat smallpox.

https://www.wired.co...lpox-epidemiologist/

He gives hope that we can defeat it, steps that should be taken, and what defeat of the novel coronavirus will look like.
808
I all honesty, at this point I'm in a "What will happen, will happen" state of mind.

I've been working from home for a while now, so nothing changed there.  I've been sick for a couple of weeks with the Flu (strain A/B) and a bad Sinus Infection, so haven't really been out much.

I know I'm in the "at risk" category, but at this point, it's not really causing any undue concern on my part.  I was following while it was in its ramp up stages, so by the time it reached pandemic status, I already knew it was going to happen.  The reaction to it had been so 'meh' during those stages that it prepared me for us not to be prepared.  So no real reason to become nervous or uncertain on my part, but I feel for the ones that are.  Information and action as opposed to reaction are the keys to fighting it off in my opinion.
809
The one main caveat I will say with this approach is you have to preserve your old hard drive in some form (either leave the old physical hard drive alone and install the os on a new one, or a new computer, or fully image the old hard drive).  That gives you plenty of time (months) to make sure you have moved all your documents over and not forgotten something.

It's for this reason I go with a blue/green approach.  I have two computers- the current, and the last.  When it's time for a new computer, I build in the last one, which will then become my current.  This also helps me if my current computer goes on the fritz.
811
Living Room / Re: Looking for audio merger Y-cable
« Last post by wraith808 on March 13, 2020, 05:24 PM »
Are you saying that the one I linked wouldn't work, but the one mouser linked will work?

Yup.  At least, In my experience.
812
Living Room / Re: Looking for audio merger Y-cable
« Last post by wraith808 on March 13, 2020, 01:41 PM »
Yeah, that first one wouldn't.  You're trying to combine Stereo into mono, so just reversing the cables won't work. That second one is what I've used in the past.
813
Living Room / Re: Interesting "stuff"
« Last post by wraith808 on March 11, 2020, 07:10 PM »
Wash your Lyrics

https://washyourlyrics.com/

Generate hand washing infographics based on your favourite song lyrics
814
dc_post.jpg

'Unfixable' boot ROM security flaw in millions of Intel chips could spell 'utter chaos' for DRM, file encryption, etc
from The Register

The short version here:
A new vulnerability has been discovered in Intel's Converged Security and Manageability Engine (CSME), the embedded system that oversees management of Intel system chipsets (not processors, this time). The vulnerability is a DMA race that potentially allows hostile code to overwrite memory in the embedded management engine before the management engine enables memory protection on its own memory space. Key to the vulnerability is the fact that this memory protection is disabled by default until and unless the management engine enables it — i.e, it is unsafe by default, and fails unsafe.

During that timing gap, other hardware – physically attached or present on the motherboard – that is able to fire off a DMA transfer into the CSME's private RAM may do so, overwriting variables and pointers and hijacking its execution. At that point, the CSME can be commandeered for malicious purposes, all out of view of the software running above it.

The vulnerability is exploitable whenever the chipset is starting up. The chipset is vulnerable from the time the CSME boot ROM first initializes the memory page direvctory, up until the IOMMU (Input/Output Memory Management Unit) is turned on. Critically, this occurs not only at system boot time, but every time the CSME or the IOMMU resets.

What this means is that every time the CSME comes out of sleep mode, or any time the CSME is reset, it is briefly vulnerable to attack.

The CSME provides, among other things, something called Enhanced Privacy ID, or EPID. This is used for things like providing anti-piracy DRM protections, and Internet-of-Things attestation. The engine also provides TPM functions, which allow applications and operating system software to securely store and manage digital keys for things like file-system encryption. At the heart of this cryptography is a Chipset Key that is encrypted by another key baked into the silicon, and you can't do too much damage, it seems, until you can decrypt the Chipset Key.

If someone manages to extract that hardware key, though, they can unlock the Chipset Key, and, with code execution within the CSME, they can undo Intel's root of trust on large swathes of products at once, we're told.

"To fully compromise EPID, hackers would need to extract the hardware key used to encrypt the Chipset Key, which resides in Secure Key Storage (SKS)," explained Positive's Mark Ermolov.

"However, this key is not platform-specific. A single key is used for an entire generation of Intel chipsets. And since the ROM vulnerability allows seizing control of code execution before the hardware key generation mechanism in the SKS is locked, and the ROM vulnerability cannot be fixed, we believe that extracting this key is only a matter of time.

"When this happens, utter chaos will reign. Hardware IDs will be forged, digital content will be extracted, and data from encrypted hard disks will be decrypted."
815
So close enough to a Bot that it might as well be one.  ;D :huh: :-\ :down:
816
Is there no content because your browser removed it?  I've seen that happen before.  On the site, it's showing as 4.8MB so there definitely should be something inside it.  I downloaded it, and there's something there.  I'm scanning it now.

UPDATE: Nothing found in it, and mine definitely had the files for the portable AHK in it.

UPDATE2: So apparently the owners of the Autohotkey site have to report it for google to fix it according to https://developers.g...acked/request_review.  I was thinking about reporting it at https://safebrowsing...eport_badware/?hl=en and putting in the comments that it's not malicious, but not sure if that would get in the way of the process.
817
I didn't think it was a twitter client from looking at it, but rather an automated way to post to different social media.
819
A new option to take a look at: https://casual-effects.com/markdeep/
820
Post New Requests Here / Re: Windows Launcher by Only One Key
« Last post by wraith808 on February 25, 2020, 05:02 PM »
It's funny- malwarebytes blocks that Qsel site, but virustotal shows it as clean from malwarebytes
821
I wonder what would happen if that errant piece that the hash is different on was just excluded?
822
What hasn't been looked it is do both clips restore correctly when pasted somewhere that is supposed to be able to interpret the data?
823
Living Room / Re: Thread on 3d Printing Cody Model
« Last post by wraith808 on February 20, 2020, 11:29 AM »
Very nice!

cody1.jpg

cody2.jpg
824
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 10 Announced
« Last post by wraith808 on February 20, 2020, 10:46 AM »
Yes, you can customize the pinned tiles, but the actual menu, you can only remove sub-sections.  If I actually ever used the start menu, it would be a bit lackluster.  But I think that they're trying to get people to use search more, as when I do use the start menu, I just start typing the name of the item that I want, and it works.
825
Post New Requests Here / Re: Windows Launcher by Only One Key
« Last post by wraith808 on February 16, 2020, 01:59 PM »
I think in the implementation that he's showing you remember the key for the item.  Still seems like a lot to me.
Pages: prev1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 [33] 34 35 36 37 38 ... 404next