topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 5:29 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 175next
1801
"Executive Summary is ..."

"Researcher skepticism grows over badBIOS malware claims
Peers have yet to reproduce the odd behavior infecting Dragos Ruiu's computers."

It's pretty risky to risk your entire career on a bogus security claim...

Unless...

Is that even his real name? Purposely not going TinFoilHat, does a bad SecRes report make ANY sense in ANY other realm of logic?

1802
Living Room / Re: do safe online game websites even exist?
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on November 05, 2013, 10:30 PM »
I have several older people in my town that having nothing much better to do than play on the computer.  They love to play card games and a few arcade style games.  I am tired of redoing their computers once or twice a year because they get on sites lite iWin.com etc..  I have downloaded a host file from hphost (malwarebytes) to try and help stop some of the junk from getting on their computer.

Does safe websites even exist?  is msn games, primarygames.com or gamehouse.com safe?  

Safe sites exist, so you have to think "double-smart" around them and carefully put nice little padded rails on that ravine cliff!

So for example, to use a "clunky-ugly-as-fsck* but example concept, each person is their own use case. So find out what they want to play and lock the living daylights out of them wandering "but this new site on the ad looked like so much fun!"

So see for example my jump page (one of two, same concept on the other one but that one is just email).

http://www.freevoteusa.com/Fun2013.html

It's no accident I need my Renny/Mouser/App/techidave/___/___/___ fix say 3-18 times a week! So, I put D-Coder on my "jump page".

Prelim - Stage zero. No one should EVER have a "commercial" site as a home page. That's where 20F of the crap comes from ... six degrees from Kevin Bacon and "Ooh Yahoo Wow News / Britney Spears/Gossip Central/ OhDearGod stop it!" See my jumo-page. It has StartPage Search on it, which except rare advanced cases gets basic junk done, so you tell them NEVER EVER type "Google". Etc. Cue Lesson.

Stage 1. Spend about three (for ex) separate sessions watching them just Do Stuff. Any Stuff. Then only put the legit ones on the Jump Page. For Ex, after that poor result with the ads, Mouser has a firm ethics stance to keep DC pretty "in the rails" away from the ravine. Like MAYBe Humor or Basement can lead "the turbo newbie astray" but that takes work!

Stage 2. Adblock, your choice of LIGHT script blocking. Prob is No-Script is really long to set up for like 30 legit sites, but block like the worst seven truly horrific offenders and tell them "you're an adult. If you see a weird ad on a brand new site you haven't told me about, don't click it without telling me first. Got it? LOUDER! GOT THAT?" They might anyway but the Cognitive Dissonance has a 50% chance of kicking in.

Stage 3. (Experimental) I'm not sure about this part but it sounds straight out of NANY - "can't click more than 1.7 domain names away with a webpage". So you're fine for Checkers.com, then Geico.com, (which they will click back from, it's not any fun, it's an ad), but then for ex on Geico's page it would block "Cars.com". (The 1.7 is my shortcut phrase because sites have a bad habit of going from checkers.com to games.checkers.com to live.checkers.com or other nonsense.)

Stage 4. For the horrible offenders install a really mean "twelve minute app" that basically only has like 5 screens. "Did you click any weird websites this month? Yes or no" "You clicked no. Are you sure, or are you lying?" "Hey, I'm not being mean, every unemployed person in the country has to answer this every week." "You clicked yes. Type at least one weird website you think you remember". "Is your computer acting really weird? Yes or no". (click buttons).

Stage 5. THEN do the behind scenes magic. Whitelist only 30 sites. If they want a new one they have to ask you to lose an old one. Nothing else goes through. EVER. These guys prob only have their X jump-list sites so it turbo-blocks ads because no matter what they click they can't get through!

Whew!

Some nasty stuff in there! But You can pick and choose. Point is, people are all fine politically like "make the unemployed leeching bastards prove every dollar they get" and go all "I wanna click any seedy ad that comes my way on my computer even though you fix it every X months!"

Hehe! Snarky but 75% true!

Cheers,

--Tao

1803
You'll never look at Australia the same way again.
 (see attachment in previous post)

Dammit!  I'll have to move ... I'm definitely a dog person.

And that joke whizzed RIGHT over my head, but I refuse to Google Startpage-Search it!
(Yay Strike-through!)

1804
"Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two
of us together.  Maybe I can then file a joint income-tax return ?"

Well, I'd say to be a little careful of those kinds of "reductio" excursions!

About half of those talking lines were run backwards in the USA last year leading to the Supreme Court "starting" to legalize gay marriage.

No one likes taxes, but at least they have a point you're not supposed to file "frivolous" tax returns. So I find the last set a little offensive because it edges over into a backhanded insult of one of the more "notorious" but actually serious psychiatric conditions. I did a hobby research project on it ten years ago and it's far from haha funny!   :o
1805
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on November 01, 2013, 11:06 AM »
This *isn't* new.  (Which we seem to agree on).
It's just that ... we ignored it.

Well, for interesting collections of "we".

To borrow the meme from the other thread, "The TinFoil Hats noticed, but no one takes TinFoil hats seriously, then it doesn't matter". Put a bit more proactively, I've been on Slashdot for years now and "we" noticed it in fine dandy form over there, but "hey, who cares about Slashdot, right?"

So you're sorta right that it's a little different now, Spin Doctors will spin, but they've had to at least think up a new message because they can't quite hide behind their old school obscurity anymore.

Unfortunately it's making them get more aggressive even than before flaunting how much they can abuse the Consitution! But whereas they kinda had a status quo, "spies do spy things, just stay out of our way", it was "sorta okay".

But we're reaching a new level of tension that feels like it's more brittle, and will one day finally tip over back into A Moment when it finally swings the other way. But that's an unknown amount of time out ahead!

1806
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on November 01, 2013, 10:47 AM »

Head of Congressional Intelligence Committee: “You Can’t Have Your Privacy Violated If You Don’t KNOW Your Privacy Is Violated”

Hahahaah!


Mark Zuckerberg Likes this!

1807
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 30, 2013, 10:54 PM »
I developed a "paradigm" - not exactly a theory - to explain all this called the "Fishbowl" way back about 2002 after the initial dot com crash. Of course I don't pretend to have known any details at all, but the gist is that the "excitement" of "cyberspace" per movies like the Matrix and Johnny Mnemonic left us, and essentially in certain ways depending when you start the clock, "no ultra game breaking tech" has arrived, and worse, *will arrive*, for X years.

So "out of existential boredom" all we can do is meddle with little things like social networks, and this year's Facebook posts aren't any more important than 2008's Facebook posts.

The Smartphone players have consolidated into iPhone and Android-clones. A few low end junk phones float around.

So we're getting bored. We've hit a wall. We haven't had anything really stunning to excite us like the old days in a decade. So we sit and stare at each other, and the Govt pulled several unfortunately devastatingly effective strings to sit on top of it all, along with your choice of 500 corps.

And there we sit FOREVER until someone with a BIG bankroll can smash it all to bits!!

"Snowden" started something ... (is he even real? The Spin doctors are trying to call him a slow leak plant).

Now we need about four more to seal it.

1808
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 30, 2013, 10:38 PM »
It seems like a lot to risk for little gain.

But they spy on hundreds of millions of other people. What gain is there in that? A truckload of effort for what?

Emotional gain?

Borrowing the Joker from Batman's epic speech, "old school" criminals wanted money or random stuff like weapons. But "some criminals just want to see the world burn".

Think for a min, the PG13 power rush of just seeing lots of little people's lives scurrying under your computer monitor / reports. It's a lot more like the Matrix minus the robots than we want to think.

For example if any one wants to do a mini proof of joke, because you know they have the GPS from our phones, so make a map with little scurrying dots of people "going about their puny little lives" (Q from Star Trek Next Gen).

1809
N.A.N.Y. 2014 / Re: NANY 2014 Pledge: Untitled Game
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 30, 2013, 10:30 PM »

Heh we need a LITTLE more info than that!

"Game"

Four Dimensional Chess in the Alice in Wonderland Universe?

Hackers 5 where Professor Falken's system takes on Tron's MCP for the computer world domination championships?

"See who can annoy Mouser the most?"

 ;D

1810
General Software Discussion / Re: Tips for Windows 8 (got any?)
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 30, 2013, 10:28 PM »
Why can't Windows 8 find the Startup Folder?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2806079

  • Win+R
  • Type the following text in Run dialog box and click OK: shell:startup

Can you make that into something like a desktop shortcut?

1811
Living Room / Re: good Videos [short films] here :)
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 30, 2013, 06:52 PM »
*Very* professionally filmed, which I think would argue for all actors. Either way, brilliantly made and done. I rarely laugh out loud at anything, and I was in stitches at that - in spite of knowing (roughly) what was coming.

Disclaimer: YMMV :P

Well they ... uh.. *said* it was filled with actors! I think there's a good chance that they ran the "prank" for like 2-3 customers at a time, then "closed for lunch" and reset it all.

1812
Living Room / Re: Facebook Requiring Government ID?
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 30, 2013, 06:47 PM »
They just blink the oopsy-daisy, your account got hacked light ... And everybody is all pre-greased and Pavlovian trained to just roll over and ...

Other things?  ;D

It also looks like their BS memes are starting to go all Flannery O'Connor "Every (Meme) that rises must converge"!

"Let's require your government ID to prove it's you so that when your account gets hacked we can prove ... uh ... Oh. $hit. "

But has anyone noticed some separate train of law managed to get HIPAA info treated the way all "social media" should be treated, with tiptoes?

Can we find a way to beat these brats at their own game with something like a HIPAA violation if they keep pulling these "oops we lost your privacy settings" stunts?

Cynical jokes aside, there *are* a few sane voices trying to do something about all this, it's just they're massively outnumbered 100-1 so the best they can do is put paper mache in tidal dams!

But this one is different, because Gov IDs are the "gold standard" for when entities like to think they are "serious" about security. So you get a bunch of THOSE all mixed up in some Haxxored social media, and then someone with legit clout might wake up and do something about all this!

1813
Living Room / Re: Facebook Requiring Government ID?
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 30, 2013, 06:34 PM »
Thousands of Facebook users have vented their fury at the social media site

Wait for it ...

on Twitter!

 :D
1814
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 27, 2013, 12:56 PM »
"Don't make the Internetz angry. You wouldn't like the Internetz when it gets angry!"

:D
1815
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 27, 2013, 11:03 AM »
President Barack Obama told the German leader he would have stopped it happening had he known about it.

i.e.

  • He has admitted it
  • He has admitted that it is wrong

More high stakes bluffing Renny.

Because today's news says ... wait for it ...

German media: Obama aware of Merkel spying since 2010
http://news.yahoo.co...eport-092009842.html

"Berlin (AFP) - US President Barack Obama was personally informed of phone tapping against German Chancellor Angela Merkel, which may have begun as early as 2002, German media reported Sunday as a damaging espionage scandal widened.

Bild am Sonntag newspaper quoted US intelligence sources as saying that National Security Agency chief Keith Alexander had briefed Obama on the operation against Merkel in 2010.

"Obama did not halt the operation but rather let it continue," the newspaper quoted a high-ranking NSA official as saying.

News weekly Der Spiegel reported that leaked NSA documents showed that Merkel's phone had appeared on a list of spying targets since 2002, and was still under surveillance weeks before Obama visited Berlin in June. ..."

We need a name for this kind of "the old way of political lying isn't working so well anymore when the refutation can spread like wildfire"! It's a Superset of what they used to call the Streisand Effect, but that term was applied more to local embarassments by people.

This is far higher stakes.
1. VIP #1: "I did not know about X. I would not have allowed X if I had known about it."
2. Reporter: "Here is a copy of your top secret clearance briefing from three years ago that formally notified you of X."
3. VIP #1: "Uhh..." (Looks panicked at the teleprompter for a desperate spin-doctor saving move.)



1816
Living Room / Re: Colletta - a project in MS Labs
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 27, 2013, 10:45 AM »
Ahh, the old "manage your info" theme. For documents, I "manage" them in local folders. If I am doing web research, I just save either a an entire copy of the page locally, or the re-discovered BBSS that cranks out paired lists of Urls and Titles if I am only at the "skim" level. Then those paired lists go to the folder.

So anyway, this Colletta thing just doesn't look like it fits my workflow.

1817

"Think of those adorable little twelve year olds who needs our nice invasive laws to keep him safe ... what's that colonel? He hacked us?? Well then destroy him, I mean give him hacker street cred for life!"

1818
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 26, 2013, 10:12 PM »
Did anyone catch Renny's 10,000th post?

1819
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 26, 2013, 09:00 PM »

In more "Snowden-esque" news:

http://www.nytimes.c...tml?hp&_r=2&

"Federal Prosecutors, in a Policy Shift, Cite Warrantless Wiretaps as Evidence
By CHARLIE SAVAGE
Published: October 26, 2013

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department for the first time has notified a criminal defendant that evidence being used against him came from a warrantless wiretap, a move that is expected to set up a Supreme Court test of whether such eavesdropping is constitutional."

---

If I didn't know better, this feels someone made a mistake, because up until now they were going all "if I deny it hard enough I can make it true".

Now if they *admit it*, then they're going for the blatant angle "haha, we've got the lock on the whole system, so what do we care about little things like the Consitution or those silly Supreme Justices".


1820
N.A.N.Y. 2014 / Re: N.A.N.Y. 2014 Submission: SoloCrop
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 26, 2013, 08:22 PM »

This isn't that far from that cropping problem Contro and I were talking about.

1821
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Bvckup 2 is in open beta !
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 23, 2013, 12:51 AM »

You misunderstand what the delta copying is and I guess the explanation I have in the Backup Config window should be reworded -
 (see attachment in previous post)
Delta copying doesn't copy deltas and store them in a separate file. It copies them into the existing backup copy. Think of it as a selective, per-block update of the backup copy. Performance-wise it makes no difference on the first run, but on the second run in vast majority of cases it delivers significant speed up (over copying file in its entirety).

I'm not so sure that I am. Copy Files In Full creates "snapshots" in a point in time, right?

Correct, but so does the delta copying.

Just to be 100% clear: both create a snapshot, which gets modified as your files gets modified. It doesnt create a new snapshot at each backup. [Just in case the "snapshots" query was also about some form of versioning.]

It doesn't get modified if you change the destination folder for the second snapshot! That's perhaps the unstated trick that I use and intend behind my comments.

1822
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Bvckup 2 is in open beta !
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 23, 2013, 12:49 AM »
Can you guess where this is going? ... 3,2,1 ... That's right - it should use Git :-)

So the plan as it stands is to get the V2 on the road first and then to tackle file versioning.

Hehe snapshots are my "my eyes! it hurtz!" method of versioning as well!

 :D
1823
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Bvckup 2 is in open beta !
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 23, 2013, 12:47 AM »
Say you have C:\Temp\file.ext and you set it to be backed up to X:\Backup.
You run the backup first time, it creates X:\Backup\file.ext. An exact copy.

Then you go and edit C:\Temp\file.ext, change something in it.
You run the backup second time. It updates X:\Backup\file.ext and again it becomes an exact copy of C:\Temp\file.ext.

This happens regardless of whether you are using the full or the delta copier. The "full/delta" differences affects *how* the file is updated, but the net effect is the same - the backup copy becomes an exact replica of the original. Think of it as a performance optimization that allows the backup complete faster, but doesn't affect what's actually being done to the backup.

Does this make sense?

Sort of, except it seems you are making the use case that I only want one backup and to keep it current. I don't! I like having the redundancy protection of several snapshots in Backup1, Backup2, Backup3. Plus it captures "the state of the union at the time". So because I am a scatter brained bird, looking at say the June snapshot reminds me that I was heavily into some topic, and all the files are there. In one of the current snapshots they are likely to get all "bound up in a batch and parked" whereas in the earlier snapshot they'd be laid out conceptually in the workflow order. In a perfect world I'd include a screenshot of the desktop because I use horozontal-vertical layout on the desktop as part of the workflow to indicate progress status of an incomplete project component and as the "to do" reminder in the Get Things Done type systems.

Somehow it just makes me feel that all of that disappears with Deltas unless you have "perfect rollback to any point in time to recreate that day's files. Can your deltas do that?

1824
Hi Contro - did you not ask this question before?

Doesnt sound to me like it would be worth the effort...

It would be if that top isn't blank!

For example you want to use an exhibit but the top has one of those "headers" that contains proprietary/regulated content, the same question would strip off that header and then the rest of the PDF is fine.
1825
Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Bvckup 2 is in open beta !
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on October 22, 2013, 02:06 PM »
Personally I think there is definitely a use case for one-way sync used as backup, and I commend you for sticking to doing one thing really well, instead of adding all the features other backup software has :up:.

Plus I "chain" programs. So it might be okay if this dev doesn't burn say 1000 hours putting in Restore if any of 3 other programs can do it.

I put a separation when "this dev is available" and puts in a *custom feature* that *no one else has*. Then that makes the program special! That is why I do ask for context how hard a feature is - if he can do it in like 20 hours that's one thing, vs "let's invent this entire thing called an automobile from scratch" ... well, okay, that wish doesn't get filled today!

:-*

Pages: prev1 ... 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 ... 175next