topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday April 8, 2026, 8:57 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 593 594 595 596 597 [598] 599 600 601 602 603 ... 1515next
14926
Developer's Corner / Re: Need help from Inno Setup gurus
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 09:17 PM »
Can i point out i also recently posted a tiny dll and inno script sample for people who want to have their programs shutdown automatically if running on install and uninstall:

https://www.donation...ex.php?topic=24786.0
14927
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: StartSSL.com Certificate Provider: Mini-Review
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 08:44 PM »
Here's a thread on the StartSSL forum about programs and services that trust StartSSL certificates:
https://forum.startc....php?f=15&t=1802
14928
Developer's Corner / Re: Need help from Inno Setup gurus
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 08:40 PM »
my inno setup looks similar to Skwire's and i think it does the same thing, but it's split into two sections:

[Icons]
Name: {userdesktop}\Screenshot Captor; Filename: {app}\ScreenshotCaptor.exe; Tasks: desktopicon
[Tasks]
Name: desktopicon; Description: {cm:CreateDesktopIcon}; GroupDescription: {cm:AdditionalIcons}

So note how the desktop icon is setup in the [Icons] section, and has a TASK specified.
And then the task entry asks the user if they want to install it.
14929
Find And Run Robot / Re: FARR stops working after win7 locked
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 08:05 PM »
Can you try changing that and seeing if that has any effect?
14930
Find And Run Robot / Re: FARR stops working after win7 locked
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 07:47 PM »
Hmm.. strange.. anyone else experiencing this?

Can i ask what setting you have for the General tab of options, under "Inactive Memory Use"?
14931
I like this idea -- i hope you will implement some more of the features we've talked about.  :up:
14932
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: StartSSL.com Certificate Provider: Mini-Review
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 07:03 PM »
As for the warnings browsers do on self-signed certificates, well, I'm afraid that they do have to be somewhat severe

I don't really agree with you, though i see the point you are making.

But I see this as in the same vein as the false positive virus warnings that antivirus programs sometimes give -- if they don't understand it then they just scare the user, and the one who loses is the small developer who can't afford to grease the wheels to get their programs (or websites) certified as trusted.  I guess my complaint is not the warnings in isolation, it's the combination of the severe scary warnings combined with how expensive it has been to get flexible proper certificates.

I suppose for website certificates, now that there is a way to get free and cheap proper ssl certificates, it's not such a big deal and I shouldn't blame the browsers too much.  But I just think the warnings that browsers put up are far too misleadingly severe.  There are lots of ways that a website can be infected and made to do bad things, and the LEAST likely of those is to have a man in the middle attack that forges an ssl certificate.  Unless you are controlling inter-ballistic missles over the web, i just think ssl certificate forgeries are the least of your realistic concerns, and the browser warnings should reflect that.

HOWEVER, as i said before, given that it's now possible to generate verified certificates for free/cheaply, i guess the solution is just to use these instead of self-signed ones.
14933
Official Announcements / Re: DonationCoder.com NEW SERVER ACTIVATED Dec 17, 2010
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 04:57 PM »
the registrar is TotalChoice hosting, but the reason the nameserver propagation happened so incredibly fast is due to a few things, that maybe Gothi[c] can elaborate on:

  • We set the TLS to lowest values weeks ago, which informs everyone that they have to recheck often for possible changes in the DNS.
  • We still have the old server up and changed its nameserver data to point to the new server -- so even when the old server was queried it had info about the new server.

These two things mean that most people got updated to the new server dns in minutes instead of days.  Again you can thank Gothi[c] the DC server admin for knowing how to do this.  :up:
14934
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 04:28 PM »
remove the labels for the move up/down and delete commands

that would work.
14935
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 04:05 PM »
Well the logic being:

1. Not all buttons now have room if the window isnt really large.
2. It makes sense to me to isolate the buttons that work on a specific selected file from the generic buttons, and putting those file-related buttons at the bottom of the list makes sense to me.

Couldnt get the crash to occur again.. the dialog that showed was the "Run As" dialog where i could give it permission to run as administrator.  It doesn't crash any more, but doesn't seem to install any context menu extension even when i give it permission.  Not that this bothers me as i love to drag+drop files anyway instead of right-clicking.
14936
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 03:43 PM »
Worked very well.. throttled itself and updated results perfectly as they became available.  Very nice.
The Jotti.org people should be excited about this  :up:
14937
Finished Programs / Re: Request: Transparent Screensaver
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 03:42 PM »
why not:

Take a screenshot, slowly invert it,
Repeat.

I read the original request as just saying it needs to display a reasonably updating view of real screen but not that it had to be constantly refreshed every second or so.
14938
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 03:38 PM »
Working here on Xp Pro !!!
NICE  :up: :up: :up:
Very cool app.


NOTES:
Trying to enable context menu crashed the app after the windows dialog was shown.

Suggestion:
Maybe move the file-related buttons to the bottom, under the grid?
Maybe add a right-click option to search for the filename in browser to help people learn more? maybe on a favorite process info site?
14939
Finished Programs / Re: Request: Transparent Screensaver
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 03:19 PM »
neat.

though i wonder if something that only briefly changes a pixel and then puts it back to original state is going to do anything to avoid burn it, since the pixel will be it's original color for 99% of the time.. maybe what's needed is to move across the entire screen, inverting everything and then undoing it, etc., so that pixels stay changed for a prolonged period.

ps. only affects primary monitor, for what it's worth.
14940
Mini-Reviews by Members / StartSSL.com Certificate Provider: Mini-Review
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 02:20 PM »
I want talk a little bit about about StartSSL.com, a company that provides SSL Certificates.  They actually do a lot of things under the umbrella of StartCom, but I'm only going to talk about SSL services here, and in particular, SSL Certificates for web sites.




Preface: An Introduction to SSL Certificates

SSL Certificates are a source of much frustration for small companies and indie website operators.

The idea of SSL Certificates is a good one.  They offer a way for users who connect to your website to have some assurance that you are who you say you are -- that the person running the website they are connecting to is really the person in charge of the organization they say they are, and that they aren't being tricked by someone who has intercepted their connection to the web (man-in-the-middle style attacks).

But web browsers (firefox, internet explorer, chrome, opera, safari, etc.) have decided to combine this idea of verifying the identity of the company running a website with the mechanism for establishing a secure connection protocol from your browser to the website (https).  Secure connections can be very important in preventing neighbors and snoops from discovering your login passwords, etc. as you browse the web.

Unfortunately, the way that web browser makers have combined these features has results in a real dilemma for small developers and indie website administrators.

When a user tries to connect to a website using https, the web browser will check that the website has an SSL certificate from a "trusted" provider.  And while it's possible for anyone to create a (self-signed) key that enables their website to support encrypted communications, without a PURCHASED and VERIFIED certificate, users will receive a big warning when they connect, telling them that they are about to connect to a untrusted/unverified site.

Many web browsers make this "warning" overly scary and complex to deal with.  FireFox makes the user go through a bunch of hoops that will scare away most inexperienced visitors and have them running for the hills rather than try to connect to your website if you use a self-signed certificate.  They will assume something is wrong with your site or that it can't be trusted.

The answer seems clear then, for website developers: Purchase an SSL Certificate from a "trusted" provider.

Surely buying and using such a certificate can't be too expensive if we expect everyone to be doing this, right?  Don't make me laugh...



The SSL Certificate Provider Mafia

The SSL certificate provider industry feels like a mafia run extortion racket.  It is absolutely outrageous how expensive it is to get reasonably flexible and valid SSL certificates.

If you have one single website domain (let's say thesslmafia.com), and don't use any subdomains (i.e. don't use things like haters.thesslmafia.com), then you can actually purchase an SSL certificate for the relatively reasonable fee from most providers ($100-$300 per year).  Don't have that kind of money? Tough luck.

But where things get really truly ugly and evil is when you need more than one certificate, because you own more than one domain name, or use subdomains more frequently.  Now you are looking at $100-$300 PER DOMAIN NAME.  How's that for affordable?



Enter StartSSL.com

And now we come to StartSSL, a company making waves in the SSL Certificate business.  As Gothi[c] (the dc server admin) aptly put it: "StartSSL is taking on the SSL Certificate Mafia!"

What makes StartSSL different is that they charge you to validate your identity and company, and *NOT* to generate additional certificates for different domains and subdomains.  So once you pay for validation, which is a real bargain rate ($50 for personal validation and $50 on top if you want to validate that you are the owner of a particular company), you can generate as many domain and subdomain certificates (including wildcard *.domainname.com certificates) as you need.

To see how unusual this is, check out the wikipedia page comparing SSL Certificate providers:
http://en.wikipedia....ates_for_web_servers

Look at that chart under the columns for number of domains and subdomains included, and you'll start to get an idea of why StartSSL is so wonderful.  Almost every other provider is forcing you to pay through the nose for each domain and subdomain you need to add.

The cost of having to pay for additional certificates (and wildcard certificates) for DonationCoder.com is why we've not previously made the leap to using proper validated SSL certificates on this website.  We just couldn't afford it and refused to give in to the unfair charges demanded by certificate providers.

Until I found StartSSL..



The StartSSL Experience

When we moved servers recently I decided to check out StartSSL.com, and i've been incredibly impressed.

Now you have to understand that StartSSL is a small operation, with a website control panel that leaves much to be desired.  The website and control panel feel a bit clunky and slow and outdated, and can be confusing at times.  BUT they get the job done, and the services provided by StartSSL are great and unique.

I had no trouble at all getting verified and validated -- the process was extremely smooth and fast -- and after one personal phone call from Eddy Nigg, who is the face (and founder?) of StartCom to verify some information and scanned documents, we were able to generate certificates for the new DonationCoder.com server.

Verification Options and Classes

With all SSL Certificate providers, you have some options regarding the quality of the verification of your (and your site's) identity.  This is related to the idea of the SSL Certificate class.  In general, the higher the class, the more expensive it is, the more difficult it is to get (in terms of proving your identity to the Certificate Provider company), and the more sure a visitor can be that you and your site are who you say you are.

With all of the other certificate providers I have seen other than StartSSL, you pay a yearly fee for a specific certificate for a particular domain (or a collection of 1-5 domain names).  The cost will depend on the class and number of certificates you want.

StartSSL is different.  With StartSSL you can get a one year personal class 1 certificate, for free -- which I understand is good enough to remove the browser warnings about untrusted certificates that you get with a self-signed certificate.  The only limitation is that you can only get this free certificate with one email/domain/subdomain [NOTE: I am informed that I may be wrong about this limitation so you need to check on this].

What you probably want from StartSSL if you are serious about using SSL certificates for your small business, or if you have lots of domains/subdomains, is a class 2 (or above) verified certificate.  The way StartSSL works is that you pay about $50 to verify your personal identity, after which you can generate new class 2 certificates for any number of domains/subdomains over the course of a year (the certificates themselves actually last two years).  This should be enough to have browsers display your site as trusted when accessed through https and eliminate any extra steps they would otherwise have to take.  If you want, you can pay an additional $50 on top of the personal verification process to verify your business, which let's people know that they are dealing with the business associated with your website, rather than just a known person.  Again, certificates last two years, and you can generate as many different domain and subdomain (and wildcard) certificates as you want for a one year period, before you have to renew your verifications.  Again, it is the ability to generate many different certificates for different domains that makes StartSSL stand out apart from the crowd, and what makes it so useful for small companies.

StartSSL also offers (class 3?) extended validation certificates which cost $200 and require serious verification steps; the benefit is a green status bar in the user's browser windows -- something that giant companies like amazon.com might care about but small companies needn't worry about.  At DonationCoder.com we went with a $50 personal verification and $50 business verification and the process was painless.

A word on Eddy Nigg and the service at StartSSL

Generating and installing certificates can be a bit tricky.  But they are nothing compared to Code Signing.  StartSSL also lets you generate code signing certificates and I went through the process a couple of times while trying to learn how to do it.  At one point I (thought) I needed to revoke a certificate I had generated (unfortunately StartSSL only allows you to have one code signing certificate at a time, and I hope they change this).  There is a fee to revoke a certificate and I figured we were getting such a great deal that I just clicked to pay it and have the certificate revoked.  Imagine my surprise when I got a personal email from Eddy offering to help me figure out what was wrong.  Eventually he revoked the certificate without a charge(!) and continued to help me figure out my problem, which I was able to do and managed to get code signing to work (code signing is a matter for a separate post and is a complicated and questionable thing -- but it's great that you can do it with StartSSL).

Now I don't think one can expect this kind of personal service all the time from a small SSL certificate provider, I certainly didn't.  Maybe some of the companies selling certificates for $400 do have serious help desks for this kind of thing, I don't know, but I wouldn't be terribly surprised.  If you have that kind of money to throw around maybe you can find out.  But I was very impressed with how hands on and helpful Eddy was.  StartCom also has a pretty active forum where you can get help from other users (and you'll find Eddy on there as well!), which is a big help when you run into trouble..



Summary

There is a near-criminal racket going on in the world of SSL Certificate Providers; most providers charge outrageous rates for inflexible certificates that force you to keep buying additional certificates for each domain you own.

Within this vast wasteland of greed, StartSSL stands out as a beacon of hope for small developers and website owners.  Bravo!  :up:



More Info

For information about SSL Certificate providers see:




NOTE: I have no relation to StartSSL; I am just a satisfied customer.
14941
Find And Run Robot / Re: Settings not being saved
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 10:41 AM »
Anyone?
14942
ProcessTamer / Re: On going theme - PT fails to start
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 10:40 AM »
Hi Flash.

I'm not sure i have seen this problem before.  There is known issue that can occur where the configuration GUI does not detect that the ProcessTamer tray is running.  But you seem to be saying that the ProcessTamer tray utility doesn't even launch.

If you launch it from the start menu, what happens? Nothing?  No tray icon?  Are you sure windows isn't hiding it under the "more icons" button in the system tray?  If you hit ctrl+alt+del does ProcessTamerTray.exe show up in the process list?
14943
it would be easy for me to make a function that a plugin can call to unload a specific other plugin and reload it, if that would help.
14944
However, it seems that it automatically run the 'aplugins' command, is there a way to reload plugins without showing them immediatly ?
i could add this.
14945
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by mouser on December 19, 2010, 04:15 AM »
I got same as Cranioscopical on win Xp Pro.
14946
Official Announcements / Re: DonationCoder.com NEW SERVER ACTIVATED Dec 17, 2010
« Last post by mouser on December 18, 2010, 07:29 PM »
i see we had a problem with double spaces converting to ? when editing a post.  that was how they occurred.  hopefully it is fixed now.
14947
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by mouser on December 18, 2010, 07:13 PM »
holy hell we have a question mark problem on the forum on the new server.

i've fixed it by reverting back to ISO-8859-1 from utf8, which solves the question mark problem but restores the problem with some post titles with odd characters.
14948
Living Room / Re: Show us a photo of your mutt or other creatures..
« Last post by mouser on December 18, 2010, 06:12 PM »
It leaves you wondering how one small animal can be so damned unlucky

He probably considered himself very lucky indeed to have had such a good year with you, and given all of the suffering in this world, i would be inclined to agree with him.
14949
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Release: BlackJack
« Last post by mouser on December 18, 2010, 05:52 PM »
oh damn it's happening to me too in some of my posts above.. what's going on i wonder.
14950
Living Room / Re: Show us a photo of your mutt or other creatures..
« Last post by mouser on December 18, 2010, 05:48 PM »
he looks so cute and full of personality.  i am so sorry for your loss.. just looking at him makes me miss him and i never met him.

the most important thing you need to remember is how happy you must have made him -- especially considering his prior life before you, you made his life worth while and just being there for him meant the world to him i'm sure.  what more could a dog ask for.

Pages: prev1 ... 593 594 595 596 597 [598] 599 600 601 602 603 ... 1515next