topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 17, 2025, 3:01 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 158 159 160 161 162 [163] 164 165 166 167 168 ... 310next
4051
General Software Discussion / Re: Scott Finnie unimpressed by NOD32 ...
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 06, 2007, 09:56 AM »
I'm just surprised to hear him commenting about Windows software - he quite explicitly said at one point that he was dropping Windows altogether.
4052
Not saying you are dense or anything :-[ but if v. 10 and X1 were bad why get X2 ??? OK it might be better but after two bad versions (even if one was a free prize) I think I'd give up - Oh I did at version 8.

My biggest irritation with Corel is that they release new versions of software for not much reason that I can see - often things get worse version by version and many times you have to learn a completely new interface with each version. Their release of updates and bug fixes are also few and far between and often seem to introduce more new bugs than they fix (and often don't install nicely either).

A classic example of Corel stupidity was a known bug in Painter where saving files in its own native format corrupted the file!! It went on for 3 versions (including all the bug fixes) before they finally sorted it out. Add to that Painter updates demanded you uninstall Painter, reinstall it and then run the updater before running the application - which is just nuts!

Don't even get me started with Corel Linux - which was a joke!

Now they seem to be getting into the Symantec style acquisition game (InterVideo, Metacreations, KPT etc) few of which are actively developed, if at all, but they keep shipping the boxes (even when there are large numbers of bugs).
4053
General Software Discussion / Re: Scott Finnie unimpressed by NOD32 ...
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 06, 2007, 05:12 AM »
Interesting - I thought he had moved exclusively to the Mac these days? That's why I unsubscribed from his newsletters!
4054
General Software Discussion / Re: Free virtualization options
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 05, 2007, 07:16 PM »
Thanks Carol - that's good to know. I'm still reeling a bit over the price. The sticker shock associated with VMWare has me permanently scarred, expecting to pay BIG money for proprietary solutions like this. I may have to download a trial.

At about 1/3 of the price of VMWare I think Parallels is worth a look if you aren't happy with the free solutions.

I can't quite imagine who buys VMWare Workstation any more. It would cost me twice as much as Parallels just to upgrade to version 6. I can see that businesses have a vested interest in staying with a product they are confident in and that offers a good support and licensing model but for small companies and individuals I think VMWare are shooting themselves in the foot and will see their market share diminishing as new free/cheaper products gain a foothold.
4055
General Software Discussion / Re: Free virtualization options
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 05, 2007, 06:33 PM »
Parallels seems to have been available for Windows for the last year or so and is in version 2.

I haven't done much with it yet but I installed it with a trial key with no problems. I downloaded ASPLinux (VM appliance) which started up without problems and I installed Windows XP from the installation CD.

It seems to access USB devices natively but I need to experiment to see how well they work. You can attach physical drives or disc images for CD/DVD drives and floppies.

All seems to work fine.

It is remarkably similar in look and feel to VMware Workstation 5 which I have also - but if anything it seems a bit lighter on resources.
4056
General Software Discussion / Re: Scott Finnie unimpressed by NOD32 ...
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 05, 2007, 04:51 PM »
First impressions after installing NOD32 v. 3 (just the AV) using default settings as an in place upgrade to v. 2.7 is that my system feels a bit less responsive.

The interface is certainly clearer and I like the fact it feels like it was written for Windows rather than some mythical OS but there is still a feeling of feature splatter - it could still do with some decluttering and rationisation (IMHO) and not just an idiots version which doesn't show you much (which is the default setting).
4057
General Software Discussion / Re: Scott Finnie unimpressed by NOD32 ...
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 05, 2007, 04:16 PM »
Thanks, I'll check out the new version
4058
Carol, not to side track here, but I never once thought that you and I would agree on any particular topic. Cheers  :beerchug: ;-)

Eh? Don't we always agree  :Thmbsup:  :eusa_dance:

Carol: (see attachment in previous post)

LOL !! true - very true (but then I did say similar in the first line!)
4059
I agree with you Josh but I don't think it is going to happen.

Personally I think a good compromise solution would be for Linux distributions to be clearly aimed at specific applications, for example Workstation, Software developer, Server etc., but within those categories aim for consistency between distributions - ie. use same folder structures, have a common approach to software installation and removal. Where they could diverge is the choice of software installed automatically but at least anyone using a particular type of Linux distribution (say workstation) would have a common starting point. It would also be really useful if a common installation system could be developed so that all distributions use the best of the installers out there and make it easier to install and troubleshoot installation problems because the process is common to all distributions (at least in terms of interface, vocabulary). Finally a removal of geek speak from the whole process would make Linux inifintely more attractive to the majority non-geek market.

This would all save large groups of people constantly 'reinventing the wheel' too as each distro type has largely the same aims!
4060
General Software Discussion / Re: Free virtualization options
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 04, 2007, 07:13 PM »
Not free but looks interesting (and a lot cheaper than VMWare Workstation). Has anyone tried http://www.parallels...roducts/workstation/ ?
4061
General Software Discussion / Re: Which MP3 tagger do you use?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 04, 2007, 06:07 PM »
Carol, can't you add a poll with multiple options? :)

Done - you can vote for as many as you like.

If people come up with different apps/methods I will add them to the choice list.
4062
I think they would make a really nice OS..

And then would come the dawn of built-in-desktop advertising.

Free programs for your pc, but your desktop background wallpaper, screensavers, and toolbars, would all be full of ads.

No thank you.

A bit like Windows desktops on new pre-installed systems ...
4063
General Software Discussion / Re: Which MP3 tagger do you use?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 04, 2007, 03:13 PM »
MP3Tag
4064
Actually I don't think the file format has changed from 2.1 to 2.2 - I updated to the beta, then downgraded back to version 2.1 and then upgraded again to 2.2 and it didn't affect my database!
4065
The Getting Organized Experiment of 2007 / Re: Here is my problem
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 03, 2007, 02:28 PM »
Sounds like me too ... lots of good ideas but no umph to get them done!
4066
Now available - just hit check for update in the help menu.

For anyone who wants to buy Evernote 2.2:

Users of the free version of EverNote can buy EverNote until November 30th, 2007 for only $19.95, a 60% discount!

Buy EverNote for only $19.95.

You can also follow this link to download the free version of EverNote 2.2, which includes all advanced features for 60 days. After 60 days, advanced features will become disabled, but can be re-enabled by purchasing the product.

Not sure if you need to download the free version first and register it or if this is open to all.

There is also a similar discount in the Member Discount section - it says it is for 2.1 and an open ended discount. I don't know for sure if it applies to 2.2 but I presume so. [Edit - DC discounts no longer seems to work it links to a page with a price of $49.95]
4067
Developer's Corner / Re: Was My Posting To The Adobe Forum Stupid?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on November 01, 2007, 07:27 PM »
Other people have said it - keep it short and clear what you want. More than 6 lines and no one is going to read it.

See http://www.adobe.com...rums/guidelines.html for some hints too.

Did you know you can also access the Adobe forums via usenet at news://forums.adobe.com (sorry you can't use links to usenet in BBCode - just copy the address to your browser or simply create an account in your NNTP reader, such as Outlook Express if you don't have one, with the server name fourms.adobe.com). They don't have all the forums on there any more (they used to) and seem to prefix everything with macromedia (which is very strange since macromedia no longer exist). I haven't used it for a long time but you used to have to log on to the usenet server with the same username and password as your web forums. I have to say when I bothered with Adobe Forums (which I don't any more) I found the usenet approach much quicker and easier to deal with.
4068
Towards the bottom of the Radsoft page quoted above it says:

Eraser is a well-received product, and it's free (mostly) but it's only a shredder and doesn't take care of your Registry or anything else like that. E3, found here, does it all. And most importantly it's flexible: you create your own 'recipes' ad hoc to deal with new projects. You get an impressive array of prefab recipes, but the system is built so it's easy to make new recipes of your own.

Guess who sells E3? And guess what - E3 is $30 MORE expensive than EE. Here is a quote from the product tour:

But things go up and down, and so it was with Windows. From the zenith of Cutler's new incarnation of VMS we now have Windows XP, the worst of the bad, a directly user-hostile system with no good features and an endless stream of dangers, and its successor's already proven to be more bother than anything.

...

If you are still running a Windows box, give this collection some serious thought. Running Windows without it is a task too impossible to consider.

See: http://www.radsoft.n.../products/tours/xpt/

Now who is hyping their product (which by the way was apparently ported from Unix - which tends to suggest a lot of the criticisms he lays at EE's door could probably be applied elsewhere too).

To me the whole page is pure marketing hype based on the 'ignorance' and 'fear' model so beloved of web security scams and modern politicians.

OK, let's face it, EE is crapware and should IMHO be ignored and deplored - especially as they market it on the back of pornography that could result in prison sentences. Personally I think anyone who needs EE for its intended purpose deserves all they get.

On the EE product page it says:

Did you know...   that the government and police are installing black boxes in ISPs to record your Internet surfing and downloads for evidence?

If that is the case how does EE do anything to help? In fact what they are saying is EE is totally pointless because your ISP can submit all the evidence required to get you convicted!

Maybe I changed my mind - let's all promote EE as widely as possible that way paedophiles will think they are safe .... until the cops turn up and they spend the rest of their lives living with the consequences.

Re. Credit Card theft - I have had two credit cards compromised. Apparently one of them was by a disgruntled employee of a company who stole the credit card database before they were fired. The other I never did fid out how it happened but I scanned my system and found no malware and my new card wasn't compromised using the same system. I think most of this kind of fraud happens because companies have their security compromised from the outside (like a large well known retailer admitted a while ago when they had a large number of sets of card details compromised) and the other likely reason is because an employee is dishonest. It isn't hard to imagine when you pay for something by phone or, until chip and pin became common, in shops that an employee can note down the details.

The banks are to blame too - there is a simple solution to mail order/internet/'customer not present' type credit card fraud - only allow the products to be delivered to the address registered at the bank. It is easy to enforce by making the supplier directly responsible for the financial loss if they don't do that rather than the bank issuing a refund. If you want to give gifts that are delivered to another address find an alternative payment method (such as PayPal which verifies the card holder address by sending a code via the card statement).
4069
A bit of light at the end of the Outlook tunnel!!! (Sorry guys I'll shut up about Outlook soon but it is intimately tied up with desktop search engines for me.).

I dropped an email to the developers of Neo Pro and got a response within a couple of hours (pretty good). The upshot is that they have not experienced Neo corrupting PST files but agreed that the MAPI interface may be the source of the problem. Their suggestion was to exit Outlook and then run the utility FIXMAPI.EXE (on my system there are copies in C:\WINDOWS\system32 and C:\WINDOWS\system32\dllcache) and finally reboot.

FIXMAPI doesn't appear to do anything (and I'd never heard of it before) but having done as they suggested I can now pound away at my PST file within Outlook and within Neo with no errors cropping up in the PST file as a result.

This is a bit of a result for me.

Regarding slugish behaviour - I used to experience that in Outlook XP but I don't experience it in Outlook 2003. Similarly I used to experience freezes when it downloaded email in Outlook XP but the only time I occasionally experience problems in Outlook 2003 is when I sync Hotmail folders (which I now do rarely). Maybe it would be worth your while uninstalling Outlook completely and reinstalling it again (your plugins, data and settings are retained).

The other approach is to reduce the size of your mail files - probably a good idea anyway for data security purposes. You can archive off emails using dates as a criteria and then have Outlook open multiple PST files so all your data is still instantly available and searchable but your active PST file (with the current Inbox) can be kept small.

I must admit I have spent part of today playing with Thunderbird and with a few addins (esp. Lightning) it is really quite usable as a calendar and task manager - and can do something Outlook doesn't - it can display Tasks in the calendar. The major drawback of Thunderbird for me is the lack of a simple method to archive your old emails and still easily access them within Thunderbird. It does integrate quite nicely with POPfile (you can display the extra header fields POPfile generates using an addin which means you can process POPfile (re)classification quickly from within Thunderbird). There are addins to to access Hotmail and Yahoo mail (and others) via POP which seem to work pretty well (although fiddly and unintuitive to set up). It has sensible methods for dealing with images in HTML mail so that you can trust mail for a single email or from a spefic address. Thunderbird's rules are adequate (though not as comprehensive as Outlook). All in all if you need a free email client Thunderbird is pretty darn good.

Strangely the calendar is supposed to import Outlook calendars as CSV files but I'm damned if I can get it to work.

Here are the extensions I was using:

sc.png

For anyone that isn't aware Thunderbird gives USENET access and can be set as the default system news reader. I must admit I found the interface for the usenet reader rather clunky and a bit disorganised and confusing.

It also icludes an RSS reader too.
4070
The main problem (which is why I think I rejected it last time) is the lack of export options. The help pages make some suggestions (such as installing Netscape and moving all your mail to Netscape and then to Outlook Express - which is cumbersome to say the least) and there are a couple of commercial apps that can archive stuff - but there don't seem to be any addins to archive or move mail out of Thunderbird (the KB suggests one but the page pointed to is a dead link and searching extensions for the name yields nothing useful).
4071
The ONLY reason I migrated from Outlook to Thunderbird + Lightning is this: there is no proprietary format; everything is stored in plain text files, exactly as the email was received.  Just like the good old unix days.

How are HTML emails and attachments stored in Thunderbird? How can you archive off older email to stop folders becoming unmanageable - are there tools built in to do it?
4072
Is ScanPST a Microsoft or a 3rd-party tool, Carol?

ScanPST is installed as part of all versions of Outlook (though until v. 2003 it wasn't at all obvious as it was in a hidden folder and the help files simply referred to the "Inbox Repair Tool" without telling you how to find it!).

Strangely Outlook 2003 has two PST file formats - the old version (compatible with Outlook 2000/XP) and a new version. The new version is designed to overcome the problems of file size (the old version was unofficially limited to 2Gb - bigger than that and you started to get real problems). The trouble is that even Microsoft state that the new format is more prone to corruption (WTF!!!)

The problem is that Outlook doesn't seem to do any sort of consistency check at all on opening the file or on closing it. It strikes me that the design of the file structure is the cause for the problems as it is so slow to check validity and a major worry about data security and integrity. Email archives are some of the most important data files on my system and I worry that one day I will try to open an archive only for me to experience the problems frequently described on the MS usenet groups.

I know you went through the excercise of looking at other e-mail clients, only to come back to Outlook.  But if you're ultimately worried about Outlook's long-term integrity, is is worth reconsidering?

Trouble is that Outlook is more than just an email client and I use it a lot. Also if Outlook has file problems that go unnoticed how do we know that other apps don't too? At least if my PST file gets corrupted there are hundreds of companies out there that will help to solve the problem - most of the other apps you are stuck with support from one company (and the hope that it stays in business).

I suspect the best solution is to use automated backups very regularly - but it would be much simpler if Outlook simply worked properly!
4073
General Software Discussion / Re: You MUST See the Price for this Software
« Last post by Carol Haynes on October 31, 2007, 04:14 AM »
Actually it is an interesting idea ... a possible corollary of the 'pay what you want' approach could be that you provide a copy at that price but users would have to decide if each future update/version is worth a further purchase rather than the current model where most users assume that if they buy something they are entitled to updates (at least for a period of time if not forever).

The upshot would be that if you have a product the users value and use a lot you may generate a small but steady flow of funds and in the long run do rather better than a fixed price for a few sales and then work for nothing to keep improving the package.
4074
I am using Windows XP SP2/Outlook 2003 SP2 and Neo 3 (there is a 30 day trieal of Neo Pro and also freebie version at http://www.caelo.com...roducts/download.php). Would some kind soul download and try this with Outlook 2003 and then check their PST files with SCANPST after each use?

I don't have the time to check this tonight, but I might try in a few days...
I must say that when I use scanpst, it will show me errors half of the time. Outlook doesn't seem to have any problems with these errors though... For now, I've decided to accept these errors as an MS feature. These PST files always have errors. AS long as they show all my data...

Have your PST files shown any signs of data corruption? Or is it just scanpst showing errors?

It just seems to be when I run ScanPST. However I don't know if any data has been lost because some of the files I am using have so much content that without keeping a catalogue there is no way I can tell.

The problem is that Outlook doesn't seem to do any sort of consistency check at all on opening the file or on closing it. It strikes me that the design of the file structure is the cause for the problems as it is so slow to check validity and a major worry about data security and integrity. Email archives are some of the most important data files on my system and I worry that one day I will try to open an archive only for me to experience the problems frequently described on the MS usenet groups.

ScanPST is the only mechanism to check file integrity and its fixing methods are notoriously brutal to data - if there is a problem it just chops out the problem region of the file. The reporting of ScanPST is so cryptic it is almost impossible to know what it has actually done.

OK I know I can keep backups but I like to feel that using an application on a day to day basis isn't going to trash my data!

Out of curiosity how do you have Outlook set up (version, service pack version and extra plugins or apps that interact with Outlook, desktop search utility and how it is set up WRT Outlook).

If you do get a chance to try out Neo it would be really useful as if you experience the same problem as me I have some evidence to support a bug/issue report.
4075
The more I read this thread the more convinced I am that there is still scope out there for the killer app - none of the existing solutions come close to ideal in my experience.

As I've said before Outlook is my biggest bug bear. None of the apps really handle Outlook PST files well - and surely finding a missing email is one of the most common uses for this sort of search.

I have reported problems with X1 corrupting PST files but I am slowly coming to the conclusion that the fault actually lies with the Microsoft API for accessing Outlook data via Outlook. A number of apps that I have tried consistently leave PST files with 'errors' or 'minor inconsistencies' when you run SCANPST.

I don't believe they all have bugs in this respect and anyway they should only be reading from the files - how can reading a file corrupt it? It's like saying you need a pen to read a novel!

Interestingly my recent experiments with PST files haven't lost data but the repaired files are actually larger than the files with errors (it is simple to compare the original PST which SCANPST simply retains with a .BAK extension). Each time stuff is added to the end of the damaged file to make it consistent. It is almost as if Outlook can't close the file properly when other applications have finished accessing the data.

My latest frustration with with Neo Pro - an addin for Outlook that allows you to use an alternative 'workflow' (I hate that word) to normal Outlook usage - it also indexes all of the PST files in catalogues so that it can search your data really quickly. I set Neo so that it doesn't open unless I click on the toolbar icon and bam as soon as I open Neo it updates its index and the PST files involved show inconsistencies and errors.

If I don't use any other apps with Outlook then all is fine.

Anyone else experience any of this?

I am using Windows XP SP2/Outlook 2003 SP2 and Neo 3 (there is a 30 day trieal of Neo Pro and also freebie version at http://www.caelo.com...roducts/download.php). Would some kind soul download and try this with Outlook 2003 and then check their PST files with SCANPST after each use?

Cheers
Pages: prev1 ... 158 159 160 161 162 [163] 164 165 166 167 168 ... 310next