topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday June 9, 2025, 2:02 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 ... 438next
3151
General Software Discussion / Re: Teamviewer mobile support
« Last post by Renegade on July 18, 2013, 10:43 PM »
Thanks for the heads up. I've used the PC version before, and it's really good.
3152
General Software Discussion / Re: Swapping Out Software?
« Last post by Renegade on July 18, 2013, 10:03 PM »
Should clarify - that cloud is a bad idea for users there above - for authentication, etc.

It *can* make sense for *content* storage, though that's still up for debate. If we lived in a sane world and cloud services were run in the best interests of the customers, then I'd be all for it.
3153
General Software Discussion / Re: Swapping Out Software?
« Last post by Renegade on July 18, 2013, 10:00 PM »
The cloud is simply a bad idea. Period. Ahem... Snowden... surveillance... etc.

Agree that how it's implemented is usually bad. But Adobe's cloud is mainly a way to distribute their software and have a subscription based sales model. You only need to connect to the web about every 30-60 days to get an authorization token. The apps themselves get downloaded and run on your local machine. It works pretty much the way Steam does - except it's not quite as obnoxious about the web connection as Steam sometime is.

...

Don't get me wrong. I'm a shrinkwrap bigot. And I'm nothing near being sold on cloud anything. I just handed a client over to another provider because I think they're making a big mistake (in this particular case) on insisting on going over to a fully cloud-based solution. But it's their call. And much as I hate to lose a client, I'll still refuse to sell somebody a broken solution.


Heheeh! I think we share the same bigotry there. :D

But, back to cloud... It's still completely idiotic for users.

If the functionality doesn't require network connectivity, then there should be no network connectivity. An initial license authentication over the network is plenty enough, and even then that isn't ever necessary. I mean that literally - it is NEVER necessary. Necessary that is... "Desirable" is another matter. i.e. You can read from a machine that is not connected and authenticate on a connected machine, but that's a PITA, so an initial authentication over the network is desirable.

Next thing you know, you'll need to have your car, fridge, TV, radio, etc., all connected so that you can be checked on to see that you really own your own stuff.

I've decided that my next machine will be a server. It will run a Virtual Environment (VE) with VMs running inside. No more OS bare on the metal nonsense. I'm just sick of it. (That's also when I plan on shifting to Linux as my primary OS.)
3154
General Software Discussion / Re: Swapping Out Software?
« Last post by Renegade on July 18, 2013, 12:11 PM »
This, in a nutshell, is the never ending cycle of business.

While I agree that moving to the cloud is a mistake, I think we get there for different reasons.

Time will tell if Adobe called it right with this one. FWIW, when it comes to CSS, I think they did. 8)

I think you're wrong there. The cloud is simply a bad idea. Period. Ahem... Snowden... surveillance... etc. etc.

I remember over a decade ago having documents come across my desk and thinking that it was a really, really bad idea. I think my gut reaction then has been vindicated.

Now, pricing your product out of reach of hobbyists/amateurs is one thing, but pricing it into the cloud for pros... yeah... not really "feeling" that here.

Give me a way to put MY data on MY server, then OK. But putting my data on YOUR servers? Thanks, but no thanks.

When I worked at ESTsoft, they had the right idea for ALPass. It was bang on 110% right.

ALPass encrypted everything client-side and uploaded it to the server. That is, if you wanted to - it wasn't mandatory.

The fallout was that if you screwed up, there was ZERO way to recover your data. YOU were responsible for it. YOU needed to remember your master password. If you forgot, you were screwed.

However, I had the advantage of knowing all of that from working inside the company, knowing the developers, and knowing everyone involved in the process. Microsoft pledges that they do that kind of thing, but it's just another lie.

However, that's going way off topic.

Swapping out stuff... CS > GIMP & Inkscape as far as I can see there. For InDesign... I'm not sure about a replacement there, but I don't use it enough to care.
3155
Unfortunately, I don't speak German, and was unable to read the article.

Oh... I just take for granted translation.  :-[


And that's why I don't use machine translation unless absolutely necessary. :)

I do like that he's come out against the surveillance, but, I can't say more about him. ;) (Dept. of Ed. is... ↓)
3156
As a quick hack, try a proxy server. They usually work.
3157
No love for JC?  The most honest president we've had in the last half-century gets no respect.

(And 10 good things he did, even in spite of the propaganda about him as a president)

Unfortunately, I don't speak German, and was unable to read the article.

Being illiterate sucks. :(

But for that "10 top" thing... it goes wildly off-topic from this thread, so would probably be better in the Basement. (I have nothing polite to say about #2.)
3158
General Software Discussion / Re: Swapping Out Software?
« Last post by Renegade on July 18, 2013, 08:59 AM »
If Adobe doesn't amend its cloud-only subscription policy I'll be switching from Creative Suite to the first competitor to include the features that I want (I suspect that will take a while to occur).
-cranioscopical (July 18, 2013, 08:45 AM)

That's a good example.

I've come to the conclusion that I'm willing to deal with fewer features and less functionality and a bit of a learning curve *IF* I can switch to a GPL or FLOSS program. I've got CS5, but will never upgrade beyond that. For cloud stuff, I'm absolutely not interested in the least unless I can run it on my own servers.

That's a hard thing to do- especially with software that others use that you depend on, like skype.  It's just a slow process... I mean, look at the adoption of word and how long it took (is taking) to get people to see alternatives.

Yup. I don't ever plan on buying any cloud office silliness, and fully plan on moving to Libre Office once I have time to finish testing some specific functionality that I need. Almost there...
 
3159
I can imagine if it does happen, that the little transmitter will have to be well hidden, otherwise it will be a target of annoyed commuters, bored youth, and of course, anarchists.

Anarchists?!?!? Ahem... ;)


That's a pretty diverse set of sites for anarchists. (Or voluntaryists if you prefer that term - same diff.) They are all very, very different. For a quick view of the variety, check out Casey Research, Tragedy and Hope, The Corbett Report, Zero Hedge, and Free Domain Radio.

You'll be treated to an information banquet on history, economics, news, philosophy, and much more.

Oh, and I'd be remiss if I neglected to list this site that belongs to a staunch anarchist that a few people here at DC may know...

http://cynic.me/

;)

Guess this is as good a time as any to come out of the closet. :P

For more information about anarchism, see this wiki on voluntaryism:

http://wiki.mises.or...le_of_non-aggression

:D

3160
Living Room / Re: Microsoft responds to NSA allegations
« Last post by Renegade on July 18, 2013, 08:38 AM »
@Vurbal - easily one of the best analyses ever posted here. Hope you do it some more. :Thmbsup:

+1 - That was excellent! :D

Now... MOAR~! :D  :Thmbsup:
3161
I would have thought though, that if you disagreed with the content of the article, that you could say that here. In this thread. All of this about the site - while I can very much relate to it, and find it nice and juicy - and sure, it gives us context - but it's irrelevant in terms of rebutting the content of the article.
What you're doing doesnt seem to me that different from someone looking at, say, a libertarian site, and saying - oh, look, they're libertarians - everything they say is dodgy biased propoganda.

I can be much softer that way. I went on a bit about 2 things in the article, but I'm simply not going to post more about it here. (Mostly here) I'd rather simply stick to lobbing slow softballs, cracking jokes, and ridiculing articles/sites/authors/etc. That way I can avoid anything religious/political and still have some fun. :D
3162
if you sort of step back from the situation and then look at it again, it's pretty much hysterically funny.

Hardly. I live here. I'm not laughing.


That's what I meant by "step back".

It reminds me of "Paranoia", an RPG from way back in 1984 (seriously). Great game. The games master can make up the rules as he goes because it's illegal for "citizens" to know the rules. It's still in print.

http://www.mongoosep...m/rpgs/paranoia.html

https://en.wikipedia...a_(role-playing_game)

Overview

Paranoia is a humorous role-playing game set in a dystopian future similar to Nineteen Eighty-Four, Brave New World, Logan's Run and THX 1138 among others; however, the tone of the game is rife with black humor, frequently tongue-in-cheek rather than dark and heavy.

Setting

The game's main setting is an immense and futuristic city called Alpha Complex, which is controlled by The Computer, a civil service AI construct (a literal realization of the "Influencing Machine" that some schizophrenics fear). The Computer serves as the game's principal antagonist, and fears a number of threats to its 'perfect' society, such as The Outdoors, mutants, and secret societies (especially Communists). To deal with these threats, The Computer employs Troubleshooters, whose job is to go out, find trouble, and shoot it. Player characters are usually Troubleshooters, although later game supplements have allowed the players to take on other roles.

The player characters frequently receive mission instructions from the Computer that are incomprehensible, self-contradictory, or obviously fatal if adhered to, and side-missions which conflict the main mission. They are issued equipment that is uniformly dangerous, faulty or "experimental" (i.e. almost certainly dangerous and faulty). Additionally, each player character is generally an unregistered mutant and a secret society member, and has a hidden agenda separate from the group's goals, often involving stealing from or killing teammates. Thus, missions often turn into a comedy of errors, as everyone on the team seeks to double-cross everyone else while keeping their own secrets. The game's manual encourages suspicion between players, offering several tips on how to make the gameplay as paranoid as possible.

Every player's character is assigned six clones, known as a "six-pack," which are used to replace the preceding clone upon his or her death. The game lacks a conventional health system; most wounds the player characters can suffer are assumed to be fatal. As a result, Paranoia allows characters to be routinely killed, yet the player can continue instead of leaving the game. This easy spending of clones tends to lead to frequent firefights, gruesome slapstick, and the horrible yet humorous demise of most if not all of the player character's clone family. Additional clones can be purchased if one gains sufficient favour with the Computer.

The Paranoia rulebook is unusual in a number of ways; demonstrating any knowledge of the rules is forbidden, and most of the rulebook is written in an easy, conversational tone that often makes fun of the players and their characters, while occasionally taking digs at other notable role-playing games.



If you've ever read the Paranoia rule book, it's HILARIOUS! Completely black humour.

The seriously dark side is that we are literally heading directly towards that kind of dystopian nightmare. If you read the above on the setting, you'll see some seriously dark parallels with today.

  • ** demonstrating any knowledge of the rules is forbidden >> Secret courts, laws that nobody can know until they are passed, and laws that nobody is allowed to know the content of.
  • ** They are issued equipment that is uniformly dangerous, faulty or "experimental" >> Same things goes on at the FDA with drugs that aren't tested for safety and GMOs.
  • ** The game's main setting is an immense and futuristic city called Alpha Complex, which is controlled by The Computer >> "controlled by The Computer" - nuff said. ;)
  • ** Additionally, each player character is generally an unregistered mutant and a secret society member >> Those are all illegal and subject to summary execution in Paranoia. This is reflected in reality in the book "Three Felonies a Day". i.e. Everyone is a criminal.
  • ** Additional clones can be purchased if one gains sufficient favour with the Computer. >> Does this sound anything like the revolving doors between lobbyists, corporations, and federal appointments? The FDA and US Supreme Court are great examples.


WELCOME TO ALPHA COMPLEX~! :P
3163
General Software Discussion / Swapping Out Software?
« Last post by Renegade on July 18, 2013, 04:58 AM »
Has anyone recently abandoned any software in favour of another piece of software?

I'm in the SLLLLOOOOOOOWWWWWW process of swapping out Skype in favour of Jitsi for obvious reasons. But, I figure that it's a kind of generic process for one reason or another, and figured that it might be interesting to see what people are using now.

With Jitsi, it's a matter of convincing people to stop using Skype, get Jitsi and an XMPP account. Not easy. I'm still using Skype more than Jitsi, which is frustrating as there are a number of things I'd like to talk to a few people about, but... need them on board as well.

So? Anyone?
3164
I was closing tabs when I noticed something in the LawFareBlog page...

Inconvenient!
Screenshot - 7_18_2013 , 4_54_26 PM.png

The inconvenient evidence:

WHICH PATH TO PERSIA?
Options for a New American
Strategy toward Iran

* 06_iran_strategy.pdf (1202.37 kB - downloaded 217 times.)

Table of Contents:

Introduction
The Trouble with Tehran: U.S. Policy Options toward Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.
Part I
Dissuading Tehran: The Diplomatic Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Chapter 1: An Offer Iran Shouldn’t Refuse: Persuasion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Chapter 2: Tempting Tehran: The Engagement Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Part II
Disarming Tehran: The Military Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Chapter 3: Going All the Way: Invasion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Chapter 4: The Osiraq Option: Airstrikes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Chapter 5: Leave it to Bibi: Allowing or Encouraging an
Israeli Military Strike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Part III
Toppling Tehran: Regime Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Chapter 6: The Velvet Revolution: Supporting a Popular Uprising . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Chapter 7: Inspiring an Insurgency: Supporting Iranian Minority
And Opposition Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113
Chapter 8: The Coup: Supporting a Military Move Against the Regime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
Part IV
Deterring Tehran: Containment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
Chapter 9: Accepting the Unacceptable: Containment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Conclusion
Crafting an Integrated Iran Policy: Connecting the Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145

3165
The fact remains that there are countless "conspiracy theories" out there that are proven facts. Not matter for debate.

You're talking chalk and cheese here.

However, branding something as "a conspiracy" in order to deflect attention away from there being corroborating evidence to support its claims is no less a pile of dingo's kidneys than insisting something is "a conspiracy" to deflect attention away from its being an assertion without adequate corroborating evidence.

No argument there.

'Conspiracy' has become an intellectually bankrupt term. Right up there with 'organic' and 'green' IMHO. Let's stop using it.

But that is a bit of a problem. How can you stop using the term when every time you attempt to bring up a few uncomfortable facts, someone starts screaming "CONSPIRACY"? Buddy boy in the article does exactly that.

So we end up with a situation where we've got this horrible abuse of language that has emptied word of any useful meaning, and we're still stuck with them.

I suppose you could simply talk about "plotting in secret", which is explicit/accurate in a literal sense, but it won't cover "conspiracies" that are publicly out in the open. (I'll skip examples for the sake of not stirring anything up.)

But, it seems like there's quite a bit of debasement of the language. Lots of examples out there. C. S. Lewis walks through the example of "gentleman" in an essay and talks about how that word was debased until it had no real meaning anymore. It's rather annoying as it destroys part of your ability to communicate effectively.
3166
Presented without comment:

http://www.telegraph...assengers-heads.html

Sky Deutschland has developed technology to transfer adverts from train windows directly and silently into commuters' heads.

 Passengers leaning their head against the window will "hear" adverts "coming from inside the user's head", urging them to download the Sky Go app.

The proposal involves using bone conduction technology, which is used in hearing aids, headphones and Google's Glass headset, to pass sound to the inner ear via vibrations through the skull.

A video for the Talking Window campaign released by Sky Deutschland and ad agency BBDO Germany states: "Tired commuters often rest their heads against windows. Suddenly a voice inside their head is talking to them. No one else can hear this message."

The voice comes from a Sky-branded transmitter made by Audiva that is attached to the train window.

BBDO spokesman Ulf Brychcy told the BBC: "If our customer Sky Deutschland agrees, we will start with the new medium as quickly as possible.



 "Some people don't like advertising in general. But this is really a new technology. [It might] not only be used for advertising, but also for music, entertainment, mass transport information, weather reports and so on."

Sky Deutschland said it had not made a decision on whether to launch the campaign.

3167
There are IR or UV lights that foil/blind camera sensors. Their light is invisible to the human eye. One only need to set up a small array around your license plate to avoid detection. The trick then would be to have them concealed well enough that your average traffic cop wouldn't see them, that is if he understood what they were.

For non-optical imaging technologies, you'd need a different approach. (e.g. radar scattering)

Do a search on YouTube as there are some decent informational and instructional videos on the topic there. It helps to actually "see" what's happening there.

The stakes would be considerably higher over here. These days you'd probably be charged with terrorism for busting one of those scanners.

While true, if you sort of step back from the situation and then look at it again, it's pretty much hysterically funny. :D
3168
Having programmed this kind of software functionality more than once, I am very far from "understanding" or "forgiving". "Automation" is not an excuse for incompetence.

If you run someone over in your car because you can't drive worth crap, you are still prosecuted. Why do these criminals get a pass?
3169
although the article is written from a conservative perspective, I dont think that affects the validity of it's content.

If you mean that it still stinks like an unkept outhouse, then I'd agree with you. ;)

But I don't want to rip on it too much as I'd end up sacrificing sacred cows. (Start a thread in the Basement to continue if you like.)

Well, that and I'm somewhat lazy too. Also got things to do like get back to work on one of those uber-popular MMORPGs that everyone loves to play. (Dammit! DC is just bloody addictive!)
3170
The big problem with conspiracy theories in general is that they can (and are) used to explain any and everything through attributions of unproven causality.


In general? Huh? You're obviously looking at some pretty wacky stuff then. We're not reading the same "conspiracy theories" at all.

The fact remains that there are countless "conspiracy theories" out there that are proven facts. Not matter for debate.

Sure, reptilian aliens are interesting, and god knows what, but that doesn't mean that the US military didn't plan to stage false flag events in order to invade Cuba. (Northwoods)

There is a very serious disconnect with reality for those pundits that keep screaming about "conspiracy theories".


@Ren - did you actually read the entire article? Because I'm amazed the main thing you seem to have taken away from it was what you saw as a diss on conspiracy theories. That's awesome! ;D

Yes. I did read it. Did you want me to continue and have this sent to the Basement? :P

I picked a couple things that were just completely insane, but not things that would get this thread sent off to the Basement. I'm really, really trying very, very hard here... Give me a break, eh? :P :D

(I read far too much on politics and economics to honestly comment on a lot of things here. Really - I'm trying very hard!!! I try to keep it light and entertaining - think of me as your comic relief! :D Sometimes at least...)
3171
Living Room / HBO Asks Google to Take Down “Infringing” VLC Media Player
« Last post by Renegade on July 17, 2013, 11:18 AM »
From the "please-stop-trying-to-make-me-piss-my-pants-laughing" department...

http://torrentfreak....media-player-130715/

HBO sent a DMCA takedown to Google, listing a copy of the popular media player VLC as a copyright infringement.

Umm, yeah, there's a word for that. Around here we call it "criminal fraud". :P

Torrent Freak is far more understanding of the horrible and terrible hardships that HBO suffers than I am. :P

While I still primarily use ALShow, I use VLC on my Mac, and also have a copy on my main PC. It's a good program. But, it's also GPL'd, which makes the takedown request all that more repellent.
3172
Living Room / Re: Microsoft responds to NSA allegations
« Last post by Renegade on July 17, 2013, 11:05 AM »
@40hz - Well put.

Because the the rule that emerged from that tribunal was that crimes are committed by men, not abstract entities.

This is a very real problem - "abstract entities" have been granted "human rights". They are not human, and have no legitimate claim there. Incorporation is effectively an abdication of responsibility for any wrong-doing, and has been abused in horrific ways. We are seeing a lot of that now. The entire information abuse aspect is merely one side of the die.

But the fact that MS was willing to call out the NSA and DOJ in a public forum is what was telling for me.

You've got a good point there. But my gut just tells me that they're only trying to shift blame, i.e. CYA (cover your ass). The US is a litigious society, so that shouldn't be very controversial there.

3173
Full article may be found here.

Sigh... Might as well...

The kind of utter nonsense in most articles like that is simply astounding. Here's a very brief quote and brief rip/rant...

Conspiracy theories and Big Brother fears always swirl at the margins of respectable opinion, threatening to go mainstream.

"Conspiracy theory" is a CIA psyop designed to marginalize anyone that does any homework. It has been extraordinarily effective. (You can search to verify that.)

So, we can effectively rewrite that quote as:

"The opinions of people that read and do their homework" always swirl at the margins of respectable opinion, threatening to go mainstream.

Shortening that somewhat...

"Informed people" always swirl at the margins of respectable opinion, threatening to go mainstream.

Do I need to elaborate? Probably a bit. (I'll keep it short.)

The author simply sickens me with his "at the margins of **respectable** opinion" silliness. He's attempting to sway opinion through some pretty low tactics. (I'll skip the argumentation theory/logic here as it's boring for most people.)

Search for some of these "conspiracy theories":


Ooops. They're all true and on record.

Why must unpleasant truth be such heresy?

Find out what questions you're not allowed to ask, and you're on the right trail.
3174
Developer's Corner / Re: Opinions wanted: Best SVN client for use on a Mac
« Last post by Renegade on July 17, 2013, 09:17 AM »
...Knowing nearly nothing about development on Mac I did some research to find that this tool requires a recurring licensing cost that we'd like to avoid...

Isn't that half the Apple experience? Always overpaying again and again? Aren't you kind of robbing them of the authentic Apple experience?

(Sorry - couldn't resist! :D)
3175
Living Room / Re: Microsoft responds to NSA allegations
« Last post by Renegade on July 17, 2013, 08:58 AM »
In that specific case, I think they were referring to the fact that they comply with the rule of law towards such things, i.e. you need a specific warrant, but they don't just let the government have direct access to all e-mails.  At least, that's what I took it as.

There are more examples in there. That was just the first one.

I'm simply unwilling to show the slightest bit of leniency for any of these people anymore. No more charitable reads. They must be absolutely explicit and unequivocal. If there's any wiggle room, I'm assuming the worst. That's the safest bet as far as I can see. But even then, just how many unequivocal lies have we been told? I think I'm being far, far more than reasonable.
Pages: prev1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 [127] 128 129 130 131 132 ... 438next