topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday May 22, 2025, 2:22 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 262 263 264 265 266 [267] 268 269 270 271 272 ... 438next
6651
Living Room / Re: A rant against the SmartPhone ecosystem.
« Last post by Renegade on October 17, 2011, 08:16 PM »
The whole quote seems painfully ignorant to me. Am I missing something?

Well, yes and no.

The specifics of the ARM deal is a bit silly as you point out. However, the general mentality that goes into embedded devices, like in the FedEx example, is being carried over in part to consumer devices. That's the part where the beef is. The "walled garden" of the embedded world is spilling over into what has traditionally been a pretty free world in the consumer-computing space. So, that's where the discontent is. Or at least as I read it.

For the technical details, as you stated, yeah... Can't argue with you there.

This is a business problem, not a technical one.

Boom! Nailed it!  :Thmbsup:
6652
Living Room / Re: A rant against the SmartPhone ecosystem.
« Last post by Renegade on October 17, 2011, 07:03 PM »
The lock-down in iOS is more than just with carriers.

The API itself is locked. This is true for a lot of APIs with different mobile OSes. Some make sense while others do not.

For example, on bada, you must have Samsung's permission to use certain APIs because they are sensitive and expose personal information or they consume a service that has to be regulated to make sure that it maintains operations.

So some things make sense to lock down.

On iOS, the media library is locked with no file access at all. Zero. So you cannot open, for example, an MP3 file that is in the user's library. At all. Instead, you have to use their player API to access the media library through URLs. So, if you are interested in using a pre-made crappy player, then it's ok. If you want to do anything, you're hosed.

This is not reasonable. They could very easily simply make the media library read-only. But they don't.

The extent to which iOS is locked-down is just nutty.

"Oh, but somebody could write a program that gets around DRM and..."  :-\

I don't see Apple changing things.

Remember, Apple only opened up hardware access on OS X within the last year to allow Adobe to get certain things running properly instead of having to do it all in software, which wasn't working very well.

Inside the walled garden of iOS, there are more walled gardens...

6653
Living Room / Re: A rant against the SmartPhone ecosystem.
« Last post by Renegade on October 17, 2011, 10:18 AM »
It's much worse than just that.

The manufacturers make deals with the telcos.

etc. etc.
6654
Living Room / Re: Amazon Signs Up Authors, Writing Publishers Out of Deal
« Last post by Renegade on October 17, 2011, 07:09 AM »
I don't know whether this is good or bad or what. It's something else though.

6655
Living Room / Re: Another Nail in the Coffin for Free Speech
« Last post by Renegade on October 17, 2011, 12:22 AM »
One thing you can be sure of - the lawyers will never be heard to complain.

b r o . . . k e n . . . s y s . . . t e m . . .

Wonder if these people would have anything to say on the topic:

http://en.wikipedia..../wiki/GooGoo_Cluster

The GooGoo Cluster is an American candy bar sold since 1912 in Nashville, Tennessee.

6656
Living Room / Re: Another Nail in the Coffin for Free Speech
« Last post by Renegade on October 16, 2011, 05:57 PM »
Why is anyone surprised!

Lady GaGa is in it purely for the money.

Once you understand that, everything else she and her handlers do follows naturally from it.
 :-\


It's fine to be in it for the money, but this whole, "I'm going to co-opt language/words for myself and call it copyright/trademark," or "I'm going to co-opt mathematics for myself and call it patent," is just nutty. "Googoo gaga" is common, and I don't see how a court can possibly rule as above.

As far as I can see, it's fine for Lady Gaga to sue like she did as there is no law against being an idiot. However, it's not the job of the courts to be idiots. Somewhere that distinction got lost. :(
6657
Living Room / Re: The Boozernet...
« Last post by Renegade on October 16, 2011, 05:51 PM »
this issss yes  ;D

And once again in NONE drunk mode...That would be a yes. :/

I have no memory of last night, but luckely this seems to be the only place i have posted lol

Hahahahaha~! ;D

Blackouts are harsh... I used to get them about once a year or so. Fortunately I'm just a very happy and silly drunk, so I never have anything to really worry about, except for perhaps a headache. :) Well, that and perhaps a post where I prove beyond any reasonable doubt that I am capable of being a complete idiot! :) You're doing pretty well I'd say~! ;D
6658
Living Room / Re: Another Nail in the Coffin for Free Speech
« Last post by Renegade on October 16, 2011, 10:23 AM »
Wouldn't it be nice to see people like "Lady Gaga" and corporations sued for using English?

Really. Like WTF? The English language belongs to the people that speak it, and allowing 1 person or corporation to co-opt portions of it is theft.

So on second thought, forget suing them. Let's just throw them in prison.

(God... I love logic~! ;D )
6659
Living Room / Another Nail in the Coffin for Free Speech
« Last post by Renegade on October 16, 2011, 09:35 AM »
Yeah, it's stupid, but...

http://www.guardian....oo-goo?newsfeed=true

Lady Gaga may call her fans "little monsters" but it appears she has no love for Moshi Monsters, after taking legal action in an effort to stop the children's social network using an animated character, singer Lady Goo Goo.

The Paparazzi singer gained an interim injunction against the parent company of the wildly popular Moshi Monsters, banning Lady Goo Goo from performing songs on YouTube, the Guardian has learned.

Isn't this covered by parody?
6660
Living Room / Re: Hoping for a Patent Bloodbath XD
« Last post by Renegade on October 14, 2011, 03:55 PM »
BLOOD BLOOD BLOOD~! THERE BE BLOOD IN THEM THAR WATERS~! :p

http://www.reuters.c...dUSN1E79C24K20111014

A U.S. judge said that Samsung Electronic's Galaxy tablets infringe Apple Inc's iPad patents, but added that Apple has a problem establishing the validity of its patents in the latest courtroom face-off between the technology giants.

Wow~!

Has a drop of sanity tainted the courts?

Will modern society devolve into rational actors?

Have we witnessed the end of the universe as we know it?

Stay tuned~! More to come in this exciting zombie cage match~! ;D

6661
Geotagging and all that goodness can be wonderful.

Imagine you want to create a family vacation slideshow (or video or whatever), and you get to pull in location data to automatically display maps of where you were.

I've been wanting to buy a GPS unit for our camera for a while. Still haven't gotten one, but eventually...

I don't think I'm really all that interesting, so I'm not particularly worried about GPS tags in my photos.

When I added some cropping functionality to my Photo Resizer software, I had to sanitize thumbnails. Those can be problematic.

The original article was in the context of stalking children though... Dunno. Geotagging can also help you keep track of your kids. It's really a double-edged sword.

Any tool can be used for "good or evil". People bludgeon each other with hammers and stab each other with screwdrivers, but we don't start freaking out about the evils of hammers. What was that bumper sticker? "Guns don't kill people. I do." :P "There are no bad dogs, just bad owners."

For automatically enabling it, I think that's a good idea. You can't get the data back if you don't have it to start with, and it's relatively easy to sanitize EXIF data.

Dunno... I just think the world is better when we don't automatically assume that terrorists and child molesters are stalking us on every street corner. The media has created such a massive reality distortion field around so many issues there, and the field isn't a good one -- it's pure fear. Not a particularly nice way to live. :(
6662
Or until such time as either the Department of Labor or OSHA crack down on Amazon big time - or until enough employees finally get so fed up they vote to unionize. Boy will that ever cramp Jeff's style. I doubt Amazon could survive a three day walkout let alone a protracted strike.

War chest > secretly setup operational infrastructure in cheaper place > transfer operations > inform staff in expensive place that they no longer have jobs > laugh all the way to bank.

I believe we've see that one before once or twice. Where is America's textile industry?
6663
If we can get back to the bare bones hardware deal but on phones where you get a default OS, but can install another, then we'll be much better off for privacy.

What am I saying? I'm clearly just bonkers. Please lock me up and get me a doctor!  :o
6664
Living Room / Re: Anyone got an iPad and like it?
« Last post by Renegade on October 13, 2011, 01:51 PM »
We only use the iPad at home, so there's no point in having 3G when the telcos have no sane plans for light usage.

What do you class as 'light usage' ?

$1/month for 50MB, (150MB if you're with TPG - which you were), and 2.75cents per excess MB is hardly a deal-breaker - this is what I use in my Android phone when I want to look up something and don't have WiFi available.

TPG Budget Plan

And the phone/SMS charges are reasonable also.

It even says: Pay As You Go Plans - Recommended for your iPad  :P

I didn't see any of that when we bought it. Other plans we saw were idiotically expensive. The device was far more, and the plan was the same as regular phone plans. I gave up there.
6665
The guy is a regular... well, Steve Jobs, I guess. Except without the fashion or design sense. Bezos is super smart; don't get me wrong. He just makes ordinary control freaks look like stoned hippies.

Bwahahahaaha~!

Man... it's a good read! :)
6666
Living Room / Re: Anyone got an iPad and like it?
« Last post by Renegade on October 13, 2011, 12:36 PM »
I think there are things that we can do simultaneously, but many of them require training to do. Some don't.

Like listening to music is a pretty good example. When you know something pretty well, you can pretty much listen and ignore at the same time. blah blah blah -- I expect other people have different takes on what they can do at the same time.

I think that we're each just wired/trained to be able to do certain things, and some things are just beyond our grasp. e.g. Editing in Photoshop while dictating mathematical lectures on the deeper lovelinesses of string theory and why time doesn't exist. :)
6667
Living Room / Re: Anyone got an iPad and like it?
« Last post by Renegade on October 13, 2011, 10:34 AM »
What do you mean by multitask?

Actually doing more than one thing at a time (not just allowing you to swap between tasks but have background tasks dormant).

That's a fallacy.  No one works in more than one app at the same time.  If you'd said background task (i.e. kick something off, and go into another program while that's still processing) I'd agree with you; though some apps can be backgrounded and still work, others can't, and it's something that I do find limiting in some cases.  But other than for reference purposes, or sharing information by drag/drop, no one actually works in more than one program at the same time- the mouse related interface that we have on computers doesn't allow it.  I hope in the future multi-touch does allow this (a la Minority Report), but for now, it's an illusion that's been propagated, and doesn't survive the light of reason.

For the most part, I think you're right there.

But... (you knew that was coming)... If you have say a Word document and a PDF open, and you type in the Word document while reading the PDF, are you "using more than one app at the same time"?

A for multi-touch as in the Minority Report, isn't that all just one big app?

I think that by our nature, we are incapable of proactively using 2 apps at the same time. Passive? Sure. Just like the PDF above. We all use LOTS of them, and even ones we don't know about. Drivers, daemons, services, agents, etc. etc. But proactively? That requires multiple input devices/sources.

If you had a sensor to detect your heartbeat, and that was hooked into an app, that would still be passive.

If you are typing or clicking with a mouse or speaking into a speech recognition powered app, that's clearly proactive.

Let's take Star Trek for an example. You're the ship's navigator and you're all alone on the deserted ship... cue spooky music please... You're frantically typing/tapping things into the computer console to avoid some Klingons pursing you... All the while you're shouting commands to the ship's computer...

Are your voice commands active? Well, yes. But how much concentration do they take? Is that using multiple applications? Or is it using one interface (the console) and intermittently actively using another interface?

I think our powers of concentration are limited, and that is the absolute limiting factor. i.e. How much concentration does an application require to use as a percentage of the users available, productive attention/concentration amount?

I think that at the end of the day, we're mostly just quickly switching between applications and that we're never really using multiple applications, no matter what the interface. (Unless it's cybernetic, but then it's still passive...)

Kind of like how mobile phones are illegal to use while driving. People don't have enough concentration/attention to do both reliably.
6668
Living Room / Re: Anyone got an iPad and like it?
« Last post by Renegade on October 13, 2011, 01:14 AM »
Yes we all can. However the reason that you buy into iPads or Apple stuff in general, is probably not to say "I can do ABC", but to say "I now do ABC in this fashion, with better accessibility/portability and less hassle, etc.".
-lotusrootstarch (October 12, 2011, 10:37 PM)


I don't find the iPad is significantly easier to use for typing anything into. It's still too small for my hands, and using my thumbs is still awkward due to the distance they need to travel, although I don't hit the wrong keys like I'm prone to do on my phone. It's just a trade-off of one inconvenience for another for me.

So at the end of the day, my phone ends up being more portable and easier to carry.

I really think that it all boils down to personal work-habits or play-habits as the case may be.

For the 3G:

Carrying and tethering a data-enabled phone to an iPad contradicts the convenience principle and disturbs the peace of mind, especially when you have to remember to worry about the battery status on your phone every once in a while.
-lotusrootstarch (October 12, 2011, 10:37 PM)

My bet is that wraith simply has a very high comfort level with those sorts of things, and it comes second nature to him. Me? Heck... I wouldn't bother trying to tether my phone. I simply don't have the patience. Heck, I barely have the patience to use my phone at all, but that's due to the crappy network and not the phone itself.

My comfort level with a lot of things boils down to, "It works? Are you sure? I doubt it. Yeah yeah yeah... Heard it all before... And it only takes 10 seconds? Last time it took an hour... Bah humbug~! It's not that critical. I'll find something else!"

e.g. My first impression of the Internet was, "Yeah? So? I'll check back later when it improves." There were only a few sites on the web at the time, they were ugly as hell, and there wasn't much there. Everything at the time was very much experimental. I already had been using Archie and Gopher, and the new "Internet" didn't really add much for me. That all changed of course. :)

So regarding "disturbs the peace of mind", yeah... I'm on board with you 100%~! :D

6669
Living Room / Re: Anyone got an iPad and like it?
« Last post by Renegade on October 12, 2011, 10:15 PM »
From my experience buying a tablet, any tablet, without 3G support is a very bad idea. Being able to access content and stay in touch anywhere anytime is essential.
-lotusrootstarch (October 12, 2011, 09:57 PM)

We only use the iPad at home, so there's no point in having 3G when the telcos have no sane plans for light usage.

We just can't justify the additional costs for something that we'd never use, or only use very rarely.

I still have my phone that I can do all that stuff on too, so it's not like I'm "stranded".

Actually, I prefer my phone for reading news and most things that I do on the iPad. It's simply smaller and nicer to use. The iPad requires 2 hands to use (1 to hold it and 1 to "use" it), while I can hold and use my phone with 1 hand. The other hand is busy with a cigarette. :P

I almost feel like singing "one hand in my pocket..." :P
6670
Living Room / Re: Anyone got an iPad and like it?
« Last post by Renegade on October 12, 2011, 09:46 PM »
I bought my wife one as well. (+1 for Wi-Fi only.)

It's nice, but I only surf news and play a few games for a couple minutes when I have a smoke outside.

I bought a remote control app to control windows, but it locks the screen, which isn't what I wanted. i.e. Control windows from laying down on the couch. :)

Overall, it's a fun toy.

There's a lot more that I probably could do on it, but why? I've got a desktop to do work on. The iPad is for casual consumption.

My wife has commented that she wants a Kindle now though as the iPad is simply painful to look at after a prolonged period, e.g. reading.

6671
General Software Discussion / Re: Dart Programming Language
« Last post by Renegade on October 12, 2011, 07:48 AM »
Part of the charm of a language is that it lets you communicate with other *people*. ;) :P

I suppose that if you had a language that only you and the machine understood,  and that you could effectively communicate your "intent" without fear of grammar/syntax and other annoying errors, then sure. But there are simply too many advantages to sharing languages as you get to use code that other people wrote.

I suppose that in an "intentional fantasy language", it's not a stretch just to throw in that all languages are compatible with each other. :)

Still dreaming...
6672
General Software Discussion / Re: Dart Programming Language
« Last post by Renegade on October 12, 2011, 07:00 AM »
^hear ya! I've been saying the same thing for more years than some coders have been alive.  ;D

Because that's exactly right. If they all compile down to that which actually gets run on a CPU, it shouldn't matter at all. Any functionally complete language should, by definition, be capable of doing what any other computer language does. 

Unfortunately, I think we've forgotten the primary reason why high and mid-level computer languages were created to begin with - which is for the convenience of the programmer.

Otherwise we'd do everything in assembler or machine code like some of the purists slowly sinking in the tar pits continue to argue for.  8)


Being forced to learn umpteen new languages every year isn't what I'd call "convenient". :)

Sigh... We can dream, can't we?
6673
Speaking of, I just wrote an expanded version of an article I wrote on getting around censorship:

http://cynic.me/2011...ip-internet-freedom/

Summary:

VPN + DNS

That solution assumes that there are still places to open VPN tunnels to, and there are still honest DNS servers.

ACTA is bent on remedying that loophole. Just wait for a couple of years.

They'll be around for a long time. I hope. I pray...

Let's just hope that ACTA can't get it's act together. :)
6674
DC Gamer Club / Re: Dungeon Defenders - A Tower Defense CO-OP RPG
« Last post by Renegade on October 12, 2011, 01:07 AM »
Good grief~! Did anyone watch the videos? The one with the dev explaining the game... Jeez... It sounds like 50 flavours of crack~! If your preferred brand of crack isn't in there, it doesn't exist! The game is a bit of everything.

6675
General Software Discussion / Re: Dart Programming Language
« Last post by Renegade on October 11, 2011, 11:55 PM »
This really has no productive value.

The days of "1 language" should be behind us. Microsoft is 1000% correct with the framework concept where languages become irrelevant. VB, C#, F#, C++, Python, Ruby, JS, whatever...

This just pisses me off because it's only one more show of idiocy when the problem has already been solved. MS solved it.

Actually, it was "solved" by JPI back in the mid-80s.

The entire TopSpeed language line used a unified IDE and underlying set of libraries for all the languages it offered. It also allowed you to mix & match languages in a single project in order to leverage code you had already written or were more comfortable coding in. I was very partial to developing in Modula-2 (and later Clarion after their acquisition of JPI) back in my code-burner days.


Didn't know that!

I just don't get it though... Why are we still banging rocks around then? Is MS the only company since then to figure out that languages shouldn't matter?

On a side note... I really need to attach a breathalyzer to my browser's submit/post button... :P
Pages: prev1 ... 262 263 264 265 266 [267] 268 269 270 271 272 ... 438next