topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 26, 2024, 7:18 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Renegade [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 438next
101
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: TI Launchpad for $4.32 (reg. $12.99)
« on: January 12, 2016, 09:56 AM »
Good grief. They just arrived. That was lightning quick!

102
Developer's Corner / Re: How to make a Solar Cell
« on: January 11, 2016, 11:00 PM »
But still... Berries?

Where do you think dyes come from? :)

Yes, but it just seems "out of place" there.

103
If they'd go back to 'dumb ads' then I think that they wouldn't have this problem.  Images... and pay the artist/photographer.  Like magazine ads.  But... progress, right?

Yep.

The question is progress towards what?



You can still use cookies yourself, or if the ad platform supports it.



People have whined in the past about it being "cheap" or "dirty" to use ad blockers because of "think of the web sitez" and stuff. I didn't buy it then, and I most certainly don't buy it now. Ads are simply obnoxious attack vectors.

If someone has a site that is worthwhile, they need a Bitcoin donation address. I checked my wallet, and all of my most recent transactions are donations for people/web sites.

I didn't donate to Mozilla/Firefox because they wanted my email address and a truckload of information. I had bitcoins in hand ready to give to them... but they f**ked it up by asking for way too much information and making it mandatory. F**k Mozilla. I gave to someone else.

104
IMPORTANT: uBlock Origin is completely unrelated to the site "ublock.org".

What are people here using?

105
Living Room / Re: Smart TVs now "smart" enough for malware
« on: January 11, 2016, 10:00 PM »
No. No. No. No. No. No. No.

Just no.

It's not "now" smart enough for malware. It's been that way for a LONG time.

I've been working on some of the backend systems for a few years now. Browsers are just 1 attack vector. The attack surface is much larger.

I've also worked on vehicle backend systems. They're less vulnerable. Take that for what you will. ;)

tl;dr - If it has a computer, or if people are involved, it's vulnerable. But some people already knew that. ;)



Personally, I would much prefer a "dumb" display than a smart TV.

Yes. Exactly that.

Also, I prefer analog to digital. Digital is way too slow. I don't have enough patience for it.

106
Developer's Corner / How to make a Solar Cell
« on: January 11, 2016, 09:50 PM »
This is pretty wild. You could do it at home even.



I think I'll skip it and just buy some cells.

But still... Berries?

107
Living Room / 3rd anniversary of Aaron Swartz's death
« on: January 11, 2016, 12:23 PM »
Just a small reminder that one of the Internet greats died 3 years ago today.

http://www.nakedcapi...wartzs-politics.html

https://en.wikipedia...rg/wiki/Aaron_Swartz


108
Who would want to  be a solipsist? You would be a supremely religious atheist, a totalitarian anarchist, a serial-killing war-mongering suicidal pacifist, a criminal kingpin who is also the police, an institutionalized maniac who is also a psychiatrist. Who would want to be such a conflicted manic-depressive? Being a serial killer with immortal victims would add to your insanity if that is possible.
Hm-m-m-m ... those descriptives seem applicable to a few of the politicians I have known  :P.  Particularly when it comes to their understandings of the internet :o :-\.

I looked up Solipsism earlier, and this is the first thing that came to mind:
[ Invalid Attachment ]

Solipsism is dangerous. It's also much more prevalent than most people realise. Mark Passio has a few presentations where in parts he outlines some of that. It's interesting stuff.

109
Living Room / Re: Movies you've seen lately
« on: January 10, 2016, 01:48 AM »
If you're a big Star Wars fan, it's not to be missed. But why am I bothering to say anything if you if you are?

Because you care, of course!  ;D

You've probably seen it twice already and are planning on going back at least once more, right?  ;)

Nope. Haven't seen it yet. Haven't had time. I'll wait for the online version. But, I still really like Star Wars a lot. Even if I don't have posters of it all over the house, and dress up like SW characters...

Honestly... A lot of Star Wars and Star Trek fans are just frikkin' nuts.

110
Living Room / Re: Movies you've seen lately
« on: January 10, 2016, 01:45 AM »
The Revenant



I utterly HATED Leonardo many years ago in the "Titanic" era.

But dammit! He's a bloody great actor.

This movie is long, but it is a good story. Totally predictable, but still... a good watch.

111
Talk about "God mode".  :D

112
Found Deals and Discounts / TI Launchpad for $4.32 (reg. $12.99)
« on: January 09, 2016, 10:36 PM »
Check out the TI blog for a great deal on the TI Launchpad:

https://e2e.ti.com/b...2-launchpad-for-4-32

New Year’s deal: MSP432 LaunchPad™ Development Kit for $4.32!

To get your New Year started off right, MSP developers can now test out the ultra-low-power and high performance MSP432 LaunchPad Development Kit for only $4.32 with the TI Store coupon code 432@432.

That's right, only $4.32, marked down from the regular price of $12.99. So get your MSP432 LaunchPad Development Kit today! This deal is only for a limited time.

It's $7 shipping for me, so I picked up 4. I figure they can't be much harder to learn than any of the other boards out there, and if it's useful, hey... I got a few extras.

But going for a third of the price minus a penny.

I'd read about that line before, but figured I'd skip it because, well... $13 seemed steep for my interest level, and the chances of me finding time for it. I've also learned enough since then to gain a bit more confidence that I'll be able to manage cool something with it.

113
Living Room / "Open" is really gaining traction
« on: January 06, 2016, 10:40 PM »
We had open source software, and the hardware community is really jumping on board. Here's one project:

http://www.electrosmash.com/1wamp

1Wamp Electric Guitar Amplifier - Open Hardware

1Wamp is a one Watt small guitar amplifier based on a JFET guitar pre-amp, the Big Muff Pi tone control and the LM386 power amplifier. This portable amp is an open hardware project designed by ElectroSmash using only free and open-source tools.

More at the link.

It seems like there's a very strong movement going on.

I'm just posting as this has been going on for a while, and it is continuing to go on in more and wider ways.

 :Thmbsup:

114
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« on: January 04, 2016, 12:05 PM »
David Cameron seems to think that raiding people's bank accounts is a good thing.

http://www.telegraph...d-bank-accounts.html

David Cameron: Taxes will rise unless we can raid bank accounts

David Cameron claims he will "have to put up taxes" unless tax officials are given draconian powers to raid people's bank accounts

Maybe for Bitcoin, as it's a heck of a lot safer than a UK bank account now.

115
N.A.N.Y. 2016 / Re: N.A.N.Y. 2016 Announcement
« on: January 04, 2016, 12:10 AM »
I feel shitty. The last few years I've had mountains of work right around the last quarter of the year, leaving me no breathing space to do anything. RAT was my last.

For N.A.N.Y. 2017 I plan to release way, way, way early.

I'll get on top of thinking about something now.

My first thoughts are for some kind of mini-computer, like a Raspberry Pi Zero or something like that.

116
Living Room / Re: Interesting "stuff"
« on: January 03, 2016, 08:55 PM »


Real Burning Lightsaber - YouTube

Damn... I want one of those!

Better yet, I'd like to BUILD one of those!~

;D

 :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:

117
Living Room / Re: Programming/Coder humor
« on: January 03, 2016, 08:51 PM »
Did you hear about the sysadmin that was always checking everyone's privileges?

118
Developer's Corner / 20 OSCILLATORS IN 20 MINUTES
« on: January 03, 2016, 08:46 PM »
On the bizarre side...

https://media.ccc.de...lators_in_20_minutes

mouser had posted a link to a talk at that event. I found this one, and it's... different.

Think 555 on overdrive.

119
Developer's Corner / Re: Ethics in Technology
« on: January 01, 2016, 08:03 PM »
On the kind of humour side:

https://youtu.be/y_uj_8QiioY?t=2m47s


120
Living Room / Re: Interesting "stuff"
« on: January 01, 2016, 01:59 AM »
[ Invalid Attachment ]

Woman stuffed $1.9 million in purse over 15 years

Seems a bit harsh considering the outright criminality going on in banking today that costs billions or trillions, which goes unpunished. 

121
Developer's Corner / Re: Ethics in Technology
« on: January 01, 2016, 01:54 AM »
A presentation by white hat hackers who decompiled and studied the volkswagon cheating firmware:
https://media.ccc.de..._dieselgate#download

I really wonder how you found that.

I watched the whole thing, and it was very interesting.

What I got out of it was that government regulations create some pretty bad situations.

If there were less force/regulation, and more transparency, I think we'd have better vehicles. Like, who in their right mind wants less efficiency in their vehicle?


122
Living Room / Re: HAPPY NEW YEAR 2016
« on: January 01, 2016, 12:12 AM »
Happy New Year! All the best to everyone. May your cup run over, and your bank accounts be full! :D

123
Living Room / Re: Funny Animal Videos
« on: December 30, 2015, 09:10 PM »
Elsewhere in Toronto...


124
Got to love the code choice. Highlighted below. :)


http://motherboard.v...an-internet-standard

The HTTP 451 Error Code for Censorship Is Now an Internet Standard

The 451 HTTP status code is now official in the eyes of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), the independent organization responsible for many of the internet’s operating standards. Now, when an internet user hits a web page that has been blocked for legal reasons (read: censorship), they may be presented with a 451 error instead of the more generic 403 “forbidden” error. This is a win for transparency.

The 451 code has been on the table for two years now, having been first been put forth by software engineer Tim Bray in 2013, who was in turn inspired by a blog post by security thinker Terence Eden. Eden’s call for a censorship error code is clear enough:

My ISP have recently been ordered to censor The Pirate Bay. They have done so unwillingly and, it would seem, have complied only with the letter of the ruling. Their block is, for now, trivial to circumvent. I am concerned that this censorship will become more prevalent. As network neutrality dies, we will see more sites ordered to be blocked by governments who fear what they cannot understand.

So, Eden proposed a code and Bray ran with it, using “451” in reference to Ray Bradbury’s censorship dystopia Farhenheit 451. Web standards are, however, not changed overnight.

In a post published on Friday, Mark Nottingham, chair of the IETF HTTP Working Group, explains a bit more. “Initially, I and some others pushed back,” he writes. “HTTP status codes are a constrained name space; once we use everything from 400 to 499, for example, we're out of luck. Furthermore, while 451 met many of the guidelines for new status codes (such as being potentially applicable to any resource), there wasn't any obvious way for machines to use it -- i.e., this was something you could do in a header or the message body of a 403, so it didn't seem to justify expending a status code.”

Sites began to use the code anyway on an experimental and unsanctioned basis, and Nottingham and co. received more and more feedback from administrators in favor of the code. Crucially, advocacy orgs Lumen and Article19 expressed interest in having a machine-readable flag that could be used to spider the web in the hunt of censored websites. That’s just what a new HTTP status code could offer.

Finally, the support was there. Some technical details still need attending to, but the code is ready to use immediately. What can it actually do?

“By its nature, you can't guarantee that all attempts to censor content will be conveniently labeled by the censor,” Nottingham explains. “Although 451 can be used both by network-based intermediaries (e.g., in a firewall) as well as on the origin Web server, I suspect it's going to be used far more in the latter case, as Web sites like Github, Twitter, Facebook and Google are forced to censor content against their will in certain jurisdictions.”

There’s still nothing stopping a government from forbidding the code’s usage, however, which is a serious but perhaps unavoidable limitation.

125
Or, if you're in no hurry the C.H.I.P. computer can handle audio input/output and is cheap.

Just. Wow. That's incredible. It looks a lot easier to deal with than some of the other boards out there. The built in memory and preloaded Linux certainly go a long way.

Pages: prev1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 438next