topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday June 15, 2025, 2:12 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 ... 438next
2201
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 11:24 PM »
The 3rd largest crowd-funding site now accepts bitcoins:

http://www.pozible.c...og/article/index/129
2202
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 10:14 PM »
In bargaining and bartering and all such interactions, the truth is not as much of a consideration in the things that the person that you're bargaining with is telling you than your own truth and perceptions are.

Say I'm selling my car to you and there's an issue that I'm aware of AND THAT I BELIEVE TO BE/VIEW AS A SERIOUS PROBLEM. If I disclose that to you, I am acting in good faith. If I don't disclose that to you, I am acting in bad faith.

To you, the issue may be far less serious or completely unimportant. But that doesn't change the nature of acting in good faith.

As a flip-side example, let's say the cigarette lighter doesn't work in the car. And let's pretend that I don't smoke. It's likely then that I wouldn't give it a second thought, and wouldn't mention it to you when selling the car simply because it's not something that I normally think of.

However, if you smoke, then it becomes more important. But that doesn't mean that I acted in bad faith by not telling you. Now, if I know that you smoke, and I know that the cigarette lighter doesn't work, then I have a duty to act in good faith and tell you that it doesn't work.

While the "truth" of a matter may be blurry, that doesn't excuse anyone from acting in bad faith.
2203
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 07:42 PM »
...without having to spend a lot and/or save up for the current cost of a single Bitcoin.

You can purchase fractional amounts. There's no need to purchase an entire bitcoin.

The easiest way for most people is probably through https://localbitcoins.com/.

IIUC Gresham's Law would indicate that Bitcoin will be saved and not spent at all - so long as fiat money exists (presuming Bitcoin continues increasing in value). [edit] but yes, your logic is good, so long as bitcoins increase). [/edit]

Well, I think we need to be a bit flexible with Gresham's law. It's more of a tendency than an absolute.

But bitcoin is naturally deflationary, so it will continue. The scenario where bitcoin inflates is where you have bitcoins being the dominant currency in a massively contracting economy with a slow velocity of money. However, that's a nightmare scenario that will probably be accompanied by the zombie apocalypse. ;D
2204
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 07:29 PM »
A rather revealing and self-defining statement about one's personal standards and integrity.

Not really. Just a sociological observation. Not all lies are created equal. We all tell lies as we negotiate our daily existences. You don't believe me? Try for a day not to tell a lie like in the movie Liar Liar. When your missus asks you the next time "Does my bum look big in this?", just go ahead and say yes and see what happens...

I think you'd be surprised. I tell my wife exactly what I think and she appreciates it. I don't have to lie.

But in the case you outlined, the subtext is more along the lines of, "This makes my butt look a bit big, but I'd really appreciate it if you'd simply compliment me so that I feel better." The actual words are merely a small portion of the communication.

But even if we tell white lies in our daily lives, that doesn't excuse black lies in public office. Public office doesn't have that subtext communication that we have in our more intimate conversations with those close to us.
2205
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 10:33 AM »
Interesting. 8)

Screenshot - 10_29_2013 , 2_31_58 AM.png
2206
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 08:21 AM »
Lying is part of everyday diplomacy of negotiating conflicting demands; we all do this in our daily realities, so it's unrealistic to expect that somehow politicians should never ever lie.

But when we lie to them, we go to prison.

Sorry. I don't buy it at all. No lying. Period. Ever. Categorically. Imperatively. ;) You just Kant lie. 8)
2207
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 08:14 AM »
Here's a site that ONLY accepts bitcoins. They sell shoes. (Some nice looking ones, I might add.)

http://persianshoes.com/bitcoin/

Screenshot - 10_29_2013 , 12_13_15 AM.png

Why don’t you accept other forms of payment?

The short answer is we’d love to but we can’t!

Our business is making and selling leather products. We like to sell our products across the world and the more customers the better. The problem is we operate in Iran and most payment systems either are not willing to serve us at all or impose a huge risk on our business. Before launching this website, our international sale has been limited to a few dedicated customers who knew about the quality of our products and were prepared to go through a lot of trouble to pay us! This of course, may sound incomprehensible for people who have all sorts of electronic payments at their disposal. However, before finding out about Bitcoin, receiving our money was the number one obstacle in expanding our business.

Now, with Bitcoin and the help of Bitcoin community we are hoping to become a role model for other small businesses in Iran to find global customers.

I really wish them all the best!

But there's another example how bitcoin is helping people do things that they otherwise couldn't. Buy & sell handmade Persian shoes direct from Iran!  :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:

2208
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 07:54 AM »
Maybe he's been chosen as the one to be thrown under a bus.

Could be.

General Keith Alexander is reportedly moving out of his position as head of the NSA. Hmm... Bus avoidance strategies?
2209
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 06:08 AM »
All world currencies are inflationary. That is, they all lose value over time. $1 today has less purchasing power tomorrow. This is true for ALL world currencies that are issued/backed by governments/central banks. There are no exceptions.

* I skipped a lot there. It's just a simple matter of tracing monetary history. For the USD, it's the gold/silver standard, the 1913 betrayal by Wilson, Bretton-Woods, Nixon's 1971 betrayal, deregulation, derivatives, and Quantitative Easing.
2210
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 05:43 AM »
Why spend bitcoins when you can get rid of fiat? (This is a general problem.) What I'm thinking is that constantly funnelling fiat into bitcoins then spending that is a good way to preserve value

???

I'm not quite sure what "???" means, but I'm guessing that what I had above was a bit confusing. Here's a basic explanation.

All world currencies are inflationary. That is, they all lose value over time. $1 today has less purchasing power tomorrow. This is true for ALL world currencies that are issued/backed by governments/central banks. There are no exceptions.

When you see the USD go "up", it's not really going up. It's still going down. It's simply that it's falling in value slower than other currencies. For example, last May the EUR was around $1.28 USD. It is currently about $1.38 USD. So, the USD has fallen in value faster than the EUR since May.

BTC (bitcoins), on the other hand, is a deflationary currency. That is, if you have 1 BTC today, tomorrow you will have more purchasing power.

So, imagine you have $1,000 USD today. You plan to save that to spend on a very nice gift for your honey for St. Valentine's Day. But that's still about 3.5 months away. With inflation, your $1,000 will be worth about $965. i.e. You LOST $35 of purchasing power by saving your money instead of spending it today. (I'm running with a flat rate of about 1% inflation per month there, which is simple, but may be high, though it is entirely realistic - some sectors see 4% inflation per month.)

However, if you buy $1,000 worth of bitcoins, you'd have about 5 BTC today. In 3.5 months you could sell your BTC for USD and have about $2,000, which adjusted for inflation from today (as above), would be $1,930 worth of purchasing power. (I'm running on a rough estimation of BTC doubling every quarter. Given that it grows by an order of magnitude or more per year, this is realistic, though may be conservative.)

So, your options are:

1) Save USD and spend $965 PPP on your honey.
2) Buy BTC, save it, sell it for USD, then spend $1,930 PPP on your honey.

* PPP = Purchasing Power Parity

Does that make sense?

i.e. Buy BTC to save - cash out in fiat in order to take advantage of the additional purchasing power that a deflationary currency provides.

2211
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 05:28 AM »
A different perspective. Note that it is a log scale.

gv9SoVH.png
2212
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 12:02 AM »
And just for fun, add some holiday horror for your local banksters:

9XDpVrY.jpg

 :Thmbsup:
2213
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 28, 2013, 12:01 AM »
I wonder if DC allows bitcoins for the donation? That would be great. I don't know if mouser has any plans to add bitcoins over here.

The only problem is this:

https://en.wikipedia...i/Gresham's_law

Why spend bitcoins when you can get rid of fiat? (This is a general problem.) What I'm thinking is that constantly funnelling fiat into bitcoins then spending that is a good way to preserve value as you avoid fiat inflation and get the advantage of bitcoin's deflation. This becomes easier and easier as more merchants/etc. start accepting bitcoins.
2214
Living Room / Re: Yay! New Laws for Crowdfunding!
« Last post by Renegade on October 27, 2013, 11:39 AM »
We do?

Code: C++ [Select]
  1. int TravelToEndOfRainbow(double);
  2.  
  3.  
  4. // Cash level management Function (note: 'L' if function name is silent):
  5. float ElfinMagic(double iWallet) {
  6.  
  7.    if(iWallet <= 0) {
  8.        TravelToEndOfRainbow(iWallet);
  9.    }
  10. }
  11.  
  12. // This is a secure function - Not for public viewing:
  13. int TravelToEndOfRainbow(double iNeed) {
  14.   if(!PrintMoreMoney(iNeed)) {
  15.      InvadeNextRainbow(dwAnyExcuse);
  16.   }
  17. }

Well, normally, yes. The code we've seen so far here reflects government client requirements. That doesn't count! Really. This is the code for it:

Code: C# [Select]
  1. public static overrides int operator +(int a, int b)
  2. {
  3.     Random random = new Random();
  4.     return random.Next(int.MinValue, int.MaxValue);
  5. }

That compiles on government machines. :P
2215
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by Renegade on October 27, 2013, 11:23 AM »
More high stakes bluffing Renny.

Because today's news says ... wait for it ...

German media: Obama aware of Merkel spying since 2010
http://news.yahoo.co...eport-092009842.html

"Berlin (AFP) - US President Barack Obama was personally informed of phone tapping against German Chancellor Angela Merkel, which may have begun as early as 2002, German media reported Sunday as a damaging espionage scandal widened.

HAHAHAHAHAA~!

THAT.IS.AWESOME!

Oh man... I'm going to LOVE these fireworks! With any luck, they'll burn down the Reichstag and the White House AGAIN! :D :P (Yes... I know... it's a joke.)

Reminds me... :P

2216
This is hilarious on many levels, but still kind of sad:

http://nakedsecurity...sites-for-anonymous/

12-year-old Canadian boy admits to hacking police and government sites for Anonymous

A 12-year-old Canadian boy has pleaded guilty to hacking government and police websites during the 2012 student uprising in Quebec under affiliation with the Anonymous brand of hacktivists.

According to the Toronto Sun, the fifth grader, who lives in the Montreal suburb of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce, appeared in youth court on Thursday, accompanied by his father.

The boy pleaded guilty to three charges related to hacking websites that included those of Montreal police, the Quebec Institute of Public Health, the Chilean government and some non-public sites.

The attacks took some of the sites offline for up to two days, at what police estimated as a cost of $60,000 in damages. A more detailed report will be handed over next month when the boy is sentenced, according to the Toronto Sun.


More at the link.
2217
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 10:34 PM »
Did anyone catch Renny's 10,000th post?

Hehe! I just noticed that I made my 100th 100th post! ;D
2218
Living Room / Re: How Much Do You Trust Wikipedia?
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 09:46 PM »
This concept (sock puppets) has been a known problem at Wikipedia for years now. Wonder why is this news now?

My guess is that they've just been able to catch & out some of them.
2219
Living Room / Re: Yay! New Laws for Crowdfunding!
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 09:45 PM »
What do you think the law would look like if it were an API/SDK?

Yep. And programmers need to be the ones who solve the horrid national tax code, and actually make the Paperwork Reduction Act have its desired effect.

As programmers, we think fundamentally differently. We use logic. :P 8)
2220
Living Room / Re: Yay! New Laws for Crowdfunding!
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 09:43 PM »
^I could say regulate the banks,
but I guess you could come back with bitcoin or silver/gold :P

They are already heavily regulated. They also enjoy legislation that effectively gives them a monopoly and leaves you with no choice but to use their services. It's working out so very well, isn't it? ;D
2221
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 09:25 PM »
In more "Snowden-esque" news:

http://www.nytimes.c...tml?hp&_r=2&

"Federal Prosecutors, in a Policy Shift, Cite Warrantless Wiretaps as Evidence
By CHARLIE SAVAGE

I like Charlie Savage. He's got some really good stuff that he's published. I think that one story in Athens woke him up a bit. ;)
2222
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 09:23 PM »
Yeah, there's a bit of a fuss being kicked up by Merkel due to her mobile telephone bing 'tapped'. It will help, but it could have some more 'omph' to it imo.

Hehehe! Yep. The cracks are spreading...

Here's a Reuters article:

http://www.reuters.c...dUSBRE99P08G20131026

President Barack Obama told the German leader he would have stopped it happening had he known about it.

i.e.

  • He has admitted it
  • He has admitted that it is wrong

That's a big deal.

In an SCS document cited by the magazine, the agency said it had a "not legally registered spying branch" in the U.S. embassy in Berlin, the exposure of which would lead to "grave damage for the relations of the United States to another government".

i.e. The US is running black ops out of the US embassy in Berlin.

Man... this is some really juicy stuff! ;D

Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung also said Obama had told Merkel he had not known of the bugging.

i.e. The POTUS isn't the one running the country... So who is?

Merkel's spokesman and the White House declined comment.

"We're not going to comment on the details of our diplomatic discussions," said Caitlin Hayden, a spokeswoman for the National Security Council at the White House.

i.e. We've screwed the pooch so badly that the only thing we can do is hide. Well, that and you don't deserve to know, stupid serfs.

So, what's the buzz at the watercooler? Probably something about "Dancing with the Stars"...  :-\ Any wonder why we're "stupid serfs"?
2223
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 11:13 AM »
^I think we 're past the point where just "speaking out" is going to be sufficient to extract us from this quagmire.
 :(

All the more reason to put one's money where one's mouth is and use bitcoins instead of fiat. ;)  :Thmbsup:
2224
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 10:09 AM »

5 ozt of silver is sweet, but 1 bitcoin is much sweeter! ;)

If you don't have any bitcoins yet, here's your chance to get 1!

And in addition to your chance to win a free bitcoin, your name will also be automatically entered for a 'chance' to be selected for the IRS's ever popular "randomly selected" high audit probability list!!! So nice of you to out yourself as a troublemaker...
 (see attachment in previous post)
( :) Sorry. Not trying to go OT or scare people off. But my current campaign is pointing out the dangerous implications and possibilities for official abuse now that we live in a surveillance state here in the good ol' USA. If the thought of what this technology can be used for finally starts to worry people...well...they need to be worried.)

All the more reason to be vocal NOW and to support things/ideas that undermine the surveillance state.
2225
Living Room / Re: Yay! New Laws for Crowdfunding!
« Last post by Renegade on October 26, 2013, 09:52 AM »
Please name some regulation that isn't bad. But before you tell me what it is, ask yourself if there isn't already some law to deal with the situation already in place. It's harder than it sounds.

<crickets /> ;)



Not so much crickets as this is borders on a debate over what amounts to an almost religious belief on the part of some.

I don't have the energy (or gluteal stamina) to get into that sort of a discussion in text these days.

I'll save that for a F2F (over drinks or coffee) at the first Annual DoCo Gathering of Geeks. ;D ;)

Oh, yeah, sure! ;) Energy! ;) Gotcha. ;D

Hehehe! ;D (Sorry - I can't help but razz about this - it's just too much fun! And yes - I honestly believe that there's no regulation whatsoever that I couldn't mock and make fun of in one way or another! ;D )

Fair enough. Until then, please imagine the API. 8)

Here's a bit of boilerplate code to help your imagination. I've put some serious thought into it, and I think that I've nicely encapsulated several characteristics that you'll find repeated in the Gov.API. ;)

Code: C# [Select]
  1. private int AddTwoNumbers(int numb)
  2. {
  3.     switch (numb)
  4.     {
  5.         case 0:
  6.             return AddTwoNumbers(numb);
  7.             break;
  8.         case 1:
  9.             return AddTwoNumbers1(numb);
  10.             break;
  11.         case 2:
  12.             return AddTwoNumbers2(numb);
  13.             break;
  14.         // Etc. etc. etc.
  15.         default:
  16.             throw new Exception("You didn't really expect this stuff to work, did you?");
  17.             break;
  18.     }
  19. }
  20. public int AddTwoNumbers1(int numb)
  21. {
  22.     switch (numb)
  23.     {
  24.         case 0:
  25.             return AddTwoNumbers(numb);
  26.             break;
  27.         case 1:
  28.             return AddTwoNumbers1(numb);
  29.             break;
  30.         case 2:
  31.             return AddTwoNumbers2(numb);
  32.             break;
  33.         // Etc. etc. etc.
  34.         default:
  35.             throw new Exception("You didn't really expect this stuff to work, did you?");
  36.             break;
  37.     }
  38. }
  39. private int AddTwoNumbers2(int numb)
  40. {
  41.     switch (numb)
  42.     {
  43.         case 0:
  44.             return AddTwoNumbers(numb);
  45.             break;
  46.         case 1:
  47.             return AddTwoNumbers1(numb);
  48.             break;
  49.         case 2:
  50.             return AddTwoNumbers2(numb);
  51.             break;
  52.         // Etc. etc. etc.
  53.         default:
  54.             throw new Exception("You didn't really expect this stuff to work, did you?");
  55.             break;
  56.     }
  57. }

There's definitely a madness in that method! ;D 8)
Pages: prev1 ... 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94 ... 438next