topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 3:00 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 [1500] 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 ... 1515next
37476
i think we will have more coders joining us for this game, so people start thinking of ideas!
37477
General Review Discussion / Years on awards?
« Last post by mouser on April 25, 2005, 04:54 AM »
should we put the current Year on the award images? ie not simply "Best Text Editor" but "Best Text Editor - 2005" etc.
in anticipation that the choices may change over time.
37478
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 25, 2005, 04:51 AM »
i think what we will try to do from now on, is try make the review available a couple of days ahead of time to members of the elite ASRT members, for early comment and review.

this would avoid the scenario just experienced where one of the members on this forum knows better than the reviewer of a flaw in a program or error in the review, and let us fix these things before the review goes public.
37479
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 25, 2005, 02:57 AM »
37480
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 25, 2005, 02:49 AM »
i've updated the review and withdrawn our recommendation of pspad - this is simply too big a problem and disqualifies PSPad from a recommendation.

i'll make a post on pspad forum; im sure they know about it but its worth mentioning to them again.
37481
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 25, 2005, 02:36 AM »
WOW
word wrapping it totally F*CKED in pspad.

yipes this sucks
i think i'm going to have to modify the review.
this is not acceptable.

its totally brought the program to a halt and also doesnt work right.
what a shame.
37482
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 25, 2005, 02:29 AM »
i should probably add info to the list of editors regarding which ones are actively developed and have active forums.
let me check performance with word wrap, that would be something really worth mentioning.
37483
General Software Discussion / Re: software i love
« Last post by mouser on April 25, 2005, 12:50 AM »
i sounds like it might be useful to have a review on these dir sync apps, to the extent that they have a different function than beyond compare.
37484
thanks atom, i will fix that .ini issue and try to fix the icon behavior.
probably the default browser icon detection is also related to short file name.. i will try to fix a way to fix it.

these reports are very useful to me, thank you.
37485
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 24, 2005, 06:15 PM »
I've updated the review to indicate that EditPlus has a column mode.

to me column mode is a really important feature and it's presence, or lack of, separates the top tier editors from the rest, so i apologize for missing it.  it is well hidden though.

EditPlus is indeed a nice editor.

In a way it's hard to do a review like this, focusing on a "best", when you have some very close contenders - the winner gets all the attention while the others get barely a mention.  i did try this time to be really clear about the fact that differences were not that great, and tried to list most of the serious text editors i could find, to give them some exposure.

For some reviews, like website watcher, it's easy to pick a clearly best app.  for something like text editor, it's much much harder, and personal tastes or small featureset differences could easily sway a particular person to prefer one over the other.  On the other hand, i still think there is value in choosing one app to focus on and making a recommendation in favor of it.

But perhaps in cases where things are so tight, we should consider some kind of symbol to indicate when an alternative program should really be considered.  It's a catch-22 really, if i only list the top 3 alternative apps, people get sad that their favorite app isn't listed. But if i list a large number of alternatives, then it's hard to separate the 2nd best from the wanne bes.

That's why for text editor i tried to list for each one it's implementation of those features i consider most important, in hopes that it would help people to more quickly filter out candidates.

The other thing is that these reviews/awards can sometimes be more about the general subject of task then the app.  90% of the text editor review could really be viewed as "Text Editors: What They Do and What Features To Look For", and written in a way that was agnostic about the actual tool; many of the features that are talked about in the center of the review are in fact features shared by most editors.. and then only at the end recommending UltraEdit.

It may be something to think about whether the weekly reviews wouldn't be better suited if they were done more like guides, with a final recommendation of best app, but not so focused on the winner throughout..  Although it does make it a little harder to discuss feature sets in general.
37486
on 4/30 there will be no software review/award, instead we will our first 2-5 hour coding contest/game, as described in separate thread.
37487
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 24, 2005, 08:28 AM »
very good point about the forum; i will add that to the review, as that is an important aspect to choosing a program.
37488
Best Text Editor / Re: UltraEdit 11 - Best text editor?
« Last post by mouser on April 24, 2005, 08:19 AM »
great post sentinel; nice to hear some other aspects of ultraedit that i didn't mention.

have you tried slickedit yet?  slickedit and multi-edit seem like they are going after the same audience; both are very expensive though.

ultraedit studio looks extremely interesting.
here's a little easter egg of sorts.  in the ultraedit help file, search for compiler.  you'll find some fascinating pages there that look like that are the begining of ultraedit studio help file and configuration dialogs.  really looks like its going to have very good compiler support.  as a c++ compiler junkie that sounds like heaven to me.

the surprise for me in this weeks review was how full featured this freeware pspad was.. i did not expect that.
37489
Best Text Editor / Re: Pre-review discussion of "BEST TEXT EDITOR"
« Last post by mouser on April 23, 2005, 11:47 PM »
The review is now up.  thank you all for your insights.  I'm moving this into the text editor review section where we can continue our discussion.  As in past reviews I will adjust the review based on feedback if you think i've missed something or gotten something wrong.  If you happen to be in contact with any of the authors of the programs mentioned, please invite them to post.
37490
I love it!!!!

dnm, if you'd like webspace to host the utility and a little forum section, i'd be happy to make it available for you.

wouldn't it be great if we could get a bunch of authors to play this 2-5 hour coding game?
37491
Best Text Editor / Re: Pre-review discussion of "BEST TEXT EDITOR"
« Last post by mouser on April 23, 2005, 10:13 PM »
great points zridling
actually i already have those other 3 mentioned, and i already covered everything in your points except i forgot to mention moving tabs order.
and i think i will add something about using a dedicated programming editor like slickedit.
37492
lol,
are you sorry because it qualifies?  ;D
37493
i suppose it would be helpful if ideas were vetted by a programmer regarding whether they meet the qualifications of the contest..
analysis of this idea:
this could be created in 2-5 hours, so it qualifies as a valid submission.
37494
Best Text Editor / Re: Pre-review discussion of "BEST TEXT EDITOR"
« Last post by mouser on April 23, 2005, 03:51 PM »
a few more for consideration:

http://www.crimsoneditor.com - CrimsonEditor (free)
http://www.vim.org - Vim for Windows
http://www.context.cx - ConTEXT (free)
http://www.emeditor.com - EmEditor
http://www.alentum.com/editpro/index.htm - EditPro
http://www.pspad.com/en - PsPad

opinions wanted..
37495
Best Text Editor / Re: Pre-review discussion of "BEST TEXT EDITOR"
« Last post by mouser on April 23, 2005, 10:06 AM »
good, keep the suggestions coming.

notepad++ is based on scintilla which is also used in scite:
http://scintilla.sou...forge.net/SciTE.html
37496
Best Text Editor / Pre-review discussion of "BEST TEXT EDITOR"
« Last post by mouser on April 23, 2005, 08:49 AM »
ok, ftp servers are going to be done in a future week.

this week's review will be BEST TEXT EDITOR.

Some candidates:
 ulraedit, http://www.ultraedit.com
 notetab, http://www.notetab.com
 textpad, http://www.textpad.com
 editpad, http://www.editpadpro.com
 metapad, http://www.liquidninja.com/metapad

other free and open source text editor favorite suggestions are desired..
37497
Mouser's Zone / Re: launcher tool
« Last post by mouser on April 22, 2005, 04:43 AM »
well good drag and drop support is one of the things i want to do.
drag new app onto empty space on bar, it adds it.
drag doc onto button, it launches with button.

i think true launch bar can do this, and even the quick launch bar that comes with windows can do this i think.

the main feature i rely on is easy ability to design a nested hierarchy of buttons with submenus; thats the main thing lacking in quick launch bar.
37498
General Software Discussion / Re: RK Launcher
« Last post by mouser on April 22, 2005, 04:23 AM »
btw i love how you posted zero3k, short description, pictures, then links and license.  that's a good model for us all to follow.
37499
Official DonationCoder.com Reviews / Re: Reviews content suggestion
« Last post by mouser on April 22, 2005, 02:27 AM »
there can be no doubt that ricnaff's comments and suggests are 100% on the money, and as zridling says, the only issue here is really the time required to get this done right.. we will endeavor to improve this and try to come closer to this ideal.  it will make a big difference if we can eventually build a "team" of reviewers, such that each review has a longer lead time between start date and deadline for publishing.

the other way i want to address this issue is to make the forum section for each review much more of an integral part of what is considered the review.  ie. one should think of the review and its forum discussion section and 2 parts of the same thing.  you read the review for the summary opinion and then you click to visit the forum section where you might hear dissenting views and maybe some users can help fill in some of the details that would be useful to have about other apps.

it takes time to build up an active forum.. we are getting there, and i think over time the forums will grow in value and become a real asset to the reviews; they've already been a great help to me.  as we get more participation from people prior to and after the reviews, i think they will begin to provide the kind of information that ric rightly says would be useful.
37500
what might be most fun would be simple little single-player games that dont involve much in the way of graphics
Pages: prev1 ... 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 [1500] 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 ... 1515next