5876
Find And Run Robot / Re: What's wrong with this FARR picture?
« Last post by tomos on July 18, 2012, 05:17 PM »(see attachment in previous post)-daddydave (July 18, 2012, 05:03 PM)
it's overly helpful?
(I only get 6 results)
(see attachment in previous post)-daddydave (July 18, 2012, 05:03 PM)
This would give you 6 TB of data space with 2 TB of parity. The simplest way to envision this is with math, i.e., 1+2+3=6 (D1 = 1, D2 = 2, D3 = 3, thus, P1 = 6). If you lose any one of the "D" drives, you can easily calculate what you're missing. Let's say you lost D2 and have replaced it. The system starts to rebuild based data off the P1 parity drive information like this:-skwire (July 18, 2012, 04:28 PM)

[img]http://www.icemark.com/blog/wp-content/upload/fish_chips_peas_and_pudding_01.jpg[/img]
YUM!-Stephen66515 (July 18, 2012, 04:40 PM)

I could use some tips on what to eat to get my weight back up.
Having lost too much from 2 surgeries (4 inguinal hernias) over the past year.
[...]
Louisiana has some great cuisine, [eat loads of the] fried stuff.-cmpm (July 18, 2012, 03:11 AM)

So if you still have a couple of 500GB drives, and say three 1TB drives... you can protect the data on all of those with only one of those 1TB drives used as a parity drive.that's 3x1TB + 2x500GB = 4TB total space.
In some packages, like FlexRAID, you can pool them all together and combine the 1TB with the two 500GB for a total of 3TB of usable space (one of the 1TB will be used for parity, and it always has to be your largest drive).
Replacing, deleting, inserting and formating of text or lines in many files at the same time.
and what about edit altdrag program?-plander (July 17, 2012, 02:26 PM)
I'm not sure, but I suspect that, to some extent, the price may reflect the sophistication of the design and the technology in use.-IainB (July 17, 2012, 03:16 AM)
-I hope you're right, IainB, because if I press Ctrl+Alt+PrtScr, FastStone Capture will create an accurate screenshot of the entire page, and offer me to merely click Save as Pdf - and I have a much better looking copy than any virtual pdf printer ever will give me - at a fraction of the price.-Curt (July 17, 2012, 09:11 AM)
MoveIt 1.1.9.3 Changed Arrow hotkeys to Alt-Winkey Arrow for move by large increment, and Control-Winkey Arrow to move by smaller increment. This should remove conflict with commonly used hotkeys.-MilesAhead (July 14, 2012, 09:03 PM)


MoveIt 1.1.9.1 Added Control Shift Arrow hotkeys. Works the same as Alt Arrow(which is still there) but moves the window by a smaller increment.-MilesAhead (July 14, 2012, 03:41 PM)

Changed Snap Explorer to Quadrant to Snap Window to Quadrant. Now the Mouse Cursor Position is used to determine the quadrant rather than the window origin. Any movable window may be snapped. If the window is not resizeable it is just moved. Otherwise it is also sized to fit in the quadrant.
See About Box and Readme.txt for more details.-MilesAhead (July 14, 2012, 03:41 PM)
That image is clearly shopped. I can tell by some of the pixels. Also because I have seen many shops in my time.-Deozaan (July 13, 2012, 11:18 PM)
From the department of "what are you saying?". The article gleefully announces that "the first photo on the web was a photoshop disaster". It wasn't even a technology test, it was in fact the world's first ad photo on the web.-TaoPhoenix (July 14, 2012, 07:51 AM)
Deo was being silly. He says this in IRC for every image we post-Stephen66515 (July 14, 2012, 08:17 AM)

OK, its not a video, but its cute, so it's going here:
[dog and deer]-Stephen66515 (July 14, 2012, 07:12 AM)
The showdown over this thing called CETA continues in late August or early September at the earliest [after summer holidays]
think I'll retire from (my very short career in) the coding world, too many variables & unknowns there for me :p :-)Ah ah, I understand your pain-tomos (July 12, 2012, 03:10 PM)Thanks for the help!
-jgpaiva (July 12, 2012, 03:45 PM)
nope, I think it's a totally different problem. The error is that ":ShiftAltTab" is an unrecognized action. This indicates that the parser is identifying the first "::" as the hotkey delimiter, and using the last ":" as part of the action.
Hence, one of these might work:>!: ::ShiftAltTab
:>!::ShiftAltTab-jgpaiva (July 12, 2012, 02:43 PM)
Does this work?>!:::ShiftAltTab-jgpaiva (July 12, 2012, 06:00 AM)