topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday December 19, 2025, 1:18 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 413 414 415 416 417 [418] 419 420 421 422 423 ... 470next
10426
Living Room / Re: Gmail's "Custom Time" April Fools Feature!
« Last post by 40hz on April 01, 2009, 11:51 AM »
googlecat.jpg
10427
General Software Discussion / Re: Firewall+Proxy?
« Last post by 40hz on April 01, 2009, 11:21 AM »
I'm with you on that 100%. That's also why I love DonationCoder. People here talk about what they've done rather than just what they've read or heard about.

FWIW: I do cut&paste from websites, but I do that primarily to save typing feature lists, or rewriting already well-written information provided by the authors. Good software should speak for itself. (And to be honest, I'm also a little too lazy to rewrite something when I really don't need to. Must come from my early days in graphic design where I learned this mantra: Never draw what you can trace; never trace what you can scan; never scan what you can cut out and paste down! )

I also tend to include screenshots because I'm a big advocate of effective interface design. There are so many terrific applications out there that are marred (and in some cases crippled) due to poor interfaces. One of the first things I look at is the design of the interface. If I don't like the way something looks, I usually don't bother with it. To my way of thinking, if you have a great application and don't want to be bothered including a well-thought out GUI, then make it a command-line application. 'Powerful but Ugly' is what the command line is all about anyway.

Just my tuppence anyway! :two:

10428
General Software Discussion / Re: Favorite Firefox Theme(s)
« Last post by 40hz on April 01, 2009, 11:03 AM »
For my desktops: Chromifox 2 which has since been replaced by Chromifox Extreme: :up:
https://addons.mozil.../firefox/addon/10674

I'm amazed I like this since I'm not a big fan of web 2.0 powder blue themes. But this one is too easy on my aching eyes to hold that against it.

For my laptops: Whitehart  :up: :up:
https://addons.mozil...tehart&cat=2%2C0

The flatter and simpler a theme the better when staring for hours at a small screen under bad office lighting. For situations like that, simple 2D icons and a monochrome color scheme rule as far as I'm concerned.

10429
General Software Discussion / Re: Firewall+Proxy?
« Last post by 40hz on April 01, 2009, 10:43 AM »
40hz have you tried it yourself?


well...I did say satisfied user. ;)

I'm more familiar with the server version, but I set the PC version up for my sister at her house. She has four machines and two kids. So far, they haven't had any complaints. As the matter of a fact, I don't think anyone (other than the family geek) even knows it's there.

Got the server version running in my home office. I'm going through it now - so it looks like it works. ;D


---

PS. If I don't have personal experience with anything I mention in my posts, I'll always say so.It bugs me when people recommend things they haven't experienced for themselves. Looks like you & me feel the same way about that.  ;D

10430
General Software Discussion / Re: System Restore Cleanup
« Last post by 40hz on April 01, 2009, 10:04 AM »
In the last few months, I've used system restore a bunch of times,

Out of curiosity, what's been up with you that you're needing to use System Restore so much? You really shouldn't need to. Almost sounds like you have a deeper undiagnosed problem on your PC that needs fixing. Maybe some of us can help you if that's the case.

So...whatcha been doin' that you need to restore so much? :)

10431
General Software Discussion / Re: Firewall+Proxy?
« Last post by 40hz on April 01, 2009, 09:56 AM »
It may be overkill for what you're looking for, but take a look at Untangle over at:
http://www.untangle.com/Product-Overview

It comes in two versions. One is a dedicated server. The other is called the Windows version which can be installed on any PC in your network. This version provides the same capabilities, but still allows you to use the host PC as an ordinary workstation. To quote the website: "It’s the same great Untangle Gateway… but without the gateway!"

Download link:
http://www.untangle....ngle-Windows-Version

A technical write-up of how re-router works can be found here:
http://www.untangle....Re-router-Technology


Re-Router™ Technology
Network Protection from any Windows Machine


Re-Router™ Technology is a breakthrough from Untangle that provides network-wide protection from any Windows XP desktop.  Running transparently in the background without sacrificing any desktop functionality (word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, etc.), Re-Router™ Technology enables users to:
 

    * Provide network gateway protection without buying new hardware
    * Protect the entire network from just 1 PC (Unlike Norton or McAfee)
    * Get started in minutes… No network reconfiguration, re-cabling or extra NICs to install
    * Leverage the best open source networking apps on the familiar Windows platform

These days, the web is a dangerous place, but buying an expensive security appliance just isn’t an option for everyone. Re-Router™ Technology finally enables organizations with less than 25 PCs to protect their whole network, from online threats like spam, spyware, viruses, phishing and inappropriate websites, right from one Windows XP desktop.  It’s the same great Untangle Gateway… but without the gateway!
 
How it works

Re-Router™ Technology leverages virtualization and layer 2 protocols to dynamically reconfigure the network so that all in/outbound traffic flows through the Untangle “server” before reaching its intended destination.   The physical network gateway thinks the Untangle “server” is each of the desktops and the desktops think it’s the gateway.  There’s no need to physically re-cable the network and if the host PC ever shuts down, Re-Router™ Technology elegantly restores the network’s original configurations without any downtime.  Dynamic network reconfiguration sounds geeky and complex (and under the hood it really is) but to the user, it's 100% automatic and seamless.  Some might call it Magic!

I've deployed both versions. It's a very effective system. Sexy interface too!  ;D
And since it's GNU open-source, it's free to download and use.

From the FAQ:
What's Free?

About 95% of Untangle’s software is free under the GNU General Public License v2 (GPL v2). In a nutshell that means it's free to use, modify and even distribute. Specifically all the software in the Untangle Server, including applications like Web Filtering, Spam Blocking, Spyware and Virus Blocking, and VPN are free.  You can check out the list on our Products Overview Page.

There are some commercial add-ons, and a paid support option available for purchase, but you won't need them.

Disclaimer: I have no relationship with Untangle Inc. nor do I have any financial interests in their product. I'm just a very satisfied user. 8)

10432
And when it comes to servers - if you know what you are doing there is no disadvantage to windows. If I consider the uptime for servers in my last, say, 8 years, BSD and windows actually win over linux

I'm in complete agreement.

Since the 2k release, the only time any Winserver I'm responsible for has gone down is when I've shut it down myself for planned maintenance. Or if I rebooted it after a software upgrade that required it. They're very resilient systems.

Same for the BSD servers. There aren't enough superlatives to describe the stability of these boxes.

Can't comment on Linux servers since I only have two test systems (Centos and a Debian-based homemade distro) running. They're purely for self-educational purposes. I have yet to deploy a Linux server in a production environment.

These poor little experimental servers occasionally do some pretty weird things. But that's because me and my cohorts are constantly doing weird things to them. ;D

10433
'scuze me for sounding dumb but how exactly does this experiment work. :-[
10434
Not since Windows95/98, except for one time with Win2k about 3 months after it came out.

Never experienced it under XP - or on any of the server (NT,2k,2k3,2k8) releases.

(And I hope I don't regret saying that now that I have. :tellme:)

10435
Living Room / Re: They drew first blood, sir!
« Last post by 40hz on March 31, 2009, 12:03 PM »
To me, this whole incident seems to be a vintage Ballmer move.

I think MonkeyBoy flipped out and decided to do something to make people pay more attention to him now that Mr. Bill has moved towards the background.

But I'm guessing that Microsoft now realizes it has put its hand in a vise, and will be looking for a quiet way to claim victory through an undisclosed out-of-court settlement with TomTom.

They've hinted as much in some of their statements that followed the filing.

Otherwise, they're going to face the risk of having each of the patents they're claiming infringement on being reviewed by the courts. And if this does goes to court, Microsoft faces the very real possibility of having those eight patents revoked or more narrowly defined.

I think TomTom knows that and is calling their bluff.

It will be interesting to see if TomTom has the fortitude and financial resources to see it all the way through. But again, I'm guessing that TomTom will ultimately work out some token licensing deal with Redmond (like Novell did) just to get it out of the way.



Sometimes I really hate it when one of my predictions turns out to be right. >:( To wit:



Link: http://blogs.zdnet.c...2398&tag=nl.e539

TomTom pays Microsoft and settles patent-infringement dispute

Posted by Mary Jo Foley @ 9:27 am


Microsoft and TomTom have settled the patent-infringement suits (and countersuits) between the two vendors, Microsoft announced March 30.

Microsoft is not paing TomTom, but TomTom is paying Microsoft an undisclosed amount as part of the deal.

Here is Microsoft’s official statement:

    “The cases have been settled through a patent agreement under which TomTom will pay Microsoft for coverage under the eight car navigation and file management systems patents in the Microsoft case. Also as part of the agreement, Microsoft receives coverage under the four patents included in the TomTom countersuit. The agreement, which has a five-year term, does not require any payment by Microsoft to TomTom. It covers both past and future U.S. sales of the relevant products. The specific financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.”

But what is really amazing is this part of Microsoft's statement which comes later on (emphasis added):

The agreement includes patent coverage for Microsoft’s three file management systems patents provided in a manner that is fully compliant with TomTom’s obligations under the General Public License Version 2 (GPLv2). TomTom will remove from its products the functionality related to two file management system patents (the “FAT LFN patents”), which enables efficient naming, organizing, storing and accessing of file data. TomTom will remove this functionality within two years, and the agreement provides for coverage directly to TomTom’s end customers under these patents during that time.”

Seems Microsoft has also decided to fall back on the loophole in GPL2 that led to the creation of GPL3.

So now Microsoft claims the best of both worlds - invoking GPL when it favors Microsoft - and challenging its legality when it doesn't. George Orwell's concept of double-think has found it's true home in Redmond WA.

Of course, MS's take on whether or not TomTom's agreement with MS actually complies with GPL remains to be seen. One thing for certain. The entire FOSS legal community will be looking very closely at this one. In the end, I think TomTom is going to lose out legally  - although whether to Microsoft or FOSS remains to be seen. Either way, they're dead. (Or Microsoft will buy them, which amounts to the same thing IMHO.)



But can any of us really claim to be surprised by any of this?

 8)
10436
$13K and climbing!

Maybe Mouser should consider running for office? ;D

10437
General Software Discussion / Re: Ack! Adobe Confusion! Need to start anew!
« Last post by 40hz on March 30, 2009, 05:38 PM »
The highly rated Revo Uninstaller is one of the best for uninstalling applications after the fact.

Works as advertised, easy to use - and free. What's not to like about that? :Thmbsup:

Link: http://www.revouninstaller.com/

revo_box.jpg

This is one of the first things I load onto every PC I own. :-*

10438
funnrazor.jpg


If you are providing a worthwhile service (which you are!), it is perfectly reasonable to ask people to support it. People respect legitimate requests for donations.

Quoting myself again here. ;)

Bravo Mouser! Well done. :Thmbsup:

10439
Site/Forum Features / Re: Update Your Browser! It's Obsolete!...
« Last post by 40hz on March 29, 2009, 09:58 AM »
I'd might be more inclined to go along with them if they'd just change their byline from this:

     An online, community initiative to phase out Internet Explorer 6

to this:

     An online, community initiative to phase out Internet Explorer



Why think small?  ;)

-----

And who are these people anyway? There's no About page - or anything else identifying who these 'oh so helpful' folks are. I'm always suspicious of nameless and unidentifiable humanitarians.

10440
Living Room / Re: Anti-Necrospamming
« Last post by 40hz on March 28, 2009, 11:17 AM »
How many "necro-spams" has the forum received lately? Any kind of hindrance to usability would be an over-reaction, IMO.

Agree.

Either our forum moderators :-*  are exceptionally good at getting rid of spam before most of us see it - or I'm going blind blind, because I haven't noticed all that many spam messages being posted.

Are we actually having a problem with this at DonationCoder? Mouser? Carol? JGP?


10441
None. It's just marketing.

Maybe I'm mistaken, but if I recall correctly, it was primarily Apple that first started referring to what Macintosh computers ran as "Applications."

Mainframes, minicomputers, and PC's ran programs. Macintoshes ran applications.

Up until then, people just used the term "program" for everything. But that was before they knew any better. ;) ;D





10442
But if you knew GNU EMACS
If you Gnu EMACS, like I gnow EMACS
Oh! Oh! Oh! What a Perl

 ;)

-cranioscopical (March 26, 2009, 10:12 PM)

Ouch!!! That's one of your best ever!

hysterical.gif

But shouldn't you be singing that song with a pronounced LISP? ;)

(It is EMACS after all... :P)

10443
General Software Discussion / Re: Your most used SPECIAL programs
« Last post by 40hz on March 26, 2009, 09:34 PM »
Back on topic :) 

Spoilsport! :P

10444
This gem has been making the rounds in the Unix/Linux blogosphere.

What would happen if Microsoft were to invade Linux? More to the point, what would happen if Paper Clip Man invaded the vi editor?

unixoid_hell.gif

 8)

----

BTW: You can easily start a flame war out there by saying:

 "That's a very funny animation based on vi. But if you knew GNU EMACS, for the same amount of effort, you could have coded an actual working version of it."

Just kidding...just kidding... ;D


10445
Developer's Corner / Python performance boosting project launched by Google
« Last post by 40hz on March 26, 2009, 08:29 PM »
As a person who is becoming increasingly reluctant to learn additional programming languages; I'm very interested in any development being done to enhance the applicability, performance and versatility of those languages I do know.

This bit of news about Python was recently put up on ars technica. As a long-time user and fan of Python, I was quite happy to see this new initiative from Google.

Link: http://arstechnica.c...erformance-by-5x.ars


Google searches for holy grail of Python performance

Google's Python engineers have launched a new project called Unladen Swallow, which aims to bring a major performance boost to the Python programming language by making runtime speed five times faster. The project is being implemented as a branch of the conventional CPython runtime and will be fully source-compatible with regular Python applications and native extensions. This will make it possible to eventually merge the improvements into Python trunk.

The goal of the Unladen Swallow project is to use LLVM, the Low Level Virtual Machine compiler infrastructure, to build a just-in-time (JIT) compilation engine that can replace Python's own specialized virtual machine. This approach offers a number of significant advantages. As the developers describe in the project plan, the project will make it possible to transition Python to a register-based virtual machine and will pave the way for future optimizations.

What makes this very exciting (from a programming and career viewpoint) is this bit (emphasis added):

The Unladen Swallow developers hope that the project will eventually make it possible to use Python instead of C for a wider range of performance-sensitive tasks. They are building it on top of Python 2.6 (2.x is not dead yet) because it will allow many existing projects to adopt it and will also provide a clean glide path to Python 3.

 8)


10446
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by 40hz on March 26, 2009, 06:26 AM »
zridling uploaded his post no. 2.000  :up:  :up:

PDance.gif

Congratulations!

I'm looking forward to reading many more. :Thmbsup:
10447
Living Room / Re: What is Twitter: A Funny Sarcastic Cartoon
« Last post by 40hz on March 25, 2009, 07:29 PM »
We really don't need that. We already have this image to use:

I don't want you to use that image. Poor little sick Cody? It's too sad! :'(

 ;)
10448
General Software Discussion / Re: Best password manager?
« Last post by 40hz on March 25, 2009, 09:24 AM »
Is this one of the "fake outs"?  As in you are really a mogul posing as a regular guy?

I'm actually The Fourth Dragon Emperor and Mystic Chowder Pot Knight of the Sorrowful Countenance in the Knights of the House of the Apostles of Eris: Mock Duck Cabal.

Or at least I used to be until whatever was in that brownie I bought from that cute girl at the Renaissance Faire wore off.

Now I'm in exile until I buy another brownie. (FNORD!) ;D

Is this one of the "fake outs"?

Nope. But these are if you're interested:  https://www.donation....msg125443#msg125443

 8)

10449
Living Room / Re: What is Twitter: A Funny Sarcastic Cartoon
« Last post by 40hz on March 25, 2009, 09:07 AM »
Here's a cody-fail
Oh boy, now it starts. A Moody Duck!
-cranioscopical (March 24, 2009, 06:56 PM)

Or Cody-Crash?

Mody Dick does look related - adds another dimension to the failure part.
Moody Dick? :-[

Yes. But aren't they all? ::)

Can't believe I almost missed it!

10450
Living Room / Re: Should we have a yearly Best Avatar award on DC?
« Last post by 40hz on March 25, 2009, 09:05 AM »
Yes, classic lines like 'And don't call me Shirley' are great
Go ahead, be Frank.
-cranioscopical (March 25, 2009, 08:13 AM)

Let me be Frank with you:

 "I did it myyyyyyyyyy wayyyyyyy!"

 ;D
Pages: prev1 ... 413 414 415 416 417 [418] 419 420 421 422 423 ... 470next