topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday March 18, 2026, 4:19 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 386next
1601
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Black Friday / Cyber Monday 2017
« Last post by Deozaan on November 24, 2017, 10:20 AM »
AdGuard licenses are 50% off:

https://adguard.com/en/license.html
1602
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by Deozaan on November 24, 2017, 12:36 AM »
A video by Luca Stricagnoli:



^ That was good!  Reminded me of this one...




Seems like a good time to remind everyone of one of my favorite discoveries from this thread:

Jon Gomm's Passionflower

Jon Gomm:





BTW - his music is "pay what you want".

1603
DC Gamer Club / Re: Free Game on Humble Store
« Last post by Deozaan on November 24, 2017, 12:11 AM »
I kind of wish we could give "likes" or "thumbs up" to posts because I want to have some way of expressing appreciation to others who post about the latest giveaways, but I don't want to fill the thread with a bunch of "thanks" replies each time there's a giveaway.

So thanks! And in the future if I don't say it, please know that I still appreciate it. (This goes for the other giveaway threads, too, such as the GOG giveaway thread.)
1604
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Deozaan on November 17, 2017, 10:09 PM »
The Blockstream fanboys would further point at bitcoin’s new uselessness as a sign of its success, believe it or not, drawing the analogy “nobody goes to that restaurant anymore, because it’s too crowded”, with the subtext that a crowded restaurant must be successful. But this is not success; this is utter failure to scale exponentially when you’re an Internet startup, and it spells dooooooooooom.

It's become a meme to laugh at all the "Bitcoin is dead" articles on the internet. But I think it's finally true. It has many names these days: Bitcoin, Bitcoin Legacy, Bitcoin Segwit, Bitcoin Core. Whatever you call it, it has absolutely failed as a "peer-to-peer electronic cash system."

I don't know what the Bitcoin Segwit fork is. It frustrates me. It befuddles me. I see virtually no utility for it in its current state. I mean, sure, if you're moving hundreds of thousands of dollars worth (or more) around, especially across borders, then sure I guess a $5-$70 fee to get your transaction confirmed in the next hour or so is pretty good. But for the majority of the first-world, the traditional banking system is in many ways superior, or at least as good. And for the much of the third-world, whom Bitcoin was supposed to "bank the unbanked," the fee for a single transaction now costs more than they live on in a single day. Yet for some reason the Bitcoin price keeps going up and I sure can't see why. Maybe Falkvinge is onto something about it being propped up by Tether (i.e., it has essentially become a ponzi (or--and I can't believe I'm actually saying this--tulip mania), backed by nothing, and it's gonna come crashing down hard in a few years).

And so here we are in 2017, with a bitcoin that nobody I know uses for anything practical (last time I used it for something was about six weeks ago, when I bought a burger with bitcoin, which cost me about $2.50 in transaction fees, just as much as the burger itself; at least I didn’t have to wait eight to ten hours for the burger). What’s new on the scene in 2017 is something called a US Dollar Tether.

You see, you can’t buy big quantities of bitcoin — which is more or less “Blockstream stock” at this point — directly, not in amounts of millions of US Dollars. So this thing called Tether popped up, where a company named Tether claimed to issue US Dollar Tether, where one Tether was supposed to be good for exactly one US dollar. Today, the bitcoin price (the price of something that is unreliable, slow, and expensive, and which nobody uses anymore for anything remotely practical) isn’t driven up by people buying it for US Dollars anymore, but by institutions buying it for large amounts of Tether, which is “kind-of-dollars-but-not-really-but-we-still-pretend-so”.

The company Tether insists that they have backing; every Tether has a US Dollar backing it. There has been no proof to this. There have just been regular conjurings-up of new batches of ten, twenty, thirty million Tethers — not US Dollars, but Tethers — that are spent pushing up the bitcoin price as though the Tethers were dollars, and this happens basically every time the Blockstream PR machine happens to need a little boost. Maybe the Tethers are backed by dollars on a one-to-one ratio, as is asserted and refused to be proven. Maybe they aren’t. Sure as hell doesn’t look like they are.

This whole story reeks of a lot of people going to a lot of prison in a few years.

Everybody's buying it hoping the price will go up. The price is going up because everybody's buying it. But Blockstream/Core have removed the foundation by intentionally crippling it. Adoption has stalled. Nobody really uses it for anything but speculation/trading/hodling. Maybe I lack vision, but as long as it continues down this path, I don't see how it won't come crumbling down eventually.

Bitcoin has a problem when one its most ardent supporters you know says things like this:

I don't send my friends BTC. I send fiat.

Whatever Bitcoin Segwit is, it is definitely not the Bitcoin I got obsessed with a mere 2 years ago. Bitcoin Cash, on the other hand, has me cautiously optimistic. I think is has the potential to be the David to Bitcoin Segwit's Goliath, and return Bitcoin (Cash) to what it was originally intended to be: Peer-to-peer electronic cash which you actually can (and want to) send to your friends.

But I'm not confident it can overcome the massive censorship and smear campaign(s). I'm not sure it can overcome the public perception that Bitcoin (Segwit) is the "real" Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash is just some "pump and dump altcoin" (to put it nicely).

And I'm also not sure what any variant of Bitcoin offers these days over other cryptos that haven't had development stalled for the past 2 years. I think Dash has integrated some cool features (like InstantSend, PrivateSend, and their treasury to help fund continued development). I think Ethereum is pretty interesting because you can run programs on the blockchain.

Right now, Bitcoin is the top dog in the crypto-space. There's no denying it. And it's rather telling that every other form of cryptocurrency (including the Bitcoin forks) is generally referred to as an altcoin. But innovation has continued in the cryptocurrency scene the past couple years while Bitcoin has stalled and even regressed in its usefulness, adoption, and marketshare. And I'm starting to wonder if, in another decade or so, we'll think of Bitcoin as we now think of MySpace.
1605
Living Room / Re: Mechanical Keyboards
« Last post by Deozaan on November 17, 2017, 04:51 PM »
Quite the collection you've got there!

Approx. how much does one of those things cost to make?
1606
Living Room / Re: Anyone here using a standing desk?
« Last post by Deozaan on November 17, 2017, 03:24 PM »
There are some changes, i.e. different keyboard,

Somewhat off-topic, but can you link me to the thread where you posted about your home-made/custom keyboards?

I found this, but the images don't match: https://www.donation...ex.php?topic=42493.0
1607
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 10 Announced
« Last post by Deozaan on November 17, 2017, 03:06 PM »
Seems pretty snappy to me on my desktop machine, which is getting a bit long in the tooth, but still performs quite decently.

On a laptop it takes a second or two between clicking the Settings button and it actually showing the settings.
1608
Living Room / Re: Gadget WEEKENDS
« Last post by Deozaan on November 17, 2017, 01:47 PM »
Somewhere I recently heard about a good alternative for compressed air, which is an electric air duster. I can't remember where I heard of it. I didn't know such a thing existed in such a relatively small and affordable form. So I ended up getting one. Then I came to post about it here and was pretty sure I found some other thread from years ago mention basically the same thing I bought, but now I can't find that thread either.

Anyway, here's my new gadget:



I haven't really had a chance to use it yet. I did plug it in and turn it on long enough to get an idea for how much force it uses. Seems like it will be powerful enough to get the job done. Hopefully it lasts long enough to end up costing less than it would if I kept buying compressed air over the years.
1609
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: pCloud
« Last post by Deozaan on November 16, 2017, 02:34 PM »
And I think Deo was referring to OneDrive Files-on-demand.

Yes, it seems I was:

Windows 10 was a big improvement over Windows 8.1 in most important ways, but it made a big change to the way OneDrive syncing worked. In Windows 8.1, you could see all the files you had stored in OneDrive, but the operating system would only actually download and open the file when you needed to open it. At least for PCs that usually have Internet connections, this was a neat way to offer cloud file syncing without consuming gigabytes of space for infrequently used files on every computer you were signed into.

But the behavior could be error-prone—apps could attempt to open the placeholder files created by OneDrive rather than the files themselves—and it could create confusion about which files were actually available offline. So in the initial releases of Windows 10, Microsoft changed the behavior to be more Dropbox-esque. All OneDrive files are now downloaded to your PC when you sign in, though as with Dropbox you can choose to only sync selected folders based on what you need to have available at all times.

In the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update, OneDrive will change yet again. "OneDrive Files On-Demand" restores the old "placeholder" concept from Windows 8.1, but with improved handling of placeholder files and tweaked Windows Explorer integration that makes it clearer what's going on. Because downloading and opening those placeholder files is now handled by the filesystem driver rather than a shell extension, you should no longer run into problems where apps try to open the placeholders instead of the actual files—any app, including the command line, will be able to trigger a file download, making the experience more seamless and reliable.
1610
DC Gamer Club / Re: Free Game on Humble Store
« Last post by Deozaan on November 16, 2017, 02:04 PM »
Another Free Game on Humble: KILLER IS DEAD - NIGHTMARE EDITION

There's probably a deadline for Steam activation before the key becomes invalid, but I don't know what that is.

Thanks! The deadline is December 2nd (~15 days).
1611
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 10 Announced
« Last post by Deozaan on November 16, 2017, 02:01 PM »
@Deozaan, this must be a later version of the FCU(it's Version 1709 (OS Build 16299.64), not 1709 Build 16299.19).

The Fall Creators Update is 1709 Build 16299.x. Any higher number in the "x" slot just means you have more recent patches applied. After installing patches last Tuesday, I am also on build 16299.64. That said, even the 16299 number should increase over time before we get to the next major update. In essence, Microsoft learned from their past mistakes* and now downloads/installs the latest patch updates when installing the major updates.



*have you tried updating a fresh installation of Windows 7 lately?
1612
General Software Discussion / Re: New faster Firefox browser released
« Last post by Deozaan on November 16, 2017, 12:25 AM »
Thanks to Mozilla for breaking things during an automatic update I had no choice to install simply because I tried to use my browser!

Well, I'd downloaded, but I hadn't installed.  I think I'll wait on that until the all-clear at this point...

To be fair, the thing that broke was due to an incompatible add-on. I'm just frustrated that the update happened automatically and didn't give me a warning or even a chance to cancel the installation before upgrading to something that was incompatible with what I was using. :(

Other than my frustration with losing all of my tabs in the various tab groups, the updated browser does seem to run well.

And in the process of trying to find another tab grouping add-on I found one called Multi-Account Containers which is a little clunky but basically allows you to set up different sessions (containers), so you can be logged into multiple accounts on the same site at the same time. And it even allows you to configure certain websites to open in certain containers by default.

So for instance, if I visit a bunch of gaming websites, such as Wikia and GameFAQs, I can configure those sites to always open in my "Games" container so they don't get in the way of my "Work" container, or whatever.

It's not quite the same as the Tab Groups were, since using the groups would de-clutter my screen and only show the tabs for the active group. But I do like how I can have separate logins/IDs for each container. I don't know about anyone else, but I like to keep identities separate, so I have a couple of different Gmail accounts, etc. Having a "Personal" container and a "Business" container which can both be logged into their own Gmail accounts at the same time, for example, is pretty nice.

Even so, I think Vivaldi is going to remain my primary browser for the time being.
1613
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: pCloud
« Last post by Deozaan on November 16, 2017, 12:11 AM »
I [...] encountered the one thing that immediately set it apart to me.  It created a drive on my machine- a virtual drive that does not store files locally.

[...]

So the 14GB that I have from pCloud shows up as a drive on my PC, but doesn't take up space on my PC.

Isn't this what OneDrive used to do, then Microsoft removed that feature, and now they've just added it back again last month in the latest version (Fall Creators Update) of Windows 10?
1614
DC Gamer Club / Re: fortnite...
« Last post by Deozaan on November 16, 2017, 12:02 AM »
EDIT: I had this response written in a tab hours ago and apparently forgot to hit submit, and now there are replies which say some of the same stuff. :-[

You must be talking about Fortnite's new F2P Battle Royale mode (as opposed to the co-op survival campaign).

I don't play it. I'm not really into PvP stuff. But I've been hearing about Fortnite (the co-op version) from someone for a few months now. He really likes it. He also seems to like Battle Royale as well. But I think maybe he's also a fan of Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), which, as I understand it, has very similar gameplay elements to Battle Royale.

The co-op campaign looks pretty fun to me. But I've got a huge backlog of other games I'd rather play if I have time, and I've heard that even the co-op part is going F2P next year, so I'm holding out for that.
1615
General Software Discussion / Re: New faster Firefox browser released
« Last post by Deozaan on November 15, 2017, 02:53 PM »
Well that sucks.

I was using a tab-grouping extension which had about 100 tabs open and organized into various groups I use when working on different things. I shut down Firefox when I rebooted my computer for a Windows update and when I got back and opened Firefox, it automatically updated, getting rid of my tab grouping extension and forgetting about the existence of all my tabs except for the ones which were in the last group I had active before closing the browser. I see no way to recover the old tabs.

Thanks to Mozilla for breaking things during an automatic update I had no choice to install simply because I tried to use my browser! >:(
1616
General Software Discussion / Re: So, what pdf reader app is your fav?
« Last post by Deozaan on November 13, 2017, 05:39 PM »
I previously posted in this thread saying I was using Foxit. I got sick of it becoming more and more of a bloated mess with each update and switched to Sumatra. That was probably a year ago; I'm still using it and liking it.

I like it because it seems simple and lightweight compared to the alternatives I've tried. But I don't do much with PDFs and I especially don't create/edit them. But for a lightweight PDF reader, I'm pretty happy with Sumatra. :Thmbsup:
1617
Why do women have cleaner minds than men?
They change theirs more often.

I liked this one and have shared it with a few people already. But I modified it slightly:

"Why do men have dirtier minds than women? Because women change theirs more often."

I feel this version of it makes it more evident that it's an equal opportunity offender of both genders and not just a dig at women. :P
1618
General Software Discussion / Re: Personal keylogger
« Last post by Deozaan on November 12, 2017, 04:15 PM »
I download the Free Keylogger but it was blocked as malware :(
Is there a tested solution?

Keyloggers are, by their very nature, considered malware.

Most people don't want keyloggers on their system. And they also want to be notified if a keylogger is running on their system so they can get rid of it.
1619
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Deozaan on November 12, 2017, 11:36 AM »
This is insane!

The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 950 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top.
For the median transaction size of 226 bytes, this results in a fee of 214,700 satoshis.

It seems my hypothetical example from the other day was prophetic.

I made a transaction yesterday and paid 310 satoshi/byte which was a recommended value. But there's been such a high demand that fees have shot up and now my transaction has been stuck in limbo for about 24 hours and there's nothing I can do about it.

Meanwhile, the value of my stuck transaction is plummeting and the value of virtually everything else is going up.

The only reason the price of Bitcoin isn't crashing even faster is because no one can move their funds out of it!
1620
I liked #1 better but maybe that's just because it has the wonderful image of Cody in it. :-*
1621
DC Gamer Club / Re: GOG Connect - DRM-free access to your Steam library
« Last post by Deozaan on November 11, 2017, 12:25 PM »
No worries. I'd have probably done the same, or similar. :Thmbsup:
1622
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: PokéWorld - Pokémon MMO...On Discord!
« Last post by Deozaan on November 11, 2017, 11:55 AM »
So it's a Pokemon MUD?
1623
DC Gamer Club / Re: GOG Connect - DRM-free access to your Steam library
« Last post by Deozaan on November 11, 2017, 11:53 AM »
I haven't been on the forum for the past few days, so I didn't see mwb's post. But when I came here to post this, I did a search for "GOG Connect" to find this thread and saw mwb's post, so I decided a post here would be useful in case someone was subscribed to this thread but not the other one. :D
1624
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by Deozaan on November 11, 2017, 11:35 AM »
The Core devs rock.

I'm really surprised you support the Core devs (especially Blockstream) after all the censorship they're implicitly advocating and participating in. I would have expected you to be all over the conspiracies that they're being paid off by "the big, evil" banks to cripple or destroy Bitcoin from within. :huh:



While the rest of this is all in response to things you said, it's not necessarily all a direct response to you. :)

But, for the block size, that's a bit misleading.

The idea is to off-load transactions into Lightning Networks. That will solve scaling issue massively.

Those will take off next year.

My understanding is that the Lightning Network has been "18 months away" for over two, maybe three, years. And that they're still saying it's 18 months away. I know this is groundbreaking technology that is still being researched and developed, so delays should be expected. I'm just saying I don't think we'll see it next year. But it would be cool if I was wrong about that.

Lightning does sound like a cool scaling solution. But when I learned more about it and thought about what life would be like with Lightning, in real-life, practical, every-day use, I came to the conclusion that it naturally leads to something that is very much like the current traditional banking system. They advertise Lightning as a way to "open channels" with anybody you want so you can send funds back and forth to each other off-chain, to avoid the high fees associated with doing transactions on-chain. Sounds cool, until you realize that (1) there would not be any high fees to perform on-chain transactions if the blocksize limit was increased, so in that regard Lightning is a solution to an artificially created problem. That's not to say that it won't be a valid way to assist in scaling in the future, but at the very least there is an artificial demand being created for off-chain scaling (with technology that doesn't exist yet, such as Lightning) when currently on-chain scaling is very simple to accomplish and very doable with current technology that exists right now. But ignoring all that, (2) in order to create a Lightning channel you need to lock your funds up in the channel before you can use them. In other words, it's kind of like a pre-paid gift card. You have to preload it, and then you can pay any amount up to how much you preloaded it with, over many smaller transactions. Of course, that's not a great analogy because those people can also pay you, so you can send funds back and forth to each other. But I don't know about you, but the people I pay generally don't pay me. And the people who pay me generally don't get paid by me. In other words, for the vast majority of entities I interact with financially, the payments are largely unidirectional. So I'd need to open separate channels with each of these people in order to send/receive funds to/from them, which is a lot like the gift-card analogy after all. And don't forget that each time you open (or close) a channel it costs an expensive BTC transaction fee. It's a mess.

So the next obvious solution is for the "hub and spoke" system, where there are a few big Lightning Hubs that people create channels with, and those hubs have channels opened with each other, and instead of sending your funds straight to Alice, you send them to your hub, which sends them to Alice's hub, which sends them to Alice. And everybody (for the most part) uses one or two of the few/several big hubs and no one interacts directly with each other anymore because on-chain fees have gotten prohibitively expensive.

Starting to sound familiar? Isn't that just like our current banking system? I don't actually pay Walmart or Home Depot. I deposit my money into my bank (create a channel with a hub) and then when I want to buy something from someone, I tell my bank (my hub) to pay their bank (their hub). Only lightning is worse than the current banking system because the limited blocksize limit means it will be expensive to deposit your money into your "bank," and it will be expensive to withdraw your money from your "bank," should you ever need or want to use Bitcoin as cash (person to person) without involving one or more third-parties.

And (3) since these big banks/hubs will need a lot of money for these big channels being opened with everyone, they'll likely need to follow KYC laws, requiring you to give them your personal information so they can make sure you're not laundering money or supporting terrorists or whatever. As such, if they know who you are, and they don't like you or the causes you support (or the people you're trying to send money to), they can refuse to process your transactions, and now you've reached a point where BTC itself is too expensive to use because the blocks are full, and the Lightning networks can censor transactions they don't like (or are compelled to by governments).

I'm not saying Lightning is intrinsically bad. I think it could be a very useful tool in some circumstances. But I do think the consequences of essentially forcing it onto everyone in the BTC ecosystem is bad for everyone and is bad for BTC itself.


This is just the beginning. There's a long way to go.

Indeed. IMO, fees will continue to rise without on-chain scaling.

Right now Bitcoin is NOTHING in the financial world. It's a blip. A curiosity.

Imagine where Bitcoin could be if adoption and use hadn't been stalled for the past ~two years because of increasing fees and confirmation times. :(


If you're not in already, do your due diligence and think about whether BTC has a place in your portfolio.

I think that Segwit2X was Bitcoin's last hope of being usable as originally intended. With the cancellation of it, and it having sealed Core's scaling roadmap, I am no longer interested in what Bitcoin has to offer, technologically. It offers me virtually no benefit over the current fiat system (I've only ever wired money once in my life, and that was over 15 years ago, but yeah, it was unpleasant and expensive). I'd be a much richer man at the end of my life with inflation slowly devaluing my currency by 2-5% per year than if I had to pay $5-$25 (or more) in fees every time I spend any amount of money. And for anything that Bitcoin does do better than fiat, there are other cryptos that do it even better.

I'm not fully out of BTC yet, but I think I will be soon. I know this is probably premature to say since it has only been a few days, but the market seems to agree with me thus far, given the sharp rise in value of Bitcoin Cash and the not-insignificant drop in value in BTC since Segwit2X was canceled. I'm not saying BTC is dead or that it will be worthless or is a bad long-term investment or whatever. I'm just saying that it is not the technology that I got so excited about a couple years ago. It has been co-opted and changed into something else much less useful and much less interesting.

None of what I've said should be taken as investment advice. I definitely agree that people need to do their due diligence and decide whether BTC has a place in their portfolio. I'm just saying that in the past, Bitcoin's virtually free transactions, relatively instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world, and at any time, were paradigm-shifting features granting enormous freedoms. But many of those freedoms have disappeared or are in the process of being hobbled. "Nobody" uses Bitcoin anymore. They just HODL, hoping the price will go up and make them rich. People are buying it because the price is going up. The price is going up because people are buying it. But I don't really see the underlying value anymore in its current form and further down the path that Core is planning to take it.
1625
DC Gamer Club / Re: GOG Connect - DRM-free access to your Steam library
« Last post by Deozaan on November 11, 2017, 09:45 AM »
As reported already by mwb1100 Syberia 1 & 2 are on GOG Connect for about another 2 days.
Pages: prev1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 386next