topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday January 17, 2026, 3:48 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11next
201
Living Room / Re: Mobo dying .... suggestions please on upgrading my system ...
« Last post by dk70 on November 01, 2006, 09:20 PM »
A suggestion, stayed at the site you linked to:

http://www.overclock...___Foxconn__174.html at bottom there is a strange motherboard which supports both AGP and PCI-E video card.

Does not seem to require newer power supply with 24 pin connector - see specs at Asrock site, 20+4. New motherboard could mean new psu as well. Not what you want. Memory modules can be recycled providing they are "compatible" or works ;) They should if identical sticks and may be will anyway. 164pins would be 184pins right? Hope so or there is a problem. PC2700 vs std. PC3200 dont mean that much, minor loss of performance. 2x1gb is too much to throw out for a few percentages extra speed. If they are overclocking friendly they can always be overclocked to PC3200 :D Depends on what chip they use and how well they work with motherboard.

Cpu could be 3000+ at 38.99 http://www.overclock...alog/Socket_939.html Only 1800mhz but with a little overclocking, even with Asrock software, you can probably get way past 2000. 2400+ if lucky. So no reason to pay more than needed. Cpu runs very cool, stock cooler which you get in retail package is more than enough - also for overclocking. For a bit of extra speed on desktop and in some games a X2 3800 would be ideal. They dont have that, cost more for sure, Im guessing 100+.

Alternative could be older socket A motherboard but probably cost the same as newer and you wont get new cpu  8)

Ive used ATA->SATA converter before, worked ok - even with cd drive. http://www.google.co...a%20sata%20converter Solution if you want cheap motherboard and more than 4 IDE disks. Not many expensive ones have more than 4 either. External PCI-IDE card is other option. I got free converter with my old Abit NF2 motherboard http://www.abit-usa....ogy/serillel_new.php Cant cost that much or they would not have included it.

http://www.asrock.co...ct/939Dual-SATA2.htm click on some of their AWARDS icons and see what reviewers think. Not sure they mention Anandtech http://www.anandtech....aspx?i=2524&p=1 Asrock is made by Asus I think, budget brand. There are disadvantages like not being able to overclock very high because of voltage limits. Enough for you and if it works out it is as good as any.

Even if you got PCI-E video card this Asrock should still be in top 5 choices considering price. May be budget models of MSI, Asus can manage to compete. Boards with VIA chipset could be a little cheaper. I would go Nvidia/ULI any day, anything but VIA but they are cheap. Less than 30£ is unlikely. The longer you wait for new video card the better, soon DX10 cards available.
202
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox extension>COOLIRIS
« Last post by dk70 on October 28, 2006, 03:19 PM »
On the other hand Im glad Firefox is not big at widget market  8)

The 4 search options for selected word in rightclick menu are almost better than link preview. Hyperwords is getting close to termination Im afraid.

May be not all hope is lost for Opera, this script claims to support Opera 8+ http://shiftingpixel.com/lightbox/ Check Opera javascript forum, got to be mentioned.

I just tried that script and it seems to work on 9.02. Perhaps better ones are available, http://webdev.yuan.c...monkey/lightbox.html is another. Ive used a few for Google previews as well but may be more to Greasemonkey on Opera than copy and paste. Have no idea.

203
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox extension>COOLIRIS
« Last post by dk70 on October 28, 2006, 07:29 AM »
http://www.cooliris.com/index.php?s=home Also for IE, Safari, Flock.

I have uninstalled it a couple of times but now it stay thanks to improved activation of preview - optional icon, shortcut, delay gets rid of popup hell. Nice Cooliris remember enable/disable per site but not really needed now.

I guess it will be a good idea to turn off "Prefetch websites" - Firefox do that already.
204
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox 2 hints and tips
« Last post by dk70 on October 27, 2006, 09:14 PM »
Uninstalling dont help much if you recycle old profile. See what you have by starting Firefox like this "firefox.exe - profilemanager" Each profile has your bookmarks, cookies, extension data. Often a good idea to start from scratch when updating program version. Problems can be hard to solve if simply reinstalling extension dont help http://kb.mozillazin....org/Profile_Manager

Im not sure if you are asked about deleting profiles during uninstallation. I think you are - be careful not to lose data. Just leave it and chose a new with profile manager. Same manager also lets you delete profiles or you can do it in Explorer, no need for uninstall process to clean up.

Every time you install extension check Add-on menu and see if "options" button is activ. Not all are user friendly, doing these clicks are sometimes only way to set it up right.
205
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox 2 hints and tips
« Last post by dk70 on October 27, 2006, 05:15 PM »
Make sure "type" is boolean when you make entry.

Surfulator is compatible with FF2 http://www.surfulate...#Firefox%20Extension and http://www.softasitg...howthread.php?t=1035

This Roboform extension is compatible as well https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/750/

206
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox 2 hints and tips
« Last post by dk70 on October 26, 2006, 03:54 PM »
Surfkeys https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2282/ and Functions for Keyconfig https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1537/ show what Keyconfig https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1537/ can do.

You can modify any menu but not so easy doing it manually so there is Menu Editor https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/710/ A few extensions might give trouble but generally it works. Full control over most menus in Firefox.

Mozillazine seems to be slow right now but search for this. Not complicated but lots of details. Here are some of my entries. Kicks rightclick stuff out.

menuitem[label="Send Image..."] {display: none !important;}
menuitem[label="Send Link..."] {display: none !important;}
menuitem[label="Bookmark This Link..."] {display: none !important;}
menuitem[label="Bookmark This Page..."] {display: none !important;}
menuitem[label="Set As Desktop Background..."] {display: none !important;}
#context-stumble-tagit { display:none !important; }
#context-stumble-search { display:none !important; }

Last 2 is for Stumbleupon extension. Anything can be modified which is good since some extensions dont have tickboxes to disable/enable. Check out www.userstyles.org for possibel useful code or perhaps Extensionsmirror http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/ Most info is available somewhere. Not all 1.5.x.x tricks works on 2.0 I think, Im not really into this but anyone can hack a little :)

All this stuff goes into userchrome.css but Menu Editor works directly with localstore.rdf. Gigantic shortcut compared to notepad.

Related is Custom Buttons, I have 5-6 of them - nice effects and you only need 1 extension not 5. Also being transformed to 2.0 status and extension comes as an official and alpha version. A little messy but check it out should you get hooked on modifications. Some have quite unique features, ie. all my top menu is only seen when I hover a Firefox icon. No space wasted. I have menu for starting applications, opening folders. One starts IE with current url, other buttons for Opera etc. Another do not show searchbar but only icon and drop down list of engines, uses urlbar as search and also acts as a go button for it = less pixels, no loss in functionality. All sidebars is accumlated into 1 button. Needs polishing but definitely nice once you find useful buttons, may be 50-75 or so to pick from now. http://custombuttons...d4f6a189e0015dd11fe8 You should read threads on each one, as said not all are 100% perfect due to 1.5.x.x vs. 2.0 vs. extension version mess.
207
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 25, 2006, 12:32 PM »
Yes, run Memtest86. Will probably fail fast if memory is faulty. XP can be forgiving about memory errors, not all programs are.

Could be dying power supply, motherboard - guessing. Remember to run sfc /scannow. Is there a repair IE component hidden somewhere? 
208
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 24, 2006, 04:59 AM »
Minimize trick must always lower memory to 10-15mb. If machine is not sluggish it probably have 1gb or more so little price to pay. May be you have a tool which can hide minimized window and pop it up with hotkey/mouse gesture.

I see why you dont like ATI .net drivers now  8)
209
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 23, 2006, 07:52 PM »
I tried a clean profile for once, I would estiamate startup time to be about 2 seconds, maybe 1.xxxxxx :) You could put Firefox on a ramdisk perhaps? Tell it to save bookmarks, cookies, forms on hd and it should work ok as permanent solution. Will have to do some boot magic but there are guides for this.

Try this strange page for a Firefox extension http://www.rjonna.com/ext/gspace.php simple but eats 90mb and I think 30mb on IE7. Dont know about Opera. Buggy page or what is going on. Hard if not impossible to set up fixed comparison, best to live with monitor tool for a while doing same browser patterns to get a "feel". Have to look out for the odd page.

Remember to disable session/undo feature of Opera/Firefox when comparing to IE7 - or better install such an add-on for it. Then you will not see exact same numbers. Other things to be aware of I think would be phishing filter. Active vs passive vs disabled. Opera has none yet. 
210
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 23, 2006, 07:02 PM »
I only found out few days ago but those 2-3 extensions allowing non compatible installations are not really needed. Look for extensions.checkCompatibility in about:config set it to false. May be what you meant. If extension maker have not updated yet or show no activity look for alternative.

Well, I doubt you have a more "dirty" Firefox than mine and it never use 200mb unless there is media involved. Be careful with numbers, look for reasons if "high memory usage" alarm goes off. 6-7 tabs of Eyeball pics and you are up to may be 350mb - minimize oops down to 1x mb. How it goes, takes 1 second at most. Not like Firefox has stolen memory for good. If you only close tabs, compare Firefox with Opera/IE7 and you see big difference. Goes for all pages I think, still not stealing but it does not want to let go easy and always takes a long time. So level is high because of crap code or because it is aggressive by nature when using memory? Both? For example default setup will not page out memory by minimizing (speed is top priority not low memory usage), opposite most other software.

I also use a lighter Firefox edition on a computer 1/4 as powerful as this one. Dont think Ive ever seen 100+mb, more like 50-60mb with a handful of tabs. Those numbers say nothing other than you have to know conditions in details. That Lifehacker "test" and most complaints shows the same. Only interesting is extensions and pages visited. Numbers alone dont say much. I dont know if you expect 10mb or something but lets say 50-75mb on a 512mb then? I find that reasonable and only notice because I monitor it. If I can run Firefox for as long as I please with no slowdowns or lockups then I dont think a (other browser)79mb vs (Firefox)102mb is something to cry about - should that be the case. I dont use Firefox because it use less memory than the other 2. Sure developers get lazy if no complaints and sure they are not done with optimization. Take a look at Bugzilla. Im not saying Opera does not use less memory in general but that you cant make direct comparisons from what is seen at a certain moment - which is what most do. Im also saying I dont buy the diesel tractor image some paint, heh - or that 200+mb is something you have to live with. There will be reasons or Mozilla close shop tomorrow. FF by itself is a hog? That is an oppinion about what is too much again but still does not change the fact most complaints in this area can be explained and fixed. As with MSN tab browsing or the old Adblock for Firefox it only take 1 bad add-on to change situation.

The way things goes there was never a chance to get a 100% perfect 2.0 much the same way as 1.5.x.x would never be perfect. They move on when they consider code stable. Just the way it is. Would be nice with a cleanup/maintaince/tuning 2.1 version with zero new gadgets but you wont get it. Ive seen that suggested even on Mozillazine. For each X version they should make 1 cleanup version. But, you think that would solve your problems? May be 3.0 will be less "who cares" about reclaiming used memory. They already lowered cache defaults in 2.0. Easy trick, but 1.5.x.x defaults were also quite high.

A clean Firefox on a not sluggish computer takes forever? You have timed it? Well ok, annoying if you have to restart over and over. If that annoying you will stop doing that  :D or use other browser. I imagine this could drive some crazy and others will shake head, Im in last category but also have Firefox open for hours and hours, can even be days - cant break it ;) I have same relation to XP bootup time. Im not completely satisfied with Firefox either but cant have it all. If it was strangely unstable as some dev. builds have been I would scream but memory usage bahhh, under control 8) I know exactly how an unstable Firefox feels, often connected with high cpu/memory usage. Unacceptable of course. Solve problem or get rid of it.

Btw, are you restarting Firefox for a particular reason? Cant stand to look at high numbers? Use Auto Reset Browser Extension http://extensions.he.../Auto+Reset+Browser/ For the very interested, heh. Works on 2.0 and does what it says.

Much Firefox/Opera on a thread about IE7!

211
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 23, 2006, 11:43 AM »
Firefox has never been quick to load - even fanboys say that  :D Should be a bit improved with 2.0 they say. The usual advice when people complain about this is to limit extension pack, clear history, downloads. Sometimes too many Live bookmarks can tease as well. Matter of few seconds on fast computer no matter what - dont think it can be an issue for average computer unless there really is a problem. I have 2.5mb bookmark files, mile long history, changed GUI, many extensions, plugins and would not call it slow, not fast either ;) A clean/empty profile will be fast. May be not much to do until they transform all bookmarks, history into sqlite format.

If I remember correctly the pre-loader thingy for Firefox is not without problems, not sure - might have been fixed. Look it up at Mozillazine if it feels wrong.

2.0 is out tomorrow btw. RC3 is same as Final, same procedure as before. Available now it seems ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/2.0 or http://releases.mozi...irefox/releases/2.0/
212
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 22, 2006, 12:37 PM »
Thanks for the balanced and honest report Renegade  8) Judging by some Firefox complaints there will be more.

Same type of confirmation here http://www.lifehacke...-showdown-208908.php

I cannot confirm but have always been unlucky when comparing memory usage between browsers. Always end up concluding difference is not worth the hassle of testing somewhat properly, like taking caching or special resource consuming features like Undo/prefetching into account. Have never seen anything like 100-300% difference when conditions are attempted similar = not singing "Take back the web" hit or mumbling "Feature not a bug my xxx". Modern browsers have potential to eat lots of ram which is good. Different behavoir in how.

Try http://www.eyeball-series.org/ for high IE7/Firefox/Opera numbers  :D
213
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 22, 2006, 09:27 AM »
http://www.enhanceie...om/ie/essentials.asp have something. Site made by one of the guys in the video btw. Or use Strokeit. Works in all browsers  :D Under "Tweaks" you can find the old speed trick he talks about.

Yep, it is a nice browser and hopefully it will help fix those pages not rendering properly in Firefox, Opera - thanks to old IE6/MS code. There are more than a few of those. Most visited sites not big problem of course but try dig into a business directory in a small country and you will see strange things. With commitment to standards general internet browsing will eventually get better. IE7 also important to Firefox users.
214
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows Vista EULA to users: Go to hell!
« Last post by dk70 on October 22, 2006, 09:03 AM »
Policies can change over time. If more than occasionally pain in the butt even MS will have to adjust. May be WGA will be perfect on Vista but still have problems on XP - you will know what to do.

Exclusive Vista features they can probably argument for. But why is it they push XP SP3 down the road, 2008 now. SP2 will be close to 4 years old by then! Hard to avoid feeling like a sheep.
215
General Software Discussion / Re: Two New Internet Explorer 7 Reviews
« Last post by dk70 on October 21, 2006, 04:45 PM »
Why is every person acting like there is no stable, not memory eating, extensions for Firefox?  Goes both ways wr975. Wait for the world to see the light  8) You are a pioneer so must be brave.

Anyway, the world still use IE6 or IE7 and will continue to do so. Except a few sites most of these crusade pics you will see where may be 50-75% already use Firefox. They make their use of internet into a big personal deal and so have chosen Firefox. Also some have hated IE6 with a passion and not just for security reasons. MS them self say it more or less directly in this presentation of IE7 http://channel9.msdn...t.aspx?postid=246705 Easy to admit IE6 was poorly maintained, showing its age, laughing at strange relations to web standards now they offer IE7  8) At some point they are praising TAB Browsing!! How they try to get rid of old habits etc. May be IE7 would have come out sooner if MS people had a broader view of what is possible. These people seem completely unaware of Maxthon, Firefox, Opera, even the terrible tabs from MSN seachbar - they live in MS land of course. No reason to love them though, may be something else...

You will like what they say, "Back with a vengeance", will not leave it at IE7. More frequent updates, supported now, helping web development highest priority.

Actually I think it will be hard for some Firefox users to swallow they no longer can sing the old song of "safer". I assume and believe that is the case. MS hate will still be strong as ever but does not sell that many tickets - may be they will just focus on own strengths, Firefox 3.0 is being baked.

Signed up for Maxthon 2.0?, not close to being done yet but looks very nice. Just noticed it says close to 70 million downloads on Maxthon site. Add Avantbrowser, Slimbrowser etc. and there is a crowd!
216
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone else checking out FireFox 2.0 rc2?
« Last post by dk70 on October 19, 2006, 07:19 PM »
Oh I missed you have TMP. It takes control over close button - Display, Tab, Show section.

Only "hacking" Ive needed with TMP is to increase coloring of tabs. You can look up code at their forum for more, ie. for a "Proteted" tab. 
217
General Software Discussion / Re: Internet Explorer 7.0 Final is out
« Last post by dk70 on October 19, 2006, 05:41 PM »
Well Firefox does not hide IE engine so if we assume IE7 is "safer" than IE6 you should upgrade - which you probably will have to at some point anyway.

May be MS developers can convince you to go back? http://channel9.msdn...t.aspx?postid=246705
218
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone else checking out FireFox 2.0 rc2?
« Last post by dk70 on October 19, 2006, 12:54 PM »
See, easy for those used to this. Confusing for others.
Use about:config as url, rightclick, select new INTEGER, type in browser.tabs.closeButtons add value as you wish.

A better way is to throw such mini-hacks into user.js file. Place it in root folder of profile. That way you know what you have modified and can go back and forth easy. Here is my close button entry.

user_pref("browser.tabs.closeButtons", 0);

Knowledgebase is really good to know http://kb.mozillazine.org/Knowledge_Base For example about profile folder http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder


219
Living Room / Re: Buying New PC. Suggestions?
« Last post by dk70 on October 18, 2006, 06:20 PM »
220
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone else checking out FireFox 2.0 rc2?
« Last post by dk70 on October 18, 2006, 01:41 PM »
I doubt you dont have choice. Dont have it installed right now but if I remember correctly explore "Events" tab. "Tab closing" or something. Think I will install it again  8)
221
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone else checking out FireFox 2.0 rc2?
« Last post by dk70 on October 18, 2006, 12:53 PM »
http://kb.mozillazin...er.tabs.closeButtons show how to rule close button - so a value of 3 will be "(Firefox 1.x behavior)".

There are also some settings for width of tabs, before the hated scroll icons kicks in. I use Tab Control https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1480/ to get new tab next to current, covers a bit more.

No way around Tab Mix Plus if you want much more - http://tmp.garyr.net/ use Dev build for 2.0. See forum thread, very old stable dev-build. Be careful about Undo and session manager/crash control in TMP, 2.0 have own so disable one of the two. Session manager can still be used to manually save/restore.

http://weblogs.mozil.../top_ten_addons.html sad I think. One of the best known Firefox employees come up with 5 extensions and 1 is a theme, another a search plugin! May be they really need some new blood at top levels.
Firefox has always come very close to satisfying me right out of the box -- perhaps that has something to do with the fact that I helped define the initial feature set :-)
Good for him, not good for more than 10-15% market share ;) Those who like extensions/tweaking shouldnt care for 1 second but majority dont use any or have the time/interest to fill gaps.
222
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone else checking out FireFox 2.0 rc2?
« Last post by dk70 on October 17, 2006, 04:30 AM »
You mean this http://uk.play.yahoo...ames/login?game=Pool Seems to work for me. Didnt first time because I missed the pop-up disable/enable warning. Think I got booted  8) You should see warning at top? Check Options, Content that you did not block Yahoo popups by mistake.

If you look at Error console there are loads of css warnings but no errors. I use latest Java 1.5.0.9 - changelog/buglist for some java versions can match those for Firefox so definitely upgrade if using old. Hmm, now I remember Im still on 1.5.0.8, not yet bothered to upgrade because of a tiny changelog this time.

Most likely you can get problem confirmed or not at Mozillazine forums http://forums.mozillazine.org/index.php Crappy/broken search is starting to make place annoying but I will be surprised if you dont find Yahoo on page 1 or 2 in bugs/support forum. May be mentioned in sticky/known problems? I saw one reply to similar complain saying Yahoo is still full of IE code blah blah, solution is to use IEtab or IEview. Dont know about that, may be some pages.

In general Yahoo is one of the sites they ask testers of betas/RCs to use so eventually it should work. Favorite sites, home banking etc. MUST work with official release or there will be trouble.

Heh, and just now Firefox crashed when I closed it. I think I know why  8) Well I did see a pool table... no guarantee you will.
223
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone else checking out FireFox 2.0 rc2?
« Last post by dk70 on October 16, 2006, 05:25 PM »
True but you dont have to go that far back in history to find Mozilla people having doubts project. Like the guy who left and slammed the door up to 1.5 Other people involved agreed about lack of reviewers, decision makers. He was a bit angry, said there was no way 1.5 would make it, other less worried but problem was acknowledged by more than a few. This about 4-6 months before release. Im too lazy to find links but was definitely a headline. Google might have changed a thing or two. Sure, there are 100s of people who contribute, test, patch but as your link also shows paid staff is way less. May be also why the new resume thingy is build on top of an extension, rss feed the same, also spell checker. Authors have contributed their code.

Im not surprised they are well paid. With so relatively few people all got to be manager of something! They could have twice as many now, dont know. Time is also spend on partners like with Qualcomm. Another thing is it does not have to be the most effective organization ever. Too much money on too few hands perhaps or too much activity too fast.

Bottom line is 2.0 lacks some basic features for tab browsing which they have bragged about a few times. They could have made a multi-row tabbar easy, added some stuff from Tab Mix Plus - dont see how that can be considered bloat. Lets see with 2.01, 2.02 etc.

About IE7, may this Opera guy is right  8)

As a technologist, can you give an assessment of the job that Microsoft has done with IE 7?
Wium Lie: It's like you have a used car--what are you going to do with it? Are you going to get rid of it and get a new one? Or are you going to give it a paint job? I think (what) Microsoft has done here is given it a paint job.


http://news.com.com/...4184.html?tag=st.num
224
General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone else checking out FireFox 2.0 rc2?
« Last post by dk70 on October 16, 2006, 03:32 PM »
http://forums.mozill...ewtopic.php?t=475076 Post no. 5 is perfect example why there will never be agreement. Part of Firefox user base is like that. I wonder if he would even appreciate more options.
225
General Software Discussion / Re: Firefox Extensions: Your favorite or most useful
« Last post by dk70 on October 16, 2006, 01:24 PM »
Autocomplete is nice idea but not much development and very slow. Not for you? I would use it if not for speed problem. Myurlbar https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1722/ is lightning fast in comparison. I have removed drop down button at urlbar so cant even check but Myurl bar probably take out that feature, no drop down list. Can live with that.

Sadly they have not learned that much from Tab Mix Plus - is still needed. But now you might be able to replace it with 2-3 smaller extensions. What I do. Not so many use all features in TMP. Extensions about tabs can be terrible if not bugfree so nice for FF there is TMP, ultimate ease of use and actively developed/supported. I might still go for it but have what I need for now.

A few new ones not mentioned (I think):

Download Sort
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/25/

Toggle Search
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2552/

SwiftTabs
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/380/

Tab to Window
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2062/

GooglePedia
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2517/
Pages: prev1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11next