2226
General Software Discussion / Re: Slickedit prevails againt patent troll
« Last post by 40hz on March 06, 2014, 12:40 PM »A public service announcement to the management and legal team of Uniloc USA:




^I don't think I'm ... giving undue emphasis to what passes for human intelligence....-40hz (March 06, 2014, 05:42 AM)
@Tao = You completely lost me. ... "No True Scotsman??? Love it! But I have absolutely no clue as to what that is alluding to!![]()
)
-TaoPhoenix (March 06, 2014, 08:59 AM)
Put another way:
As I understand it, the Turing Test was supposed to be about a person talking through one terminal and a computer program talking via another one, and the human operator is supposed to try to figure out which is which.
But I think there are some assumptions going on about the level of intelligence of the participants. So if the human on the other side of the terminal is less coherent than a chatterbot and can't type either, and the test taker is also feebleminded, and if the chatterbot is tuned well, it very well could win!
So the "No True Scotsman" part kicks in if we start trying to say things like "oh, well, that's not a true test...".

Any digital image is a collection of samples representing an analog image. Think of each pixel as an individual detail. I refer to that original resolution as the image's definition. In other words definition, as I use the term, refers to the level of captured detail. If you reduce the resolution you also reduce the definition. However if you increase the resolution, the definition remains the same. You haven't added any actual details. All you've done is told your computer to interpolate new details which may or (more likely) may not be accurate.-Vurbal (March 06, 2014, 05:48 AM)

^I don't think I'm being paranoid or giving undue emphasis to what passes for human intelligence.-40hz (March 05, 2014, 10:09 AM)
Yes. Yes you are. I wasn't kidding. "No True Scotsman" is deadly.
I give you the following item heard about once per week in my tax office:
"I'm on welfare. I want to file like I did last year so I get my $5,000 back, for free."
So yes. Your idea of "human" ... has serious statistical flaws!
*That's* why "Entry AI" ... isn't that tough!
Put another way, via different questions, *people* fail the Turing Test about once per week!
-TaoPhoenix (March 06, 2014, 12:17 AM)
)

Modula!
And Oberon! 
:

@Deo - do you mean DE as in "Debian Edition" or do you mean DE as "desktop environment" as in a distro that will let you boot into several windows managers?-40hz (March 04, 2014, 10:11 PM)
I meant desktop environment. Sorry. I tried to avoid ambiguity by spelling it out the first time I said it before abbreviating it to DE when referring to "desktop environment" later in the post. I had also hoped that talking about the differences between MATE and Cinnamon would clarify my intent.
-Deozaan (March 05, 2014, 03:17 PM)
We aren't really upset or anything, but please look at it from our point of view - we get an email from DonationCoder saying "hey, can we have a discount please!", so we come to DonationCoder to see what people are saying, and find a thread where mostly what they're saying is what horribly nasty thieves we are.-JonPotter (March 05, 2014, 02:14 PM)




I really enjoy working with Debian and I’m really happy with the quality of LMDE. I can see a few things which are better on the Ubuntu side, but also things that are better here with Debian. Overall I’d say they’re pretty much on par at this stage, with a little advantage going to Ubuntu because it’s frozen, thus doesn’t require people to read/understand the problematics related to APT upgrades.
The big difference though is popularity and adoption. LMDE started as an R&D project, it was successful and so we continued it. Nowadays it’s as popular as one of our DE editions, but it requires maintaining on a different base, testing UPs and it is declined into two DEs. That’s a lot of extra work compared to a MATE, Xfce or KDE edition.
It would have to become more popular and gather wider adoption from the community for us to put more resources into it. We’re giving it our best shot each time and we hope people will enjoy it, but at the end of the day our focus needs to reflect what the majority of our users want. LMDE is special, it’s extremely exciting to work on, it holds strategic interests (in the eventuality of a complete departure from Ubuntu for instance) and it keeps getting better. But it does need more adoption and we do spend too much resources on it already with the current level of adoption.
I admire the Linux Mint developers for doing LMDE, but Clem's comment does make me wonder if a day will come when it has to be cut in favor of the Ubuntu versions. It's a bit disheartening to read that the Linux Mint developers can't put any more resources into it until its popularity increases.
.
.
.
The Ubuntu developers have alienated some Linux users with their decisions so it seemed reasonable to me to think that a significant number of Linux Mint users might have dumped the Ubuntu versions and moved to LMDE. But I guess that just hasn't happened yet.
It will be very interesting to see if this changes in the future or if Linux Mint Debian Edition either stagnates or ultimately declines in terms of usage. I think it will be a very sad day for users if the Linux Mint developers ever decide to shut down development of LMDE...



I'm happy to be done with "How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed" by Ray Kurzweil
You can file this one away as another famous narcissist with money getting more famous with a self-indulgent book that is mostly empty of insight and full of self promotion. Blech. Terrible.-mouser (March 04, 2014, 12:00 PM)



I'd like to go in that direction too - have you decided on an approach?
I'd like to not have certain programs get pulled out from under though (I have this vague impression that sometimes things leave testing temporarily) -- do you think that could be a potential problem?-ewemoa (March 03, 2014, 07:31 PM)

Re LibreOffice, App103 expressed my concern, that all the VBA code I've written won't work, or won't work well. Plus the groups I work with are all standardized on Office.-AndyM (March 03, 2014, 11:05 AM)

