topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 24, 2025, 1:38 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 ... 131next
2251
General Software Discussion / I will kill thee a 150 ways...freely
« Last post by zridling on June 17, 2007, 04:00 AM »
Claus Valca provides a comprehensive list of process-killer software that is second to none on his Grand Stream Dreams tips blog when you absolutely, positively must unlock that file.

[attach madgirlwithswords.jpg][/attach]

He breaks them down into a progression of categories:
  • Easy and Good
  • Bit More Complex
  • Best left for the Pros
  • Not Exactly Related...but good to have handy
  • Boot from another Windows or Windows-Like OS
  • Hire a Mercenary

Go. Read. Now!
2252
Thanks for the link, Redhat!
2253
Wow, thanks Carl, for picking this link up!
2254
General Software Discussion / Re: HovText - Clipboard enhancer
« Last post by zridling on June 15, 2007, 01:18 AM »
Okay, this is a really cool app. Thanks for sharing Lanux, I was unaware of it!
2255
I really need to start at the beginning with an "Idiot's Guide" or something, to get a grasp of the whole picture of the file system and storage management in GNU/Linux. I'm going to reload either Ubuntu or Fedora 7 this weekend with KDE and see if it's easier. But I'm glad I'm doing this, because when I read other accounts of Windows users who have made the switch, they don't seem to chronicle the obstacles.

As I keep saying, it's enlightening not because I can't do it yet, but simply because it's different. I'll get there eventually!
2256
Thanks guys! I had a busy first half of the year, but the delay allowed the online word processors to make a lot of progress and in the end, a more thorough review. It's not a traditional in-depth review, but it makes for easy reading, and lots of pretty screenshots — ha!
2257
Hmmm, Gothic, I'll be honest, this is really all above my head, as like before, I truly don't understand what you're talking about. I'm not at the point where I can grasp this right now. I pulled out a Ubuntu hacker book and input all their commands to no avail also. As Tonurics noted, I'd love to be able to save data to a "d-drive" using ext3 and never have to worry about losing the data if I go distro hopping (as I invariably will over the next year).
2258
Since then, here's what I've done:

              ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid/

which returned:

              total 0
              lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2007-06-14 04:36 6068b6ae-9b08-4ce9-a6fe-08add83228c0 -> ../../sda1

So I did the following:

              mkdir /mnt/2drive

Open fstab file and added this line:

              /dev/hdb1 /mnt/2drive ext3 defaults 0 0

__________________________________
I read this, but I didn't understand the following command:

              mount /dev/mapper/<other_thing> /<mountpoint_directory>

What is the "other thing"?

Oy, nothing. Maybe I should consider doing this under KDE as Tonurics suggests. Gnome is making my tiny dinosaur brain hurt.
2259
Tonurics, thanks, and yes, naturally I like KDE better, but thought I'd learn something new with gnome. I'm off to try.
2260
Darwin nails it — if you're not a pro or a graphics wiz, Photoshop is a serious luxury in your case. And Vista x64 is a mixed bag. Most programs work fine, but a LOT of my old XP programs have something a little wrong with them. Often, the problem starts right with installation. And the apps I want to be 64-bit aren't written yet — file managers and text editors, specifically.
2261
Me likey Photofiltre. But it's for simple needs. There really isn't a Photoshop equal, although many have tried.
2262
General Software Discussion / Re: The GIMP, thoughts...
« Last post by zridling on June 14, 2007, 08:35 AM »
Carol, check out GIMPShop as a transitional app, because it shares the exact same menus and toolbars as Photoshop. Also, here are some Gimp Tutorials, most of them pretty fundamental tasks.
2263
Living Room / Is it me, or is the internet getting S L O W E R ?
« Last post by zridling on June 14, 2007, 08:30 AM »
I swear these backbone telnet corporations are shaping internet traffic already. Seems everything is bogging down lately.
2264
Living Room / Re: Links page - suggestions wanted
« Last post by zridling on June 14, 2007, 08:28 AM »
Consider the following:

Dave Taylor under Help/Support:
http://www.askdavetaylor.com/

Schneier on Security
http://www.schneier.com/blog/

Daily Cup of Tech
http://www.dailycupoftech.com/
2265
After you've installed your distro, take the time to walk through the various user guides offered online. They will provide an installation guide, a complete tour of the desktop, along with how to manage software installation and upgrades to help get started. I had to go back to square one when I realized that there were too many subtle differences I wasn't understanding. A user guide helped me understand that ALT+Tab can manage separate desktops (if you setup more than one), for instance, rather than merely switching among open apps.

Some things in GNU/Linux are surprisingly simple. No, really. Take DVD burning. This is all there is:
  • Open a Nautilus window, such as Home or Computer. (Nautilus is the file manager.)
  • Select Places > CD/DVD Creator.
  • Drag and drop the files you wish to burn into this new empty window.
  • Click Write to Disc.
  • In the dialog box, you can change the name of the disc and the write speed if they are incorrect.
  • Click Write.

And holy crap, it works. Same for my USB flash drive. Even though it was "Vista certified," it would only work in Vista if you applied a low-level format utility in XP! And then Vista wanted to reformat it every single time you inserted it. Under Fedora 7, it was recognized, and "mounted" on the desktop for me to open, copy, delete files to and from. Again, I'm surprised by that because of all things, I figured DVD burning and USB drives would be difficult. Similarly, playing audio files are not difficult either. Here's what the Fedora 7 user guide had to say:

                 Fedora includes complete support for many freely-distributable formats. These are the Ogg media format, Vorbis audio, Theora video, Speex
                 audio, and FLAC audio formats. These freely-distributable formats are not encumbered by patent or license restrictions. They provide powerful
                 and flexible alternatives to more popular, restricted formats such as MP3.


Ogg is a nice, high-quality format, but I'm not converting 40Gb of MP3 files, especially since the MP3 patent expires in 2011. Not a problem. That's fixed by merely downloading the LAME encoder. GNU/Linux supports every audio format except for WMA, which is only partially supported.

confused1001.jpg

Another difficulty is that I have two HDs on this GNU/Linux system, and formatted both of them as ext3 drives during setup. However, the second HD is not "mounted." More reading. Spent an entire night looking for a solution, but the two I did find didn't work for me. Hmmm. Here's what I tried:

  • Make a mount point, mkdir /media/seconddrive, then mount it, mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb1 /media/seconddrive. You should now see your drive available in Nautilus. If this doesn't work then post the output of fdisk -l
  • Command wise, it is like above. sdxx refers to the device and partition, eg, sdb1 (sd = some device, b = second hd, 1 = first partition). '-t type' refers to the filesystem type, usually found automatically but on occasion it isnt, eg, ext3, ext2, ntfs, vfat (fat32), msdos (fat16).
  • mount -t type /dev/sdxx /mount/point
  • With the exception of loopback devices (iso's, encrypted file systems, etc), which are mounted like so.
  • mount -t type /file /mount/point -o loop

I'm not embarrassed to say I didn't understand a single word of the above commands, and I overheated my tiny dinosaur brain. More reading, I'll get there. I remember the similar DOS commands, but this is another animal. Meanwhile, I took time out to install Mac OS X in a VM and jeez, I still don't like OS X. It must be me; I still wonder why everyone goes ga-ga over it.

[UPDATE]: Turns out this was not a "problem" after all. The installation did format both my drives, but unlike Windows, GNU/Linux combines all drive space into its filesystem model. Thus, both my drives appeared to combine as one. However, when I disconnected the d-drive and rebooted, the OS still worked without a hitch. Cool! The lesson I learned is that the layout of the Linux filesystem is a different model than we know in Windows. Mayank Sarup does the best job of outlining it. This may be one of the hardest things to wrap my mind around. In Windows we have a "file manager" that manages files on different media — HDs, floppies, CD/DVD, old ZIP drives, network drives, FTP, and so on — CLICK-n-DRAG. And while you can manage your files on GNU/Linux this way, it's not efficient for that platform, since it follows Unix hierarchy. Instead, files in Linux, even executables, are fluid and mobile. Once again, GNU/Linux is not wrong, just different.

________________________________________________
Part-01: My journey from Windows to Linux
Part-02: Which Linux distro to choose?
Part-03: First impressions and first problems after installation
Part-04: The "User Guide" as life raft, more n00b problems
Part-05: Ten Great Ideas of GNU/Linux
Part-06: Software Management is not that different
2266
Lashiec, you ol' distro-hopper!
2267
Thanks for the tip, Lanux, and holy crap that's a funny toon, nosh!
2268
The last distribution I had installed was Fedora 7, and after getting a new videocard, I reinstalled Ubuntu. For the unsuspecting newbie like myself, after you've installed a half dozen distros from Debian to Fedora to Mandriva to MEPIS to PCLinuxOS to Ubuntu, the first thing you notice is that they all essentially look the same. That's because they're using one of two desktop environments (shells in Windows lingo) — Gnome or KDE. If I didn't go any further than appearances, then it doesn't matter which distro is underneath that pretty UI. But the differences can be either subtle or significant depending on how you use your system, and what type of system you're able to install GNU/Linux onto.

After booting Ubuntu the first time, I installed the updates automatically. However, Ubuntu didn't recognize my videocard despite allowing me to download the specific driver for it. Fonts were grainy, and even after adjusting their settings, they still looked bad. After running the update manager, the system needed to reboot. When I rebooted, Ubuntu froze. Here's the complex solution which did not work for me. (http://ubuntuforums....wthread.php?t=461215) I ended up reinstalling it two more times to the same result. Not wanting to spend an entire weekend or longer trying to fix it, I surrendered. Our friend Gothi(c) predicted this common problem in the last part of this serial!

[attach linux-problem01.png][/attach]

If you do install Ubuntu (or any distro) via dual-boot, just like everything else, backup your system! Reread that last sentence. I'll wait.         If you install Ubuntu, you'll want to also download and install Automatix, which allows you to download tons of Win32 software, drivers, and codecs for Debian-based systems. For other distros, you don't need Automatix, just download whatever software you want straight from the website and install it yourself as with Windows. Otherwise, you can use the "package manager" included with the distro. The one in Ubuntu is iconic and well layed-out, whereas the one in Fedora 7 is a cleaner text list. Be forewarned, you'll be tempted just to check them all and install everything. Resist that urge, and just take it one step at a time.

I move to Fedora 7, and like PCLinuxOS, and MEPIS, it just works on my system. The new videocard and new monitor are recognized; the fonts are clear, and it's asking me if I want to install drivers for my HP printer. Installing my own fonts are as simple as click-n-dragging files from the DVD to the Fonts folder. Yea! Firefox is easy and works great, but I prefer Opera, since I've customized it to my workflow. Opera installs fine and I'm able to apply my scripts without a hitch. Same for a few other apps like WinRAR, XnView, OpenOffice, and Nero.

One way to bridge the gap and save the investment you've already made in your Windows software is to use emulator software such as VmWare, CrossOver. Or you could try b]Wine[/b], which mimics many of the Windows system functions (you do not need Windows installed on your computer). This allows you to install your Windows software through Wine and then run it under Linux. (Here is a list of software that has been confirmed to run well using Wine.) CrossOver runs some very big apps like Photoshop and Microsoft Office with ease, and while it will cost you some money, it keeps you from having to drop everything and learn new and often times inferior apps on GNU/Linux. If you do run Photoshop, check out GIMPShop as a transitional app, because it shares the exact same menus and toolbars as Photoshop.

Within my first week, what I've learned about GNU/Linux is this: be prepared to read — because there is a learning curve. Learning something for the first time is energizing, but just like we all did with Windows way back when, you're going to need to set aside time to not only learn GNU/Linux, but about it. To do the ordinary things you do everyday on GNU/Linux will likely require your study, which makes for fits and starts when using it. You will have to stop and read enough to learn to do some things, among them solve problems (like mine mentioned above). This takes time. Again, respect the learning curve: you will not learn GNU/Linux without bending your brain. But once you reach a comfort level, the rewards are exciting, among them, no more Registry, woohoo!

And one last time: if you're dual-booting a GNU/Linux distro, backup your entire c-drive in Windows, just in case.
________________________________________________
Part-01: My journey from Windows to Linux
Part-02: Which Linux distro to choose?
Part-03: First impressions and first problems after installation
Part-04: The "User Guide" as life raft, more n00b problems
Part-05: Ten Great Ideas of GNU/Linux
Part-06: Software Management is not that different
2269
Lashiec, share your list!!

Gothi(c), thanks for your input here, we're grateful. So far, what you say has been true to my experience; that is, a particular distro is a matter of comfort, and will likely change, which is good. And in Part-03 of this serial, I had to switch off of Ubuntu again because I didn't have the time or energy over the weekend to fix a reboot death.

And Darwin, that's exactly what you should do, just play with some of the distros — for isn't the definition of learning "meaningful play"? At the least, you'll be able to gauge how far GNU/Linux on the desktop has come over the past two years. It's no Windows replacement, but it's giving more people an excuse to be lured away.
2270
[attach regular_expressions.png][/attach]
2271
Part 2 brings me to which distribution, or distro, to choose, where you'll install it, and with which desktop environment (shell). Fortunately, there's lots of help here online, perhaps the two best places to start are:

(1) DistroWatch Top Ten
(2) PolishLinux.org
(3) LinuxQuestions.org Distro Reviews

First, consider for what and how you will use GNU/Linux, as a:
  • Primary system for all your major tasks, mainly productivity or programming;
  • Secondary system for background tasks, such DVD burning, Usenet, BitTorrent, running a server, domain, etc.;
  • Server, for your home network, a domain, or whatever;
  • Test system, e.g., to learn GNU/Linux.

How you will use GNU/Linux will affect which distro you select. If you're wanting easy setup and non-open drivers, that's one consideration (often Ubuntu or Freespire). If you want a quick OS with a small installation footprint, that's another, as there are lots of "small" Linux distros available, such as MEPIS. You might also want to select a distro based on your work — graphics or video editing; programming (Ubuntu makes it easy to install codecs; other distros let you download and install them yourself). Or how much time you have to spend learning it, or how you might use it, e.g., as a server for your domain. Some think you should consider how many software packages are available for a given distro. For example, Ubuntu lists over 24,000 apps whereas Fedora 7 about 11,000. However, I can get any app I want via download or by searching inside the package manager. And don't be fooled: app lists are like binary newsgroups — most apps aren't worth downloading.

For now, my setup is as a test system, which was a five-year-old Pentium system. I upgraded the videocard and bought a cheap flatscreen monitor for it. The old videocard was too limited and my old monitor was a 15-year-old, 50-kilo dinosaur.

PolishLinux.org offers a brief survey that will return an interesting, perhaps unexpected result at http://polishlinux.org/choose/quiz/. After answering it, the survey said my best choices were: (1) Mandriva; (2) Ubuntu; (3) OpenSUSE; (4) Fedora 7; and (5) Debian GNU/Linux. Only two of those did I really care for, Fedora 7 and Ubuntu. And where the heck is PCLinuxOS? LinuxQuestions.org's Distro Reviews section allows users to write brief, forum post reviews of the distros they like. This is nice because much like product reviews on NewEgg.com, you get a wide sample of views, positive and negative by people who've used each.

If you just want to try GNU/Linux and see a distro in action, most offer Live CDs, meaning you can download and burn the ISO image as a boot disk and evaluate the distro using only the LiveCD (or DVD) version, leaving your Windows partition untouched. For this, I recommend either PCLinuxOS, Fedora7, or Ubuntu. Booting from the Live CD takes a little longer for everything to load, but it's worth a look.

A second consideration is where you're going to install your distro. For example, for years I've dual-booted a GNU/Linux distro on my Windows system; I didn't have a second computer since I'd always donated them. Now I do and it's much nicer to set aside an old computer to destroy and rebuild at will when learning. Better, I can install — even dual-boot — any distro I want at will on a second system since Windows has the occasional habit of erasing Linux's boot loader, called GRUB file, i.e., Windows will always want to boot first on a dual-boot system. The other advantage to having GNU/Linux on a second system is that I can use the first to troubleshoot it online if I completely screw something up, and being a newbie, that's already happened a few times.

The final consideration is one of desktop environment, often between Gnome and KDE. Both have been around almost as long as Windows95, but the oversimplification is that Gnome is more like Mac and that KDE is more like Windows. Yes and no. Gnome will be very familiar to Windows users, but it's different in a few ways. But don't let that fool you. Anything you don't like, you can change. And I mean anything. Most distros by default use Gnome, but you can choose to install KDE on them either during or after install. PCLinuxOS uses KDE as its default desktop environment and they make it look good. But don't commit to one over the other, since being new to GNU/Linux, you'll need a wide open mind.

[attach dilbert.2007-01-25.gif][/attach]
________________________________________________
Part-01: My journey from Windows to Linux
Part-02: Which Linux distro to choose?
Part-03: First impressions and first problems after installation
Part-04: The "User Guide" as life raft, more n00b problems
Part-05: Ten Great Ideas of GNU/Linux
Part-06: Software Management is not that different
2272
The issue comes down to: do you want to pay a corporation to access your data? In the end it's that simple. Knowing the evils that corporations have spawned over the past century, they don't inspire my trust. But Darwin, the great thing about ODF is that it's only the format — you can use any word processor or office suite you like as long as it supports ODF, which to date, even Microsoft cannot do with any fidelity.
2273
[via Bob Sutor]:

Sam Hiser has posted an excellent summary of the salient differences between the OpenDocument Format (ODF) and Microsoft’s Office Open XML format. I strongly recommend everyone considering OOXML/OpenXML take a look at it before either supporting it as an ISO standard or adopting it directly.

This is an example of buyer beware. I’m not sure how much more strongly one can make the case that ODF is, well, open, and OOXML/OpenXML is, well, Microsoft’s personal and private XML specification for its product. As I’ve said multiple times, Microsoft has every right in the universe to have its own formats, but that is different from making private, proprietary formats into international standards that no one else will be able to implement in their entirety.

If you want insurance for the future that you will not be locked into the whims and technical decisions of a single vendor protecting its products and marketshare, go with ODF. If you are just fine with the avoidable loss of your freedoms to choose from a range of applications and are willing to commit to a single vendor, go with OOXML. That is the real choice here, and I think (I hope) most people understand that. If you are not paying heed to the deep technical and market control issues with OOXML, then you are trivializing what is really happening here.

Don’t, because you’ll pay for the consequences for a long, long time. Don’t, because there is a real open, international document standard called ODF already in place that is being actively developed by a global community of experts. Don’t, because we’re all smart enough to see through the FUD and the fluff to recognize the lock-in play in OOXML that just happens to be wrapped in a standards disguise.
________________________________________________
Meanwhile in related news, Microsoft Lobbies Legislatures to Kill ODF Bills
2274
Living Room / Re: Humour - The End of the world
« Last post by zridling on June 07, 2007, 04:50 PM »
Definitely one of the greatest flash videos EVER. I remember when it first came out, I couldn't stop laughing, even went around saying "I'm le tired" all the time. Quite impressionable on soft brains like mine.
2275
Darwin, I'll talk about this in a later post, but there are some "Windows equivalent" software sites like these two around:

http://www.linuxalt.com/
http://www.linuxrsp.ru/win-lin-soft/table-eng.html

They will be a big help when I get to that point. I'll post 'Part 2' later tonight or by Friday morning and link to it in the top post here.
Pages: prev1 ... 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 ... 131next