topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 4:42 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 ... 364next
1201
Fluorine is an important component of sarin nerve gas, but we put it in our water/toothpaste/etc.
Hydrogen is an important component of Hydrogen bombs, but we put it is in our water.
1202
General Software Discussion / Re: Question about extra-large JPG
« Last post by f0dder on December 26, 2011, 04:23 PM »
The filesystem on the CF card was probably partially corrupted, leading to a FAT entry for the big image claiming it was much larger than it is.
1204
Living Room / Re: Windows XP system clock losing (lots) of time.
« Last post by f0dder on December 25, 2011, 09:04 AM »
Hm, would a CMOS battery affect the RTC of a running system? I WouldaThunk it only used the battery when powered off?
1205
General Software Discussion / Re: adding tab support to apps that dont have it
« Last post by f0dder on December 25, 2011, 08:47 AM »
Windows already enforces the one app per window
Umm, what?
1206
General Software Discussion / Re: adding tab support to apps that dont have it
« Last post by f0dder on December 23, 2011, 07:16 AM »
There's no generic way to do it.

You can do app-specific hacks, with pretty mixed results... but that's it.
1207
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: $380 PDF to Flash [page flip] for free
« Last post by f0dder on December 20, 2011, 10:28 AM »
Ugh.

I hate people who use these pdf-to-flash, and with a passion. Just gimme a good old download link so I can use my PDF reader of choice, instead of being forced with a slow and crappy UI running in the most CPU-sucking, security-holed and unstable piece of crap software on the web.
1208
AutoHotkey / Re: AHK_L / PHP Encryption
« Last post by f0dder on December 20, 2011, 09:48 AM »
I must have tried over a dozen implementations but any that use Microsoft's cryptographic libraries produce different hashes than PHP implementations.
Then you're doing something wrong - standards are standards.

What are you trying to encrypt, how are you trying to encrypt it, and... WHY? Doing something like this with symmetric encryption is likely going to be pretty useless.
1209
Living Room / Re: SATA III - performance
« Last post by f0dder on December 20, 2011, 09:34 AM »
Was that for a zillion small files, or a few large, Carol? And were any of the drives fragmented?

Even near the last sectors, you shouldn't have dropped all the way down to 20MB/s if you're doing large sequential non-fragmented transfers.
1210
Skwire Empire / Re: playback status from Win API SendMessage
« Last post by f0dder on December 19, 2011, 10:10 AM »
Wouldn't all/any players that use Windows API's reply to the same syntax?
Nope :)

What "plain Windows APIs" means in this context is that instead of using a big set of GUI and class libraries, the application uses relatively low-level functions to do it's work. This is more work for the developer, but results in smaller and (sometimes) faster executables.

Unfortunately, it doesn't mean that there's a standard Windows API for controlling arbitrary media players.
1211
Skwire Empire / Re: playback status from Win API SendMessage
« Last post by f0dder on December 19, 2011, 08:46 AM »
You'll have to look at each individual player you want to support.

If you're lucky, they'll have a well-defined open interface, either through SendMessage or proprietary plugins. If you're not lucky, you'll have to do a bit of reverse engineering to find out control IDs... and if it's something with a really custom skinned GUI, you might not be able to SendMessage at all.
1212
Living Room / Re: SATA III - performance
« Last post by f0dder on December 19, 2011, 08:44 AM »
RPM isn't the only thing that affects drive speed - a 5400rpm with higher data density could outperform a 7400rpm drive with lower data density. Now, there's probably more platters in the 2TB drive carol just ordered, but if both drives had the same number of platters, the 1TB drive would have a higher data density than the 2TB one :)

As for SATA II vs III, it indeed doesn't really matter for mechanical drives - SATA-II has a theoretical peak of 300MB/s. It matters with some of the really big & spendy SSDs, or if you're connecting a a RAID rack to an e-Sata port :)
1213
Living Room / Re: Flood of server hammering after sending out an email. Suspicious?
« Last post by f0dder on December 19, 2011, 12:35 AM »
The timing is probably a coincidence, but yes - sending email does largely mean your message is available in plaintext across the internet. Even if you and your recipient have encrypted connections to your respective endpoints (smtp for you while sending, pop3/imap/webbased-whatever for him receiving), there's no guarantee that intermediary SMTP servers will do encrypted traffic.

Please don't expose FTP servers to the internet, the protocol sucks and so many of the ftp daemons are riddled with security holes. Set up an SSH server so you can do SCP (there's decent enough Windows GUIs for it), and it lets you authenticate securely via public-key encryption (remember to turn off password-based SSH access, that way you're not bruteforceable).

Oh, and if this is a linux server, install something like fail2ban. It monitors log files for suspicious activity, and firewall-blocks IPs (temporarily or permanently) according to various rules - it's good stuff.

At any rate, on a server that's exposed to the internet, make sure it's NAT'ed to only let the specific ports you need through.
1214
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: StartSSL.com Certificate Provider: Mini-Review
« Last post by f0dder on December 18, 2011, 03:08 PM »
Perhaps it is important news. I read in The Register that StartCom, which operates StartSSL, suffered a security breach that occurred last Wednesday.
It matters if the breach is big enough and handled unprofessionally enough - *cough* DigiNotarw *cough* :)
1215
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by f0dder on December 18, 2011, 03:04 PM »
I personally see nothing wrong if they are changing their licensing agreement for new customers, just don't pooch your old customers by virtually tearing up the old contract and shoving the new one down their throats.
Yeah. Unfortunately, what are you going to do as a software developer when you see that there's no longer new purchases of your software? I think most of the companies that start out by offering lifetime upgrades sincerely belive that they're going to be able to do that, and don't like it when they have to retract that.

What makes me angry is when they don't have the balls to admit they were wrong, but try to hide the fact by "discontinuing" the product, and launch a "new product" that's basically just a major version upgrade of the old. It might be legal, but it definitely smells.

rarlab.com doesn't offer any "insurance" by the way, while win-rar.com adds the "WinRAR Maintenance" package to your shopping cart automatically... neither of the sites specifically mention anything about the lifetime for licenses, though.
1216
Living Room / Re: Intel vs AMD processors
« Last post by f0dder on December 18, 2011, 07:18 AM »
Pretty sad (for AMD) that the 4-core Intel Core i7 2600K is better than the 8-core Bulldozer in most of those benchmarks. That's not to mention that the 6-core Phenom II is often better than the Bulldozer. What were AMD thinking? :huh:
Probably the engineers were all "fsck, fsck, fsck, we're never going to pull this off", and marketing went a little too creative. When is the last time anybody heard from John Fruehe? :)
1217
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite ZIP/RAR application?
« Last post by f0dder on December 18, 2011, 07:15 AM »
That sounds very strange, y2kusuma!

I registered WinRAR back in... humm... it was the very first thing I registered when I finally got a VISA card, so it's quite a few years ago. And I've just checked, it works fine with the latest 4.10 beta 5. Deal with rarlabs.com instead of win-rar.com :)

I'm actually surprised they still offer lifetime upgrades, and IMHO it's a big failure for companies to do so. Eventually, they'll have saturated their user base, and then they'll have to launch new products or pull some nasty tricks and drop the lifetime upgrade support. Better to be realistic...

And besides that, the .rar fileformat doesn't have any (big) benefits over the other compressed fileformats that makes it worth to pay for.
Nor the illusion of 'support' from any of these suppliers.
It wasn't until 7-zip that there was a competitive compression format with both speed and size - and it took a while before 7-zip on high compression settings got fast. And are there any of the other archivers that support advanced features like saving NTFS alternate data streams and security ACLs? On top of that, WinRAR has pretty flexible commandline support, and at least 7-zip comes nowhere near that.

I also find the GUIs of the other archivers I've tried to be, well, sucky. WinRAR is lean and mean :-)

That said, it's 7-zip I put on friends and relatives computers, since it fits their needs and is gratis. Heck, it (mostly) fits my needs too, and I also do like that the archive format and code is open. These days, I could probably live with the less polished product, since I mostly do unarchiving and my archiving is scripted through the commandline...
1218
Living Room / Re: More Hilarity - "Can I have my spy plane back?"
« Last post by f0dder on December 16, 2011, 11:28 AM »
An early christmas present, a little appetizer - a taste of the democracy that's to come.

As popular war advances, peace is closer.
1219
N.A.N.Y. 2009 / Re: NANY 2009 Release: Crush Cryptonizer
« Last post by f0dder on December 16, 2011, 11:21 AM »
I'll bet $128 no one would bust that with anything less than 3 months and $100,000 of services. Aka. Never.
Yeah.

security.png
1220
Living Room / Re: Intel vs AMD processors
« Last post by f0dder on December 15, 2011, 02:39 PM »
Intel's OpenCL implementation can't utilise the on-chip GPU. I believe I've read that their future integrated GPUs will be supported, but the current ones won't be.
So, write code for DirectCompute? :) (that should be supported... one of the gpgpu APIs definitely is, as there's transcoders utilizing the onchip gpu).
1221
Living Room / Re: Intel vs AMD processors
« Last post by f0dder on December 15, 2011, 02:03 PM »
Intel has on-CPU GPUs as well - not as powerful as the AMD/ATI ones, though... but if you're mainly going to play with it, and the CPU goes in your main system... well, I'd go for the more powerful CPU :)
1222
Living Room / Re: Intel vs AMD processors
« Last post by f0dder on December 15, 2011, 10:53 AM »
I foresee AMD going out of the CPU business within long, if they don't change their act.

Their last few CPU releases have been extremely lackluster, and they've spewed out advertisement that's been so false I'd label it as lying. Check out Scalis posts on AMD, he's got the stuff pretty well covered.

In the past, at least the AMD CPUs were cheap - they didn't reach the performance levels of Intel CPUs, but the equivalently performing Intel CPU would be more expensive. With AMDs latest CPUs, they've priced it about the same as Intel's, but perform worse.

A shame, really, back in the initial AMD64 they whooped Intel's hineys... but then Intel introduced Core2, and the rest is history.
1223
General Software Discussion / Re: Win7 -- to x64 or not to x64, that is the question
« Last post by f0dder on December 14, 2011, 05:48 PM »
x64, and never look back.
1224
Developer's Corner / Re: Is Clojure the next C ?
« Last post by f0dder on December 13, 2011, 04:27 PM »
a 2048-core laptop sounds plain old lame to me.
And 640K of memory is all anyone will ever need.  ;D
Stop perpetuating that false quote :)

Also, that situation today is vastly different from how things were back then. Yes, we have scalability issues on the back-end side of things that need to be fixed, but we're pretty well off on the end-user side of things, apart from a (relatively) few specialized niches.
1225
Developer's Corner / Re: Is Clojure the next C ?
« Last post by f0dder on December 13, 2011, 03:24 PM »
+1, Eóin :)

I also find he trivializes that changes that has been in software development over the years. Yes, there's probably some magnitudes more complexity in the hardware engineering field, but a lot has been happening in software engineering as well.

And then there's the premise that we have a problem. Really? Most users aren't going to need a fraction of the computing power a modern CPU offers. Handling massive loads of users on a web backend is a completely different programming task than running desktop software - a 2048-core laptop sounds plain old lame to me.
Pages: prev1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 ... 364next