topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 27, 2025, 2:49 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 95next
576
DC Gamer Club / Re: Steam, and the gift of game...
« Last post by Lashiec on September 02, 2008, 05:51 PM »
Is Steam really all it's cracked up to be? Does it phone home or run when it's not supposed to? Does it hide itself as a service that runs automatically when my PC starts up?

It's not perfect, but it's much better than similar services, either devised for gaming (Direct2Drive and the like), or for music and video (yeah, that big sack of crap called iTunes). The unique problem I see in its future it's the reliance on DRM, which poses the question of what will happen with your games if Valve goes out of business (or another company buys them). You could say that something like that will never happen with Valve, but bigger companies fell despite it seemed they could do nothing wrong. Gabe Newell said unofficially that they will provide something if that happens, so I guess it's not a problem (we can always use other methods anyway *cough*).

Something that also worries me is that everyone seems to be in a "me too" stance, and they're releasing their own services, complete with frontends: Microsoft, Stardock... prolly others like EA or Activision could join the fest, as well as more "niche" companies.

Other than that, it's pretty nice. Not intrusive, takes care of your games, you can use as a frontend for other games you have in the computer, and the terms of service are reasonable. The option of letting you download the games as many times as you want it's what convinced me. That, and getting some free games thanks to my copy of Half-Life, and the nice offers they have for older games.

Personally, I'm more interested in things like Good Old Games, which don't tie you in any way, and have excellent prices. Of course, we're talking about games not available in physical shops, so I guess companies will not embrace it as an alternative method (with all the crazy talk about piracy, low prices and no DRM for PC games scare 99% of the game companies), but I think it will find its place in the net. In my case, I'm drooling over the perspective of almost stealing Operation Flashpoint and Fallout so...
577
Living Room / Re: What do you usually forget to backup?
« Last post by Lashiec on August 31, 2008, 11:59 AM »
Usually, I forget everything, so I just copy the entire Windows installation (including all the software) to the other hard drive :D. I have to design a backup strategy...
578
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Red Alert 1 for free
« Last post by Lashiec on August 31, 2008, 11:41 AM »
Whew, just two days since I read about it, and almost forgot it was released today. Thanks for the heads up! It's worth the download, even if it's just for Klepacki's soundtrack.
579
Site/Forum Features / Re: Help us pick some new SMF mods to install on the forum
« Last post by Lashiec on August 29, 2008, 01:35 PM »
Some i am looking at:

mouser, by looking at the picture I think the forum already has this mod :)
580
General Software Discussion / Re: PC Upgrade - A few questions
« Last post by Lashiec on August 28, 2008, 07:33 PM »
I restored the last (Acronis) image from the old system and miracle of miracles, XP started without a hitch, literally saving me weeks of grunt work - I was expecting to have to run a 'repair' at the very least coz of the mobo/CPU change, but the computer gods must be in a good mood!

Wow, that's quite an unexpected event. A first I dare to say :)

BTW, talking about the 4 GB purchase, are you using or planning to use a 64-bit OS?
581
Developer's Corner / Re: Best way to sync programming projects?
« Last post by Lashiec on August 28, 2008, 06:56 PM »
Why don't you use VNC or Remote Desktop to access your home PCs from your laptop? I think it's more convenient, faster and easier than sync in a rush every morning :D. I know a few guys in college who use it, and they're pretty happy with the method. The only concern would be security, of course.
582
Living Room / Re: Video chat: Why don't people like it?
« Last post by Lashiec on August 28, 2008, 06:34 PM »
I guess that will vary from person to person. Multitasking is definitely a big reason, you can do everything you want while you talk on the phone, meanwhile with video chat you have to be in front of the camera. Also, some people can be uncomfortable when talking using a videocam, in the sense that they can be in pajamas at home, in underwear, or doing those little things everyone does at home, and it's embarrassing for them to let others see them like that.

I suppose it's a matter of asking your girlfriends why they don't like it. Personally, I don't have a webcam, and never felt inclined to buy one for videochat, maybe because I don't have any particular reason about having or not having one.
583
Site/Forum Features / Re: Help us pick some new SMF mods to install on the forum
« Last post by Lashiec on August 28, 2008, 06:10 PM »
The only one that I see could be interesting IMO, is the Google Maps one, considering that the Fraprr map was a bit messy.

It could also be interesting to add the Twitter and XBOX Gamertag ones, if enough people use those.
584
If you categorize start menu, will it confuse FARR when opening programmes?

Nope, FARR is able to search recursively through complex directory structures.
585
If it's a laptop, then yeah, no reason against swapping.

If it's a desktop Mac, no way in hell. Not only for the fact that desktop Macs rarely have a decent graphics card, but also that I would be swapping a home-assembled PC by a pre-assembled one, and I prefer to build and tinker with the innards of the system myself, and not having some corporation behind telling me "this will void your warranty".

I'd need a really good text editor -- that's 200% necessary. Editplus is what I use now, and there would have to be some equivalent for the Mac. BBEdit? Dunno. But good regular expressions are 500% necessary for a text editor for me. That's he first thing I look at.

TextMate, maybe?

3. Apple has been consistently (well, reasonably consistently) successful with Steve Jobs and consistently unsuccessful without him. There will be a limit to how much longer he will drive Apple forward, and then what will happen?

It will probably keep going forward, the Apple of today is a quite different animal of the 80s Apple, and they have enough provisions and business lines to survive without Steve Jobs, while back then they were a one-trick pony. Besides, they already did quite well without Steve Jobs for a time.
586
General Software Discussion / Re: Mozilla Ubiquity Prototype Available
« Last post by Lashiec on August 27, 2008, 06:07 AM »
personally the Apple/Ted type "oh my god shhh.. this is going to revolutionize the world" marketing-style way it's talked about does kind of rub me the wrong way.  Do we have a name yet for these pretentious style presentations?  it's like as soon as you get to a big company (which i guess mozilla is now) you get trained on how to market everything you do using some snake-oil-style approach.

Yeah, it's called "hype through obscurity" ;D. You can also call it "politics", ya know, you talk about something without really saying nothing, doesn't it?

Jokes aside, there's a good explanation about all this. Why it's true that the post is not exactly "enlightening" (hell, when this appeared on the channel the past night I was wondering what the heck Mozilla was talking about), this is just the natural evolution of what Alex Faaborg prototyped a while ago, so not only the Firefox team know what a launcher is, if you look at the blog post author, they actually know of such apps first hand. It also explains the general feeling of the post, I ranted a while ago how presumptuous the guy sounds most of the time, although I thought he reformed after getting into Mozilla, as the video he showed a while ago of Fennec interface looked fairly interesting, and sounded normal.

In any case, not only such functionality is already present in most launchers, it's already present in Firefox 3! The search functionality is possible through search keywords (which, by default, you have to add), if you use the proper search strings (if it's possible to use JavaScript with these strings, you can do some pretty nice and useful things). And someone did Ubiquity a bit earlier than the Mozilla team.

Personally, I would prefer a system-wide app to interact with the apps I use, not to duplicate the functionality I already have in another app that I might or not use. In any case, it adds something different to what launchers are capable of doing, but I'm a bit concerned about that objective of making the extension works in the most natural way (the "Book a flight to a Chicago next Monday..." thing) as people rarely will formulate such things the same way from individual to individual, and it puzzles me how they're going to solve that. I think that verb + object will be enough if you chain various actions, and more easy for people and extensions developers. Oh well, at least this is quite more usable and plausible than those video mockups they showed a while ago, detailing the future of browsing and the future of bookmarking (in summary: it did not look cool at all, and the interaction was neither natural nor easy), although they have a few ideas worth looking into.
587
Living Room / Re: Viacom vs. Google
« Last post by Lashiec on August 26, 2008, 02:31 PM »
There's no real good explanation for YouTube keeping such logs. Everyone already knows that most big sites do the same, so in a way it's OK, it's not right, but what are you going to do? Sue them? Ignore the sites? (which is feasible up to certain point, considering you encounter Google everywhere).

In a way, it's not a bad thing they're keeping such logs. There are tons of companies keeping data about you, most of the times without you knowing it. So does the government. The problem is that all these companies, and the public administration do this under strict policies, and more or less you have an idea of why they would want it. But what's the explanation of Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Amazon, etc.? Yeah, there's the usual "we use the combined data, which in no way can be traced back to you, to improve our services and thus make things easier to you". That's nice and everything, but there's no need to link my searching, viewing, clicking, etc. habits to an ID, I mean, to improve searching results I hardly doubt there's a reason to do this. In the case of YouTube, perhaps in the future they intend to release a new service that makes personalized video recommendations, but Last.FM collects the data about the music you like once you signed into the service and after the service is operative.

It's cool to see Google protecting their users rights, but those rights also include knowing what the hell all the aggregated data is used for. The lack of transparency with Google is astounding, not near Apple levels of course, but it's quite baffling to see things failing, all these privacy issues, and not a single world telling us what's happening. One would say that no explanation is better than PR-explanations, but a company as hated in these cases as Microsoft usually makes good explanations when software fails or issues arise. Perhaps it's also a trade secret to reveal such uses, who knows.

Also, I wonder why Viacom is getting such logs, but not Google employees logs. If you work there, are you exempt of such tracking? Or perhaps Google thinks their employees are more important than their users? Hmmm.... Bah, the most probable answer is that some higher-up is looking at nasty things during his work :P

As for all the Viacom acts, it's just another case of a corporation unable to adapt fast to a changing world, hitting the wrong keys. The funny thing is that they're failing at all levels, conscious consumers hate them for these practices, and the rest ignore them, doing whatever they want, either watching content on YouTube or obtaining it from more dubious sources.
588
General Software Discussion / Re: Text Manipulation Addons Firefox
« Last post by Lashiec on August 26, 2008, 01:26 PM »
I still wonder why form enlargement is not a default function in Opera and Firefox...
589
General Software Discussion / Re: PC Upgrade - A few questions
« Last post by Lashiec on August 26, 2008, 01:08 PM »
And I try to go for extended warranties for RAM whenever possible, coz it not something that can be 'fixed'.

Yeah, no problem there, I think most reputable vendors have lifetime guarantees on RAM sticks.

Lashiec, wouldn't it make sense to try and go for a stick running faster than  800 MHz, guess what I'm asking is, what's the usual bottleneck on most newer systems. I know that's too loose a question but since most of you are running multi-core systems, where would you say your system bottlenecks, if that's a word.

Not really, there is a bottleneck, that's for sure, but at that hardware level is not reflected in actual performance. Then again, considering the price of DDR2 1066 vs. DDR2 800, a few more MHz can't hurt :D. Also, take advantage of the ailing economics of RAM manufacturers, and snag a 4 GB kit, it's cheap, cheap (/me thinks about getting one...)

Assuming a limited budget, which scenario would you go for?

If money is not a concern, I'd go for #3 right away. If that's not the case, I'll go for the next best thing considering your current setup: buy two normal hard drives, a small one for C: (reserved for apps and the operating system), and a big one for D: (data and whatever you want). #2 might be acceptable, if you're not concerned about its 300GB capacity limit. I'm not too keen on #4, never liked partitions, and that dislike can also be applied to #2. But that's a personal opinion.

Unless you absolutely need to buy a new PC quickly, I will advise you to wait.

A Core2Quad CPU + a mobo with DDR3 is going to be the main trend in no time.
Especially on the memory consideration, due to their socket design, a mobo can only support one of them, either DDR2 or DDR3 (not both). My main concern is all major mobo manufacturers are pushing out new ver of mobo on DDR3. Take a look at my dream mobo: Asus P5E3 WS Pro this guy is all there for I/O performance.

Well, I'm not too sure on that one. DDR3 is far cheaper than months ago, but the thing is there is not much difference between DDR2 and DDR3 performance. DDR3 would be useful in the future, thanks to its higher bandwidth, but only for newer processors, I think. The problem buying a Core 2 Quad now (which is also recommendable for future proofing, even if not many software use 4 threads now) and DDR3 is that you have a dead-end path, as Core i7 (Nehalem, Core 2 successor) is a very different processor due to the integrated memory controller, and the new socket, so you can't upgrade to a Core i7 in the future using the same motherboard. DDR3 makes more sense with a Core i7 as more cores mean more need for bandwidth, but with a Core 2 you might just save a nice sum of money to invest it in better things.

And well, you can also wait for Core i7, but there's nothing affordable until 2009. It's the usual thing with computing, wait to get better components which yield better performance for more money, the customer have to decide if the extra performance it's worth the waiting time and the higher costs.
590
General Software Discussion / Re: Songbird
« Last post by Lashiec on August 24, 2008, 07:51 PM »
Well, the 0.7 version was released a few days ago, and just like it happened with Firefox, it's starting to be usable. The interface was cleaned up quite a bit, including the options screen, which feels a bit more less Firefox-y. Most of the show-stopping bugs present in past versions are gone, so you can actually use the program as a normal media jukebox, something that was impossible even in 0.6.

I also like the addons available, some are still very rough, but they offer most of the functionality present in the competition, and it's easy to set up them to show around the interface. Which, by the way, it's a cross between iTunes and musikCube. I mean, there's no "Stop" button ;D

Among the bad points, the integration with music services is buggy, some of the tags are not correctly mapped to the proper fields (and no multifield support at the moment), cover art is not present (whether it's embedded or lying around in a folder), and memory usage is HIGH. I guess that can't really be solved.

All in all, they really improved the software between 0.6 and 0.7, and it's starting to look like a competitor for those other jukeboxes. Perhaps it was hyped to hell a bit too soon that it should, but it's trying to live up to the expectations.
591
General Software Discussion / Re: PC Upgrade - A few questions
« Last post by Lashiec on August 24, 2008, 07:24 PM »
About the RAM, if you're not going to overclock, you're just fine with plain DDR2 800, but be sure to follow mouser advice.

Think about wether is worth buying a Raptor or not as it's no longer the panacea it was a couple of years ago. Drives like the Samsung Spinpoint F1 or the Western Digital Caviar SE16 give it quite some challenge in most tasks. Another completely different thing is the VelociRaptor, that drive is a beast and only a good SSD is capable of competing with it. The only caveat is that is quite expensive.

A 9600GT or a 8800GT are both good choices. If you budget can be stretched a bit more, I suggest you to look into a Radeon 4850.

The soundcard question is tricky. The X-Fi is quite a decent card, even more considering all the years Creative was laughing at its customers' faces. Is it the better? Personally, I might opt for a Xonar DX, which is even better quality-wise, and has compatibility with the latest EAX versions using some tricks. Also, do consider what kind of sound equipment do you have. If you're going to use a couple of normal computer speakers, investing into a soundcard is not really recommended.
592
Living Room / Re: Nightmare on Sesame Street - Video Search Challenge!
« Last post by Lashiec on August 24, 2008, 01:51 PM »
Well, on YouTube there are several videos which seem to be what you're asking for.
593
Living Room / Re: Odd FF3 Problem... sucking up bandwidth
« Last post by Lashiec on August 24, 2008, 01:45 PM »
the reason I'm steamed is twofold, one its the legitimate plug-in.. its not infected or modified at all. so what are they trying to do? second I uninstalled the plug-in weeks ago after a 2 hour trial run in a sandieboxed ff3. so how/why  it ended back in there behind my back i ain't sure. but i did some md5 comps against the legit version and they match so....yeah anyway issue resolved.

Well, if you deinstalled it in the sandboxed session, and the plugin was installed before that session, there you have the answer. If not... :S

As for the constant downloading, contact the devs and let them know about the issue.
594
I'll give you a mountain bike for every bank site you can find that works with Opera. I'm talking released versions, not betas. This cannot be.

Have one ready, Caixa Galicia works ;D. It should be said that most bank sites SUCK hard, very hard, so hard my eyes bleed after trying some examples. There's something that rubs the wrong way when you see some of the biggest banks in Spain (and, in two cases, some of the biggest of the world) with sucky sites. I mean, they make record profits in times of economic crisis, at least they could invest them in something *useful*. No, wait, they are banks, what the hell was I thinking... ::)

The web is an adverse environment for Opera users. This is getting worse, not better, because people create broken sites in Opera faster than we can report them and Opera devs can fix their releases. Not to mention that Opera decision-makers take pride in ignoring user feedback like no other company.

I'm considering collecting 'signatures' to ask Opera to change their behavior. It may imply renewal of the director's board, so it may never work no matter how many people sign it. Why? Because they still make the best browser, and I want it not to suck.

This will sound old, I know, but from my experience the problem is mostly outside Opera's reach. When you see sites failing, whose behaviour can be corrected with a few lines of JavaScript, you know those coding them are not making the work as they should. I wonder why people don't design a standards-compliant site, with specific fixes for IE if needed, instead of targeting a specific browser.

Can Opera Software do better? Sure, nontroppo already listed all they are doing, and I'm sure they can do other things. But I'm afraid there's no magical solution in the short-term, apart from ditching Presto and adopting Gecko (which I don't think it's as easy as it sounds). For now, cross browsing is the unique solution :-(

Getting a new management could maybe solve a few things, but I am not aware of the power Tetzchner and his board has over Opera development direction, apart from general guidelines. I mean, they have other things to care about. Even in that case, major reworking in Presto it's not an easy task, and after all, such thing is scheduled for Peregrine.

Besides, Tetzchner already fired the entire board a while ago after they tried to fire him for business decisions.

Smaller banks from Spain: (caja rural, general) Not working

Caja General (Granada?) seems to work OK.

Having said that, I use admuncher and I have the sneaking suspicion that it may be interacting with sites the wrong way. I've seen people (on opera forums) saying that development is too slow - I'm just too used to it to switch it off, but it may be causing more harm than good.

Yeah, it should be a good idea to turn it off when encountering problems, and reload the site. It's not the first time I encounter problems with the adblocker activated, so I guess the same could be happening with Admuncher.

As nontroppo said, things improved over time. If you think about it, this is not as different as the situation with Firefox a while ago. There were all this bashing against it because some sites failed to render correctly with it compared with IE. It's true that back then AJAX was just a football team and a cleaning product, but the general situation is the same. Through aggressive marketing, word of mouth, and being a better browser than IE, Firefox turned out the stakes in its favour, and now the number of incompatible sites is quite low.

And that's one of the problems with Opera, marketing. While most developments in Firefox are featured in the tech press (the most recent one being the impressive improvements in JS performance), with major new releases being featured in the mass media, Opera has this stigma of being an underdog. Rarely it's featured in the press, except when major versions are released, and it's usually mocked by the usual trolls (apparently people are happy with just two options). While Asa Dotzler is disliked by a lot of people, we have to recognize he played a important role in Firefox market expansion, and Opera Software should learn from him, while trying to not fall in the traps he fell (turning a browser choice into a religion, for example).

This also includes listening to people. Opera always has a bad habit of not doing it, although after the Opera 9.5 criticism, it seems they're improving this. This is also a very difficult task, because they have to cater both to the longtime users as well as to the newcomers, and there is always a clash between those wishing for a very specific function versus those who want a more general feature, including cloning ideas from the competitors, and clearly, this is a difficult thing to maintain balance with.

Some of the things they really should be part of the browser is a extension system, perhaps not as featured as Firefox's (due to security concerns, and perhaps some inability to interact with the whole browser GUI), but enough for most tasks. I've never been a great fan of plugins in browsers, because the paradigm seems different than plugins with other type of programs, but I'd like to have some extra functions in the browser without waiting for the next versions. And an update system, which is one the most demanded functions as well. And real clipboard copy :-). It seems that the two first ones are coming, so it's a matter of time.

That should improve Opera's image, and market share as well. Meanwhile, they could fix some of the most annoying problems in the current version, like random freezings accompanied by massive HDD I/O operations.

And even in that case, my opinion is that Opera will always be a niche browser. Perhaps not as niche as it's now, but at least in a Safari way. People is accustomed to what they know, and even if that new thing provides the same functionality and some more, it takes time to being accustomed. In the case of Opera, the extra functionality is rarely used by many people, and why change from Firefox to Opera if there's no real incentive to do it, and problems can appear? I saw this scenario happening many times before, "Yes, Opera is very nice, but I'll stay with Firefox". Perhaps Opera is missing something that is key to attract people, but I can't imagine what it would be.

And this is what happens when you let me too many time with a keyboard. I'll go do something else now :-[
595
Living Room / Re: What May Happen in the Next 100 Years (Predictions from 1901)
« Last post by Lashiec on August 24, 2008, 11:49 AM »
It's a shame some of the best predictions didn't turn out to be true (like those silent streets), and ironically some of them are told to be happen in the future as well, or are being researched at the moment. I wonder what was the reasoning behind those bigger fruits and vegetables, or the disappearance of the C, the X and the Q

What I find most interesting is that everybody (futurists, sci-fi writers, etc.) all missed the single biggest thing that changed just about everything - the ubiquitous microprocessor.

Sci-fi writers understood some kind of "machine" was needed for certain tasks (there you have HAL9000 or the Navigators in Dune), but the miniaturization needed for consumer adoption was a difficult thing to predict. Heck, not even those directing computing companies were sure about it.

I was talking to some 20-somethings last week, and I realized they couldn't really grasp (or maybe they just couldn't believe) what life was like back in 1970. I think that speaks volumes about how radically different are the ways we work, live, and play compared to just 35 years ago.

Then illustrate for us, youngsters, how it was back then :)
596
2 ) As a consequence, folder hierarchies should lose predominance and smart folders should pervade. No OS is where I want it to be (r.e. metadata and smart folders) on this.
-nontroppo

I'm not sure if I agree on this... I find well-structured folder hierarchies easy to navigate, and they're fast and efficient. For metadata based navigation, you either need very smart indexing, very smart caching, or you will suffer abysmal speed and/or bloat. And you need to be very good at tagging your files for something like this to be useful, imho... (yeah, there's content-based search, but then you do need those huge index files).

Well, the idea would be to have the two schemes coexisting together. While a folder hierarchy is a must at least do dissipate that general feeling of "where are my files?" that permeate pure tag-based systems, for files deep nested in the file system, be able to find and classify them would be a plus. Of course, the main problem here is cross-compatibility between different filesystems... and I don't see any reunion to kick start the process any soon.

5) Core support for the coming GPU revolution. I do a bunch of DV editing, and harnessing the GPU as a general purpose device would rock. I don't want a proprietary 3rd-party to do this, I want it pervasive and universally offered by the OS. Better support from multiple CPUs goes without saying, but it is depressing to see high-core machines having cores sitting idle.
-nontroppo

Get NVidia to allow people to use the CUDA interface for free, and get the other companies to use it. CUDA doesn't even need to be opensourced to do this, it's "just" the API specs (and perhaps a few internals-style things) that needs to be fully documented.

CUDA time is ticking. While nVidia offered a helping hand to all those other vendors who wish to implement it (there was this guy porting CUDA to ATI hardware with nVidia backing). The problem is that CUDA is singlely handed by nVidia, and there's no sign they're going to let other major players mess with the specification.

What's more, Apple announced the Grand Central technology in Snow Leopard that harness multicore (GPU or CPU) computing power independently of the hardware the system is using, Microsoft said DX 11 has support for GPGPU, and Khronos is working on OpenCL, which I suppose it will be used on Linux (as well as on OS X). ATI already ditched its CUDA-esque Close to Metal framework in favour of OpenCL and DX11, so it's a matter of time nVidia does the same. All the better for everyone in theory, because we seem to be in the DirectX-OpenGL dichotomy all again.
597
Find And Run Robot / Re: How to view more search results?
« Last post by Lashiec on August 22, 2008, 04:37 PM »
i'm useing "Microsoft YaHei", which is the default font of Windows Vista(simplified Chinese)

Aha, thanks. The Chinese get all the best things :D

Using Microsoft Yahei font in Windows XP.

Don't worry, I know how to keep a secret ;)
598
Living Room / Re: Odd FF3 Problem... sucking up bandwidth
« Last post by Lashiec on August 22, 2008, 10:56 AM »
Process Explorer is able to show to which servers is Firefox connected, by clicking on "Properties" of the "firefox.exe" process, and going to the "TCP/IP" tab. Still, is weird to see malware only working when Firefox is open, and is not visible in physical form (toolbar, plugin, etc.). Try to disable all addons as well.
599
Living Room / Re: Logitech Customer service, thumbs up! tiny review.
« Last post by Lashiec on August 21, 2008, 02:16 PM »
Yeah, the Logitech guys are pretty nice. I had a similar a problem a couple of months ago with the right left button of my LX710 mouse, so I sent them a quick mail, and they told me they would fix or replace it right away. A few days later, the problem was fixed, and the mouse is ready for some more pixel hunting :)
600
Living Room / Re: Odd FF3 Problem... sucking up bandwidth
« Last post by Lashiec on August 21, 2008, 01:55 PM »
Also, Firefox does call home on startup for various things (checks for addons updates, renew the phishing and malware blacklists, etc.). How much data is being downloaded and during how much time?
Pages: prev1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 95next