7551
Living Room / Re: On Wikipedia, Cultural Patrimony, and Historiography
« Last post by tomos on September 08, 2010, 02:20 AM »one of the catch22's with wikipedia is that any info in there requires a 'reliable' source.
This is understandable (I dont have a better solution) but it's abused a lot by people with agendas. Well it was abused in my brief personal experience discussing a wikipedia page:
"That source isnt good enough", "you need more sources", "more reputable sources" etc etc. It's very odd to be in a situation where you know something is true but people wont accept it.... (I gave up)
my emphasis:
This is understandable (I dont have a better solution) but it's abused a lot by people with agendas. Well it was abused in my brief personal experience discussing a wikipedia page:
"That source isnt good enough", "you need more sources", "more reputable sources" etc etc. It's very odd to be in a situation where you know something is true but people wont accept it.... (I gave up)
my emphasis:
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true.http://en.wikipedia....ipedia:Verifiability

Recent Posts

