topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 9:40 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 ... 175next
2076
(see attachment in previous post)

Yes. I would do that for you. Also, people need to make funnier wills! I've joked about that many times over the years.

Working beyond the grave for example.

"Hi. This is Steve Jobs. Here is my keynote presentation for the iPad 6."
;D
2077
I realize you were being facetious, but it's not all that far from reality.

Hmm. I was indeed being more serious than facetious, just with bits of rhetorical flair thrown in.

Given that certain ad campaigns can cost a bundle and only "influence" people, just pay them cold hard cash to use X program! I am indeed thinking of Linux and Office packages, but maybe other things as well.

2078
Living Room / Re: Google: Gmail users shouldn't expect email privacy
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 15, 2013, 07:40 PM »
Two words: Third party.
More words: Only people can make that happen and they can.

Another word: Coordination
More words: Without it nothing happens and the third party gets laughed at.
I keep saying we need a Political Social Network like VoteBook.


2079
"...There is no "below cost" distribution in Free Software..."

Actually that leaves the door open to a *fascinating* level "below free" - *pay* people to use your software!

After all, since Lock-In is worth trillions over decades, who cares about a measly 1-time incentive fee!?

:tellme:

2080
Living Room / Re: Google: Gmail users shouldn't expect email privacy
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 15, 2013, 01:56 PM »
... everybody was in on it - including the American public itself for their continuing refusal to face yet another "inconvenient truth."
...

I'd like to disagree with this wording. Govt & Corps are "in on it" - actively spending billions on it.

The Public is just caught in a giant form of some mix of Prisoner's Dilemma and Tragedy of the Commons and related "Game Theory" stuff. Given a "safe" outlet such as web comments or chat rooms, tens of millions of Americans are not happy at all!

But then they get stuck because they have no recourse. Nothing short of a stunning "gestalt" movement 1000 times stronger than the Anti-SOPA one will have any effect. So no, we're not "in on it". We just don't know what to do.

I don't think Obama is a saint, but I'd say he's a wee few % points better than Bush, and the *other ticket* was even worse!

Then you get Congress, where "all the States (via the reps) get to hang out" in the same rooms, but there's no current method for Wisconsin Activists to tell the Vermont Activists to vote out their guy/gal.

Then you get more meetings in the 3-letter-agency rooms and the Corp back conference rooms with the hundred dollar catered lunches.

Snowden made a start, and he's gotten a few steps farther than Bradley Manning did. But we need something to make it stick.
2081
Living Room / Re: Google: Gmail users shouldn't expect email privacy
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 14, 2013, 08:44 PM »
As I posted the original, I have to post the correction link also:

Yes, Gmail users have an expectation of privacy

So, though I know that the day that Google is proven to be evil will come... but that day is not today.

"Yes it is today, just not in this story. It's in the next story over".

This is spin control.

I like to use a Magic the Gathering analogy for current news (even though I never played all that well!)
News reports B.
News reports D.
News comments that "see, nothing is all that bad".
News reports C. Your intuition is ringing, but you can't quite put a finger on it. But also by this point B and D are old hat, and we've been trained that anything older than Last Month is old hat. (You can joke about Last Week, but the cycles are really just a bit longer than that.)


Then News reports A, the Oh Dear Gawd piece. A + B + C + D = the nasty gamelocking combo, and if it had ever come out all at once, no one would ever have allowed it.

So here, if I send an email to a Gmail user, *I wouldn't expect that to show me ads in a YouTube video*! But they have cross-link tech now, and they can do that soon.

2082
General Software Discussion / Re: 'non-religious' religious head's-up
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 14, 2013, 03:52 PM »

Well, I think there's a missing Venn diagram here.

If the ***/***/*** crowd can remotely activate phones & comps and start listening, then LOTS of stuff happens.

Religious confidentiality is only a subset. Medical, Legal, and X other types of confidentiality matter too.

Some of y'all have seen that whole Division by Zero math joke. So once you end up with 0=1 in your chain of premises, then anything else follows as it pleases you. This surveillance mess is the social version of all that.
2083
Living Room / Re: Google: Gmail users shouldn't expect email privacy
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 14, 2013, 02:06 PM »

Okay, I'll comment!

This is posted here for the most relevance, but I wonder if it has any kind of tangential edge correlation to the Snowden Affair.

Abbreviated From Slashdot:
"For most businesses, data analytics presents an opportunity. But for DARPA, the military agency responsible for developing new technology, so-called 'Big Data' could represent a big threat....

As Foreign Policy points out, there's a certain amount of irony in the government soliciting ways to reduce its vulnerability to data exploitation. 'At the time government officials are assuring Americans they have nothing to fear from the National Security Agency poring through their personal records,' the publication wrote, 'the military is worried that Russia or al Qaeda is going to wreak nationwide havoc after combing through people's personal records.'"

So isn't THAT a complicated new development? The "easy depressing view" is that Corps & Govts are in semi-agreement, maybe with bumps on precise edge cases, but generally happy to work together to create a nice totalitarian prison with soothing muted colors backed by political court judgements & stuff.

But what happens if you begin to get them both nipping at each others' heels, with Govt saying the Biz dataset is a security risk and Biz saying that new Govt rules are an economic risk?

I'm just a poor lil' humanities type - figuring out how *that* plays out (beyond a mere truce agreement), is beyond me!

Now also from Slashdot, "A group of researchers from MIT and the University of Ireland has presented a paper (PDF) showing that one of the most important assumptions behind cryptographic security is wrong. As a result, certain encryption-breaking methods will work better than previously thought. "

So what if we get a thermonuclear data explosion where *everyone's data* becomes available all at once, with none of this peaceful filtering? You know, someone willing to risk instant death for treason busts all of data collection wide open, Johnny Mnemonic style?

Speculation is now open, drinks half price!
:Thmbsup:
2084
Living Room / Re: Massive Subpoenas For Bitcoin People
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 13, 2013, 01:43 PM »
Hmm. This feels different.

So it really kicked off about 2010 after a couple of years of concept demos etc.

Three years is a long time. "Suboenas are "instant" - random bits of paper. Last I knew there isn't exactly a super-event in Bitcoin that signaled Things Must Change.

So after random round-tables, *now* they decide to basically do a tombstone piledriver on the entire industry?!

This really is the fight-back of the Jocks vs the Nerds again. Even with flaws, the concept of Bitcoin is brilliant. Subpoenas are Muscle.

2085
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: FREE Today Zemana AntiLogger
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 13, 2013, 12:06 AM »
What about a test?

Has anyone tried one? Install a logger, then that? : )

2086
MEWLO Web Framework / Mewlo web framework collaboration discussion
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 12, 2013, 03:13 PM »
What I would really LOVE to do is find some more serious Python coders who are interested in being part of the team creating this.  It's a huge project and it's going to need all the help it can get.

I've been watching from the sidelines for a while, and I KNOW that I am very far from prepared to commit in any substantial way.

However, I know that there are always a trillion things to be done, and many of them are quite small and easily manageable by developers that work in an office/nursery.

If you think that you could come up with a list of "mini-mini-projects" (like at the method or class level), I would be interested in helping to solve some when I had time. e.g. A database of cuss words and a filter that doesn't eliminate legitimate words, e.g. remove "ass" but leave "pass" and "assassin". That's just an example. (It takes a while to compile the database, and would be a great project for a non-programmer.)

A pair of favorites:
analysis and analyst!
therapist!

Honorable mention might go to Slashdot's popular acronym of
I Am Not A Lawyer. :  )



2087
Man on the Street Monday!  :Thmbsup: (More silly petitions that people sign!)

 :o "You just supported that."  :o


Adds a whole new level to "Think of the Children"!
:D
2088

The Silly Side of Mewlo

1. Yumps was still more fun to say!
2. Doesn't Mewlo sound like a cat? (Inspired by mine screaming this morning! And yes, he gets both syllables in Mewlo with a pitch change!) So who is going to draw the Cat Mascot of Mewlo?
;D
2089
This is no longer a matter of whether it's not the United States I and millions of others used to know.  This is no longer the United States of America as defined by it's founding documents, period.

Yes. Isn't it amazing that fewer than 1 in 100 Americans realizes that the U.S. government has been overthrown - not by the communists, or Al Qaeda, or anyone else we've been repeatedly warned about - but by some self-proclaimed "patriots" with the U.S. government itself.

There's a term for what's happened in the United States. But say it softly. Because coup d'état is a foreign term for something that's only supposed to happen in foreign places. Not here.
 :(

Naw, I really want to get the terminology straight - the Govt hasn't been overthrown.

The Govt has succumbed to systemic abuses of power.

2090
Living Room / Re: Apple Patents Making You SHUT UP!
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 08, 2013, 08:55 PM »
Clear the room of anyone with sensitive ears. You are about to erupt into a blithering mass of profanity. Better yet, run out on the airport tarmac next to a jet as it might mask the volume of your screams...

Then again, you might just sigh and figure it's all par for the course.

No. I absolutely promise I will not erupt into a blithering mass of profanity.

Instead, I'd invoke Harlan Ellison. So Renny if you haven't read enough of his work (for example not counting that Star Trek episode), then he can take your boring old hat 1.0 style profanity, and turn it into a blithering mass of far worse words that will just make you want to curl up in a corner and expire. Quietly, so your passing doesn't bother anyone!
:o
It doesn't stop the horror of the situation. But it's cathartic to at least have the proper vocabulary! Come find me in IM's and I'll give you a class! : )

2091
Living Room / Re: Apple Patents Making You SHUT UP!
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 08, 2013, 08:51 PM »
See, the weird part here is Apple can *invent* this kind of thing all they like.

But why *patent* it - so does that mean that Android is safe because Google or Samsung won't license the patent!?

2092
Living Room / Re: Anti-Tracking Smartphone Pouch
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 08, 2013, 08:18 PM »
"Free speech" doesn't mean that you can't say whatever you want... you can... just as long as we know who you are, where you are, and what you're saying...

  That pretty much sums it up....   :mad:

In that vein, there was a particularly (and prob accidentally) unsubtle error message I got today.

"In order to use Yahoo mail, turn Private Browsing off in Safari".

I'll deliver that one straight-face and let y'all do the antics!

2093
Living Room / Re: Bitcoins Can Be Regulated
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 08, 2013, 08:13 PM »

I wasn't surprised at that news at all. The Govt doesn't like anything to be wild-westy anymore.
2094
Well, it's a little murkier than that. There really is a basic level of "safety through security" in that we don't (yet?!!) have Jackboots marching down the streets. So if you just live your life, you'll get through most days.

But Snowden isn't exactly a dummy - he clearly knew he's in Whole Hog on this, and that's taking it to a whole other level. So speaking of Chaos, everything around him is going to go through a distortion field.

2095
Living Room / Re: US Government War On Hackers Backfires
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 08, 2013, 05:58 PM »
Bottom line is ... They can force you to show up, they can force you to sit in front of a computer ... But they can't force you to know anything. When applied correctly...ignorance truly is bliss.

The most dangerous game I like to play, is called micromanagement. You push to hard, I start doing exactly what I'm told. There is no warning when the transition happens. Scary part is...regardless of what I know about just how detrimentally dangerous your instructions are...I'll do exactly what I'm told...calmly, dutifully...you'll never see me laughing. I've never lost this game ... Ever.

I've sorta done that a little, but with far less of a smirk and more of a "keep your head down and just pay the rent". I am no people-genius, I can't play a complicated meta-game with my jobs!
2096
Living Room / Re: New bill upgrades unauthorized streaming to a felony
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 07, 2013, 03:21 PM »
Now, what else will qualify as a felonious public performance of a "copyrighted" work, under this?
...

Bingo App. I'd give Happy Birthday a "hardcoded exemption" under some random amendment, because it's the only song of its kind that matters, but you caught on to my general point - post a random Bon Jovi video and you're cooked.

If I didn't know better, this almost makes me want to design a new school curiculum with "practical advice", which would include Venn Diagram Analysis to Political Statements. (Right in the line of fire here!)

P.S. It's funny to see what "normal" people's idea of IP via Youtube is ... "Here's some copyrighted video, which I am posting, but as long as I say it isn't mine, I'm okay. Right??!"



2097
A cop was patrolling late at night in a well-known spot. He sees a couple in a car with the interior light brightly glowing. The cop carefully approaches the car to get a closer look.

Then he sees a young man behind the wheel, reading a computer magazine. He immediately notices a young woman in the rear seat, knitting. Puzzled by this surprising situation, the cop walks to the car and gently raps on the driver's window.

The young man lowers his window . "Uh, yes, officer?" The cop says: "What are you doing?"

The young man says: "Well, Officer, I'm reading a magazine." Pointing towards the young woman in the back seat the cop says: "And her, what is she doing?"

The young man shrugs: "Sir, I believe she's knitting a pullover sweater."

Now, the cop is totally confused. A young couple. Alone, in a car, at night in a Lover's lane....and nothing obscene is happening!

The cop asks: "What's your age, young man?" The young man says, "I'm 22, sir." The cop asks, "And her ... what's her age?"

The young man looks at his watch and replies: "She'll be 18 in 11 minutes."

Epic! It would have been a passable joke in the 90's, but given our current situation, this is great!
:D

While the ages are a bit young, given their observance of detail, it would be hysterical if one of them was a lawyer and the other was in IT! (Age wise I'd have to put the guy in law and the babe in IT).
2098
Living Room / Re: New bill upgrades unauthorized streaming to a felony
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 07, 2013, 12:22 PM »
I've got a few ideas on some acts they can publically perform with that bill.

No. No you can't, you indecently exposing felon!

>:(
2099
Heh Hooray for Zombie Threads!

So Urlwolf, whatever became of all this?
2100
Living Room / Re: New bill upgrades unauthorized streaming to a felony
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on August 07, 2013, 11:07 AM »

This bill seems *incredibly dangerous*.

Because in Boiling Frog fashion, you introduce the "structure", then other days you fiddle with the numbers.

This might hit every youtube uploader of their favorite clips!

It's a bit amazing that "Web 2.0" was built on "sharing" - how can you share anything except your own cat videos?

Look at that last sentence:

"...holding a public performance without a proper license is not a felony. S. 978 adds "public performance" to the felony list."

That's not even streaming! See the Spin Doctors at work already? Even in the article, they didn't "make Streaming a felony", they "made public performance a felony" and "streaming a subset of public performance"??!

:o

Pages: prev1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 ... 175next