topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 20, 2025, 3:54 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 438next
1276
Living Room / 3D Printed CAR!
« Last post by Renegade on September 16, 2014, 06:47 AM »


https://localmotors.com/3dprintedcar/

Your 3D printed handgun (not included) goes in the glove compartment. :P

Your car has over 20,000 parts. Ours has 40.
The Strati: 44 hours of printing. 2 days of assembly.
Full-scale. Fully functional. Can we do it? Hell yeah.
1277
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 16, 2014, 03:24 AM »
Sk8rboi
1278
Living Room / NSFW - Naughty Bits - Sexy Bitcoin "News" Show :)
« Last post by Renegade on September 15, 2014, 04:44 AM »
Remember the Nude News?

http://www.reddit.co...y_bitcoin_news_show/

NSFW

Naughty Bits - Sexy Bitcoin "News" Show :)

Hello everyone! I just posted the first episode of my new bitcoin "news" show where I talk about things that I think are sexy in the world of bitcoin! :)

The show isn't really intended to be informative or educational, just fun! Hopefully the show will get people excited about bitcoin! ;)

So I did 2 versions of the show, an uncensored version for my Pornhub channel, and a comically-censored version for YouTube! Both are pretty NSFW:

Pornhub: http://www.pornhub.c...p?viewkey=1683533477

YouTube: https://www.youtube..../watch?v=CwTCgvCAz80

Here are the things that I thought were sexy in this episode:

PayPal Accepting Bitcoin through Braintree: http://www.theguardi...ree-overstock-reddit

CoinKite's new Nym service: http://blog.coinkite...ayment-pages-for-all

The OpenBazaar Beta: /r/OpenBazaar

Bazaar Markets : /r/BazaarMarkets

I'd love to hear what you guys think is sexy in the world of bitcoin so I can talk about it next time!

The show is free and always will be, but donations are always appreciated! :)

XO-Saffron

1279
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 15, 2014, 03:55 AM »
Klingons
1280
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 14, 2014, 11:44 AM »
Woof!
1281
General Software Discussion / Re: web automation
« Last post by Renegade on September 14, 2014, 08:39 AM »
is there any other option?

I want to create my own standalone programs that automate webpages and secure them with password so that the source won't be visible! and sell them!

as I can do with AutoHotKey for desktop automation programs!

I've done a lot of web automation in the past using Visual Studio. I don't know if that's an option for you. There are a few tricks that you need to know to get things smooth, but it does work.

how do you get VS to "see" a radio button or a text form in a website?

Here's an example:

Code: C# [Select]
  1. // This is the basic method to use when a document loads. Expect problems and check StackExchange.
  2. private void webBrowser1_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e)
  3. {
  4.         // Get a collection of all the kinds of elements that you want to look at.
  5.         // In this case, we're looking for <input> tags.
  6.         HtmlElementCollection collection = webBrowser1.Document.GetElementsByTagName("input");
  7.  
  8.         // Run through the collection and look for a specific element.
  9.         foreach (HtmlElement element in collection) {
  10.                
  11.                 // Check the name of the element.
  12.                 if (element.Name == "user") {
  13.                         element.InnerText = "kalos";
  14.                 }
  15.  
  16.                 // Check if the element has a specific attribute.
  17.                 if (element.GetAttribute("type") == "password") {
  18.                         this.Text = "Found it!";
  19.                         element.InnerText = "some password";
  20.                 }
  21.         }
  22. }
  23.  
  24. // This shows clicking a sbumit button.
  25. private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
  26. {
  27.         // Get a collection of all the kinds of elements that you want to look at.
  28.         // In this case, we're looking for <input> tags.
  29.         HtmlElementCollection collection = webBrowser1.Document.GetElementsByTagName("input");
  30.  
  31.         // Run through the collection and look for a specific element.
  32.         foreach (HtmlElement element in collection) {
  33.  
  34.                 // Check if the element has a specific attribute.
  35.                 if (element.GetAttribute("type") == "submit") {
  36.                         this.Text = "Found the submit button!";
  37.                         // This is how you click. It is not always 100% reliable.
  38.                         element.InvokeMember("Click");
  39.                 }
  40.         }
  41. }

Here's the compiled version:

* WebBrowserForKalos.zip (39.53 kB - downloaded 343 times.)

It should look like this:

Screenshot - 2014_09_14 , 11_38_32 PM.png

I think that should be enough to get you started.

1282
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 14, 2014, 08:08 AM »
glue
1283
Living Room / Re: Movies or films you've seen lately
« Last post by Renegade on September 12, 2014, 08:27 AM »
Wer

Wer-2013.jpg

Worth a watch!  :Thmbsup:

I don't want to say much about this, but just go into it blind.

It's a horror on a relatively common topic, but does it really well. I think the horror fans out there will be pleased.
1284
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 11, 2014, 09:39 AM »
Dice
1285
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 11, 2014, 09:06 AM »
Metal
1286
Some good Aussie humour:









More here:

http://imgur.com/a/nvwFB

1287
https://twitter.com/...207474999297/photo/1

HAHAHA!  :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:

Just to make it easier for people:



1288
http://www.zerohedge...0/iclock-post-mortem

Tim Cook announced Tuesday the release of Apple’s long-rumored watch, the latest in wearable technology. Here are some features of the new device:

- 13-megapixel camera enables users to take crystal-clear pictures of wrist
- Allows wearers to start and stop the flow of time
- Discreet, but not so discreet that anyone would mistake it for a regular watch
- Comes in a variety of colors and styles to express your personal submission to the planet’s dominant tech company
- Adjustable ticking volume
- All the convenience of a traditional watch that needs to be charged every 12 hours
- Built-in thinkpiece regarding the increased connectivity yet simultaneous isolation of the millennial generation
- Small size and intricate circuitry able to drive twice as many Chinese workers to suicide as iPhone
- Makes it easier for muggers to see whether or not you’re carrying an expensive electronic device
- Another screen to throw into your current rotation of things you look at

But apart from that... it's 'awesome'

Haha! :)  :up:

ZH is one of my favourite sites. (Even if the joke is a repost.)
1289
But... what if they aren't filming?  They're trying to stop anyone from wearing/using them.  Just because there is the 'possibility'.  Just for one possible use.  It's a device that can do a *lot* of things... and this one use is the one that they're trying to get the whole thing thrown away because of.  And it's funny that most of the people on the other side of the issue, are those that are usually for the freedom.

Seems pretty simple to me.  It takes an active use in a manner that offends/is an imposition to others before anyone else has a right to step in.

I've not made up my mind quite yet. Which is why I posed questions above.

But I certainly do like the technology!  :Thmbsup:

Here's another example...

You have a coffee shop or bar near a university where you offer free Wi-Fi, but disallow Google Glass. Since it's your place, well... you make the rules.

Conversely, if I'm a patron, and you change your policy to allow Google Glass, and I disagree with that, I can't see how I can legitimately block GG on your premises from your Wi-Fi.

The issue gets muddier in public places. But, that would seem to be already covered by harassment or stalking laws.

Dunno. Haven't thought about it too much. I can see both sides of the coin. I'm leaning towards zero restrictions on GG in public places. It's really no different than someone walking around with a video camera.

Is following someone (who doesn't want to be filmed) in a public place with a video camera harassment? Possibly. I can imagine scenarios where it clearly would be. I can also imagine other scenarios where it wouldn't be. Muddy.
1290
Here's an example - Say Cindy Citizen Journalist is filming herself on the steps of city hall to get the news out about the horrible new by-law making it illegal to park your car with the windows down! The frame isn't zoomed into only her nose, but rather a more reasonable full body shot with the sinister den of iniquity (city hall) behind her. People are still going about their business and most people walk behind her, but are clearly visible in the frame. Shy Stan walks behind her and is also captured in the video.

QUESTIONS:

  • What is Cindy filming?
  • Is Stan "being filmed"?

The first is obvious - Cindy is filming herself in front of city hall.

The second has 2 answers - yes and no. Those 2 answers have very different presuppositions regarding "filming".

Yes assumes that anything in the frame is "being filmed".

No assumes that the intent and main focus of the frame is what is "being filmed".

But, that's just one example of a focused recording, and doesn't include the "Google Glass" scenario.

For general surveillance cameras, it seems that we would usually say that whatever is in the frame is being filmed, similar to the "Yes" answer above. i.e. Shy Stan walks past a surveillance camera, so, he *IS* being filmed.

Does the same apply to Google Glass?

If not, would we then say that someone is being filmed (by GG) if they are framed and in focus, but not being filmed if their appearance in a frame is incidental? Where does the line start to blur?

This site has a lot to say on the topic:

http://stopthecyborgs.org/

1291
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 10, 2014, 11:55 PM »
1292
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory



James Corbett pulls off the funniest explanation of the official storyfairy tale.

1293
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 10, 2014, 09:39 PM »
Shyamalan
1294
I guess funny in the saddest way possible :down:

That would be unfunny then.
1295
Living Room / Re: The One Word Game!
« Last post by Renegade on September 10, 2014, 11:27 AM »
anything
1296
General Software Discussion / Re: comment on my business plan
« Last post by Renegade on September 10, 2014, 06:22 AM »
Fix up their computers for free, and install zombie software that lets you use their computer whenever you want for any purpose, e.g. posting & tweeting, emails, cryptocurrency mining, distributed computing, etc.

On second thought, that's a bad idea.

I got nothing that I'd actually consider doing there or think that would be worthwhile.

The big problem as I can see it is that it will be very hard to reach that audience. You're more likely to get more business by starting a blog for beginner computer problems, do some YouTube videos, build all that up, then offer classes or do the speaking circuit trying to get corporate education gigs, etc. Dunno. If they have crappy hardware, they probably have crappy budgets. That's going to make things rough.
1297
Funny or unfunny?

http://betabeat.com/...ce-bucket-challenge/

Headline: Teen Dies Attempting Risky Stunt for Viral Ice Bucket Challenge

(Un)funny part: Cameron Lancaster, 18, is believed to have completed the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge, and then jumped feet-first off an 80-foot cliff into the shallow water at an abandoned quarry, the Telegraph reports. His body was found after a four-hour search.

Hashtag: #IceBucketChallengeDarwinAwardWinner

1298
Living Room / Re: A warning to anybody who is looking to purchase a VPS.
« Last post by Renegade on September 10, 2014, 06:02 AM »
I know someone that charges what works out to be about $0.83 per month ($10/year) for his smallest VPS package, that would give a lot better customer service than that, for free. (and yes, I already pointed Stephen in his direction) So, no, the price isn't that unrealistic.

I'm skeptical. Got a URL?
1299
Living Room / ‘Cyborg Unplug’ Is a Personal Jammer Against Drones, Glassholes
« Last post by Renegade on September 10, 2014, 05:45 AM »
This is a nifty gadget:

http://betabeat.com/...t-drones-glassholes/

Everyone from professional photographers to Martha Stewart is using little quadcopter drones to take stunning landscape videos and aerial photographs. But if you’re a glass-half-empty type — or maybe just a shoot-that-drone-out-of-the-air type — there’s now a handy tech toy to defend you from unwanted surveillance.

An upcoming device called Cyborg Unplug will allow you to disrupt the connections of drones, Google glass, wireless microphones, and other devices to your WiFi connection. The project is led by Glasshole-hater Julian Oliver, and lists the dystopian ‘Stop the Cyborgs’ campaign as an inspiration and “conspirator.”

“Whether business office, restaurant, school or nightclub: it’s your territory and your rules, so make it harder for those that seek to abuse it,” the Cyborg Unplug site says.

The small device “sniffs the air” for the WiFi signatures of unwanted surveillance devices and automatically disconnects them from the network it’s assigned to protect. Cyborg Unplug will be up for sale in the $50 – $100 range on September 30. So far, it can’t interrupt Bluetooth connections, but they’re working on that.

Besides protecting your own network, the device also has an “All Out Mode” that can disconnect unwanted devices in range from every network they’re connected to, including tethered cellphones.

The trouble is, this is totally illegal in America. In the FCC’s own, unambiguous words:

We remind and warn consumers that it is a violation of federal law to use a cell jammer or similar devices that intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications such as cell phones, police radar, GPS, and Wi-Fi.

On the Cyborg Unplug site, they absolve themselves of all responsibility should you run into trouble with the law.

“We take no responsibility for the trouble you get yourself into if you choose to deploy your Cyborg Unplug in this mode,” the site says.

Drones? They’ve got your back. But when it comes to the Feds, you’re on your own.

Site: http://plugunplug.net


Cyborg Unplug is a wireless anti-surveillance system for the home and workplace. 'Plug to Unplug', it detects and kicks devices known to pose a risk to personal privacy from your local wireless network, breaking uploads and streams. Detected devices currently include: Google Glass, Dropcam, small drones/copters, wireless 'spy' microphones and various other network-dependent surveillance devices.

...


HOW DOES IT WORK?

Every wireless (WiFi) device has a unique hardware signature assigned to it by the manufacturer. These signatures are broadcasted by wireless devices as they probe for, connect to and use wireless networks.

Cyborg Unplug sniffs the air for these signatures, looking for devices its owner has selected to ban. If a banned device is discovered an alarm is triggered (LED, audio or message*). Further, if that device is found to be connected to a network that Cyborg Unplug is trained to guard, a stream of special 'de-authentication' signals (packets) are sent to disconnect it. It does this automatically, without any interaction required from its owner.

* Due to technical limitations, alarm features may be restricted to the high-priced model.
IS THIS LEGAL?

It is perfectly legal to block certain devices from using a network you control and administer. Some wireless routers allow an administrator to create blacklists, although generally they are limited to specific devices rather than an entire product. Cyborg Unplug is just as legal, differing only in that it takes a 'direct action' approach to wireless defense: a detect-and-disconnect routine, alarm system and an automatically updated list of devices able to be banned. Please see CAN IT BE USED TO DISCONNECT DEVICES FROM ANY NETWORK? below for more information.
IS THIS A JAMMER?

No, not in any stretch of the word. A jammer disrupts all signal within a given (radio) band by flooding it with noise. Cyborg Unplug does not do this. Rather, it detects and targets a specific device and disconnects (only) it in turn by sending the same, legal, de-authentication packets a router sends when it disconnects a device.

...


CAN IT BE USED TO DISCONNECT DEVICES FROM ANY NETWORK?

In short yes. But be sure to read on to understand the implications...

Cyborg Unplug can be operated in two modes. The recommended mode is Territory Mode, disconnecting target devices from selected network(s) owned and operated by the user. The other mode is All Out Mode, which disconnects all detected target devices from any network they are associated with, including paired connections with smartphones. Please note that this latter mode may not be legal within your jurisdiction. We take no responsibility for the trouble you get yourself into if you choose to deploy your Cyborg Unplug in this mode.

More at the site.

From here:

http://julianoliver....log_2014-05-30_20-52

Code: Text [Select]
  1. echo '
  2.    ___           _ __    __                     __             __        __  
  3.   / _ \___  ___ ( ) /_  / /  ___   ___ _  ___ _/ /__ ____ ___ / /  ___  / /__
  4.  / // / _ \/ _ \|/ __/ / _ \/ -_) / _ `/ / _ `/ / _ `(_-<(_-</ _ \/ _ \/ / -_)
  5. /____/\___/_//_/ \__/ /_.__/\__/  \_,_/  \_, /_/\_,_/___/___/_//_/\___/_/\__/
  6.                                         /___/                                
  7. '

I love stuff like this!  :-*
1300
Living Room / Re: YouTube finally forces creation of google+ A/C to comment
« Last post by Renegade on September 10, 2014, 04:24 AM »
At this stage, I suspect this is a combination of pure incompetence, and an unwillingness to let go of the ideal of having gmail and g+ and YT using the same name.

I'm going to go with incompetence.

I cannot use YT in OF ALL BLOODY BROWSERS... CHROME!!!  :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash:

No replying. No liking... Pfft. It's idiotic. In CHROME!

Now, in Opera, liking and replying work. But... The volume control always resets to 100% every time for every new video. :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash:

For that one, I'd probably chalk it up to maliciousness rather than incompetence. Google/YT has a vested interest in Chrome and seeing users leave Opera. Incompetence there is possible, but maliciousness wouldn't be unprecedented, e.g. Microsoft with Netscape, etc.

I could be wrong about that, but... I'm just pulling these opinions out of my ass. They're based on jack as I don't have access to inside information and it's all just pure speculation worth pretty much nothing.

Pages: prev1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56 57 ... 438next