^Apples and oranges. If you work long and hard enough, anything can be made to look "almost" like anything else.
-40hz
Same thing happened on the article. People focused so much on the substance of what the 'outing' was used for, that they missed the point.
He wasn't defending Brutsch. He was condemning outing as a tool. And I totally agree. As much as I don't want the government in my life, either via social or financial issues, some things are better handled by an impartial party. And whether as the result of internet or 'real life' interaction, prosecution is one of those issues. Mob rule is never going to be the right thing. It may make short term gains, but in the end, the mob is too fickle, and too subject to direction by a minority of the mob and emotion for an unregulated group of people to ever come up with a truly reasoned and rational approach to any problem. This is a slippery slope, and one that's far too easy to find one's self downhill of unjustifiably.
If you have the information, and think that the person did wrong, then report them to the correct authorities, and let them take it from there.
But, as I said in a response to this, true change moves too slowly for short term emotion to be satisfied- so that's where the mob comes in. If this is bad, and there is not a law against it, it's easier to pillory the person and put them on display in the town square rather than work for true change
that won't just apply in this one situation. And one that won't put the needs of those that are in similar but different situations at risk.