Messages

1751

General Software Discussion / Re: Mind-Mapping Software

« on: May 18, 2008, 04:09 AM »

Topicscape ( http://www.topicscape.com ) allows as many parents for a node as you want, it also has a 'loose association' link for ideas that are outside the parent/child hierarchy, and a Topicscape Islands node where things can be parked for later consideration, to be moved once you've decided where they go.

-roytsganda (February 14, 2007, 08:05 PM)

With the resurrection of the topic, I had a look at this. It seemed very attractive until I looked at the screenshots under User Stories. I had expected it to be much more visual than 2D mindmaps, but it is actually much less - everything is represented as a pseudo-3D triangle/cone/pyramid. Just a slightly graphical frontend to a database. I'm as happy as anyone to deal with pure data, but the point of mindmapping to me is to see more possibilities and different types of links  by seeing/thinking visually.

It would be nice if there were anyone around who actually uses it and can say why I'm wrong.

1752

Living Room / Re: What to do when you receive bootleg videos?

« on: May 15, 2008, 01:02 PM »

I thought that ebay/paypal were pretty notorious for 'turning a blind eye' to counterfeiting if they don't have someone like Adobe coming down heavy on them. And notorious for not actually producing good resolutions - too many examples of sellers and buyers being stung and ebay/paypal just reaching casual judgements to get rid of the case. Whatever they claim, it really is a case of buyer (and seller) beware.

1753

General Software Discussion / Re: Ideamason on special

« on: May 14, 2008, 05:30 PM »

And its coming up on BitsduJour again.

1754

Living Room / Re: An idea for the forum regarding disclosure

« on: May 14, 2008, 05:08 PM »

Out of the sites I visit regularly, the one that seems to have the most spammers/scammers is webhostingtalk. And the community there is incredibly good at digging them out and exposing them. Policy seems mostly to be to ban spammers, leave threads and exposures if that seems generally helpful and delete the lot if not.

Cynicism rating of most regulars is pretty high though, which is probably why they are so good at reaching the conclusion  

1755

Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Notescribe not taking software - request for reviews

« on: May 09, 2008, 10:26 AM »

Database-wise, I'm not sure what you're asking. Could you elaborate?

As far as export/import, you can export your notes as .rtf to be used, edited, or integrated with external programs.

-jpm2112 (May 08, 2008, 09:43 AM)

I expect a prog like this to have import/export options for text etc.

The database issue is a big one. It doesn't really matter for text/notes because there are lots of ways of dealing with that. It does matter for info that you would never want to retype and where you want certainty of future access to the data all in the right fields. It is one of the main things I look at for any database prog. It is never possible to predict which progs will come to an end and there is always the risk of being left high and dry; much less likely for very popular progs because someone will be likely to produce a means of moving the data to a still current prog.

Many progs are founded on a mainstream database engine rather than their own in-program option. For instance IdImager has options based on SQLite and SQLserver (and used to have an option based on Access's Jet engine). This gives extra confidence that the data will be readable & managable in in the future. If this is the case, it is nice to know what the engine is (and will give an idea of strengths, weaknesses and scalability).

Whether this is true or not, it is reassuring to be able to export the database in a format that can be read by other progs. Just as an way of avoiding the data being left up a blind alley.

The info in NoteScribe that seems to require that protection is the citations/sources, and probably the linkage between text, sources and attachments.

All the progs I rely on a lot have the ability to export their databases in fairly common formats. Otherwise I would never have considered them.

1756

Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Notescribe not taking software - request for reviews

« on: May 09, 2008, 10:12 AM »

Additionally, I take it everyone on here hates a nag screen? Is that something we should get rid of?

-jpm2112 (May 08, 2008, 09:43 AM)

Some programs that offer a free version (crippleware?) have a nag screen (at least on occasion) to promote the paid version. Not popular, but semi-acceptable as an exchange for the free version. Many people will still not use them though because of the irritation.

Some programs have a trial period and then permit the program to continue to be used without registration - but with a nag screen coming up every time. No-one can really argue about it because they shouldn't be using it at all after the trial had run out. I definitely see this as acceptable/generous.

Having a nag screen come up during a trial period is something I see as unacceptable and I would recommend getting it out of the program.

Even more important probably in your marketplace since the completely free version of TreeDBNotes offers a lot of the functionality of NoteScribe, as do many other alternatives, and you don't really want to irritate potential customers. OTOH, many/most potential customers are probably not aware of the alternatives out there.

1757

Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Notescribe not taking software - request for reviews

« on: May 07, 2008, 05:49 PM »

I've test run a lot of notetaking/text editing software and, for my own use, settled on TreeDBNotes. I have even thought about doing some sort of summary, but I don't really have the time to be systematic with it. So I'm not as interested in looking at new programs as I was (since I don't have the same personal need as before) but am still somewhat interested. However, there is no free version so any work put into it during the trial is lost without a purchase. And I notice from Softpedia that there is a nag screen. Altogether that is just enough to stop me even downloading it to have a look.

The USP appears to be the source editor with formatting styles and I would have a look if I felt I needed that (would need a lot of convincing to go with a program for that though; at the very least would need to know about the database being used and export/import options).

1758

General Software Discussion / Re: What’s this "Linux" thing and why should i try it?

« on: May 06, 2008, 11:50 AM »

Yes, I considered running Linux on top of Windows, but I have to admit I never understood the proper way to get a dual-boot working.  It was easier (and more fun) for me to just wipe out Windows!

-MatthewSchenker (May 06, 2008, 06:36 AM)

I never really liked dual boot myself. VMs do seem like a good idea (for Windows on top of Linux & taking advantage of the Linux core).But what I was referring to was the ability of H Heron to be installed into Windows. No dual booting into one or the other. No going through a VM. Just Ubuntu working as an OS-type app in a Windows installation. Not really tested it out yet, but I do intend to install it on a Windows box and see how it goes (was rather waiting until the 8.04 bugs were reduced somewhat).

1759

General Software Discussion / Re: What’s this "Linux" thing and why should i try it?

« on: May 05, 2008, 04:16 PM »

If you are buying equipment for any distro of Linux you do need to make sure beforehand that there are drivers for that equipment. And that may mean asking around for what other people are using. Pretty much everything will work with XP (though you can't rely on everything being Vista compatible) so that is a definite advantage of Windows. But you can load the latest Kubuntu on top of Windows which would allow you to do both.

1760

General Software Discussion / Re: roboform2go or sticky password?

« on: May 01, 2008, 11:50 PM »

Hi There is a major security flaw in Roboform as it does not encrypt your passwords in the default folder

-whippy (April 29, 2008, 07:10 PM)

This has been the case forever, I think.  Or at least since I have used it, and I started using it in 2002 or 2003.  If you search you will see complaints about this way back.

-J-Mac (May 01, 2008, 11:28 PM)

And doesn't that tell you everything you need to know about Roboform as a security program rather than an ease-of-use program?

1761

Living Room / Re: which hierarchical note program?

« on: May 01, 2008, 03:30 PM »

I just checked out Maple (I noticed it was mentioned), and it is FANTASTIC.

-imtrobin (May 01, 2008, 01:31 AM)

I had a quick look at the website and couldn't see what would make it better than TreeDBNotes. And the features mentioned are in the free version of TreeDBNotes.

1762

General Software Discussion / Re: General brainstorming for Note-taking software

« on: April 30, 2008, 11:03 AM »

There's a twofold problem with using structured folders as your system.

The first is that everything needs to be put somewhere when created (else you have a holding folder that you work on intermittently) and this sort of decision & typing a name etc is more work than giving a tag.

The second is that everything fits singularly in a fixed hierarchy. So, only one way to categorise. Whereas, it's easy to add two or three or more tags if you want in a tagging/keyword system.

Not bothering with a structure at all might be effective if the search engine does everything you want.

Personally, I'm finding it easier to have everything of a type within a program rather than opening files all the time.

1763

General Software Discussion / Re: Office 2007 Search Command add-in

« on: April 28, 2008, 05:05 PM »

This looks as if it could be useful.

So far 2007 looks like a simplification (making Office easier to use if you don't already know where things are on the menus) AND a dumbing down (a lot of 2003 features are very hard to find and some are just not there at all).

This might just make it a bit less dumb.

One issue I do have is that 2007 and 2003 do not cohabit comfortably. And, without any improvements, its looking as if Word 2007 will have to go.

1764

General Software Discussion / Re: What is the currently best Desktop Search software?

« on: April 26, 2008, 06:20 PM »

- but it is fast!

-Curt (April 26, 2008, 05:39 PM)

But slow for me. I started it on a search on my C drive (no option to search all drives that I could find), I then switched to SearchGT doing the same search across 3 drives (total GB over ten times greater). SearchGT completed its search quite a while before BareGrep/

1765

Image Manager Shootout / Re: Xnview vs. IrfanView - integrity issue examined

« on: April 26, 2008, 10:08 AM »

if there was such impropriety in the past,

-Steven Avery (April 26, 2008, 09:18 AM)

May or may not be. It's my impression that Irfan explicitly mentions those points he believes he can prove. He may suspect, or have only circumstantial evidence for, a whole lot more. If he doesn't, its hard to see where the extent of the anger comes from.

I have both IrfanView and XNView - but I use both of them very rarely. I use Dopus for everyday image viewing and Faststone for anything in a bit more depth. So I don't think I am biased one way or the other.

With the evidence available, I don't feel able to believe bad of either. Something is not right in the situation, but I have no idea how big that something is or how to apportion any 'blame'.

1766

General Software Discussion / Re: Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron? Hardly

« on: April 26, 2008, 06:41 AM »

OSX had lots of problems when it launched and various versions have had their own issues. Vista is still being avoided by people wanting productivity.

The recommendation for productivity has always been not to switch to a new version until you know it all works as it should. Usually at least a revision or two down the line. A lot of corporates are still running on NT/2000, though most have decided that XP is stable enough now. Not an issue about Linux taking more time or not being a desktop OS of choice. No sensibly run production environment would have installed 8.04 immediately on its release.

I have one installation of Vista (and it will be the only one ever). I have one installation of 8.04 (which is actually doing what it needs to do). But the rest are XP Pro & 7.10 and it will stay like that until I know an upgrade will do everything we need reliably (and I am just talking about a home network here). If I had just the one machine, new stuff would only go on in virtualisation mode.

We just have to be realistic here; new versions of nearly everything tend to have bugs. And the more new big features there are, the more bugs there tend to be.

1767

Living Room / Re: My New website ...

« on: April 25, 2008, 06:21 PM »

Lovely part of the world.

Clearly fine as an initial website. I agree with Mouser's impression. And clearly identifies you as embedded in the local community.

My natural inclination was to click on the sheep, though; so I'd make the sheep a button too. I'm always slightly irritated by having to look for the enter button. In practice,I prefer having the menus available on the first screen, but that may just be me.

I'd also add Linux to your list. You may not feel expert - but you can tell people how expert you feel - and most problems will probably be within your compass. And there won't be many locals who will actually want support for a Linux machine, anyway. But it would help the impression that they can take all their computer problems to you.

Good luck.

1768

General Software Discussion / Re: What's a good memorization software?

« on: April 25, 2008, 05:19 PM »

And I really like the fact that FullRecall is for Windows and Linux and PPC and is portable.

One question though. Is the advantage of scheduling and shuffling using these progs really better than having sequential Qs & As in Powerpoint where you can get much more control over layout impact etc?

1769

Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MiniReview of Linkman URL Organizer and Search Tool

« on: April 25, 2008, 06:57 AM »

After reading the review, I downloaded and tried Linkman out. Never really got the hang of it at the beginning & stopped using it and then uninstalled when the trial ended. Maybe its because I use Opera & don't need it as much as ie users. And I don't have a massive number of favourites. Maybe its because I didn't read the 90 page manual. Maybe its a natural inability.

I can see an advantage to having a prog that keeps links with a bit more info than just the url - but for me it has to be very, very easy to use. I'd add things to the drop basket and not find them there when I looked later and it was easier to let it go than to try to read manuals or find out why. And the drop basket did get in the way, and I kept moving it around. I'd probably have preferred a small, hidden and zoomable basket somewhere on the top of the screen. (And maybe I could have pressed a couple of buttons and made it do that).

None of this is meant to be a criticism of Linkman; just a question of whether this type of software really makes my life easier or not. I'll possibly try again another time.

1770

General Software Discussion / Re: Carbonite Online Backup

« on: April 25, 2008, 02:13 AM »

The cost of b/w and the shortage of really high speed internet access (and backup accounts) mean that an online solution is unsuitable for really large collections, unless you will never need it all back in a hurry. And it would still take time to get there.

As you say, HDDs are cheap. You can slip them in and out of a caddy just like we used to do with floppies. For smaller quantities, the same can be done with USB sticks. These are the only realonably high speed, cheap solutions for really large amounts of data. And easily portable and convenient enough to be taken off-site for extra protection.

I think online soutions are best for a smaller amount of data you may want quickly (eg for system backup) or large amounts of stuff (eg photos) that will just stay on the online server in case you lose them locally but will never be needed at any sort of speed.

1771

General Software Discussion / Re: Carbonite Online Backup

« on: April 24, 2008, 12:35 AM »

I think that is Dreamhost's approach. The T&C are there to protect them if necessary. There are other hosts out there though who will aggressively implement the same terms on accounts that are using more resources than they would like. How can they tell the difference? Well, its their decision with no appeal and no right to a refund if you break the T&C. As I say, I don't believe you will get this sort of problem with Dreamhost.

1772

Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Resource Tuner 50% off on Bits Du Jour Tuesday, April 22

« on: April 22, 2008, 02:34 PM »

I'd seen it coming up on BdJ but it never occurred to me that I might have a use for it until I saw the post here. I'll d/l it now and, with an offer standing open to the end of the month, I have a chance to see if I can do anything with it. Thanks Yuri.

1773

General Software Discussion / Re: General brainstorming for Note-taking software

« on: April 22, 2008, 11:11 AM »

Info Select = Long established program for Windows and Palm. No PPC or smartphone version.
All that suggests a company/product not really at the cutting edge in product development and it looks a bit old fashioned too (not necessarily a bad thing, but ...)

OTOH, 2007 does run on Linux under Crossover.
And $50 a year, always with the most recent version, does not seem bad value when compared to the exhorbitant cost of a purchase (& $100 an upgrade!).

Since there is now a 30 day trial, I can imagine that I would consider it if/when my new current system seems to be failing in a place Info Select might address. But not otherwise.

1774

General Software Discussion / Re: EverNote beta 2.2.0.372 has some nice new features

« on: April 21, 2008, 02:58 PM »

The time and effort invested in the data could be substantial and its not likely that you could stay with 2.2 forever. So, if you think 3.0 is the wrong direction, then you need to look away from Evernote. Continuing with 2.2 would be a short/medium term option only.

1775

Living Room / Re: Fujitsu Scansnap S300 - Looks Nice; Anyone Using One?

« on: April 21, 2008, 02:17 PM »

And if you got a book from which you need to scan a few pages or many pages for that matter, would it tear your heart out if you had to tear the pages to scan the pages with Scansnap ?

-patteo (April 21, 2008, 01:12 AM)

Much easier to use a camera.