topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 10:56 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 [82] 83 84 85 86 87 ... 127next
2026
General Software Discussion / Re: The Best Of: text editors
« Last post by rjbull on April 28, 2009, 08:19 AM »
tranglos, great post!  I'm glad I inspired something  ;)

I've concluded I'll never find a Windows text editor I'm really happy with, because I don't like the way Windows works.  Like you, I find that many seem to be oriented mainly towards programmers, and I'm not a programmer.  Again like you, I find I want macros I can edit.  My problem is that not being a programmer, it had better be a simple macro language, with enough details in the editor's Help file.  I don't want to have to learn Javascript, Lua or whatever just to program the editor. 

Incremental search: what is that?

Search and replace in multiple files: I routinely have to make the same replacements if multiple files, so I use a multi-file search-and-replace program, now usually HFFR Text Workbench.  This is claimed to do unicode and Word files, amongst other things, though I haven't tried those features yet.

Text clips: an interesting idea, depending on what's meant by it.  I have a variety of programs for text expansion and completion if I want them, and at least completion is included in many editors.  Many other programs offer text clips and templates, e.g. AceText (which I haven't tried) by the author of EditPad Pro (payware), and freewares like Konrad Pappala's Ka TypeIn.  It's simple, but allows you to add your own named variables in templates, e.g. "firstname", "lastname".  As a very simple trial, I made one for quoting URLs in DC's SMF.  Then there's mouser's own Form Letter Machine (again I haven't tried it), and some template functionality is offered by most clipboard enhancers, like ArsClip and the clipboard module in Comfort Keys by Comfort Software.  That one is so clever you can build little menus with it.

Short comments a few editors I've tried recently:

  • Boxer: abandoned because it doesn't wrap text to the window, so can't see long lines
  • EmEditor: abandoned (at least for now) as a consequence of its license.  If you use it at work, you exhaust the terms of the license, even if you purchased the license with your own money.  The workaround is to install it as portable - but it's crashed on me a couple of times when I've done that, not during basic editing, but when fiddling with macros and configuring.  That may not be EmEditor's "fault," but whatever the reason, if it crashes, I can't depend on it.
  • PsPad: didn't quite "click," and crashed when making extensive use of the clipboard facility.
  • Notepad++: much improved since I last looked at it.  Still some glitches, e.g. the only way to make it recognise the AWK syntax file was to uninstall it, then reinstall it as portable: no accelerator keys on some menus; macros saves as XML, which means some folk can edit them, but I can't.  Please could there be a free-standing menu-driven macro editor, or something?
  • HippoEdit: first impressions are it works well, looks nice, friendly forums, developer working hard, but (apart from no macros yet) it's positioned as a programmer's editor more than a general text editor, which is what I need more.  I think the Help file could do with some work, too.  It tells you what can be done, but it often isn't obvious how to do it.  E.g., there doesn't seem to be a menu item (that I could see) for wrapping text, that's on a button.
  • Zeus 3.94a (free): installed, took one look, wow, that's one hardcore programmer's editor!

What I actually use:

DOS editor/word processors VDE and PC-Write, largely because I'm used to them, but also because they're WordStar command set.  One more nice thing about WordStar: bookmarks are to the character, not just to the line.  Infinitely more useful for editing text.  When I do Windows editors, currently it's TED Notepad and/or Crimson Editor, depending on what I'm doing.  Lately Notepad++ has been coming up on the outside.

One other note: while the NoteTab editors don't seem to have much mindshare on DC, NoteTab Pro is due on Bits du Jour at half price on Monday 4th May 2009.

[edit]
Forgot to add, there's also The Semware Editor (TSE), another with little mindshare on DC, and another I haven't tried.
[/edit]
2027
Note Taking Software / Re: SuperboyAC's Notetaking Software Roundup #1
« Last post by rjbull on April 28, 2009, 05:55 AM »
I'd like to try out CintaNotes as a possible replacement for Evernote ...

It's a simple application that doesn't do more than text, but I'm intrigued by the latest version of Notesholder, because it gives you a hotkey which will save the latest clip from the clipboard as a new note - and the nice bit is that if the clip was made from a browser (don't know how many are supported) it will include the URL of the page the clip came from.  Even the freeware Lite version does this now, and both Pro and Lite can be installed as portable, too.  The Pro version will be on Bits Du Jour on Sunday 3d May.
2028
Yeah I noticed, but it is exremely ugly. I rather have something eyecandy.

Well, if what you mostly want is eye candy, heaven help you.  Don't forget that HotKeyz is a hotkey program; the screenshot on the Web site is just its configuration window.  When you're using it, you'd just use whatever hotkeys you'd assigned, and wouldn't see HotKeyz at all.  You'd just see the row of coloured blocks marching across your screen as Windows increases or decreases the volume.
2029
Developer's Corner / Re: Hotkey nostalgia
« Last post by rjbull on April 27, 2009, 04:37 AM »
Anyone suffering DOS withdrawal syndrome should check out the Free Software for DOS Web site  :)  Not primarily TSRs, though.

One TSR I really liked - a shareware called OnCall, which was a TSR control program.  You loaded your other TSRs into it.  It kept one of them active, and saved all the rest to disk.  When you needed another one, you got OnCall to swap them round.  I would have registered, but the company disappeared.  Then QEMM + DESQview came along, which was a very good multi-tasking system, and the need for TSRs more or less went away.

2030
Developer's Corner / Re: Easy Small Free Windows Language that does cool GUIs??
« Last post by rjbull on April 24, 2009, 03:36 AM »
Maybe PureBasic?

[edit]
Oops...  looks like there's no free version any more.  I think they had a limited free version a few years ago.
[/edit]
2031
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 24, 2009, 03:30 AM »
I'm not Jussi, but I've downloaded and installed it and it appears to be a 'registered' copy upon installation.

What mwb1100 is 100% correct. This is a fully registered version of Zeus that will never expire and can be used free of charged.
-Jussi Jumppanen (April 24, 2009, 12:24 AM)

That's very generous: many thanks!  :)

But remember this version is about 5 years old

Jussi, I still regularly use PC-Write.  Its .exe is dated 1993.

it is missing a lot of features found in the latest Zeus release.

I'll bear that in mind!  But I'd guess that also makes it faster and lighter weight for older hardware like my Win98SE laptop - which, admittedly, even I will have to replace with Vista UAC hell when I get some time to set the new one up.
2032
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 23, 2009, 09:51 AM »
I can't recall seeing STDIN support (and never needed it), but the editors I've used that supports user tools have been able to capture STDOUT.

I'm hankering after wider availability of TED Notepad's ability to send text through a filter and overwrite the original marked text with the modified text...   ;)

Good point: I grew up with persistent selections.  From your last sentence, I presume those features must be present in NPP, so I suppose I'd better go and look for them :)
Nope, I've gotten used to living without them :) - I'm contemplating coding a "mark-begin, mark-end" plugin though :)

NPP 5.3.1 has "TextFX Quick" features Find Matching Brace, Mark to Matching Brace, Delete Matching Brace Pair, Mark Lines to Matching Brace.  Those aren't bad work-arounds.
2033
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 23, 2009, 04:19 AM »
In fact the 3.94a version is so different from the latest Zeus it can be downloaded free of charge from this link:
http://www.zeusedit....m/z300/ze32r394a.zip
-Jussi Jumppanen (April 19, 2009, 08:14 PM)

<erm>  Jussi, does that mean free download, i.e. you don't have to pay to download a trial, or free software, i.e. you don't have to pay to keep and use it?  Or is there a lower fee for the older version?
2034
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 23, 2009, 04:15 AM »
STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR work irrespectively of a command shell - when you use win32 CreateProcess, you can override those handles at will. Even GUI processes can use stdin/stdout/stderr, not just console processes.

OK, but in practice I find editors tend not to enable access to STDIN etc. to user tools.

If you press almost any other key, you lose the marked area and have to start again.
This is a Windows standard so I suspect that is why most windows editors do this. But in Zeus this is configurable.
Another piece of Microsoft stupidity that has to be fixed by the aftermarket...
Dunno if it's stupid, I guess it depends on what you grew up with. Most of the time, with my usage habits, this is a decent enough default. For a serious editor, I prefer also having the option of persistent selection, as well as mark-begin + mark-end.

Good point: I grew up with persistent selections.  From your last sentence, I presume those features must be present in NPP, so I suppose I'd better go and look for them  :)
2035
Post New Requests Here / Re: I need an app like Filenote for folders
« Last post by rjbull on April 23, 2009, 04:06 AM »
leaving us like all the other girls do :P  Just kidding

You should be reported to Global Moderator Carol Haynes for that!   ;D

2036
Living Room / Re: How many furries here at DC?
« Last post by rjbull on April 23, 2009, 04:00 AM »
whatever you call robot fandom.

Charles Stross wrote a humorous science fiction novella Trunk and Disorderly in which cyborgs were "clankies" and unaltered flesh bodies "squishies"...

2037
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: set default printer according to ip address
« Last post by rjbull on April 23, 2009, 03:48 AM »
Not sure it helps the OP much...  but there's a program called SDP = Select Default Printer by Edward Brophy, available here (the author's page seems to have disappeared).

What is it?

  SDP is a command line utility for setting which printer/output-device
  is to be used by default under Windows 95, 98 and NT.  It will not run
  under Windows 3.1.

Why did I make it?

  I had to make print outs every morning automatically using task scheduling
  software using NotePad & WordPad using the little know /p command line
  option.  (aside:  NotepPad /p SDP.TXT automatically loads, prints, and
  closes this doc.)  However, if someone sent a fax or something the previous
  day, the print outs would go to the fax instead of the printer.  I needed
  A utility that would make the printer the default output every morning. 
  I created SDP and I set my scheduling software to run it before the morning
  print outs and... guess what?  No more problems.

How do you use it?

  The basic usage is:  SDP.EXE <printer description>
 
  Just type in all or part of the printer's name and/or port and SDP will
  select the first device that it matches.  The printer description is
  CASE SENSITIVE!  Epson is not the same as EPSON to SDP.  You should run
  SDP without parameters to see the case used.  Also do no use quotes or
  chevrons (< >) on the command line, just what it asks for. 

  Example:  SDP.EXE Okidata

  Running SDP without parameters gives you the help screen that shows which
  printers are installed (i.e. selectable) and their complete, case sensitive
  description.  It displays the printer's name and port separated by a comma.
  You can enter this entire description as shown or any part of it.  If
  the printer description was:  HP LaserJet 4P,\\network\hp you could
  enter:  SDP.EXE 4P,\\net and SDP would find it.
 
  SDP can be run from a DOS window, a DOS batch file, the Run command on the
  Start Menu or you can create a shortcut with the <printer description>
  after the program's name.  From a DOS batch file, it's a good idea to use
  the START command with the /w wait option.
2038
The OP *might* like Skynergy's HotKeyz
Mmm I do not see it in its description...

Try looking at the screenshot on the HotKeyz Web page!

And I've briefly tried it; feature is there.

2039
The OP *might* like Skynergy's HotKeyz, a donationware general-purpose hotkey program that has what I think the OP might mean built in.  HotKeyz's author has posted on DC, but sorry, I can't remember his DC UserID.
2040
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Replace Hourglass with Quote from text file
« Last post by rjbull on April 22, 2009, 04:35 AM »
Reminds me of an old tagline.  "Windows loading.  Come back tomorrow." 

2041
Living Room / Re: How many furries here at DC?
« Last post by rjbull on April 22, 2009, 04:34 AM »
The queen of furry fandom is Kay Shapero.  Furry conventions (ConFurence), furry fiction, furry folk music, recommended reading, the lot!
2042
Screenshot Captor / Re: How to capture a DOS screen with Screenshot Captor
« Last post by rjbull on April 20, 2009, 07:25 AM »
Have you thought of trying one of the DOS screen capture programs, like Screen Thief, two versions available here?  Not sure if they'll capture a screen graphic as well as a DOS text screen, but it might be worth trying.

2043
What's the Best? / Re: Anti-Virus Package
« Last post by rjbull on April 16, 2009, 04:08 AM »
does anyone know of a reasonable anti-virus that's also free for commercial use ?

Maybe ClamWin?  But it scans files only, and doesn't have a real-time scanner.

2044
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 16, 2009, 04:01 AM »
Zeus has all these feature: http://www.zeusedit.com
[...]
I am not exactly sure what you mean by a redirection filter?

When the editor runs an external tool it will put in it's own hook to capture the output. If you redirect this output there will be nothing for the editor to capture.
-Jussi Jumppanen (April 14, 2009, 01:30 AM)

I use lots of DOS and Windows console-mode ports of Unix command-line tools, like sed, awk, tr, comm, etc.  These normally work by taking input from STDIN and sending transformed (filtered, I suppose) output to STDOUT.  Many editors allow you to define user tools, but they often invoke them by means other than a command shell.  If there's no command shell, there's (as I understand it) no access to STDIN/STDOUT and the redirection process, so one can't use tools that operate as filters, at least not at all easily.  By contrast, consider TED Notepad.  It presumably uses a hidden command shell, because you can define STDIN/STDOUT filters as user tools, mark a block of text, hit the hotkey for that tool, and have the transformed text over-write the existing block.  Very convenient.

If you press almost any other key, you lose the marked area and have to start again.

This is a Windows standard so I suspect that is why most windows editors do this. But in Zeus this is configurable.

Another piece of Microsoft stupidity that has to be fixed by the aftermarket...

Compare this with WordStar-style editors.

FWIW Zeus has a WordStar keyboard emulation mode.

I was aware of this, but I should make it clear I'm not a coder, other than AWK scripts and batch files.  The latest version of Zeus is a 10 Mb download - not that out of the way nowadays, but many competent editors are much smaller and presumably faster loading - and costs $USD 69.95.  I'm sure one gets what one pays for, but it might be too much for me.  On the other hand, if I'd bought it first, maybe I wouldn't be on this quest    :-[
2045
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 16, 2009, 03:45 AM »
There's an editor I have not heard of before coming up on BDJ in a few days - HippoEDIT

The code-folding screenshot, and even the outliner-like features on the Web site, are very reminiscent of Notepad++.  Is that just convergent evolution?

2046
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 16, 2009, 03:37 AM »
If you buy it for yourself, and use it for yourself, even if it's on the job, I think (hope) that's still considered personal use. I use EmEditor on my home PC and my laptop, which I also use for work, and that was my assumption based on the license.

Here's what's in the Help file for EmEditor 8.04:

You must obtain a license for each computer you install the software on. Therefore, a license is needed for each terminal computer on a network, including remote terminal computers. If this software is for personal usage and not installed on corporate computers, you can install up to 5 computers for your use only.
If this software is installed on a portable drive such as a USB drive, one portable drive equals to one computer as described above

Which I read to mean that I have to treat it as a single-installation license because I use it at work, even though I paid my own money.

Quoting Eóin:
But the specifics are usually a bit ambiguous in most cases.

You never typed a truer word...

Hmmm, time to contact Emurasoft.
2047
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows editors - do they have to be so bad?
« Last post by rjbull on April 13, 2009, 03:48 PM »
Speaking up for EmEditor again :)

Its licensing is not per-installation, but per-user.

I read it as per-installation.  Will have to take another look.

Since I bought a License for EmEditor back in version 5 or 6, and it's still good in version 8, it's quite generous :)

They're already talking about version 9  ;)


[edit]
Ah, I see the confusion over the license.  EmEditor Web site says:


You must obtain a license for each computer you install the software on. Therefore, a license is needed for each terminal computer on a network, including remote terminal computers. If this software is for personal usage and not installed on corporate computers, you can install up to 5 computers for your use only.
If this software is installed on a portable drive such as a USB drive, one portable drive equals to one computer as described above.

I mostly use software at work, so read the license as per-installation for my purposes.  It isn't clear whether buying a license primarily for work, but with one's own money, also confers a right for personal use at home.
[/edit]

2048
General Software Discussion / Re: EditPad Pro +1
« Last post by rjbull on April 12, 2009, 03:39 PM »
EditpadPro +1
Pros: (first answering rjbull's requirements...)

Bookmarks - either 10 per file or 10 per project. Sorry, no "Next bookmark" hotkey.

That's quite important.  How am I supposed to remember which hotkey is assigned to which bookmark?  I wouldn't mind if "next bookmark" could be a macro rather than a native feature.  10 bookmarks per file is a bit meagre (same in Boxer), though in practice I'd try to minimise the number.

Flexible tools integration with configurable stdin/stdout/stderr I/O. (is this what you mean by Filters?)

EditPad Pro actually has what I mean by filters  :)  it's on the Web site.

Portable - can be installed on memory stick with all config in INI file.
Generous license to the user allows installation on multiple computers.

I noticed that.  EmEditor is cheaper, Boxer more expensive, and both of them are single-installation licenses.  Both of them can be made portable, but I'd (much) rather have EditPad Pro's more generous approach.

Text "snippets" - hard to describe but easy to get dependent upon.

That's not unique, but appears to be particularly well implemented.

No scripting language support.

I'm not a coder, and don't really want to have to learn Java or whatever...  I'd like it to have its own simple macro language, with editable files.  I understand it currently uses all-but-impenetrable INI files, which is a pity.


Actually, I regret not purchasing an EditPad Pro license when it was on Bits du Jour...  but I have a reminder running in case it turns up a second time   :)
2049
New release by Nir Sofer - WhatInStartup
Announced on DC here


[Edit]
Oops  :-[  didn't notice it was mentioned above.
[/Edit]

2050
New Nir Sofer utility - WhatInStartup - displays the list of all applications that are loaded automatically when Windows starts up

WhatInStartup
Description
This utility displays the list of all applications that are loaded automatically when Windows starts up. For each application, the following information is displayed: Startup Type (Registry/Startup Folder), Command-Line String, Product Name, File Version, Company Name, Location in the Registry or file system, and more.
It allows you to easily disable or delete unwanted programs that runs in your Windows startup. You can use it on your currently running instance of Windows, as well as you can use it on external instance of Windows in another drive.
WhatInStartup also supports a special "Permanent Disabling" feature - If a program that you previously disabled added itself again to the startup list of Windows, WhatInStartup will automatically detect the change and disable it again.

System Requirements
This utility works on any version of Windows starting from Windows 2000 and up to Windows 7.

[...]

Permanent Disabling is a special feature of WhatInStartup that allows you to Permanently enforce the disabling of programs in Windows startup.

[...]

Using WhatInStartup On External Drive [...]
Pages: prev1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 [82] 83 84 85 86 87 ... 127next