topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday April 28, 2024, 5:53 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - CodeTRUCKER [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 43next
151
Living Room / Re: Why does the Mayan calendar end on....?
« on: January 31, 2011, 12:03 PM »
Hm. I can only say that calendar in my kitchen ends on 31st of December, 2011. And that's before Mayan :(
-fenixproductions (January 31, 2011, 11:27 AM)

Ha!  This makes me wonder (given all the hype) if your next years calendar will show December 21, 2012 as the last day with a note that says in small print at bottom...

"In case the world does not end, please attach the enclosed addendum of December 22 thru 31 here.  Please note the addendum was shipped in the original shipping envelope.  If you have lost your addendum, don't bother contacting us for replacements since you would need to allow six to eight weeks to receive the replacement."

152
Living Room / Re: Why does the Mayan calendar end on....?
« on: January 31, 2011, 11:53 AM »
@ Edvard

Hahaha!  Your cartoon was somewhere between bullet #1 and #2.  I really enjoyed it! 

I get what you were saying about an event of world-ending proportions would have garnered at least an honorable mention.  The only pertinent question I would venture is would cataclysmic events be highlighted if the Maya were subscribers to a fatalistic view?  If fate was the final authority in their day to day lives, an event such as a "Dark Planet" would simply be accepted, if not welcomed.  What do you think?

As far as the "no one knows the day or the hour," the Bible is not recognized as a universal standard.  Besides, there is surrounding context where these words are found which brings applicability into question, IMO.

Thanks for the quasi "Mayan Calendar Math for Dummies" type link.  I need it!  :)

153
Living Room / Re: Why does the Mayan calendar end on....?
« on: January 31, 2011, 11:09 AM »
Hi Eóin,

Please accept my rebuttal as friendly "sparring."  That's the way I received your comments!  Also, I am not interested in proving *my* point because I do not have a point to prove.  I am interested in keeping robust flow of validity.

Well... I don't know much about Mayan math, science and astronomy knowledge.
Excellent!  We share a common ignorance of the facts.

But I'm sure there are enough records out there.

I have to challenge statements like this in this context.  Ask yourself, how are you "sure?"  On what facts do you base your supposition?

Chances are they could prove that Mayans didn't know enough about the movement of celestial bodies to be able to predict the future date of a collision.
Since the concept of being "sure" there are "records" is previously held in question, it follows any proof by virtue of those records, can not be substantiated.  Also, it is very easy to chart the movement of stars and planets across the heavens.  Halley's comet was not accurately predicted by supercomputers and slide rules, but by observation of phenomenon and a modicum of consistent care in record keeping.

The prediction of a collision did not require extensive math.  Simple geometry, diligent observation and careful record keeping were all that was required.   Besides, if the celestial event occurred in the mid to deep southern celestial hemisphere, those in the northern latitudes would never have seen it, much less be able to scrutinize the ramifications.

By the "progressive" culture standards of the west, the Maya would be (and were) considered "primitive."   Unfortunately, this necessitates a bias of demotion of the Maya's abilities and a complimentary biased promotion of the abilities of western civilization.  This dichotomy is ingrained in the western mind, but that does not validate its authority.

That's one way to disprove the "Dark Planet" theory.
Unfortunately, neither you nor I, as the author, can disprove the "Dark Planet" theory.  Have you ever seen the "Dark Planet?"  I haven't and as the author of this "theory," I can denounce it and state unequivocally it was an invention of my imagination, but I can't prove its non-existence or invalidity.

OK, it appears you lost that round, but I would be happy to continue an amiable discourse.  :)

Lastly, keep in mind the Mayan calendar does reach an ending.  The purpose of this thread and my original post is to explore all the possibilities of "why?" it ends.
 

154
Living Room / Why does the Mayan calendar end on....?
« on: January 31, 2011, 09:25 AM »
Today, I spent roughly five hours with my wife and children discussing the hype and potential accuracy of the Mayan calendar as a harbinger to the end of future existence.  I/we have done no exhaustive research on the Mayans, their calendar or the congruency of 12-21-2012, but we haven't been living in a cave either.

My primary and salient bullet of our discussion's agenda was not so much concerned about whether 2012 will be the last year of the Gregorian calendar nor was it concerned about the harmony of the respective calendars.  No, my interest was in "why" the Mayan calendar ended?   Given, AFAIK there are no Mayans left today that can offer an authoritative explanation on this conundrum, we are left to our own devices.  As I pondered and we discussed this, three possibilities emerged.  The Mayan author(s) of their calendar...
  • ...chose an arbitrary date, say 5,000 "years" and set it at the end of the calendar, perhaps just for the aesthetics of symmetry. Who knows?
  • ...created some arbitrary and inconceivable date "out there" and then set all the particulars at various intervals to fit within that framework.
  • ...really *knew* something of a cause-and-effect sequence of events now lost to obscurity.


Since the first two bullets are arbitrary, seemingly unconcerned with the cessation of existence, we can focus on the final point.  Maybe the present and highly publicized time chart for the Maya was not their first calendar?  Perhaps the Maya have had numerous calendars over the millenia and it will be time to make the next one commencing on the now infamous date?  Occam's Razor would certainly support this supposition, but let's go to the playground of our minds and examine other possibilities.  Shall we?

Assuming the Gregorian reference of December 21st of Two-Thousand-Twelve does; indeed, equate to the last day of the Mayan calendar, was there a concrete requirement to end their calendar?  Was it motivated by the Maya institutions of religion, science or just their commerce?  Considering the Maya existed in latitudes significantly south of the known world of scientific authority in Europe and the UK, is it possible Mayan astronomers knew something the "white men" did not?  

Let's consider these items... the elevation of Mayan "observatories," clear mountain air and the lack of industrialism would have offered the pre-historic and mid-historic indian stargazers a view of the heavens Spaniards, Portuguese, Europeans, Brits, Scots and Irish astronomers would have coveted, if known.  Now couple the advantages of Mayan vistas with the permanence of their culture.  Add to this the fact the Maya had written records and you have a potent mix for assimilating and dispensing cumulative astronomical, et.al., knowledge for thousands upon thousands of generations.  Is it possible the Maya calendar-makers were given the "heads-up" by these early astronomers?

At this point, I would like to offer this... technological advancement does not necessarily equate to intelligence.  Just because the Maya may not have had the "benefits" of industrial technological "progress" does not mean they were morons.  To the contrary, their culture did have technological "progress," but not the same as those aforementioned.

Given the previous commentary, I would like to offer a "possibility" for discussion.  Actually, this is only one scenario.  I suppose there are countless other possibilities, but I will prime the pump with this particular sequence which does not violate any of the above facts and suppositions.  For lack of a better moniker, let's call it the "Dark Planet."

Since almost all of scientific "advancement" was ensconced in the northern hemisphere, observations of the night sky was biased north of the celestial equator.  Simply put, not many eyes observed the Crux or any other southern constellation except inhabitants in the southern latitudes.  It should also be noted that even over the course of the year the telescopes in the north would never have witnessed southern occurrences.  What if the Mayan astronomers witnessed the rapid passing of the "Dark Planet" only in the night sky on a certain date at a certain time of the year, say every 327 years (yes, this is arbitrary, but stay with me).  Further, what if the Mayan architects and engineers interpolated certain triangulations and realized that in every cycle of passing the "Dark Planet" was getting closer and closer to a collision with our own Terra Firma?  Could it be the Mayan calendar ends because it coincides with the last day of the last 327 year cycle of the "Dark Planet's" orbit?  

If this was/is true, no astronomer in the north would have witnessed the singular night's apparition swiftly emerging and then disappearing into unknown realms of blackness.  If this was the last cycle (for the sake of argument), it was the last appearance and would have occurred on Saturday, December 21, 1685.   Aside from some early and crude telescopes, there was no technology in the seventeenth century that would have been capable of disclosing this "Dark Planet" to the scrutiny of "modern" scientists.  Given, these telescopes would have been in the north, the chance of discovery was basically null.

I admit this is somewhat whimsical (fun) and a touch macabre, but can anyone disprove my "theory" of the "Dark Planet?"  No, no one can or could.  If I was to offer this hypothesis to the readers of American Scientific it could not be discounted or disproved.  They might attack the "messenger" to discredit the author and discount the report, but it would be impossible to attack the "message."  That's the funny thing about reality... you can only prove what you do, in fact, know.  You can never disprove what you don't know.   You can make some reasonably educated guesses about the unknown based on the known, but you will never be able to invalidate any scenario embedded in the unknown.

In closing, the above made for a lively debate in our home and I saw a lot of "light bulbs" turn on above some wee heads.  In truth, I do not know if the "Dark Planet" is relentlessly pursuing its malevolent errand.  What I do know from scientific report is the Mayan calendar ends and there is a reason!  What I don't know is "why?"  

Any thoughts?

 ~CT

155
Living Room / "Betelgeuse" Email Doins'
« on: January 31, 2011, 07:04 AM »
I was checking out an alternate meaning of a word on www.thesaurus.com and discovered this little tidbit...

<quote>
...
Apparently, some pseudo-scientific gossip is circulating online claiming that Betelgeuse will explode in 2012, causing damaging neutrino release and gamma radiation. There will be two bright, sun-like bodies in our earthling sky, the sun and a super bright type II supernova.

</quote>

Since Betelgeuse is 520 light-years away from us, here is a dual set of copper(?) rail-splitter type presidential mintage for your consideration...

  • If "B" already went into supernova anytime in the last five centuries, it's already coming and we won't know anything until it happens which could be between now and ~518 years into the future.  Since neutrinos and all other EMR travels at the speed of light, its effects, if any, will be seen and felt at the same time. Even the Hubble Space Telescope wouldn't see it sooner.
    .
  • If "B" does go supernova on 12/21/2012, we still won't know about it for 520 years.


So, what's the moral of this story... Don't worry, "B" happy!   :P

Ciao!
 ~CT

<Edit> Corrected date.  Thanks SJ! </Edit>

156
Living Room / Any Good & Safe Free Movie Sites Beside StageVu?
« on: January 27, 2011, 01:23 PM »
Hi,

Notice:  While I have no direct experience, I have been advised  StageVU is a pirated movie site. 
FWIW, most if not all, are not real good quality, so that may be why they are not shut down.  This is not a defense or endorsement, but a personal observation.


I would appreciate any links to other gratis-oriented sites or links to previous DC threads.  Registration is Ok as long as it is legitimate and isn't just harvesting email addresses.

I have used www.stagevu.com as a resource for locating movies.  I have discovered some real flops there, but also some real gems too!  :)

Thanks!
 ~CT

157
Hello,

I need to get some real stats on how many computers run which O/S.  My purposes cannot use "market share" as an indicator, but a best estimate of the real numbers.  I will derive my own market share and percentage numbers myself.

Thanks!
 ~CT

158
I've used BlueDomino for years.  Perfect?, nah, but it works for me.

I have just done a test of domains I searched for (and found) about six months ago and all but one I checked are still available.  Does this pass the "squatter" test?

PS - When one is considering quotes pertaining to business and the general consumer populace, one must consider the wisdom of P.T. Barnum and what has also been attributed to him he never said.

159
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 20, 2011, 05:48 PM »
So does the number represent how many years someone has participated? Or how many entries?

It presently reflects "years."

160
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 20, 2011, 05:35 PM »
Hmmm... my first impression on seeing them was "very nice!"  Then the digits, "01," "03" and the "05" on the badges provoked an instinctive perception the digits were "years."  

Maybe we could consider just single digits "1," "3" and the "5" centered in the lower portion?

I had also considered "#1," "#3" and "#5," but it could be problematical once some folks get to "10," "13" and "15."

Roman numerals, anyone?  :P

Just thoughts.  :)  

161
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 20, 2011, 12:53 AM »
+1 (Especially if this method does not add more to your workload.) :)

162
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 17, 2011, 03:42 AM »
Ok, well this brings us full circle.   8)

I know I suggested some changes, but in thinking about it, I see things differently.

NANY is all about participation.  Perhaps just use, the present, one badge that indicates any NANY participation.  Who's keeping score any way?  So what if a person contributes 1 year or 10?  What's next... NANY "Privates," "Lieutenants," "Generals?"

Adding another NANY badge is not going to make me work any harder to get my 2012 app out there and not adding another badge won't prevent me from entering as many future NANYs as I have time for and inclination.  I do it because I love doing it!  NANY is a blast! :Thmbsup:

Frankly, if it hadn't been for the help of the people that kept pushing, advising and encouraging me, "VeggieSquares" might not even have materialized.  

I remember the night I was going to cash it in because I had snafu'd and overwrote my entire source with something else and didn't realize it until it was too late.  I posted my regrettable forfeit.  If the next post had not been, "Hey CodeTRUCKER, did you look in the...?"  I would have given up, but although it wasn't where my fellow DC'er had suggested, my memory was triggered to look in a place I had forgotten and I was able to restore about half the source.  That was not a lot, but it was enough for me to not give up.  If the poster had not cared about my success, it would have been over for that round.

So, you tell me ... who deserves the NANY badge more?  Me or the folks that kept me going?  I couldn't have done it without them, especially, "A. Nonymous!"

IMHO,
Calvin

<Edit> I fully realize I only have *1* NANY badge, so it would seem I have nothing to lose in this debate?  While this is reasonable to assume at this juncture, I will be participating in future NANYs.  Given this I do have a real stake in this discussion.

163
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 16, 2011, 09:04 PM »
The second badge could then have a changeable numeric element to acknowledge the times someone's participated.


that's an interesting idea, and feasible.  though i think just one nany badge in that case, with a number indicating how many times you've participated.

Unless I miss my guess, it is also "script-able," as in could be automated, no?   

164
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 16, 2011, 05:12 PM »
...
I maybe would wonder about having a different colour for Entrant and Admin (/and maybe volunteer)... I know from this year where my NANY entry was a miserable failure (as far as completing goes), and it would be nice not to have that confusion in the badges.

+ 1 for this idea!  :Thmbsup:

May I suggest.
  • Admin - Navy Blue on top with White Text
  • Entrant - Medium Blue on Top light enough to use Black text.
  • Helper - Very Light Blue with Black text

I also like Hamradio's original design.  While nudone's gradient idea at the top doesn't do anything for me (I can't see it very well), I do like his idea of using the DC Blue.  Maybe as the background for the big area at bottom?  Would the gradient work there?

Calvin





165
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 16, 2011, 05:04 PM »
...
that's why i was voting for dif colors -- just to break up the monotony.  maybe if they were all in same family -- like pastels.
i think the other reason, besides just the aesthetic niceness of seeing not just a row of the same icons, would be that it kind of helps identify the group -- ie the orange nany badges all participated in the same nany, etc. 
...

Have you tried to see how many diferent colors are really distinguishable at 16px x 16px?  Let's just try and see...

Red, Blue and Yellow are the primary colors we can start with.

Now if we add the secondary

Red + Blue = Maroon
Blue + Yellow = Green
Yellow + Red = Orange

Ok now we have 6 colors that has a reasonable contrast, but the text (assuming we start with Black would have to be reversed to White on Blue and Maroon for sure and may need to be considered on Red and Green, depending on how the Black text looks.

What other colors could be added that would still have reasonable distinction at that tiny a footprint?  How different would a Purple look net to a Blue?  Would a Red-Orange be distinguishable from Red or Orange?

Even if we added three more colors to the options, that only gives us 9 choices before we have to redesign the NANY badge, or repeat previous colors.

This is my point.  At a 16 pixel square, there just isn't enough real estate to get too fancy.  Now this is my personal views, but I'll be happy to defer to others as well as more experienced graphics professionals.

Thanks for the ear,
Calvin

 


166
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« on: January 16, 2011, 03:14 PM »
I'll chime in here and cast my vote for...

No color distinction

Leave the colors as they are.  Why?  It's simpler and using distinct colors has some issues, to wit...

  • NANY will lose the continuity that is *presently* ensconced and immediately recognizable.
  • For the viewers, there would be no rhyme or reason to it unless you had *all* the badges to "see" the spectrum.
  • What sequence of colors would you start with?  Do you start  on the "red" side of the spectrum and go through to the "blue," or start with the "blue" side of the spectrum and go through to "red?"  Random colors?
  • How many colors could be reasonably used before you would have to start over.  Sure, you can get 65,000,000+ colors out of 32-bit, but how many colors could reasonably be used in so small a space that could be easily distinguished?  How many would show up with proper contrast? Maybe 8, I think.
  • At some point the "text" will lose the contrast and will be hard to discern.
  • Keep in mind a fair amount of the population have to deal with color-blindness.
     

On the positive side, the numerical distinction will be completely unique at least for about a century.  Besides I think the colors are just fine.  :)

Not trying to be rain on anyone's parade, but I needed to add an element to this discussion that was missing, IMO.

Calvin

167
Finished Programs / Re: IDEA: Insert Anywhere Date and Time utility
« on: January 15, 2011, 07:46 PM »
Can the results be formatted exactly like this? - Nov 15, 2010 02:43 PM

this snippet should do it. just append it to nudone's script and type 'qdt' to get the date/time format as you wanted.

Code: Autohotkey [Select]
  1. ::qdt::
  2.    FormatTime, TimeString,,MMM dd, yyyy HH:mm tt
  3.     Send %TimeString%
  4. Return

Thanks, lanux128!  I'll check it out. 
Calvin

168
Official Announcements / Re: January 2011 Giveaway is open for entry
« on: January 14, 2011, 06:10 PM »
...
Actually... it was after I stopped laughing (which took some time -- hence the delay in posting my remembrance)  :)

Awww.  You're too kind!   :-*

169
Official Announcements / Re: January 2011 Giveaway is open for entry
« on: January 14, 2011, 06:02 PM »
Psssst!... my comment above about "CleverCat," was intended as mirth.

Of course... my comment was just something I had wanted to mention previously and yours reminded me  :)

Whew!  I was beginning to think I had lost my comedic talent,...but,.... wait a minute?!?  It "reminded" you of *something*... it didn't make you laugh.  :(

[Informational Notice: Given the present level of my jocose abilities, I find it incumbent to advise the above statement should be qualified as  a "joke."  (Rats!  How demoralizing.)]

170
Official Announcements / Re: January 2011 Giveaway is open for entry
« on: January 14, 2011, 05:43 PM »
Psssst!... my comment above about "CleverCat," was intended as mirth.

171
Finished Programs / Re: IDEA: Insert Anywhere Date and Time utility
« on: January 14, 2011, 05:40 PM »
i've got an autohotkey script that inserts time or date anywhere i type either...

qtime or qdate

i assume you could create any number of different date formats associated with a key word. you could even just have something like qt or qd if you wanted to keep it simple.

#IfWinActive
::qdate::
   FormatTime, TimeString,,yyyy-MM-dd
    Send %TimeString%
Return

#IfWinActive
::qtime::
   FormatTime, TimeString,,yyyy-MM-dd HH.mm
    Send %TimeString%
Return

Can the results be formatted exactly like this? - Nov 15, 2010 02:43 PM

172
Official Announcements / Re: January 2011 Giveaway is open for entry
« on: January 14, 2011, 05:31 PM »
There is a way.....

If a 'humble' non programmer (such as myself) won, they could 'give' the programme to a NANY participant!  :Thmbsup:

My only concern is if CleverCat won, what algorithm would have to be implemented to bias the "giving?"   ;)  

173
Finished Programs / Re: IDEA: Insert Anywhere Date and Time utility
« on: January 14, 2011, 05:20 PM »
@SJ and rjbull,

Thanks for the heads-up!  I was not aware all these were available. 

Thanks, for pointing them out.  :Thmbsup:
Calvin


I'm glad I posted this thread!  It's an adventure in discovering DC!  :)

174
Finished Programs / Re: IDEA: Insert Anywhere Date and Time utility
« on: January 14, 2011, 05:14 PM »
Nice!  I can already see the potential!  If you can create the following format...

"Nov 15, 2010 02:43 PM"

...it would be great, perfect. :Thmbsup: I have to have this format to match existing conventions in my work.

Anything for a fellow DC-er... I'm planning an update this weekend anyway, so I'll make sure you're able to create that format with predefined tokens.


Aw shucks!  That was nice!  :-*

If I may be so bold as to suggest improvements(?)...
  • Change the label "Mnemonic" to Mneminic Trigger" as this will create an immediate association with the "Erase Trigger" checkbox below.
  • Add a small "Insert" button below the drop-down box to insert the "predefined text" into the "Replacement Window"

The above is not mandatory, just my reflections of my first uses, BUT I did not read the help, so my confusion/disorientation was my oops!

FYI - After you mentioned other candidates out "there," I recollected a couple, but it is always good to have a direct line to the developer, especially one as  accommodating as you are being!

Great app!  

Thanks,
Calvin

175
Finished Programs / Re: IDEA: Insert Anywhere Date and Time utility
« on: January 14, 2011, 04:50 PM »
Inserts today's date when you type 'dt'
 (see attachment in previous post)
Inserts the date in a format you can control when you type 'dt1'
 (see attachment in previous post)
I can add AM/PM tokens or whatever else you'd like, if you find this program useful for what you want to do. Just let me know.

Nice!  I can already see the potential!  If you can create the following format...

"Nov 15, 2010 02:43 PM"

...it would be great, perfect. :Thmbsup: I have to have this format to match existing conventions in my work.

Thanks!
Calvin

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 ... 43next