6376
Living Room / Re: Yet another reason why I often wish I lived in Massachusettes
« Last post by wraith808 on February 06, 2013, 02:34 PM »So the current state of affairs with online retailers not charging sales tax is a temporary one at best. And it will be a quick tech fix on most order entry servers once they're required to collect it. So it's not as if it impractical or not doable from an order processing perspective. It's just a sku + zipcode + tax table lookup + calculation loop on their system. No big huhu. This stuff is old hat - and the code has already been written anyway. The computer handles the heavy lifting so it's really just a "set & maintain a tax database" thing.
About the only tricky part will be if somebody in state A buys something - but has it shipped to an address in state B. In most places that wouldn't be taxable under current 'destination-based' sales tax laws. In my state something purchased with the intent of shipping it out of state within 30 days, and actually shipped within that grace period, is usually exempt since we're a destination-based state for sales tax purposes.-40hz (February 06, 2013, 12:54 PM)
Currently, in most states that I know of, you are charged tax even if you purchase online if you reside in a state that they have a presence in. That's what Amazon (and Woot) already got slammed for; not charging tax on purchases by TX residents.
The second part is the part that I was referring to as a burden, especially on small business. When I worked in retail, we only shipped to certain places because of it- we had the tax codes for a few places in the system; others were just out of luck. To much trouble maintaining that.

Recent Posts


)
