topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 9:30 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 364next
1601
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: $20 for PureComponents
« Last post by f0dder on March 14, 2011, 02:39 AM »
Tip: mention which platform it's for (my first guess would be .NET, but not everyone knows you :)), and perhaps a copy-pastaed list of controls inclued, and purrrrrhaps even a few screenshots :)


* f0dder gets off Renegade's back.
1602
@fodder: you really offended Stan Lee.  :P
*cough* Venom *cough* :p
1603
The program icon looks like a spider. Spiders are nasty creeps.
1604
General Software Discussion / Re: original win98 games
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 06:44 PM »
Weren't the games from the Plus Pack included in WinMe?
1605
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: JetDrive Defragmentation Suite
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 03:50 PM »
I get very weary when I see stuff like "special registry defragmentation algorithm". My guess is that it can defragment the hive files that the registry is stored in, in which case it should simply state that - no need for marketing snake-oil.

And "JetDrive recognizes errors in your hard drives, and can even detect and fix errors automatically if you prefer." - what does this mean? Repair of filesystem errors that should probably be left to chkdsk (or a proper recovery application that doesn't do in-place "repairs"), or do they really mean drive errors? A pretty weird thing to incorporate in a "defragmentation suite" at any rate (including both fix & defragment in a "drive suite" would be another matter, though).

Ho humm.
1606
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 10:29 AM »
Has there been no word on the effect this policy change will have on existing license holders? If they're not saying anything, maybe anyone who bought a license prior to Dec 2008 (or so, I'm guesstimating here) will continue to enjoy lifetime upgrades... Has anyone written to them yet? If not, I'm game...
Haven't seen any mention of this anywhere, except for Jibz' investigations - definitely no emails or anything. Can't remember when I purchased WinRAR, but it's the first app I bought when I finally got a VISA card and could shop online.
1607
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 10:28 AM »
The 7z GUI is still very limited, but frankly I almost only use WinRAR's "extract here" and "extract to" context menu folders (when not using a more specialized RAR extractor like SCuN), and "add files to archive..." - and once in a blue moon I browse through an archive looking for a particular file.
 
1608
Quoting EncyclopædiaDramatica (which is extremely NSFW and pretty funny):
T'S OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND! or just Over 9,000 is an over-used meme that was started by the japanese anime show 'Dragonball S**t', where characters would use scouters to detect power levels. This meme was c**tpasted many, many times and it's not funny anymore. Usage will only make you look like a weeaboo.
1609
Developer's Corner / Re: Named Pipes for Inter Process Communication
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 08:44 AM »
I think Renegade should get a "My post got run over by the f0dder-truck"-badge for that one :D.
:-[
1610
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 08:07 AM »
Jibz: on win-rar.com perhaps, but not rarlabs.com which I've always used.

Yep, does seem like they might want to pull the plug on lifetime licenses; can't say I blame them, but it's a bit sad nonetheless. If they pull the free upgrades, I'm moving to 7-zip, it's mature enough by now imho. It doesn't have as many nice commandline options as rar.exe, but I'll live; haven't needed NTFS permissions or alternative data streams in archives, either.

As long as I can extract .rar files, subsequent packaging can be done in another tool, and having a truly open format is a definite bonus.

There´s another one that could get very important in the future missing in the list: Nanozip
It has the best compression power and its goal is envolving to create new and higher compression algorithms compared to others. Some testfiles have become the half of 7zip in ultra - depending on the data.
You can check out an actual comparison to other archivers here.
We'll see - as long as it's binary-only, it's uninteresting apart from academic purposes.
1611
Developer's Corner / Re: Named Pipes for Inter Process Communication
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 07:53 AM »
What's wicked cool about it?

It's a über-lowlevel approach, the blog post doesn't mention sockets, the author confuses message queueing with SendMessage-style messages, and dismisses memory-mapped files entirely. Also, reading the blog comments, it sounds like the code is buggy and haven't been fixed even though race conditions were mentioned as early as March 15, 2010 - that's almost a year ago. Caveat Emptor.

Only briefly scanned through the code, but it looks like it only handles byte streams and spawns a thread per connection? Ho humm. Not the abstraction level I'd like to work at; thread per connection might be excusable since you're not likely to have a crapload of connections, but for something general-purpose I'd prefer async I/O.

Oh, and it also seems the code requires a connect/data-xfer/disconnect for each "message" rather than supporting connected mode - not good if you need to do high-performance stuff.
1612
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by f0dder on March 12, 2011, 06:48 AM »
Curt: where's that from? I don't see the Danish distributors, nor RarLabs own shop listing such addons? WinRAR has been free lifetime upgrades up to now, and that's a lot of years. Not saying they might not move away from it eventually, I personally don't believe in "lifetime upgrades", but... well :)
1613
General Software Discussion / Re: A New Name for StackOverflow
« Last post by f0dder on March 10, 2011, 05:43 PM »
I don't see how reputation is relevant to proficiency. I thought it was more about being able to trust someone to be a constructive and helpful member of the site. You don't need to be an expert in much of anything, except perhaps good manners and etiquette for that.
It's relevant because people judge quality of answer by looking not only at the ranking for each individual answer, but also at the answerer's overall reputation.

On some of the stack sites this could be more important than others...

Also, not sure where you get the figure for 100 rep for linking the account. My new account(s) have exactly 0 rep. Er, well, I guess you start at 1? I can't remember for sure.
Hm. I started on StackOverflow, and have used a couple of the other sites. When I log on a new stack site with my OpenId, it gives me the opportunity to link accounts, and the times I've done that, I get a +100 rep bonus on the new site for linking.
1614
General Software Discussion / Re: A New Name for StackOverflow
« Last post by f0dder on March 10, 2011, 04:59 PM »
It makes sense, though - just because you're an excellent programmer doesn't mean you're excellent at, say, the English language... and you do get, what is it, 100rep or so just by linking the account.
1615
Living Room / Re: Do it yourself dropbox
« Last post by f0dder on March 10, 2011, 07:58 AM »
SpiderOak has a blog entry somewhere that lines out some security flaws (some which aren't all tinfoil hat) with a scheme that shares blocks between users - too lazy to search for it now, sorry, but it shouldn't be too hard to track down if you're interested. No reverse-engineering is needed, if global hashes are stored all the Evil CorpTM needs is a subpoena.

From the SO blog posts, it sounds like their method and reasoning for it is pretty well considered. Zero-Knowledge ftw.
1616
Living Room / Re: Do it yourself dropbox
« Last post by f0dder on March 10, 2011, 07:07 AM »
I would have thought any sane service to only transfer modified blocks - SpiderOak certainly does.
-f0dder
Actually, a friend of mine found out that DropBox does even more than that. It only transfers new blocks among all of its members' blocks. That is, if you try to upload a known large file (say a Ubuntu DVD or some known media), it'll upload instantly (regardless of the speed of your connection).
Good for speed, and storage space reduction at DropBox's servers, bad for privacy.
1617
General Software Discussion / Re: What the hell is OpenCandy?
« Last post by f0dder on March 09, 2011, 05:03 PM »
The paranoia which surround OpenCandy astonishes me. I find the DLL related freak-outs particularly funny, seems as if people think a DLL sitting on your harddrive is more dangerous than a txt file? Which by the way, in terms of security/vulnerability issues, it's not!
I've yet to hear of a text-file exploit, but it's not outside the realm of possibilities that an exploit could be found in the Portable Executable parser somewhere, that could trigger during explorer icon-extraction, an anti-malware program scanning the file, etc :)
1618
Living Room / Re: Do it yourself dropbox
« Last post by f0dder on March 09, 2011, 02:51 PM »
kartal[/b]: perhaps he's using block-based rather than file-based syncing?
With dropbox?
I would have thought any sane service to only transfer modified blocks - SpiderOak certainly does.
1619
Living Room / Re: Do it yourself dropbox
« Last post by f0dder on March 09, 2011, 09:20 AM »
kartal: perhaps he's using block-based rather than file-based syncing?
1620
Living Room / Re: XP multiuser default login
« Last post by f0dder on March 09, 2011, 07:17 AM »
SJ: that shouldn't be possible - at least not directly. Winlogon runs on a separate desktop (the NT object type, not "background where your wallpapers go").

If you elevate your application to LOCALSYSTEM privileges, everything is possible, but that's nasty hackery.
1621
Living Room / Re: Do it yourself dropbox
« Last post by f0dder on March 09, 2011, 06:22 AM »
housetier: check out SpiderOak - while even the best providers might disappear without notice, at least the SpiderOak guys have no way to access your files. Client works on multiple OSes.
1622
Living Room / Re: XP multiuser default login
« Last post by f0dder on March 09, 2011, 05:25 AM »
Hm, I do wonder if that kind of approach would work for the logon screen, 4wd - it's designed to run with some different constraints than regular applications.
1623
Living Room / Re: The 10 idiosyncrasies of Steve Jobs
« Last post by f0dder on March 08, 2011, 03:10 PM »
#9 lacks plural form - perhaps he badtripped, hated it, and that explains why he's such a fsck today :)
1624
General Software Discussion / Re: eBoostr, now version 4
« Last post by f0dder on March 08, 2011, 01:00 PM »
Thanks, Curt. I uninstalled eBoostr 4.x a couple of months ago and haven't looked back.

-this doesn't tell much, does it. You uninstall anything and everything!   :P
Whereas you install anything and everything? :P

*friendly poke*
1625
General Software Discussion / Re: DVCS ?
« Last post by f0dder on March 08, 2011, 11:02 AM »
Interesting notes on performance!

I find that all these GUIs have limitations. And, yes, having all these tortoise running at the same might cause some caching problem. Although I've read that they're now supposed to play well together (speaking of the icons overlay here).
Oh, the problems I've had are there even with a single Tortoise flavor installed - dunno if it "stacks up" when there's multiple versions. Happens relatively rarely, but enough that it's a minor annoyance.
Pages: prev1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 364next