topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday November 16, 2025, 2:01 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 183 184 185 186 187 [188] 189 190 191 192 193 ... 310next
4676
Hmmm ... do you really want software randomly downloading unknown software and installing it?
4677
Living Room / Humour - The End of the world
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 07, 2007, 04:52 AM »
Posted today in the Windows Secrets a fun flash animation:

Sensitive types don't click here!
Note this animation contains some naughty language and silly national stereotypes!! If you would find such things offensive this is not for you.

For all sane people Click Here and laugh your socks off!

4678
General Software Discussion / Re: Outlook 2007 - a rant
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 07, 2007, 03:20 AM »
You can go back to Outlook 2003 but it may take a little effort.

Firstly you can export all your email and contacts to Outlook Express and then reimport them into Outlook 2003.

Not sure about other things like calendar though?

Looking at Outlook 2003 File > Import and Export ... there seems to be an option to export to CSV files (and a variety of other file formats) so it may be worth experimenting a bit - just keep a backup of your current PST until you are sure it has all worked.

Edit:

Just checked and you can export contacts and calendar as Excel files. I have tried the export functions and they seem to work OK but I have not tried the import functions. The only problems you may encounter are:

  • The Excel files created by Outlook 2007 may be Excel 2007 format files so you will need to open them in Excel and save them in a format likely to be understood by Outlook 2003 (I'd guess standard XLS format will do it).
  • You may need to manually map field names during export and import to Excel files (read the help files in Outlook for this).
  • Calendar recurring appointments cannot be exported but you can specify a date range. I tried 1/1/1900 to 1/1/2020 and then it basically exported all recurring appointments in the past from the date they were set up and inserted appointments up to 2020 that have not yet occurred. Obviously you wouldn't want to do that but you could do it until the end of the year to make sure you catch all recurring appointments and then they can be setup again manually after importing the XLS file.
4679
Just tried DVDFab 'generic' conversion to produce an AVI (Xvid + MP3) and it seems to work great. You can set fixed bit rates, output sizes, frame rates etc. and is all very easy to use.
4680
I find DVDFab Platinum to be really very useful. It comes with a lifetime of free upgrades (and it is prolifically updated - practically everytime I open the app there is a new version to download).

It rips pretty much anything you throw at it (either to ISO files or to a VIDEO_TS folder) and will resize/bit copy/reduce to main film etc. (even on the fly) and burn a copy of any DVD but also allows recoding for iPods etc and has a generic convert option which produces XvidD plus the original audio format or MP3 audio in the form of an AVI file.

I haven't tried the generic conversion but the rest of the app is excellent and remarkably quick.

I have attached a couple of screen shots so you can see what is there but I suggest you donwload the trial from

www.dvdfab.com

the only drawback is  that it is now $50 - but it really is a pretty much one click automated app that works brilliantly and the speed of development makes the price tag quite cheap.

sc1.gif

sc2.gif

sc.gif
4681
General Software Discussion / Re: Outlook 2007 - a rant
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 02:03 PM »
Why? Well, it took some digging to find out, but apparently MS, in its infinite wisdom, decided to stop using the IE HTML engine to render Outlook emails. Now Outlook 2007 uses....MS Word's HTML engine. Really.

The infinite wisdom presumably came from the constant criticism in the past of ActiveX/Java based viruses arriving in emails because of the holes in IE's rendering engine.

Trouble is using Word is just shooting themselves in the foot big time. Maybe someone should suggest Firefox - or allow users to choose the rendering engine. It is, after all, rather reinventing the wheel when most people will have multiple engines installed already!!

Anyway, thanks for the heads up - I wasn't totally convinced about the upgrade to the ribbon interface but this has finally convinced me to leave it at Office 2003 which works fine.

Not sure about PST backward compatibility but Office 2007 comes in various flavours - some of which don't include Outlook 2007. Why not uninstall Outlook 2007 and go back to Outlook 2003 which should coexist quite happily with the other Office 2007 apps.

Before you do it however I would strongly suggest that you export all mail to Outlook Express from every PST file you have opened in Outlook 2007 because I think they changed the PST format between versions and also your contacts (you can import it back in to Outlook 2003 if you need to).

I'm not sure how you could salvage other data types such as tasks, calendar etc. but you may be able to export them in a CSV file or Excel file.

Whatever you do backup your PST files before messing then at  least you can return to Outlook 2007 if you feel it is causing problems.

IIRC when they gave out the public beta and RC1 and 2 of Office 2007 it didn't install Outlook 2007 because of backward compatibility issues.
4682
General Software Discussion / Re: Share Usb Devices
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 01:45 PM »
That's the sort of thing I was thinking of Hirudin.

For a further choice of such switches see:

http://www.dabs.com/...gorySelectedId=11127

This one looks particularly good value at £12.30 (inc. VAT) and it is USB 2.0 (take care, a lot of the devices are USB1.1 which is 40 times slower):

http://www.dabs.com/...Key=11127,4294956958
4683
General Software Discussion / Re: how to reduce pagefile usage?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 01:39 PM »
Check out Crucial for memory - reasonable prices, 100% compatibility guarantee if you use their system selector system and lifetime no quibble warranty.

If you really want to defrag your pagefile, set it to no paging file, reboot then set your paging file to system manged or whatever your preferences are. Reboot. You then have a fresh paging file system.

Doesn't work I'm afraid - if your system files and MFT are fragmented on the disk you will almost certainly get a fragmented page file. You need to do a boot time defrag to tidy those up, in which case you may as well let it defrag your page file.

Carol, it's been a long time since I messed around with my paging file and I note that at the moment I have a fixed 50 MB (not a typo) custom sized paging file on my Windows and programs partition and a set 2048 MB (this is double my RAM - not sure why I did that) paging file on my documents partition, which is on the same physical drive. I'm off to create a 1536MB paging file on my Windows partition and to remove the paging file on the Documents partition.

1.5 x memory is the MS recommended setting - but they point out that it is less efficient (and less necessary) when you go above 2Gb of physical memory.
4684
General Software Discussion / Re: Share Usb Devices
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 11:01 AM »
Can you not simply scan the A5 negative like any other document and then 'develop' the image in a graphics application? Inverting colours from negative to positive should be an easy one click fix. Then you should be able to use any scanner to do the job.

Hmmm ... just been looking and it isn't non-trivial.

How about the USB hub approach - still cheaper than sharing software.

Failing that you could use Windows to set up a share folder which both compters can access. If you want to make it easy to access you can even assign that folder a drive letter so that it looks like a hard disc in Windows Explorer and is accessed in exactly the same way.

Another alternative is a USB switch that allows you to select which computer has access - but I am not sure how much they would cost.

Having said that - the Intellidriver software (scanner edition) should do what you want for £11.

Why not download it and have a play and buy it is you are happy. There is a demo download at http://www.intellidr...ducts.2.16_Demo.html
4685
General Software Discussion / Re: how to reduce pagefile usage?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 10:47 AM »
Yes - thanks tomos! I defragged my pagefile.sys file and all is well. Using PerfectDisk, this is done on reboot, before windows loads. In the past I've had the pagefile set to a fixed size on a different partition on my notebook harddrive but didn't notice any difference and went back to default (and deleted the partition). WinXP myths, as linked to above by justice seems to suggest that setting the pagefile to its own partition on the same physical drive is a no-no anyway (as Carol implied when she stated "preferably on a differnet physical drive").

That's correct - if you put PAGEFILE on a partition on the same physical hard disc it will actually make your system slower. The best solution is to place PAGEFILE on a separate hard disc altogether - preferably in the first (and therefore fastest) partition - preferably a primary partition (as opposed to a logical partition which can take longer to access).

Set the minumum and maximum pagefile sizes to be 1.5 x memory (upto about 2Gb of memory - after that set it to memory size) and you will avoid the file becoming fragmented with use.

Use a pagefile defragger (I seem to recall SysInternals have a free one) to defragment it - but you should only need to do this once if you are not changing its size.

If you haven't got two physical hard discs then place PageFile.sys on you Windows system partition following the same size and defrag. notes above.
4686
General Software Discussion / Re: Share Usb Devices
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 10:12 AM »
if they have a scanner that cost 350 Pounds,
presumably it's a very good one so  -
sharing would be attractive

Maybe a very good scanner - but you don't need fantastic quality images to put things on eBay. What ever you upload to eBay is going to be downsized to 72dpi and a size that the eBay gurus like.

You only really need a drammatically good quality scanner if you want to produce profession quality copies of photographs - or scan negatives at professional quality (in which case you get a dedicated negative scanner which will cost a lot more than £350).

The second Canon scanner I pointed to has an optical resolution of 9600 x 4800 dpi - which is more than adequate for practically anything most people would want to do and is more than adequate for negatives.
4687
General Software Discussion / Re: Share Usb Devices
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 09:56 AM »
Why on earth would you spend £350 on a scanner ???

There are loads of good scanners out there that will be practically as cheap as buying USB sharing software.

Alternatively buy a couple of really cheap USB hubs and make it easy to unplug the scanner.

Here are some cheap scanners:

Canon Canoscan Lide 25 for £36 (OK this one doesn't do negatives but it is good quality)

Canon 4400F for £58 (and this one does slides and negatives too).

Both prices include VAT.

I love Canon scanners (I have had a 3000F and 3200F since they were first release and have never had any problems with them). They are really easy to use (just press a button on the scanner) and easy to set up (drivers install easily, you can assign the scanner buttons to do what you want).

If you want to see other similar models, including some cheap and cheerful Canon all-in-one solutions (printer, scanner and PictBridge compatible photo printing without a computer), have a look here
4688
General Software Discussion / Re: Share Usb Devices
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 09:39 AM »
The logic of sharing a scanner alludes me.

Sounds painful - I think you mean "eludes me" ;)

Sorry for being a pedant.  :-[
4689
General Software Discussion / Re: Share Usb Devices
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 08:05 AM »
Looks interesting - but not exactly cheap (the first looks like best value but is tied to the computer by its license code).

If you only need this for a single device (eg. a scanner) it is probably more convenient, and possibly cheaper, to buy another device! Printers and Harddisks don't need this anyway as windows can share them anyway.
4690
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Microsoft OneNote 2007
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 05, 2007, 02:44 AM »
Fair enough - nit pick away.  :D

My point still stands though - and if anything is strengthened.

Having said that I am not aware of any software that opens MHT files other than IE ... anyone know of any?
4691
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Microsoft OneNote 2007
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 04, 2007, 05:12 PM »
OneNote 2003 (and I presume 2007) can export to an MHT file (a compiled HTML file). OK that is used by Internet Explorer but I can't see IE disappearing in the foreseeable future. It can also export to a Word .DOC file - and again I think MS Word is going to survive for a little while yet (and even if it doesn't other software such as OpenOffice will read it).

All this talk of proprietary formats is a bit of a red herring - all of the apps for note taking use proprietary formats as far as I can see - the format most guaranteed to survive (IMHO) are those supported by MS (much as I hate to say it). Most of the other companies are small beer compared to MS and would sell out like a flash if MS made them a suitable offer.
4692
Congratulations - a job very well done.

The shelf supports look really neat too - goo idea.

My only concern is it will be completely full within a few months and you will have to start another one ;)
4693
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Microsoft OneNote 2007
« Last post by Carol Haynes on June 01, 2007, 03:42 AM »
You can get more details on the changes here: http://office.micros.../HA100325701033.aspx

Thanks, that is really useful.

The one thing I would like MS to do is remove the link for handwriting and the tablet PC. I understand why it is there but they are trying to sell product rather than support users. They must know that there are loads of other tablets out there that people use daily!
4694
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Microsoft OneNote 2007
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 31, 2007, 07:10 PM »
Nice review - thanks.

Did you use (or anyone else) OneNote 2003? How have things changed in 2007?
4695
Living Room / Re: Microsoft's proposed new user interface
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 31, 2007, 04:34 PM »
They reckon it will be for things like booking theatre tickets and checking in to hotels.

Another example of not talking to people any more ... before long there won't be any real people out there - just a handful of MS employees (probably robots anyway) ....

Brave new world!
4696
So you didn't try again after you long struggle with version 4 ;)

No - the general suggestion seemed to be stick with version 3.5 until version 4 becomes stable. I can't see the point of using software that more or less requires that you stay a generation behind to get a stable product.

Maybe I'll have another try with version 4 now that version 5 is coming out ;)
4697
Don't know - I have a subscription but I unistalled the software a long time ago and would never reinstall after all the problems it caused.
4698
I bet you can configure at least some of these to run in BartPE so that you can run them even if Windows won't start. Difficult if there are no graphics though  :tellme:
4699
Should be good for a laugh - if you like BSODs ...

Agnitum's record on new release versions is so bad anyone would be daft to even try this until at least 6 months after the official release - God know what their betas will be like  :o.
4700
The other thing is that if parts need to be replaced that is fine but the faulty parts should also be returned to the customer - they are theirs after all. They should also be consulted and given a choice of replacement parts and prices.
Pages: prev1 ... 183 184 185 186 187 [188] 189 190 191 192 193 ... 310next