Messages

2476

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 19, 2007, 10:16 PM »

Hello there,

I’ve tested MS Word 2007 today for about 4 hours at some friends place and, for what I want, I'm not too impressed. I was hoping that the experience with “huge documents” would have been encouraging… but it really hasn't been the case.

Not only did I find the 2007 version sluggish compared to Word 2003 (on my  computer, Word 2003 fires up almost instantaneously; on my friends laptop — an 8 months old HP with an Intel Core duo, which compares favorably against my inspiron 6400 — Word 2007 took at least 15-20 seconds for… a blank page,) but it refused to open several of my biggest documents (I admit that they contained a lot of text boxes and frames — they were mainly precious OCRed material — but still…).

Isn't that amazing? (At some point, one of these documents opened after 10 minutes!). Maybe not actually…

So, I'm still finding it hard to find an application which would allow me to manipulate big amounts of mostly textual data (but ALSO containing some images and tables — some kind of visually attractive structured database, I guess…) with formatting and all that, AND which also provides a flexible outliner.

I haven't tried LyX yet (I will, in 5 minutes…), but, from what I read, I doubt that it will provide any good solution. I might just go back to my old strategies. [Edit : Nope. LyX won't do it... Way too much tinkering and it's more a "write it, edit it, format it, and publish it solution" where format comes in third or even fourth place. i.e. :To much of a "styles, formatting and WYSIWYG is for prettiness" mentality. I might use it to format articles though... But, for that task, Endnotes + Word seems already more than enough...]

But — sorry if that seems like a dumb question — what are the writers, researchers and Ph.Ders in the DC community using when structuring and restructuring big amounts of mostly “textual” data (ALSO containing images and tables — almost inevitable in my field)?  Softwares like myBase or Ultra Recall? Despite the format restrictions they impose? Just wondering…

(Of course, some clues have already been provided... :

suleika and Jimdoria --> tiddlywiki or other wiki solutions
urlwolf  --> OneNote
steeladept  --> HTML editor
f0dder --> LyX (with some... reservations?) )

2477

General Software Discussion / Re: RSS readers: Omea Pro, Feeddemon, RSS Bandit, Greatnews, others?

« on: July 18, 2007, 12:32 AM »

NewsGator, if you're using outlook.
And what about NewzCrawler ? Depending on if you already ditched ie or not...

 

2478

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 17, 2007, 11:53 PM »

(now don't laugh, ok?)

-laughinglizard (July 17, 2007, 10:04 PM)

I won't.

Thanks for all the info laughinglizard.

Blink

-laughinglizard (July 17, 2007, 10:04 PM)

Blink didn't pass the leak-tests like a champion, but, who knows, it might be good at other stuff...

2479

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 17, 2007, 08:04 PM »

Well... 10 years ago (I was 23), my computer science roommate tried to convince me LaTeX was the best thing ever. I must say that MS Word or Word Perfect weren't too hard to beat back then... 
Anyway. I do find that LaTeX and its cousins are pretty neat, but… maybe a bit abstract if you're trying to do what I'm trying to do, and especially if text formatting is not really about prettiness but more about  displaying info in the most readable way.
LyX is a  bit of a different story though. I remember trying it in my *n*x ( )days, but that's about it.
I'll try it again and report.
Thanks f0dder.

2480

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 17, 2007, 07:13 PM »

NOD32 certainly has a good reputation. But you're talking about NOD32 the AV, not about the new ESET (beta) suite... Right?

2481

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 17, 2007, 06:32 PM »

BitDefender surely have some interesting features... 

-Mark0 (July 17, 2007, 06:05 PM)

Oh my. 

2482

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 17, 2007, 02:28 PM »

So if you decide to take the plunge and install it again, tell us how it goes this time.

-Lashiec (July 17, 2007, 02:17 PM)

I will! 

2483

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 17, 2007, 02:23 PM »

Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts, jimdoria.

Right after I read your post last night, I tried tiddlywiki for about 3-4 hours. You're right : it IS a strange beast and an amazing system.

At first, I had some problems saving my “wiki” in Maxthon (even after following all the indications), so I decided to download and install the latest version of Firefox, which solved the problem.

So…I like what I saw and I can see how flexible tiddlywiki is or can be.

Some notes on…

What I really like:

-   Portability and accessibility
-   visual presentation (pretty sexy)
-   “indexability”
-   possibility to zoom in and out within the browser (a bit weird, but it does work…)
-   its structure flexibility, and all the other things you said (“create tabbed sections within the body of your text […] Tags are built in. Topics are tracked by both a main menu of links (which you maintain) or by an automated list that lets you view topics by timeline, by tag, by link info, or just all in a list.”) + being able to jump from one section to the other, jump from one concept to the other, etc.
-           the formating options (but these could be a bit hard to really master... : html.. will talk about it in a few lines)
-   the saving and backup features
-   the fact that it's… open source and that it’s just HTML (This is one thing that I don't like about *.doc, and even more about *.one, or *.docx… since these formats are not as widespread and they’re closed.)
-   It is possible to have a kind of “unified or continuous view” of all my data — even if a bit awkward (maybe a plugin could allow me do that, I don’t know…)


And some notes on…
What “frightens” me and makes me hesitate:

-   the “work” (and language learning) involved to be able to insert images, numbering, graphics, tables, etc. Like I said ealier, I’m not an html expert. I’m willing to learn, but I must not forget my — ahem — other work (this thing for which I’m trying all these productivity software for… )
-   the “tiddlers” indicated by “[[ ]]” don’t seem to be treated exactly as the “normal” CamelCase one : the cross referencing and hyperlinking doesn’t seem to be created automatically  throughout the wiki. (While I was playing with tiddlywiki, I couldn’t help but wondering why word processors and most note-takers haven’t integrated this feature yet)
-   The outlining is not as clear as a “regular” outline — like in a word processor, or like in a “tree view” (Surfulater, EverNote…). Off course, it does work in a different way : each series of levels can be opened  from a tiddler, etc.
And the reorganizing of all the structure levels (+ the sorting, etc.) could become a bit of a daunting task (remember, I want a “very easy way to reorganize the order of the different sections”).

Well, this is the outcome of  my limited experience.  I have to do a bit more work now, but I’ll continue my explorations later.

Thanks again for your suggestions.

And I’m also still willing to read about others experience with MS Word 2007 (dealing with huge documents).

[edit] PS : jimdoria : have you used Zulupad before ? Just wondering...  http://www.gersic.co...zulupad/zulupad.html

2484

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 17, 2007, 01:20 PM »

I don't recommend using any suites.. Better you mix and match your security applications.. but a lot of people don't have time to do such a thing so they go for "4 in 1" (etc.) suite solutions..

-mitzevo (July 15, 2007, 10:44 PM)

Lashiec (in Reply #8 ) seemed to suggest that Kaspersky might very well be an exception there. If I judge by what I'm reading everywhere, it seems to be the case.
To me, the most important thing is what the independent testing say.
Anyway, I agree with you. I'm tempted to go NOD32 (and, as KenR said, they're having some nice stuff coming), but, like Grorgy, I'm also tempted by the simple KAV solution...

I don't know about virtualization. Maybe in a few days I'll have a look at it when I solve some other data problems (another thread...).

2485

FARR Plugins and Aliases / Re: FarrUninstall plugin - v1.0

« on: July 17, 2007, 01:08 PM »

Amazing. I've always hated the add/remove window : slow and awkward. Now it's quick and I can literally jump to the software I want to extirpate...

Someday, i guess it will be just windows, FARR and an few software...   

-nitrix-ud

 

2486

General Software Discussion / Re: imaging & partitioning queries

« on: July 17, 2007, 12:52 PM »

As for the size, I never really noticed it being nearly the size of the initial image, but I don't remember defragmenting before taking differential images either.  I will have to check that out...

-steeladept (July 17, 2007, 12:42 PM)

Well, from my experience, defragmenting before an "incremental image" makes the increment as big as the initial image. Which makes sense since the data has been moved a lot. For that reason, I only defragment my C drive once every two or three months.

Edit : Just wanted to add that I DO defrag too before an initial image.

2487

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 16, 2007, 07:44 PM »

Thanks steeladept. I've checked around and saw Zaine Ridling writing that :

For the sake of sheer size, Word 2007 allows the biggest documents and most processing power. After creating a 32,767-page document, Word 2007 had reached its upper limit.

http://www.thegsblog.com/?m=200609

That's a lot of pages. But I wonder how safe (and smooth...) it is to use at that point. Prone to crash or not?

Let's see if anybody else has something to say about Word 2007's ability to handle really large documents.

2488

General Software Discussion / Re: imaging & partitioning queries

« on: July 16, 2007, 05:05 PM »

With Acronis, I can take Differential Images as well, and use those as updates to the original.  I do this so the original stays relatively pristine, while the differential images allow for software updates to be included in the image.  When you keep your data on a different partition, that becomes a rather elegant method of backing up the entire system without clutter.  (I backup the data at the same time, but in a different job so as to keep the data and the programs separate as much as possible).

-steeladept (July 16, 2007, 07:57 AM)

Just want to say that the "incremental" (but I don't remember about the "differential" option -- steeladept?) imaging only works well if you don't defragment. Otherwise, the image will be as big as a full image... Which pretty much diminishes the interest of the procedure...

Also, I think that one should just see an image (and treat it) as a pretty normal backup solution -- nothing miraculous... but one that's really efficient at backing up the operating system's partition, one that's got a good compression level, one that's absolutely exhautive, and one that's easily restorable... [there are different solutions -- I like the Acronis and the BootIt NG solutions. I currently use Acronis, like steeladept.]

Look at all the threads on backup strategies and look at how people integrate imaging in their backup strategies. I've posted my solution at some point, and I know that mouser and superboyac wrote extensively on the subject.

2489

General Software Discussion / Re: Am I the only one who hates smooth scrolling?

« on: July 16, 2007, 04:16 PM »

Are you guys all using a mouse?
I'm a more the touchpad type...  Except for graphics.
Scrolling with the touchpad has usually been a pleasure...

2490

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 16, 2007, 03:18 PM »

Maybe I'm just drowning inside the smallest cup of  water... 


OneNote is definitely well done and powerful.

Urlwolf : in your list, I notice that the most unique OneNote features are probably not the one I need the most :

[…]
- images containing text are OCR'ed and can be searched (!). Ideal to paste stuff from an article
[…]
- quick napkin operations, e,.g. 2 + 2 = will produce 4 automatically.
- most flexible "page": point where you want to start writing and it works.
- can save video and record sound (dictation!)
[…]
- no need to hit save ever
- recognizes handwriting. Ideal with a tablet or a wacom interface

-urlwolf (July 15, 2007, 11:22 PM)

I must admit that I like the “no need to hit save ever” and “most flexible ‘page’ ”features.  They're not absolutely important to me though. Not at that point.

And, maybe predictably, the other features you mention are almost all (albeit not exactly in the same way) found in MS Word,  :

here are some definite pluses from my POV:
- […] outlining (inside a page) […].
- fast tables
- easy to reorganize and tag items
- keyboard friendly
[…]
- formulas possible (!)
[…]
- can attach any file type

-urlwolf (July 15, 2007, 11:22 PM)

So am I back to square one ?  Do I finally just need a word processor, one that can gracefully handle huge documents and show me the data in different ways (mostly, structurally speaking) with great outlining capabilities?  I'm starting to think that, stupidly, it could very well be the case… Especially since other solutions like Ultra Recall, myBase, Surfulater, etc. seem to limits what I want to do (although they're great in many other aspects).

TexNotes Pro could also be an option. But... TexNotes seems to suffer from the absence of a zoom in / zoom out feature. (TexNotes aficionados : please tell me if I'm wrong) .That zoom in / zoom out feature might seem a bit of a caprice but, actually, the more I think of it, the more I realize it's really not a whim  — especially in cases where I want to be able to see the totality of a big diagram.

Maybe evernote would do more of what you want.
And the underlying format is html.

-urlwolf (July 15, 2007, 11:22 PM)

I think if I were you, though, I would try Evernote first, as this route could take a long time to streamline and make effective (assuming the missing zoom feature didn't disqualify this to begin with).

-steeladept (July 16, 2007, 08:25 AM)

Thanks for the suggestion guys. I'm already a big EverNote user. After using it for several months I have decided that I would not use it to structure data in any fixed ways, but just to capture random bits of text and images, articles and web pages, that I can categorize loosely (using specific tags), to be used later in more structured thought processes (in my own articles, research projects, etc.). To be used in any other way I find that EverNote misses some kind of “knowledge tree” like Surfulater… plus, you can't zoom in/out and the formatting options are more limited.

Thank you for the explaination, that helped a lot.  The zooming, to my knowledge can not happen the way you described if you want to keep the pages separate.  That is just one of the drawbacks of using HTML.

-steeladept (July 16, 2007, 08:25 AM)

Yes, the zooming in and out seems to be a problem, I might still look at different html options.

Other than that, though, HTML can do exactly what you want.  Since I tend to code my own HTML directly in a text editor like Boxer or Notepad++, I can't really make any good suggestions as to what WYSIWYG editor would work best for you, but hopefully someone else here can.

-steeladept (July 16, 2007, 08:25 AM)

No problem. I’ll wait for suggestions and try different options on my own too…

What I can say is you would need to put a lot of thought into the underlying structure before the editor would work the way you want (for pagination and navigation for example).  Most likely that would also require a lot of custom coding before using the editor.

-steeladept (July 16, 2007, 08:25 AM)

Since I need a very flexible structure, all that custom coding and thought concerning the underlying structure would definitely be a drawback.

Had you thought of using a wiki?  There are so many indexing and categorising possibilities with the sophisticated ones (MediaWiki, obviously, but also PMWiki for example) that jumping around should be easy.  And I believe with most of them you can insert pages, which dynamically update when they are edited, into other pages (like master pages).

-suleika (July 16, 2007, 08:53 AM)

I have to look at that too. Thanks!
I have the feeling that these wiki solutions might require a lot of maintenance work. We’ll see…

But I have the feeling that I'll be coming back to some kind of more traditionnal word processor. Nothing else seems to really fit the bill. Oups?

I wonder if some of you actually use Word 2007. Like many others, I'm still using Word 2003 and never really considered buying office 2007. But what if word 2007 handles huge documents beautifully? Any first hand experience?

Thanks a lot!

2491

General Software Discussion / Re: djvu: an alternative to scanned pdfs?

« on: July 15, 2007, 07:26 PM »

Seems like it would be best for all those out of print public domain works.

-app103 (July 15, 2007, 07:19 PM)

I completely agree.

But I have a couple books here (scanned and compressed in that format), and I find them a bit heart to read.

I guess it depends what you want to do with the files.

2492

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 15, 2007, 07:11 PM »

Thanks Andre.

Funny because I'm actually considering Kaspersky again. After all the problems I ran into (testing all the other solutions), I realize KAV isn't that bad!    And it really seems like it's the lightest of all (I'm talking about its memory footprint and "CPU consumption").

I'll have a look at... Look n Stop. It might be just what I'm looking for -- in combination with NOD32.

2493

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 15, 2007, 06:47 PM »

Just want to share some quick comments on the OneNote solution (for the problem I exposed in the first post).

On the PLUS side (comments loosely based on my previous requirements):

- Managing huge files : OneNote doesn't seem to have problems with huge file (but I should say "notebooks" instead of files -- these can actually contain numerous files. I actually find that the way OneNote manages different files and folders in one unified notebook is actually quite clever... I wonder if an HTML solution -- see steeladept,s comment -- could do the same thing?)
- Interface : the interface is pleasing (the tabs, being able to color-code everything, etc.)
- Formatting : the formatting options are great (and it offers a very flexible way of inserting data -- whether it's text or not -- on the note "pages"), it's easy to use tables, etc. Formatting wise it seems that you can basically do almost anything you can do with a powerful word processor.
- Zooming in and out : I can zoom in and out inside a page (but not whole sections and section groups... I'll talk about it later)
- Performance : It's pretty quick and the memory footprint is quite small (depending on the size of note books you're loading in memory of course)
- Structural/outlining flexibility : it's pretty easy to reorganize the order of the different sections, providing they're actual parts (represented by different tabs) of OneNote's outlining system.


On the MINUS side:

-Outlining : OneNote' s "outline hierarchy system" seems a bit limiting. It goes like that :

• Section groups. Many section groups can be nested into each other; so you can have a section group inside a section group inside a section group... you get the picture. But one has to be careful because "section groups" are actual folders in the Windows filesystem.
  
• sections. Aren't nestable into each other : you can't have sections inside sections inside sections... Each section corresponds to an actual file (*.ONE).
  
• pages (I couldn't nest them into each other)
  
• and sub pages (don't appear to be able to be nested into each other; you can't have... just read my previous comment on sections) so you're basically limited to 4-5 levels easily viewable hierarchy. of course, you can create numbering and outlines inside a page... but that structure doesn't seem to be viewable with some kind of "outline view" (like in MS Word or OpenOffice, for instance).

- Zooming in and out : predictably, I can't seem to be able to zoom in and out a whole section or even a section group. Of course, I can have the outline view of what's inside a section group (and see the different sections and pages), but I don't get to have a continuous view of "everything"... as if it was one big chunk of text. I don't know if I'm being clear...

- Exporting : that was not necessarily a big consideration, but... since OneNote doesn't seem to be able to give me a unified view of the my texts, it does become a problem : in onenote the only way for me to get that unified view would be to export it to a single file. And that's when I realized that I can't export a whole notebook to another format than OneNote's own "2nd" native format for that specific task (*.onepkg). Of course, I could export a notebook section by section (each section can contain an considerable number of pages and sub-pages), but that doesn't seem very convenient if a notebook contains something like 50 different sections or section groups.

- Searching : I like OneNote's searching abilities. Pretty quick and thorough.  But, for more power I'd need to add another desktopsearch software to my collection (I use Archivarius and X1, mainly -- and for good reasons...) to be able to index OneNote's files. And I'm very reluctant to do that...


Temporary conclusion : right now, I find that the minuses are a bit hard to deal with...
Still pondering.

I might have a look at the HTML solution... but which editor should I try for that?

2494

FARR Plugins and Aliases / Re: Announcing Winners of the (first?) Find and Run Robot Plugin Programming Contest

« on: July 15, 2007, 06:10 PM »

Congratulations to the winners! 

Haven't downloaded FARR in a while, so... I haven't tried the new plug-ins... I want to wait for the big day : FARR 2's release!

2495

General Software Discussion / Re: djvu: an alternative to scanned pdfs?

« on: July 15, 2007, 06:04 PM »

This seems like a very reasonable thing to have around.

-urlwolf (July 14, 2007, 06:01 PM)

Yes it is...

But I still have ambiguous "feelings" about it.

When I first wanted to use it, I wondered about its future... the pdf format is almost universal and very well supported, but not djvu. And if you're going to archive things, it's an important factor.

Also, I didn't really like the available viewers : I couldn't insert comments on the pages, I found that reading stuff compressed in that format was a bit hard on the eyes. It might be OK for images though. Your experience may vary...

Anyway, when after some tests, I didn't find that it was that worth worrying about using it for my own archiving.

2496

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 14, 2007, 07:07 PM »

from what I can see, a Good HTML structure, especially with CSS for formatting, might work very well for you.  You can use a masterpage concept to create the outline view, you can skip to any page you want without regard to it's location within the "document", you can add pages with a simple writeup, and you can index it with ANY indexer.  Best of all, if you have it on a web server, you can access it from any computer with web access.  Alternatively, you can compile it into an .mht file (I think that is what it is called) and carry it with you as an archived HTML file.

-steeladept (July 14, 2007, 04:33 PM)

I've thought about that a bit (but didn't really know where to start because I'm not an HTML expert). So... That also could be a good idea. I wonder if the "masterpage" would be flexible (and smart) enough to modify itself when pieces of the structure and their titles are moved around, edited, added, etc. It seems to involve a lot of editing. But maybe that depends on the software.

Some aspects that I really like about that idea are the portability, accessibility and indexability.

Can you explain what you mean by "zoom out and see a lot of material"?

-steeladept (July 14, 2007, 04:33 PM)

What I mean is that in most word processors (or any viewers for that matter), you can zoom out and see many pages at the same time. I find that extremely useful, especially when I look at some huge tables, graphics... or anything that would benefit from a zoom out/zoom in feature.

With the right editor, it is as easy to use as Word as well.

-steeladept (July 14, 2007, 04:33 PM)

Were you thinking of any editor in particular?
I need an editor that will not get me in the same kind of trouble I'm trying to escape... I need an editor that can manage huge amounts of data all at the same time. And that brings us to the next point…

The only catch is, I am not sure how you would impliment the Unified View, because I am not completely certain I understand what you want out of the view.

-steeladept (July 14, 2007, 04:33 PM)

What I mean by unified few, is being able to have (or the illusion to have) all the data accessible at once, maybe in the same file (and if in different files, it shouldn't feel like it), and, maybe, even being able to have all the pages and sections one after the other, like the "continuous view" in text document (which allows to jump from page 1 to page 1051 without opening another file or changing window is a great thing.)

To be able to look at my work from different perspectives, with different views is very important to me. This is one thing that I (re)learned from the “note-taking” thread. Different views of the same data (hierarchical outlines, tag clouds, tabs, multiple windows, mind maps, …) can help to work more efficiently, understand better what the data tells you, and... be more creative -- E. Tufte's work is very much about that.

2497

General Software Discussion / Re: How to work with (display, format, restructure) big amount of structured data?

« on: July 14, 2007, 11:52 AM »

I'd say oneNote 2007 has all you need. May take a while to get used to the approach with basically tabs left, right, and ontop, but it is indexable (by MS search live) and you can access info really fast.

-urlwolf (July 14, 2007, 11:32 AM)

Interesting. Thanks. I've tried OneNote several times (in my quest for the best note-taking solution) and never stuck to it (for different reasons: EverNote is better at tagging, finding, etc.). But I've never thought of using it for really long documents or to structure big amounts of data. Maybe I should give it another try in light of that new perspective/usage. (If only I knew how to think laterally a bit more...)

2498

General Software Discussion / Working with (display+format+restructure) big amount of data (text+graphics)?

« on: July 13, 2007, 10:45 PM »

I’m really struggling to find out the best way (softwarely speaking) to work with big amounts of flexibly structured data, mostly text and some images(sections, chapters, etc. but that are movable).   

I have thousands of pages on acting techniques. Presently, they're all in a Word document (sometimes, I like having big files because otherwise, I tend to duplicate data and get lost if I have to many loose files on the very same subject)… But using MS Word for huge files is just not very convenient (if not downright dangerous — “corruptionly” speaking. Although I've never experienced that...).


What I need is to be able to have:

- a unified view of all the data (one reason for that is that I want to be able to zoom out and see a lot of material at once, I want to be able to jump from page 1 to page 1052 in a second, etc.).
- an outlined view of the chapters, parts, sections, etc., (MS Word does that : Outline View, and Document Map)
- a very easy way to reorganize the order of the different sections,
- a file format that’s indexable (or a database that’s indexable – X1, Archivarius are the Desktop Search solutions I use -- It's just not a good way to use an internal searching engine, separate from the rest of my files!!!),
- an editing solution which allows the same kind of formatting ability, Bold, Italic, bullets, cross referencing, etc. that MS word, OpenOffice or any advanced word processor will provide (to me, formatting is not just fuss : it gives the document a hierarchical outline, makes it easier to read, find info... to me it's not just a matter of content first, form after...),
- the ability to access my data and READ it on an other computer relatively easily. (I might be willing to cede on that one though...)


There are already strategies that I’m not sure I want to try… Unless someone has an effective and safe way of implementing them :

- I don't like the idea of using a Word Master document -- it just doesn't have a good reputation (“corruptionly” speaking...),
- I don't like the idea of using the explorer "folder method" (dividing the document in pieces, placed in a hierarchy of folders) : it's not easy to reorder files and have a global view of the data. (There might be ways to do it in an orderly and efficient way though... Any thoughts? The programmers among you probably know ways I ignore...)


So... What are the other possible solutions? Using some kind of database? :myBase, Ultra Recall, Surfulater? Other softwares FrameMaker, OpenOffice.???

I've superficially tried some of these other strategies, but I'd like to hear your opinion on the matter before I commit to anything…

Thanks !


[edit: I've added some explanations and, hopefully, some clarity...]

2499

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 13, 2007, 10:11 PM »

Thanks Curt!
I'll have a look at it.

2500

General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking opinions about combination antivirus/firewall products

« on: July 13, 2007, 11:49 AM »

Thanks Curt for you honest and detailed response! I'll see if I get into the virtual world or not (I already know VMware quite well, but that's another beast altogether — I also remember trying altiris SVS in the past, just for the fun of it… But not having much fun).

As a softwarephile, I do like to try a lot of software every week/month (depending on my schedule) and, right now, I usually image my drive before I do. I've learned that almost ANY software can have detrimental effects on my system (some might say it's MS Windows, but it's also true -- although not as much -- on Linux or MacOS... whatever others say).

You mention a certain "reason 3"... Well, apart from these, ahem, files, isn't sanboxie also good thing against viruses and other malware?