Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
249$ vs. 249€ (<= that currently equals to 363$).European retail prices usually include VAT. That's a 20% extra, if it is included here. Any indication whether it is or not?
That's more than 100$ difference!-phitsc (June 07, 2011, 02:23 AM)
To make that a bit more clear, a list of URLs is intrinsically worthless, since there's no indication what that URL references until you click on it. Sorry if I misunderstand, but I've had that result. Oh, yeah, it's also difficult, if not impossible, to edit the note attached to that URL.-barney (June 06, 2011, 09:20 PM)
The biggest problem I have is getting the URL of stuff I've imported from the Web-barney (June 06, 2011, 05:09 PM)
Which version are you using? Does it have the "Univqersal Clipper," and if so, does that work with FF5?V4. No universal clipper for this one as far as I can see. I could use an old version, but I don't often use FF anyway. Pretty sure they will have a clipper working with it soon. Could also stick to v4 of FF but not really any point since I don't use it.-rjbull (June 05, 2011, 10:37 AM)
I have DOpus viewer as default programme for all images, but can it be the case that I dont have to, in order for the viewer to be the default image viewer from within dopus?
Will experiment. I suspect a Catch22 situation but may well be wrong. ~ note to self: must stop having negative expectations ;-)-tomos (June 01, 2011, 02:41 AM)
you're looking at images in the viewer and you see one you want to open in your image editor - you have to take note of the name, go back to the main window, find the file. A simple open [current image in viewer] in external app, or even just copy filepath would solve this.-tomos (May 31, 2011, 03:21 PM)
Problems zooming into images - on my machine I often cant get over 200%, I have no problem with the same images in other viewers. I have yet to report this officially (but it was reported in the forum in 2009).Checked this too. No problems going up to 800% with any of the images I tried.-tomos (May 31, 2011, 03:21 PM)
Also problems with one bit Tiffs only showing as an enlarged thumbnail. Again, yet to be reported officially but reported in the Dopus forum here.Haven't checked this.-tomos (May 31, 2011, 03:21 PM)
Has it to do with the feverish passion, or the irrationality that led to it?-Renegade (May 22, 2011, 06:10 PM)
Maybe it's the "image-processing and interpretation" part of the brain. You know, from looking at pictures and images and processing them into some kind of meaning.-Deozaan (May 22, 2011, 03:47 PM)
A team of neuroscientists studied Brooks’ brain while undergoing an MRI scan, to see how it reacted to images of Apple products and (heaven forbid) non-Apple products.Image processing areas would, of course, have been triggered by both Apple & non-Apple products, so that cannot be what they were looking at. There have been quite a few fMRI studies on religion.
According to the neuroscientists, the scan revealed that there were marked differences in Brooks’ reactions to the different products.
For Audio Technica, I looked at their mics a while back, but everything I liked was significantly more expensive. A friend bought their USB mic and it was very nice. I forget what he paid, but it wasn't cheap either. Came with a nice stand though.-Renegade (May 22, 2011, 06:33 AM)
). I'm certain I'd've cracked it fairly quickly with full immersion, but I have other programs I use and no spare time to allow me focus on it for a period of time.
I'm thinking of going the Reaper route if I can't get SONAR, or maybe crossgrading to SONAR X1 Essentials from FL Studio.I'd certainly recommend Reaper, even if you do soldier on with other DAWs. Very actively developed, very reasonably priced and with a very knowledgeable and helpful community; lots of veries in one package. When I think about what I'm doing/going to do, it is always with the idea that I will pull it all into Reaper in the end.-Renegade (May 22, 2011, 12:53 AM)
Liquid Story Binder XE looks really complex but I'm intrigued is there ample documentation included with the program to help figure it out because without that I can see myself getting lost quickly.-Dochappy (May 15, 2011, 03:44 PM)
$560 for 240GB?
I can't afford to throw away that kind of money every 200 days or so.-Deozaan (May 12, 2011, 05:13 AM)
As far as changing their business plan, that's the risk you take using free services.-40hz (May 10, 2011, 06:38 PM)
I should have put it better: handing over control of my data. I would feel very vulnerable if it was only stored on their servers.Agreed - except that the cloudy versions always have a copy on the HDD too. I don't think there's a way of making it cloud only (I suspect using sync minimises their transfer costs).-rjbull (May 11, 2011, 04:01 PM)
I doubt it would remain free very long, but, I thought the storage was part of what you paid for when you paid for Evernote > 2.2. I don't want to go on paying for evermore...-rjbull (May 11, 2011, 04:01 PM)
I always did only use Evernote for snippets.
If I remember correctly, Evernote 2.2 was the last version that was a "proper app" which stored its data locally. I believe the 3 series is a cloud app.-rjbull (May 10, 2011, 05:03 PM)