Recent Posts
), for example. I guess the big question is: do you have a standalone licence for either of them? If so, all you need is the media from someone. If not, I'm not sure what the implications are (other than the obvious, which I will not dwell on )., I hadn't thought of the Danish language requirement! What I really would like to know is what a program like Archivarius, X1, etc. offers that Copernic does not. Since Copernic is free and these others are not, there must be something compelling that makes them worth the money, but I haven't been able to figure that out from the discussion here.-cyberdiva (December 22, 2008, 10:07 AM)
But I know what I meant to say 
See signature 
That's the sole function I use and I sorely miss it form Maxthon. I've been using one that I created to mimic the Maxthon one - and this is where I have found All-In-One clunky - but it often doesn't open anything at all or opens the link I want and any others I happen to graze with the cursor. I'll give the one you pointed out a try I'm sort of happy that this happened. I've been using, and loving Maxthon for years (started using it when it was in beta years ago, version 0.7x) and have tried many times to switch to Firefox. This latest issue has forced me to use it, get to know it, and to bend it to my will. I love it! Only thing I miss are Maxthon's mouse gestures. The add-ins for Firefox are clunky.-Darwin (December 17, 2008, 01:46 PM)
I've never used Maxthon, so I'm not sure what its mouse gestures are like, but I absolutely love Marc Boullet's All-in-One Gestures for Firefox.-Deozaan (December 19, 2008, 05:57 PM)
BRU is infamous for its GUI, which is considered cluttered...-Darwin (December 19, 2008, 07:56 AM)
On the contrary, Darwin, I love the fact that every option is in front of me, instead having to tab through endless menus, tabs, and dropdown lists. Same goes for Flexible Renamer, which recently got a version upgrade. I just set how I want for repetitive job, save it as a profile, then BAM! I'm done.-zridling (December 19, 2008, 05:08 PM)
But its GUI does have its detractors (I'm not one of them, though).
I notice, even on my Dual Core laptop with lots of RAM that it's "heavier" in its latest incarnation. Not enough to make it annoying or even noticeable unless I go looking for it... but "heavier" nonetheless. Functionally, it's the same as always and I haven't seen any problems, yet.- I would certainly expect the "1 GB/Hour" to be 1 GB indexed documents, not hard disk space!-Curt (December 19, 2008, 02:47 PM)
Ads? Heh - I'll keep the last ad-free version installed also. I still have the setup if...
Jim-J-Mac (December 19, 2008, 03:57 PM)
I wrote to the developer immediately after making the post above no word, yet, but I'll report back when I do hear form him or her. What has me a bit puzzled is that the purchases were made in 2006... so well before Feb 2008.-Darwin (November 28, 2008, 08:35 AM)
I haven't actually installed Windows Server 2003/2008 yet (though I have downloaded it and got a key). Are you saying both 32 bit and 64 bit versions are on the same image because DreamSpark doesn't doesn't mention the installation type.-Carol Haynes (December 19, 2008, 03:14 AM)
We students are poor fellas that still have to work with Windows 98. A little help is always welcomed-Lashiec (December 18, 2008, 06:57 PM)