topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday December 25, 2025, 3:32 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309 310 311 312 313 ... 364next
7676
Living Room / Re: is it me or is it the machine (i'm sorry for even posting this).
« Last post by f0dder on January 24, 2007, 10:14 AM »
memtest is a good suggestion. It's weird, however, that the problems are with one XP install and not the other - especially considering they're on the same disk (but different partitions)? Doing a chkdsk with sector scan on all the partitions on the raid  might be a good idea.

Computers >:(
7677
General Software Discussion / Re: From the makers of CCleaner... Recuva Beta 1
« Last post by f0dder on January 24, 2007, 10:08 AM »
Restoration has one clever feature which the other recovery tools mentioned on this thread are missing: it will offer to delete all unrecoverable files found. I clicked 'yes' and was relieved of 10,000 files!
You weren't "relieve of 10,000 files" - you just made 10,000 files even more unrecoverable :)

I also don't see the point of speed++ in a recovery app, surely the most important feature must be the ability to actually recover stuff? I somehow doubt that the superfast tools are as thorough as the ones that do a full sector-based scan of your disk.
7678
Developer's Corner / Re: Problems with LCC-WIN32 compiler produced outputs
« Last post by f0dder on January 24, 2007, 04:12 AM »
Hrm, has LCC-win32 finally added C++ support?

Last time I looked it was purely C, so I wonder how the above even compiles...

EDIT: hm, seems like LCC has some limited support for iostreams like stuff, even though it doesn't do C++?

Anyway, your problem (hinted by NTVDM error, which is something you get for DOS apps) is that LCC produces object file output, not executables - you need to manually link. Using "-Fo" just changes the name, not the contents, and windows then interprets the .exe (which is really a COFF object file) as a DOS .com app.
7679
General Software Discussion / Re: From the makers of CCleaner... Recuva Beta 1
« Last post by f0dder on January 24, 2007, 04:10 AM »
The recovery software that has worked best for me to date is RunTime GetDataBack. It's extremely slow, but has given me ~99% recovery the couple times I've had filesystem crashes.
7680
Living Room / Re: wanted: quiet external HD (case) (not wanted: crying children)
« Last post by f0dder on January 24, 2007, 04:09 AM »
Here in Denmark, we have www.edbpriser.dk which works pretty well (especially with adblock running :)).
7681
N.A.N.Y. Challenge 2007 / Re: Cody Mug for NANY Participants
« Last post by f0dder on January 24, 2007, 04:05 AM »
Heh, isn't than an intel engineer?

Pray tell, is your computer an AMD64? Then I think we know why it's causing you so much trouble. If it's an Intel, well... I give up.
7682
Living Room / Re: wanted: quiet external HD (case) (not wanted: crying children)
« Last post by f0dder on January 23, 2007, 06:52 PM »
I wonder how much sata I vs II matters for an external enclosure - it's not like a single drive will saturate even SATA-I. That enclosure looks really sweet though, I might consider something like that (though ideally what I really want is a fileserver :) ).

PS: what's the power connector like (the end you insert in the enclosure)? One of those flimsy svhs like pieces of crap, or something more sturdy?
7683
SMF Forum Mods / (SPAM!) Re: SOS: Sticky topic disappeared from the Index
« Last post by f0dder on January 23, 2007, 05:29 PM »
SPAM >:( >:( >:(
7684
ProcessTamer / Re: process tamer now functional
« Last post by f0dder on January 23, 2007, 05:28 PM »
The longer you're working with Windows, the more residu of opened files clutter up your harddisk. Even cleaning up and defragmenting does not clean up your disk entirly. Process tamer will then not be able to get a fix on where exactly it should look for the process to tame, because it gets mystified by windows. Reinstalling solves this problem.
-FHM1
This has nothing to do with it - process tamer doesn't even know nor care what file is used for a process it's taming.

The real answer is "windows works in mysterious ways, and computers aren't really deterministic though people claim they are" :)

windows takes a lot of time of cleaning up the threads and in the worst case create a stack overflow in the GDI resources thus rendering your system to be nonresponding. Adding a Ramcontroller helps out for a while, but a reboot does a better job.
-FHM1
Trying to sound smart? That was absolute gibberish. "Stack overflow in GDI resources"? Gibberish. "Adding a Ramcontroller"? Can't do that, part of either the chipset or (in case of AMD64), the CPU.
7685
Developer's Corner / Re: Esoteric Programming Languages
« Last post by f0dder on January 23, 2007, 04:18 AM »
Haha, the esoteric algorithms part is great!

Drop sort :-*
Towers of hanoi sort :-*
7686
Living Room / Re: wanted: quiet external HD (case) (not wanted: crying children)
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:59 PM »
I wonder if the drive-full status works if you format it for NTFS... when you buy an external usb enclosure that comes with a disk, it's usually FAT32 formatted.

7687
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: pop-up genogram maker
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:38 PM »
Might be more than you need, but perhaps it's worth to take a look at http://www.legacyfamilytree.com - afaik there's a free version.
7688
Official Announcements / Re: Google Ads are gone from the site once more..
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:28 PM »
Hm, phone call from google? DC must've generated some noticable traffic for them, then? :O
7689
General Software Discussion / Re: Sudo for Windows?
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:26 PM »
Dunno if there's an easy way to handle the uninstall - but that ought to happen rarely, so logging into an administrative account shouldn't be that bothersome. Right-clicking the installer and "run as" (or use the "runas" command from a shell) ought to do the trick for installation, I think.
7690
N.A.N.Y. Challenge 2007 / Re: Cody Mug for NANY Participants
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:22 PM »
Sorry, I don't have a better camera :(
(which is good, because like that you can't see that i'm really ugly and that's not the camera's fault)
You're not ugly, au contraire. But you should do something about that 1970'es style haircut :)
7691
Developer's Corner / Re: Best Programming Music
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:19 PM »
The whole HVSC!
Ah, that brings back some fond memories! You might also want to check out http://remix.kwed.org - plasm303 has made some pretty cute Zak McKracken remixes :)

7692
General Software Discussion / Re: common router firewall outbound settings?
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:08 AM »
i understand that when typing the information into roboform when setting it up could obviously be monitored by a keylogger, but i'm hoping that when it pastes the information into a page for you that a keylogger won't catch that. i don't know how these kinds of things work. wishful thinking on my part i guess.
Probably does a SetWindowText/sends a WM_SETTEXT message - I dunno how it would do it otherwise. Would be pretty trivial to do a hook that intercepts those... a bit less trivial to filter only the interesting messages out and avoid getting flooded (there's a LOT of WM_SETTEXT going on :)), but still pretty doable.

So if you're trojanized, you're screwed. But that's really goes without saying, imho.
7693
General Software Discussion / Re: multi core cpu control - is there a need?
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 05:05 AM »
For applications that aren't multi-threaded, you can gain some advantage of locking affinity to a single core - especially if the system, other than that, is mostly idle. Windows tends to schedule threads in a "load balancing" kind of way; for multicore CPUs with separate cache per core (rather than the shared approach of core2), it's a bit more optimal to stay on one core and avoid cache reloads and such.

I don't know how much you can really gain by this, as I haven't done any hard tests - but (placebo or not :P) some single-threaded things do seem slightly smoother/faster with affinity locking on my AMD64x2.
7694
General Software Discussion / Re: common router firewall outbound settings?
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 04:43 AM »
Just keep in mind that RoboForm, unless it does something really unique, is still vulnerable to keylogging etc., so you do want to have some decent antivirus and check for spyware every now and then.

I currently run without any AV software... might be a bit stupid even though I don't really visit any "shady" sites; all it takes is one firefox exploit placed somewhere that gets through AdBlock, and *b00m*.
7695
General Software Discussion / Re: common router firewall outbound settings?
« Last post by f0dder on January 22, 2007, 04:31 AM »
i've just woken up this morning and the first thought that popped into my head was how will my router firewall know which programs are good or bad if all it does it use port numbers in the rules. well, obviously, like you've said - it won't.
-nudone
Unless you spend a decent amount of cash and get something that filters by content rather than just ports... but that costs, and isn't really necessary for a home network IMHO.

Btw, uTorrent supports UPNP, so you don't need a static mapping for that - but okay, some people feel UPNP is über-insecure and evil, etc... :)

it was reassuring to see the popups from zone alarm for out going requests but i guess most of (if not all of it) was from harmless apps just wanting to call home.
-nudone
And that's basically all you were going to see - at least last time I looked, the PFW leak tests weren't very uplifting. Okay, while PFW wouldn't stop intentional data smuggling they still make it harder to use your box to directly infect other boxes on the net (since that requires specific ports), but IMHO it's more important focusing on not getting malware on your computer than trying to stop it from spreading :)

I do miss the "hey, this app is trying to phone home!" false sense of security, but I don't miss PFW popping up while starting a game, which turns out to be badly coded and unable to handle being switched out of :)

I also don't miss how some PFWs seem unable to handle a massive amount of connections (ie., torrents or other p2p traffic). Nvidia's NAM for their NForce chipset is renowned for BSODs and memory leaks.
7696
General Software Discussion / Re: common router firewall outbound settings?
« Last post by f0dder on January 21, 2007, 07:07 PM »
I stopped using personal firewalls a while ago - they were too much bother compared to the security they give, and there's ways to penetrate their outbound filtering as well.

Don't get me wrong, it's nice to catch apps that phone home, it's nice to have cryptographic hashing to check that an executable that you've allowed outbound access haven't changed, etc... but that just wasn't worth it for me.

Instead, I rely on my router. Not even on firewalling in there, but simply NAT and port forwarding (which can be seen as a form of firewall, I guess). I think the only static rule I have is forwarding of the IDENT port, and uPNP for things like µTorrent, MSN, etc.

While I wouldn't enable uPNP at a company, it'ss quite fine for home use, and makes things a lot less painful. Really. On a home network, if malware gets a chance to run, you're pretty much dead and the ability of malware to do some port mapping is without consequence. Which leads me to...

Outbound filtering on a home network is also pretty useless, as nothing stops a piece of malware from using port 80 (ie, HTTP) for it's malicious deeds. If you want effective outbound filtering, you need protocol filtering as well, ports by itself doesn't help much.

I do have Windows Firewall turned on, though - to avoid the scenario where a friend visits me with an infected laptop.

So, to summarize my setup: by default, all outgoing ports are allowed, and all incoming ports are silently dropped. A few ports have static mappings, and uPNP is turned on to allow dynamic mappings. No firewalling except the most basic windows firewall. Good antivirus to keep malware from running (I like KAV, since it also does some behavioral blocking beyond the traditional antivirus heuristics).
7697
Living Room / Re: The lego car factory - neatest thing EVER
« Last post by f0dder on January 21, 2007, 03:02 PM »
Some people have WAY too much time - but damn that's coo :-*
7698
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA Random walk over desktop image
« Last post by f0dder on January 21, 2007, 02:52 PM »
Flash for ActiveDesktop sounds like a very bad idea, considering how flash tends to hog your CPU. Might be a solution for a screensaver, though.

jsmallberry: walking around a not-too-complex scene without super-highres textures and too many shader effects shouldn't eat up too much ram or CPU processing time, so it should be doable.

I've never really messed with ActiveDesktop, so I don't know if need to do a ActiveX control or whatever - or a html page loading a java applet ;). But ActiveDesktop is one solution - another would be setting desktop background to some very specific color (ugly pink is usually used), then render to a video overlay with the desktop background color as colorkey.

I've even gotten videos to "play in mIRC" this way :)
7699
SMF Forum Mods / Re: Is there a better way to handle Gri's posts?
« Last post by f0dder on January 21, 2007, 02:47 PM »
I don't really mind gri.

I don't understand a word he says, and I don't really care for his mods. I get a headache if I try to follow what's going on, so I mainly just ignore him. But he doesn't annoy me :)

(It would, however, annoy me if everybody started using those windings and griviwhateverniks - makes it hard to follow a topics).
7700
Nope, don't use UltraMon - and don't have any problems :)

Pages: prev1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 [308] 309 310 311 312 313 ... 364next