topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday May 22, 2025, 2:28 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 263 264 265 266 267 [268] 269 270 271 272 273 ... 438next
6676
General Software Discussion / Re: How to attach in Winrar
« Last post by Renegade on October 11, 2011, 11:53 AM »
I don't get it...

Do you mean "how do I edit archive comments"?

6677
General Software Discussion / Re: Dart Programming Language
« Last post by Renegade on October 11, 2011, 11:47 AM »
Does every language in existence suck so badly that none of them could replace JavaScript and we need a new one?  :huh:
Other programming languages to run directly in the browser, interacting with the DOM, only JavaScript serves that role presently.

That's exactly what I mean. (None of this is directed at you -- this is a larger issue that drives me nuts.)

Like WhyTF would you create a *new* language? There are lots already.

Why not just tool up an existing language to work in the browser.

Like JFC, Erlang is pretty damn good. Why not start with something like that?

Who cares? Why not do something INTELLIGENT for a f*****g change? The .NET concept is EXACTLY right. I shouldn't have to worry about the language I "speak" to be understood.

Google is only f*****g things up more. This really has no productive value.

The days of "1 language" should be behind us. Microsoft is 1000% correct with the framework concept where languages become irrelevant. VB, C#, F#, C++, Python, Ruby, JS, whatever...

This just pisses me off because it's only one more show of idiocy when the problem has already been solved. MS solved it. Why fart around?

It doesn't need to be ".NET" at all. Who cares about ".NET"?

What we want is a framework that we can use to DO STUFF. But the language should be irrelevant.

Any attempt to create a new language is pure idiocy. We do not need more languages. We have enough of them.

Let me bore everyone with a small list of computer languages:

Ungodly list
  • A# .NET
  • A# (Axiom)
  • A-0 System
  • A+
  • A++
  • ABAP
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ALGOL
  • Abel
  • ABLE
  • ABSET
  • ABSYS
  • Abundance
  • ACC
  • Accent
  • Ace DASL
  • ACT-III
  • Action!
  • ActionScript
  • Ada
  • Adenine
  • Agda
  • Agora
  • AIMMS
  • Alef
  • ALF
  • ALGOL 58
  • ALGOL 60
  • ALGOL 68
  • Alice
  • Alma-0
  • Amiga E
  • AMOS
  • AMPL
  • APL
  • AppleScript
  • Arc
  • ARexx
  • Argus
  • AspectJ
  • Assembly language
  • ATS
  • Ateji PX
  • AutoHotkey
  • Autocoder
  • AutoIt
  • Averest
  • AWK
  • Axum
  • BB
  • Babbage
  • Bash
  • BASIC
  • bc
  • BCPL
  • BeanShell
  • Batch (Windows/Dos)
  • Bertrand
  • BETA
  • Bigwig
  • Bistro
  • BitC
  • BLISS
  • Blue
  • Bon
  • Boo
  • Boomerang
  • Bourne shell (including bash and ksh)
  • BREW
  • BPEL
  • BUGSYS
  • BuildProfessional
  • CC
  • C--
  • C++ - ISO/IEC 14882
  • C# - ISO/IEC 23270
  • C/AL
  • Caché ObjectScript
  • C Shell
  • Caml
  • Cayenne
  • Cecil
  • Cel
  • Cesil
  • CFML
  • Cg
  • Chapel
  • CHAIN
  • Charity
  • Charm
  • CHILL
  • CHIP-8
  • chomski
  • Oxygene (formerly Chrome)
  • ChucK
  • CICS
  • Cilk
  • CL (IBM)
  • Claire
  • Clarion
  • Clean
  • Clipper
  • CLIST
  • Clojure
  • CLU
  • CMS-2
  • COBOL - ISO/IEC 1989
  • CobolScript
  • Cobra
  • CODE
  • CoffeeScript
  • Cola
  • ColdC
  • ColdFusion
  • Cool
  • COMAL
  • Combined Programming Language (CPL)
  • Common Intermediate Language (CIL)
  • Common Lisp (also known as CL)
  • COMPASS
  • Component Pascal
  • COMIT
  • Constraint Handling Rules (CHR)
  • Converge
  • Coral 66
  • Corn
  • CorVision
  • Coq
  • COWSEL
  • CPL
  • csh
  • CSP
  • Csound
  • Curl
  • Curry
  • Cyclone
  • Cython
  • DD
  • DASL (Datapoint's Advanced Systems Language)
  • DASL (Distributed Application Specification Language)
  • Dart (Google's Web programming language)
  • DataFlex
  • Datalog
  • DATATRIEVE
  • dBase
  • dc
  • DCL
  • Deesel (formerly G)
  • Delphi
  • Dialect
  • DinkC
  • Dialog Manager
  • DIBOL
  • DL/I
  • Draco
  • Dylan
  • DYNAMO
  • EE
  • Ease
  • EASY
  • Easy PL/I
  • EASYTRIEVE PLUS
  • ECMAScript
  • Edinburgh IMP
  • EGL
  • Eiffel
  • ELAN
  • Emacs Lisp
  • Emerald
  • Epigram
  • Erlang
  • Escapade
  • Escher
  • ESPOL
  • Esterel
  • Etoys
  • Euclid
  • Euler
  • Euphoria
  • EusLisp Robot Programming Language
  • CMS EXEC
  • EXEC 2
  • FF
  • F#
  • Factor
  • Falcon
  • Fancy
  • Fantom
  • Felix
  • Ferite
  • FFP
  • Fjölnir
  • FL
  • Flavors
  • Flex
  • FLOW-MATIC
  • FOCAL
  • FOCUS
  • FOIL
  • FORMAC
  • @Formula
  • Forth
  • Fortran - ISO/IEC 1539
  • Fortress
  • FoxBase
  • FoxPro
  • FP
  • FPr
  • Franz Lisp
  • Frink
  • F-Script
  • Fuxi
  • GG
  • GameMonkey Script
  • GAMS
  • GAP
  • G-code
  • Genie
  • GDL
  • Gibiane
  • GJ
  • GLSL
  • GNU E
  • GM
  • Go
  • Go!
  • GOAL
  • Gödel
  • Godiva
  • GOM (Good Old Mad)
  • Goo
  • GOTRAN
  • GPSS
  • GraphTalk
  • GRASS
  • Green
  • Groovy
  • HHAL/S
  • Hamilton C shell
  • Harbour
  • IBM HAScript
  • Haskell
  • HaXe
  • High Level Assembly
  • HLSL
  • Hop
  • Hope
  • Hugo
  • Hume
  • HyperTalk
  • IIBM Basic assembly language
  • IBM Informix-4GL
  • IBM RPG
  • ICI
  • Icon
  • Id
  • IDL
  • IMP
  • Inform
  • Io
  • Ioke
  • IPL
  • IPTSCRAE
  • IronPython
  • IronRuby
  • ISPF
  • ISWIM
  • JJ
  • J#
  • J++
  • JADE
  • Jako
  • JAL
  • Janus
  • JASS
  • Java
  • JavaScript
  • JCL
  • JEAN
  • Join Java
  • JOSS
  • Joule
  • JOVIAL
  • Joy
  • JScript
  • Jython
  • JavaFX Script
  • KK
  • Kaleidoscope
  • Karel
  • Karel++
  • Kaya
  • KEE
  • KIF
  • KRC
  • KRL
  • KRL (KUKA Robot Language)
  • KRYPTON
  • ksh
  • LL
  • L# .NET
  • LabVIEW
  • Ladder
  • Lagoona
  • LANSA
  • Lasso
  • LaTeX
  • Lava
  • LC-3
  • Leadwerks Script
  • Leda
  • Legoscript
  • LilyPond
  • Limbo
  • Limnor
  • LINC
  • Lingo
  • Linoleum
  • LIS
  • LISA
  • Lisaac
  • Lisp - ISO/IEC 13816
  • Lite-C Lite-c
  • Lithe
  • Little b
  • Logo
  • Logtalk
  • LPC
  • LSE
  • LSL
  • Lua
  • Lucid
  • Lustre
  • LYaPAS
  • Lynx
  • MM
  • M2001
  • M4
  • Machine code
  • MAD (Michigan Algorithm Decoder)
  • MAD/I
  • Magik
  • Magma
  • make
  • Maple
  • MAPPER (Unisys/Sperry) now part of BIS
  • MARK-IV (Sterling/Informatics) now VISION:BUILDER of CA
  • Mary
  • MASM Microsoft Assembly x86
  • Mathematica
  • MATLAB
  • Maxima (see also Macsyma)
  • MaxScript internal language 3D Studio Max
  • Maya (MEL)
  • MDL
  • Mercury
  • Mesa
  • Metacard
  • Metafont
  • MetaL
  • Microcode
  • MicroScript
  • MIIS
  • MillScript
  • MIMIC
  • Mirah
  • Miranda
  • MIVA Script
  • ML
  • Moby
  • Model 204
  • Modula
  • Modula-2
  • Modula-3
  • Mohol
  • MOO
  • Mortran
  • Mouse
  • MPD
  • MSIL - deprecated name for CIL
  • MSL
  • MUMPS
  • NNapier88
  • NATURAL
  • NEAT chipset
  • Neko
  • Nemerle
  • NESL
  • Net.Data
  • NetLogo
  • NewLISP
  • NEWP
  • Newspeak
  • NewtonScript
  • NGL
  • Nial
  • Nice
  • Nickle
  • NPL
  • Not eXactly C (NXC)
  • Not Quite C (NQC)
  • Nu
  • NSIS
  • Oo:XML
  • Oak
  • Oberon
  • Object Lisp
  • ObjectLOGO
  • Object REXX
  • Object Pascal
  • Objective-C
  • Objective Caml
  • Objective-J
  • Obliq
  • Obol
  • occam
  • occam-π
  • Octave
  • OmniMark
  • Onyx
  • Opa
  • Opal
  • OpenEdge ABL
  • OPL
  • OPS5
  • OptimJ
  • Orc
  • ORCA/Modula-2
  • Orwell
  • Oxygene
  • Oz
  • PP#
  • PARI/GP
  • Pascal - ISO 7185
  • Pawn
  • PCASTL
  • PCF
  • PEARL
  • PeopleCode
  • Perl
  • PDL
  • PHP
  • Phrogram
  • Pico
  • Pict
  • Pike
  • PIKT
  • PILOT
  • Pizza
  • PL-11
  • PL/0
  • PL/B
  • PL/C
  • PL/I - ISO 6160
  • PL/M
  • PL/P
  • PL/SQL
  • PL360
  • PLANC
  • Plankalkül
  • PLEX
  • PLEXIL
  • Plus
  • POP-11
  • PostScript
  • PortablE
  • Powerhouse
  • PowerBuilder - 4GL GUI appl. generator from Sybase
  • PPL
  • Processing
  • Prograph
  • PROIV
  • Prolog
  • Visual Prolog
  • Promela
  • PROTEL
  • ProvideX
  • Pro*C
  • Pure
  • Python
  • QQ (equational programming language)
  • Q (programming language from Kx Systems)
  • Qi
  • QtScript
  • QuakeC
  • QPL
  • RR
  • R++
  • Racket
  • RAPID
  • Rapira
  • Ratfiv
  • Ratfor
  • rc
  • REBOL
  • Redcode
  • REFAL
  • Reia
  • Revolution
  • rex
  • REXX
  • Rlab
  • ROOP
  • RPG
  • RPL
  • RSL
  • RTL/2
  • Ruby
  • Rust
  • SS
  • S2
  • S3
  • S-Lang
  • S-PLUS
  • SA-C
  • SabreTalk
  • SAIL
  • SALSA
  • SAM76
  • SAS
  • SASL
  • Sather
  • Sawzall
  • SBL
  • Scala
  • Scheme
  • Scilab
  • Scratch
  • Script.NET
  • Sed
  • Self
  • SenseTalk
  • SETL
  • Shift Script
  • SiMPLE
  • SIMPOL
  • SIMSCRIPT
  • Simula
  • Simulink
  • SISAL
  • SLIP
  • SMALL
  • Smalltalk
  • Small Basic
  • SML
  • SNOBOL(SPITBOL)
  • Snowball
  • SOAP
  • SOL
  • Span
  • SPARK
  • SPIN
  • SP/k
  • SPS
  • Squeak
  • Squirrel
  • SR
  • S/SL
  • Strand
  • STATA
  • Stateflow
  • Subtext
  • Suneido
  • SuperCollider
  • SuperTalk
  • SYMPL
  • SyncCharts
  • SystemVerilog
  • TT
  • TACL
  • TACPOL
  • TADS
  • TAL
  • Tcl
  • Tea
  • TECO
  • TELCOMP
  • TeX
  • TEX
  • TIE
  • Timber
  • Tom
  • TOM
  • Topspeed
  • TPU
  • Trac
  • T-SQL
  • TTCN
  • Turing
  • TUTOR
  • TXL
  • UUbercode
  • Unicon
  • Uniface
  • UNITY
  • Unix shell
  • UnrealScript
  • VVala
  • VBA
  • VBScript
  • Verilog
  • VHDL
  • Visual Basic
  • Visual Basic .NET
  • Visual C++
  • Visual C++ .Net
  • Visual C#
  • Visual DataFlex
  • Visual DialogScript
  • Visual FoxPro
  • Visual J++
  • Visual J#
  • Visual Objects
  • Vvvv
  • WWATFIV, WATFOR
  • WebQL
  • Winbatch
  • XX++
  • X10
  • XBL
  • XC (exploits XMOS architecture)
  • xHarbour
  • XL
  • XOTcl
  • XPL
  • XPL0
  • XQuery
  • XSB
  • XSLT - See XPath
  • YYorick
  • YQL
  • Yoix
  • ZZ
  • Z notation
  • Zeno
  • ZOPL
  • ZPL
  • ZZT-oop


Ahem...

http://en.wikipedia....rogramming_languages

Do we really need another?

Why not create a framework for some of those languages to work in browsers.




What was that xkcd cartoon again? :P



To be 1,000% clear...

MICROSOFT IS 1,000% CORRECT IN THEIR .NET CONCEPT BECAUSE WE DO NOT NEED MORE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES. WE ONLY NEED FUNCTIONALITY THAT WE CAN ACCESS FROM A LANGUAGE. WE WANT FUNCTIONALITY. WE DO NOT NEED NEW LANGUAGES.

I'm going to have a drink now. ;) :P

Happy Halloween and whatever. :P

6678
Bandwidth might be an issue but shouldn't be exaggerated, even for the case of video transcoding. A fairly large number of people have had 100Mbit connections at home for some time. Very far from all of course. But many enough for this kind of service to take off I'd think.

Doesn't really matter how much bandwidth you have if it's being limited by your ISP, which is a very real situation a lot of people are in.

Speaking of, I just wrote an expanded version of an article I wrote on getting around censorship:

http://cynic.me/2011...ip-internet-freedom/

Summary:

VPN + DNS
6679
General Software Discussion / Re: looking for programming language
« Last post by Renegade on October 11, 2011, 05:24 AM »
The weakest element may be web page interaction.  But I haven't explored that area.

If it can hook into typical C++ APIs, then it can do it. However, a lot of that stuff gets EXTREMELY messy with the shdocvw.dll and mshtml.dll/tlb. Another browser engine is likely better to use unless you know what you're doing. Again, you need to be able to hook into typical C/C++/.NET APIs/SDKs/components.

For web browser automation, I'd recommend starting with .NET and the WebBrowser in Visual Studio. It's very easy to get started with, and the .NET interface is relatively clean there. Still, it can get very messy if you need to start doing some complex things. Check my blog at RenegadeMinds.com or Cynic.me and search for "browser" as I've written a fair bit about it in the past.

6680
Developer's Corner / Re: Windows 8 from a Developer's Perspective Post-BUILD
« Last post by Renegade on October 11, 2011, 02:06 AM »
From what I can tell, it's business as usual for desktop development, and it's only Metro development where you get hit with stuff like no System.IO and a 30% tax on sales.

I'm I wrong? (I've just looked into it quickly.)

If that's true, then why would I want to develop Metro software? Like WTF? I'll only get buried in the long tail in any app store, so why should I care about Metro?

Can't we just fake Metro in the normal, free, desktop world?

As for XAML, I never got into it much. I tried it out and it just seemed slow and convoluted with no real practical upshot for development. e.g. It can scale. Oh yay.

Dunno... Maybe I need to look at it again. It just seems like everything in XAML takes much longer than in WinForms.
6681

Renegade: Video transcoding was only one example. I can see many other uses: image manipulation, 3D rendering tasks, complex OCR tasks for a lot of documents, and so on. Basically, any task where
 (upload time + download time + cloud processing time) < local processing time

Bandwidth might be an issue but shouldn't be exaggerated, even for the case of video transcoding. A fairly large number of people have had 100Mbit connections at home for some time. Very far from all of course. But many enough for this kind of service to take off I'd think.


You're absolutely right.

I was probably lazy there.

What I mean is that we have could computing for business right now, and businesses typically have lots of bandwidth with servers in data centers.

The thing is for consumers... Different story. While a lot of consumers have bandwidth that can handle large tasks like that, I don't believe that the consumer market has reached a critical saturation point where the business model for consumer cloud computing for bandwidth intensive tasks makes sense.

Hmmm... that's a mouthful. Let me simplify it.

I don't think that there are enough consumers (that have enough bandwidth) for a company to justify creating those services. It wouldn't be profitable right now. Given time, better Internet infrastructure can be rolled out, which would then make the business model practical.

Any company that jumps into the market there would likely be trying to get the first mover advantage, and counting on increased bandwidth in the consumer sector to drive their growth in the future.
6682
General Software Discussion / Re: Dart Programming Language
« Last post by Renegade on October 11, 2011, 01:15 AM »
Does every language in existence suck so badly that none of them could replace JavaScript and we need a new one?  :huh:

Does Dart offer any advantage over VBScript? We know how that one went...

P.S. Gotta love xkcd! :)



6683
Living Room / Re: Steve Jobs is dead.
« Last post by Renegade on October 10, 2011, 09:20 PM »
Following up on the RMS post, here's one by Eric Raymond:
http://www.muktware.com/news/2623

Its time to get out of the RDF (reality distortion field) created by Steve Jobs and admit the truth, which even if bitter is truth.

Nicely put.
6684
Living Room / Re: Steve Jobs is dead.
« Last post by Renegade on October 10, 2011, 09:19 PM »
Okay so we're well past the 3 day mark ... Shouldn't he be back by now??

Bwahahahahaha~!

He's already had his second coming though when he returned to Apple. :)
6685
Living Room / Re: Steve Jobs is dead.
« Last post by Renegade on October 10, 2011, 10:50 AM »
Sing on, RMS:
http://www.muktware.com/news/2618

His original post:

http://stallman.org/...ber_2011_(Steve_Jobs)

The reactionary Cnet author:

http://www.zdnet.com...-glad-hes-gone/15275

I can understand that Apple’s view of computing is at odds with Stallman’s view of the world, but this sort of outburst is uncalled for.

Regarding "righteous indignation", ahem...

Kind of not safe for work =P

Please insert the absolute most vile, evil, sick, depraved things you can imagine here. Things that would make Lucifer blush...



(I'm behaving pretty well~! :P )


6686
Developer's Corner / Re: Lauren Ipsum
« Last post by Renegade on October 10, 2011, 09:08 AM »
"A story about computer science and other improbable things"

This first chapter made me chuckle a couple of times (via Hacker News). :)

Initial impresson...

HAHAHAHAHAH~!

It sounds like a mix of Lewis Caroll meets Dr. Seuss meets Jacob Two-Two meets the Hooded Fang. :)

6687
That's what computing originally was. Then we got personal computers.

Hahahah~!

That takes me back a bit. Working on terminals on big mainframes... Archie. Gopher. :)
6688
Transcoding - jeez -- that's tough. You've got huge files to deal with to start with, so network bandwidth is a major consideration.

I think it's a ways off still. It's just hitting business now, so the trickle down hasn't happened yet.
6689
General Software Discussion / Re: looking for programming language
« Last post by Renegade on October 09, 2011, 08:06 PM »
Given the fact that it must be able to identify and interact with windows and controls of other apps, with databases, with website elements, etc

Eóin makes a good point that you kind of need to figure out what you want to do... but, if that's the list... Any .NET language will let you do that. e.g.:

Interact with:

  • Windows - This is very basic, but you may need pinvoke
  • Controls of other apps - You will need pinvoke
  • Databases - ADO.NET
  • Website elements - The WebBrowser control or MozNET can help you do this (or WebClient etc.)

Goals are important there as well, e.g. What do you want to do with a web site or web site element?

6690
Living Room / Re: App vendors discover a new way to abuse Windows
« Last post by Renegade on October 09, 2011, 08:01 PM »
+1 for 40Hz

Regarding:

Ok...so once you've installed Chrome and accepted whatever term and conditions existed at the time you installed it, you automatically agree to any changes and give them your implicit consent if you use the product after such changes were made. In short, no need to formally agree. If you use it - you have! Even if they change the terms and conditions after the fact.

I really think that those kinds of things should be illegal. I honestly don't understand in the least how they could ever be enforced in court. Not with a judge that has half a brain at least.

I'm all for protecting "rights holders", but don't humans have rights? And shouldn't people come before "things"? Yeah -- those rights. And those "human" holders.
6691
Living Room / Re: The All New Kindle - ripoff!
« Last post by Renegade on October 09, 2011, 08:45 AM »
I find it funny all this outrage at U. S. companies doing this (not saying it's not wrong, just read on).  Meanwhile it happens to U. S. companies and people just as frequently, if not moreso.  The key here is the U. S. computer market provides much of the innovation and many of the largest companies are here.  However, in the electronic entertainment industry (consoles, TV's, Stereo's, etc.), Japan is probably the single biggest player with the likes of Sony, Onkyo, et. al.  These are all almost double the price in the U. S. over Europe despite the VAT taxes etc.   Note, that is EUROPE, not Japan!   Likewise, East Asian auto manufacturers trounce American auto manufacturers because they can produce them so much cheaper (for a ton of reasons).  Do they lower the prices in the U. S. because of this?  Well, yes, to just below their American competition.  They don't price it based on a percentage profit, they price it based on what they can get in that area.  I understand the outrage, but lets direct it all all industries and countries practicing this, not just the U. S. computer industry.

Good point.

We don't talk much about consoles or cars here, so that's probably why they go unnoticed.

6692
Living Room / Re: Steve Jobs is dead.
« Last post by Renegade on October 09, 2011, 03:46 AM »
There is a 'Steve' hidden in everyone, just need a chance to come out.

This is Renegade's wife...

He immediately tried to give himself an SJ lobotomy when he read your comment.

Thanks a lot. Now I'm a widow.





Just kidding~! :P

Couldn't resist some sick humour there. ;D

6693
Living Room / Re: App vendors discover a new way to abuse Windows
« Last post by Renegade on October 09, 2011, 02:38 AM »
Flash player updates drive me bonkers, mainly because of the time they choose to popup, i.e. just as you've logged in. An almost silent updater which only asks for a yes before applying the final step would be easy enough, and better for the user IMO.

+1 I hate being pestered.

But the true source of my all encompassing demonic bloodlust is the popup... that steals focus... Stealing focus has to be the single most evil thing in computing.

POP~! ==> "Hey! I see you're in the middle of some difficult work and have spent lots of time on it! Would you like to start cursing? Just press any key to reboot!"

Makes me wonder if the "pop" is supposed to mean a blood vessel...

Back on track...

Flash needs everything to close, so silent is hard as it would then require a reboot. So, if you have any browsers or that open, it can't be silent.

It's not a huge step for them to take to smooth that out, but it is a step.
6694
Developer's Corner / How to Create Windows Firewall Outbound Rule?
« Last post by Renegade on October 09, 2011, 12:51 AM »
I posted this at StackOverflow:

http://stackoverflow...s-firewall-exception

I need to open up the Windows Firewall for outbound connections for an application I'm writing.

The best answers I've been able to locate are here:

http://www.shafqatah...controlling-win.html

http://www.vincenzo....the_Windows_firewall

The problem is that method only creates an inbound rule, and not an outbound rule. (Both the C# and InnoSetup script use the same method.) This is entirely useless for me.

The default behaviour for the Windows Firewall is to allow outbound traffic, but that doesn't guarantee that someone won't change that.

I would prefer to do this in the installer (using InnoSetup) rather than doing it in C#.

Did I miss something?

Does anyone know how to create an outbound rule?

Does anyone here know the answer?

6695
Exactly!!  Oh wow! A free download??  No way!  Oh my gosh, I have to tell all my friends.  You can download a FREE TRIAL for free, guys!!  That's just crazy!  You better jump on this before they realize how crazy they are?  Who in their right mind would offer a free download of a free trial software?  Life is good...

While sarcastic right now, I fear that will be a very genuine reaction at some point in the future.

However, there have always been "buy before you try" software titles out there. It's not a small market. Entire niches/sectors are dominated by that model.

:(
6696
General Software Discussion / Re: Looking for 'self email' sender
« Last post by Renegade on October 08, 2011, 01:34 PM »
I wrote a tutorial a number of years ago that has source code on how to send email in an emergency:

http://renegademinds...abid/92/Default.aspx

It's close to what you want. You'd want to add in some saved settings, but that's not hard.
6697
General Software Discussion / Re: Lodsys Patent Troll - Get Ready to Scream...
« Last post by Renegade on October 08, 2011, 01:09 PM »
This software patent insanity has to stop.  Yet another situation where only the largest companies can afford to defend themselves against this kind of harassment.

This is one of the reasons why I'm hoping for wholesale slaughter in the Samsung v. Apple patent wars.

If the patent system can create a massive, high-profile debacle, then we're one step closer to sanity.

The body count only matters for BIG players. If these guys walk away bloody and bruised, then that's an advancement.

Small guys... Irrelevant. Companies like Lodsys can destroy lives until the cows come home, and nobody will care (in the media/judiciary/whatever).

Hoping... crossing my fingers... praying to the Flying Spaghetti Monster... :)
6698
General Software Discussion / Lodsys Patent Troll - Get Ready to Scream...
« Last post by Renegade on October 08, 2011, 12:51 PM »
So, it appears that Lodsys is running around suing small developers for having "Buy Now" buttons inside of their software.

They're sending patent infringement letters (FedEx) for US patents 5999908, 7133834 and 7620565.

If you want to see part of the trainwreck, errr... the portion that the media reports...

http://www.techdirt..../search.php?q=lodsys

But they are targeting small developers as well. Like, 1-man shops.

The claim is that having a "Buy Now" button is a patent infringement. Or some crap like that. Whatever. It's idiotic.

I can't post what I really think because it's simply... ummm... not nice? Is that a good way to phrase it? :P

6699
Living Room / Re: NAS Recommendations?
« Last post by Renegade on October 08, 2011, 11:59 AM »
Personally, I don't get the one or two drive NAS units.  What's the point?  I have a $20 enclosure with a single drive in it (I used one of my old drives) that works fine for basic storage. 

NAS = "Network Attached Storage". The key there is the "Network". Having a USB-connected drive enclosure doesn't give access to all systems in the house.

Yes, but in a house, it's simple enough to setup a share. And in a small office with a server, same thing.

It still seems like overkill for a single drive.
6700
Living Room / Re: NAS Recommendations?
« Last post by Renegade on October 08, 2011, 11:44 AM »
Personally, I don't get the one or two drive NAS units.  What's the point?  I have a $20 enclosure with a single drive in it (I used one of my old drives) that works fine for basic storage.  I understand some of the software options they add, but really, if it is software you want; buy what you want rather than whatever some company can pawn off as cheaply as possible.  From my understanding, the main purpose of a NAS is to aggregate storage for size and redundancy purposes, neither of which can be done in a single drive solution and only marginally effective for one or the other purpose a dual-drive solution.  I mean is a shared folder solution really that difficult that it is worth the money for the single drive attached to the network?  If it really is, isn't the minimal price difference (not counting the drives) worth the extra expansion room?  Maybe I am just missing something here.  Can someone enlighten me?

+1 there. I would like to know the niche where it makes sense.

I fail to understand 1-drive NAS at all. 2-drive? Well, still seems a bit pointless unless all you want is RAID. And as you mention, a fancy shared folder.

4+ bays seems good. Slot in 8 TB and you can mirror RAID 4 TB, or whatever.

Pages: prev1 ... 263 264 265 266 267 [268] 269 270 271 272 273 ... 438next