topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 3:04 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 ... 252next
2901
Usenet can actually be a terrific support method if it is used properly and well-covered by the developer. Of course that goes for regular software forums also. As for having to search for information on Usenet I have Agent Forte (though admittedly it is not currently installed - though I do have a current license). Agent is built specifically for Usenet groups - and nothing else. It has a built-in email program too but I never used it much. But for searching, building watches, filters, and marking posts for later reference, it is the best available. And with it Usenet can be pretty decent.   :)

Jim
yeah, back before forums became mainstream, I used Forte Agent a lot.  it was great for that.  But now, it doesn't make sense with all the conveniences available with regular forums.  Just look at this forum here, it's amazing...the way you can present content, search, and the interface is just amazing.  people come here and they don't have any frustrations mechanically, which is not the case in other forums.  newsgroups are horrible compared to forums.  I'm not saying they are bad in every way, but once you've tasted the forums, it's hard to go back to that.
2902
Some more complaints about the Bat's support.  I keep looking for a helpful, normal forum to figure shit out about the Bat, but there is nothing like that.  here's what I've found:

The actual Ritlabs forum:
This is the one on their website.  According to the rules, you can only say "positive" things about the Bat there.  Nothing else.  no bug reports, no support questions, nothing about beta.  Only "positive" remarks.  It's basically a forum to only give good testimontials for the program.  So the official forum is basically useless.  i doubt anyone goes there for anything...ever.  That's why it's not used.

The stupid mailing list (also accessed through usenet, if you prefer):
This is by far the most active place to discuss all things related to the Bat.  The only problem is that it's, well, really really antiquated.  We're talking early 90's technology here.  Either you use a listserv mailing list, which basically means people communicate through emails.  You subscribe and get tons of emails, or one large weekly mail.  Or if you don't like that, you can read/post through the newsgroups which mirrors the activity in the mailing list.  This is very insane.  Good luck searching for answers, or navigating through all the information.  Forums are really the way to go for stuff like this, if only the Bat would get with the times.  it would be great if they just allowed the Ritlabs forum to be used as a regular forum, open to everything so people can actually figure things out about the Bat.  Or give us a manual!  Something!  Good grief...

Now, I found this forum, called The Unofficial Bat Support Forums:
http://the-bat-forums.org
The problem with this forum is that nobody uses it.  It's great if people used it, but they don't.  It's a normal, modern forum, with all the features you would expect.  But because everyone that matters uses the mailing lists, nobody uses this.  So it's basically useless.

I have such a love/hate relationship with this program.  There are like 5 things that they never fix, and if they did, it would be awesome.  I can even show them exactly how to do it, and it wouldn't be that hard from a programmer's standpoint.  But as many of you know, the only features they have added in the past 5 years are very minor, and predominantly useless.  Why?  Because the only feedback they ever get is from the mailing list users.  And anyone who regularly participates on a mailing list is not a "normal" person.  That's not a criticism, what I mean is that they hardly have any sense about what is "easy" for normal people, and they don't care about buttons/UI as long as their keyboard shortcuts are working.  So you can't expect them to care about easy conveniences.  A version 5 is coming out, and I can almost assure you that there is going to be nothing noticeably different about the program.
2903
T-Clock / Re: T-Clock 2010 (download)
« Last post by superboyac on January 30, 2011, 05:46 PM »
T-Clock is awesome!  Thanks Stoic!  I may...er...have a list of very particular feature requests soon!  I used to use betaclock, but it's not being developed anymore and there were a few minor issues I had with it.
2904
Okay, got it working (finally). There are currently no (.ini/reg) save functions as of yet. So it is on a perennial first run basis at the moment. But a general feel of the app can be had so I thought I'd toss it up for comment.

When the dialog opens, caret focus is on the adapter list, so just arrow down to the adapter wanted and hit enter.

Let me know if I'm on the right track here SB.
 (see attachment in previous post)
I'll report on Monday, I don't have anything to test it on right now.
2905
Living Room / Re: Online Dating is Super Safe
« Last post by superboyac on January 30, 2011, 12:38 AM »
What really sucks are the guys there on the side who the website considers as "similar users".  That can't be good...
2906
Do you mean Internet traffic or ALL network traffic?

For all, it would be a simple matter of disabling the interface.

If you mean ALL then I'll try and knock one up for you in a few hours, (basic toggle function is already available).
Yup!  All network traffic.  Anything coming in or out of that computer.  Click on, click off.

Thanks!
2907
Since I've switched to MSE from Kaspersky, there is one thing I miss: the "block all network traffic" button.  Kasperksy had a feature where you could right click on the system tray icon and block all network traffic.  It would be cool if someone could write something that could quickly block and unblock network traffic simply by clicking on the system tray icon.  If you block it, the icon turns red, if you unblock it, it turns green.

It should really be that simple.  And it should play well with the actual firewall software you are using.
2908
I'm a little sketchy on this part, should I be flattered, frightened, or both... :)

Definitely frightened!

Why?  Probably because you leave yourself open to repeat custom. ;D
That just might be true...
2909
Developer's Corner / Re: Choosing an Installer
« Last post by superboyac on January 28, 2011, 05:51 PM »
I'm sure this is not helpful, but I just have to mention it:
I also love the installer that is used for all the "Just Great Software" products (Editpad, Acetext, Powergrep).  I'm pretty sure that he has written the installer custom from scratch, but it's really quite nice.  He covers all bases: one-click installation, advanced options installation, portable installation, you can review EVERY SINGLE FILE that is going to be installed beforehand.  Really quite excellent, as is everything from this dude.
2910
Developer's Corner / Re: Choosing an Installer
« Last post by superboyac on January 28, 2011, 05:45 PM »
When i went searching for installers many years ago, one of my requirements was the ability to make an installer that built setup executables that did not have to bundle in with the files to install.

I use this in my applications to make my installer packages zip-compatible, by NOT having INNO setup package the files, and just make a standalone installer that i then create a self-extracting zip from.

Just something to keep in mind.  Wise used to make an installer that would do this automatically which was really nice.  Both INNO and NIS can create standalone installer exes.  There are a couple more commercial setup makers that also make zip-compatible installer packages, which i really like.
As an end user, I truly appreciate this approach.
2911
General Software Discussion / Re: Splash Lite 1.60
« Last post by superboyac on January 27, 2011, 04:08 PM »
Yeah, I've soured on Splash because of all the indicators I mentioned.  I'm all for paying for this stuff even though 99% of people are perfectly satisfied with the free version.  I definitely will pay for a video player if it is done really nicely.  I paid for Light Allow, which is very underrated in my opinion.

Splayer is ok, nothing special in my book.  it needs more options, for me.  Of all the players, I still find KMP to be the best all around.  KMP plays back my HD files better than Splayer currently, but I don't have a lot of really big, full disc rips of dvd's at the moment.  I just have a couple of 1-2 GB mp4 HD files.  I'm trying to avoid using a player just because it does one thing better than another.  I'm really hoping for a player to come along that is the clear cut winner.  For me, it's KMP right now, with Light Alloy in the mix as well.  But neither of them are perfect I guess.  Daum was promising, but it's pretty buggy right now.  We'll see.  It really doesn't seem like the full HD support on most players hasn't matured yet.  It feels like we're in the infancy stages and working out the kinks.  Which is weird in my opinion, because HD has now been around for a fairly long time.

But I do notice a surge in the interest of HD playback on the computer lately.  I can't be sure if I'm noticing it only because I've begun thinking about my HTPC project, or if it's actually true.  But it feels as if 2011 will see a large increase in the HTPC related stuff, as well as playing back HD with files.  Currently, players "support" all this stuff, but it's not really elegant anywhere.  There are still NO players with buttons for previous/next chapter in mkv files.  or for enabling/disabling subtitiles, or changing audio.  They are all context-menu driven type stuff.  We're seeing more HTPC specialized hardware coming out into mainstream circles: things like those mini htpc boxes that you can setup in your living room instead of a full tower setup, players like Splash and stuff are coming out bragging specifically about their HD playback.  This wasn't the case even two years ago.

By the way, the reason why HD is not mainstream is because it makes the "man" nervous.  Full HD files represent the worst things to them.  It makes any kind of discs obsolete, so the whole bluray thing would go out the window if mainstream users caught onto things like mkv files and 50gb bluray files.  And once mainstream users learned that they can connect little htpc's to their tv's that play EVERYTHING under the sun without the need for 10 remotes, dvr, bluray player, etc., well, that would be bad for a lot of companies.  Standalone dvd and bluray players would suffer.  Even things like the PS3 would take a hit because a lot of people buy that simply to playback bluray movies.

So I feel like 2011 will be the year for HD files.
2912
General Software Discussion / Re: Splash Lite 1.60
« Last post by superboyac on January 27, 2011, 03:13 PM »
I like the Splash line of players.  It's a good design, elegant, with great picture quality, and for some reason it has an easier time playing full HD files than any other player.  My complaint with the program is with what I see the business strategy is looking like.  First, they have WAAAY too many versions of the program planned to come out.  See here:
http://mirillis.com/...ashpro_features.html

Why does that bother me?  Well...it's just a freaking video player.  Most of the time, companies who do this kind of thing do it as a gimmick to make more money somehow.  i don't quite understand the strategy, but it's very common for those enterprise type software that nobody knows what they do, but they have like 15 versions all distinguished with vague jargon and other nonsense.  Oracle products are the best example of this.

What kind of scientific research do they think a customer is going to do when buying a video player??  "Hmm, I'm interested in playing videos.  This Splash player seems good.  Whoa!  Wait!  Do I need the HD-CAm version or the Pro?  What the hell is avchd?"

So, that makes me suspicious of the direction this program is going.  My suspicion is that they're going to draw people in with the program's eye-candy and speed, and then a few years down the line the expected improvements to the program won't be all that impressive.  Meaning, the things we like right now about the program...well, that's it.  I don't think the program will develop into what users would like it to develop.

not only that, but as miles mentioned, they don't respond to mildly controversial topics, rather than responding and just saying clearly what their intentions are.  So those are all signs of a company trying to bank in on a gimmick rather than pleasing users.

Now, the makemkv forum is a different story, just to compare two programs in similar stages.  They have a very active forum, they answer all questions, and it's clear their goal is to satisfy as many of the user requests as they can handle.

So, that's my prediction.
2913
If you sell people a "lifetime" license, it's understood that they should be receiving all future version of the product at no additional charge beyond what was paid for the lifetime license.

And please let's drop the word "free" from this discussion. These lifetime licenses were never free. They were all paid for; and were purchased with the understanding and expectation it would be the only fee that would ever need to be paid for a non-expiring license to use all future releases of this software.

All the equivocation, semantic tap dancing, and hair-splitting over exactly what "lifetime" means will not change the fact that this company is obviously trying to rationalize its way out of the promises it made.

So what this all comes down to is whether or not a person or business keeps its word.

There are at least a thousand reasons why someone may decide to go back on their word. And probably something like half of those reasons are very good ones. But it still doesn't change the fact that, at the end of the day, a promise was broken. And in the end, that's the only thing that matters to those who are affected by it.
Yeah, you're right I suppose.  I guess that is the real point of all of this.
2914
Living Room / Re: The Coolest Macintosh I've Ever Seen!
« Last post by superboyac on January 27, 2011, 09:32 AM »
Do they have one featuring Joann Kelly or Evangeline Lilly by any chance?

I'm a great admirer of Canadian fine art.   ;) :)
Nice!  Who is that?!  good taste...
2915
Well Stoic, if you are planning on making a full fledged program out of this, here are my ideas.  I don't know how feasible any of this is programmatically, they're just end user ideas.

Is there a way for you to have a dialog on just the first startup or somwhere in the option settings where the window detects all the adapters currently installed in Windows?  Then the user clicks on the adapter desired, and the program runs from there without anymore dialog on startup.  Now, if the user wants to change adapters, he can do so from the menu or something.

command line, ini is ok, but it would be better if it could programmed in the interface.  So if you need options for autostart, suppressing the startup dialog, exit/minimize on close, system tray, etc., it would be better to have those all as checkboxes or something in a options dialog.  But if that's too much work, text file or command line works also.

Also keep in mind having profiles to be used as a portable application?  Yeah?  Then you can run it on other computers and store the settings when you are done.  That would be really cool.
2916
Living Room / Re: Is SEO worth the trouble?
« Last post by superboyac on January 25, 2011, 05:46 PM »
But I wouldn't believe everything you read about it. A lot is just conjecture.
I do things that "gurus" say don't work, but I get results.
What is it you do that gurus say doesn't work?  And how do you get results?
2917
Living Room / Re: Is SEO worth the trouble?
« Last post by superboyac on January 25, 2011, 05:45 PM »
Thanks app!  That's a very well written article, I'll definitely be using that.  To all interested, I think App's article is excellent and addresses the intent of this thread I started.

Thank you. It was written as a response to the exact question in the title of the article. If one person wants to know, others are bound to want the same, so I turned my response into a blog article, to benefit all asking the same question.
i love that.  Those are the kinds of websites that are worth finding through the sludge of the google crap.
2918
It's the spirit of the thing that counts, it doesn't have to be practicle...as long as it's fun. ;)

I've gotten this far with it (and want to try worstje's idea), so I'll just keep playing with it until I (win) can figure out what to do with it. Let me know if you to do anything with it and I'll work that in too.

Wifi connections are always a hassle and I keep looking for a helpful utility, but there are none.

...Ya never know where this project could end up going.
Hey!  If you do actually do this, I can offer a lot of suggestions (as usual), and I think it would be VERY handy for people with laptops.  I don't care what anyone says, wifi is a hairy beast once you get involved with all the settings for security and all.  And all the interfaces suck for them.  But I kind of understand why now if Windows doesn't even have a way to access that one window.

I started a thread asking for this a while back:
https://www.donation...ex.php?topic=23791.0
See if you get any ideas from there, and I'll be more than happy to offer suggestions, solutions, etc.  I'm only limited with programming, that i can't do.
2919
Living Room / Re: Is SEO worth the trouble?
« Last post by superboyac on January 25, 2011, 03:49 PM »
You might want to take a look at my article How can you rank well on search engines, without fussing with SEO?

This has been my approach to SEO for awhile, and I have had no problems with it. My ebook directory is the top result in Google for the keywords "programming ebooks" and has been for a number of years, despite site design changes, domain name changes, and being a victim of content theft (a lot of people with high PR blogs copied the original one page site and shoved it into a single blog post, never even bothering to link back to me as the source of their info).

I also do not have problems with any of my other sites when I follow my own rules.
Thanks app!  That's a very well written article, I'll definitely be using that.  To all interested, I think App's article is excellent and addresses the intent of this thread I started.
2920
General Software Discussion / Re: Outlining software recommendations?
« Last post by superboyac on January 25, 2011, 02:37 PM »
How about Noteliner - a simple and traditional pure outliner?

Interesting find, johnk!  But looks to me like it's best for getting the basics of ideas down, less like a tool you'd use to write long documents/books.  The text manipulation features are rudimentary.  I'd like more keyboard-friendliness too.  Can't see a keyboard method of expanding/collapsing nodes, for example.
Yes!  +1
Excellent simple utility.  I will definitely put this in my toolbox.  It's the best simple outline creator I've seen.  i probably won't use it too much between Infoqube and OneNote, but as it is, I'm starting to use Onenote less anyway.  I find IQ the best for really sophisticated information storage, and now I rely on very simple tools to do less formal type of information management.  Like Cintanotes is good for just dumping stuff in.  And now I might use Noteliner anytime I need to whip out an outline really quick.  I'd just as soon do it in Infoqube, but printing is a problem.
2921
You know, maybe it's not worth it if there's no way to get an elegant solution.  I can get to it in two clicks.  So it's not worth all this trouble to just reduce one click.  But at least this cleared up for me why there are no third party wifi managers out there.  I always wondered about that.  Wifi connections are always a hassle and I keep looking for a helpful utility, but there are none.
2922
Living Room / Is SEO worth the trouble?
« Last post by superboyac on January 25, 2011, 09:55 AM »
SEO has become one of those words that are thrown around a lot these days as if people know what it means, but frankly, what is it?  It sounds like a bunch of BS to me.  I mean, I get it...search engine optimization.  That's a nice term and all, but how does it work?  Whenever I come across terms or ideas like this (especially in a corporate sense) my BS radar starts going off, and I'm usually right.  For example, when you go to a enterprise software website and there's a bunch of vague descriptions, but no screenshots and no price that's easy to find, that's the same kind of thing.  They want you to call them to send a salesman to your company.
I think SEO is the same thing.  No?  How do you optimize your website?  If you are using a Wordpress site, all the code is setup already.  It's not like a guy like me is going to change wordpress code.  So then what?  There are themes that are "SEO friendly"...yet another term that doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense to me.  I've seen the theme code.  It's nice and clean.  Does that mean it's SEO friendly?  I don't know.  So then I think maybe SEO has to do with strategically worded paragraphs in your content?  Or banners and ads that make you more attractive to google?  What does SEO actually mean, without the corporate jargon?!

And here's what I don't understand.  If I don't "get" something, I'll avoid it completely.  So when I started my website, I didn't want to deal with SEO, so I didn't do anything.  So I didn't do anything special for SEO, and I didn't put any banners or ads or anything like that either.  I don't make a cent on it.  But even with all that said, my engineering articles got relatively popular in the engineering community, and now if you do certain searches, my website is at the top of the list.  Sometimes, it's first before the website of the actual authors of the books I mention, which I find interesting.  So my website climbed up to the top without me having to do SEO or ads or anything.  So what does SEO actually do for me?  I don't get it.  To me it kind of confirms that content really is king, but I'm not convinced quite yet.
2923
Stoic, i tried your file, but it didn't work.  it gives the error "No GUID Given".

At this point, I'm just waiting for SB to see if there is any type of GUI (tray icon etc.) he wants this wrapped in. Then I could just chain the loop to that and be done with it.
It doesn't need a GUI at all.  It should just be a shortcut icon that you can double click and it will open the window.  It's basically a launcher for the window.  That way, I can take the file and put it in my launcher or start menu or whatever.  It's just a file.
2924
Thanks Stoic, for whatever you're trying to do!
2925
Yeah  ;D that doesn't help.  Thanks, though!  I wish I were a programmer...
Pages: prev1 ... 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 ... 252next