topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 26, 2024, 8:06 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - allen [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 46next
326
I think it more likely they're trying to pick up some of the market that isn't yet using a respectable browser.  While that might be competition, in that Firefox too would like to snatch up these users, I see it not really undercutting them so much as presenting themselves as a more viable transition.

It has the advantage of being the property of a name, google, that is as well known as Microsoft--which by name familiarity alone may make for a less anxious transition than IE to Firefox.  When trying to get someone to use Opera or Firefox from IE, I've often found resistence because they want to know what the hell a firefox is and why it has such a silly name--often assuming it's some weird flybynight thing and I've been duped.  It's not as common now as it once was, but I still encounter this situation.

But tell them to switch to google's browser--I can see the conversation playing out already, with non-technical users who fumble with the Internet.  "I use google all the time, they have a browser? That makes sense... can I import all my favorites? How do I get it?"

I doubt Chrome will be a viable alternative to Firefox or Opera for power users who have been using/tweaking configuration/extension combinations for years, have a work flow they are comfortable with . . . I can easily see chrome taking market share from Internet Explorer, but not so much firefox.

327
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Game Review: Toribash
« on: September 02, 2008, 09:01 AM »
While we're all competent at searching the web, a link to the game might be a good idea, too :D

328
I doubt it'll become my primary web browser . . . I don't expect it to have the graceful customization and keyboard friendliness of Opera, it won't be a true MDI and, too, will lack Firefox's redeeming quality--extension support.  Unless it happens to be extremely fast and extremely light weight with passable keyboard support, it'll just be a novelty download for me.

That said, being the opposite of Kartal in all things google, I am excited to take a peak at Chrome.  I'm a bit disappointed they didn't ground-up write this, including the rendering engine, but I'm curious to see their results. And as aforementioned, if nothing else perhaps it *will* introduce some really innovative features over time to rejuvinate browser development accross the board.

329
I was blown away by Codex Transportica, it's one of my favorite blogs -- so when I (Yes, a month late) stumbled upon your announcing a comic I shouldn't have been surprised at how great it was... but I was surprised. Again, blown away.  Comic strips online are a dime a dozen these days, it's rare to see something that is of such quality. Even the "quality" comics seem to start out rocky and slowly get their act together as they gather a readership, but yours started out sharp. The writing and art alike are subtle, simple--but not too.  Very well done!

330
Isn't google supposed to be working on a similar tool? Presumably it'll have a usable interface.

Ah, here we go: http://hothardware.c...Throttling_Detector/

331
Living Room / Re: What do you do during your free time?
« on: August 21, 2008, 09:06 AM »
I have the best of both worlds--not so much MMO's, but video games occupy a good bit of my free time. But I am not unmarried!

Re:Battlestar Galactica, in preparation for the final season my wife and I watched all of the previous seasons (all but Razor, which we've not heard great things about) -- amazing show, so glad we waited to get into it though. The cliffhangers were bad enough spread over a few minutes or days. Watching it live, it would have been awful. (We kept saying last season we should have waited for it to finish rather than watch it episodically)

332
I've been mousered many a times, and am quite pleased to see the term "mousered" used to describe it. I'm so frequently guilty of this practice, I'd not be surprised to see the term "al'd" or "prawned". Thankfully I'm not nearly as influential and, as such, my wandering off for cigarettes or days at a time mid-conversation goes largely unnoticed. :D

333
Living Room / Re: What are your favorite gadgets and gizmos?
« on: August 21, 2008, 08:37 AM »
Think geek has a few dalek things, but I don't think they have a dalek usb hub.

I want an Ood brain in a jar.

334
Living Room / Re: What are your favorite gadgets and gizmos?
« on: August 20, 2008, 08:33 AM »
tardis_hub.gif

It's without a doubt the bulkiest USB hub I've ever used, but oh how I love the sound of the Tardis each time I connect a device...

335
Living Room / Re: Favorite part of the Beijing Olympics so far?
« on: August 14, 2008, 05:55 AM »
Why wear a swimsuit? Wouldn't the olympics be more interesting if the swimmers wore no suits?

I'd watch the female swimming and probably spend less time looking at Phelps. . . of course, protrusions (might I call them that?) probably wouldn't be conducive to aerodynamic form.

336
General Review Discussion / Re: Wovel
« on: August 13, 2008, 03:47 PM »
I continue to be impressed by this company.  My son removed and lost one of the wing nuts used to secure the wheel to the handle.  I called them today and they're sending me two, no charge.

337
Living Room / Re: Foxmarks has a new forum! (so does Evernote)
« on: August 13, 2008, 11:59 AM »
I love getsatisfaction -- didn't realize Evernote was over there. Will have to add them to my apps!

Edit: Actually, looks like there's no Evernote presence at get satisfaction, just users.
Edit-again: Okay, maybe they do, they just haven't taken the time to set up their accounts as Evernote employees, interacting as end users.

338
Living Room / Re: Favorite part of the Beijing Olympics so far?
« on: August 13, 2008, 11:49 AM »
Personally, I love the olympics--I think maybe the world might be a better place if we more often than once every two years put aside the bullshit to have a play date.

As far as events go--my wife is a fan of the gymnastics, I don't mind watching them with her.  I've been following the swimming, witnessing the undisputed greatest swimmer in recorded history is something to behold. On the other hand, I feel awful for the rest of his team who're completely overlooked. (How furious must the guy who won the relay for them have been at the race being referred to as Phelp's 7th gold every other minute).

I'm disappointed that I missed handball yesterday, was looking forward to that.

Forgot to add...

Tom Cruise's [...]

I absolutely agree with your rant about Tom Cruise--it's spot on.  Though I'm very much one who separates the idiot from his work--I'd be glad to kick Tom Cruise/Mel Gibson in the family gems any day, but I won't let their idiocy keep me from enjoying a truly mediocre film.

Bono. I think I hate him more than even those two.  I think South Park very well summed up why no matter what seemingly good things he does, he always seems to be a giant shit. Love South Park.

339
Sounds like a great idea! Throw in some customization options (colors/fonts), and maybe the ability to decide whether you want to show titles, full posts or x-length "previews" of posts and you'd have a unique forum/blog hybrid.  I think it sounds brilliant.

340
General Software Discussion / Re: Linux is Not Windows
« on: August 12, 2008, 12:15 PM »
I always try to follow an old forum guideline that I believe was originally articulated by the moderators up on The WELL:

Try not to offend. Try not to be so easily offended.

The well mods seem to churn out the best forum rules of thumb...
You own your words
Do you still participate there?

As for this thread--I found the article worth reading, interesting enough to warrant the time.  Windows versus mac versus linux?  I'm not the first here to state that such conversations are always volatile, always inconclusive and will one day be spoken in the same breath as religion and politics as subjects to avoid in conversation at all costs.

341
I really think that the essay touched on a moot point. Or misses a moot point, however you want to put it.

The author of the essay touched on the truth a bit--questioning whether things like gears were html competitors, even quoting google on gears being an html ally; but I don't feel like he got it. I felt like he really thought that there would be one technology to rule them all. I'm having a hard time swallowing his premise.

Flash and flash-free websites have co-existed for years; this won't change.  In both cases there are advantages--there are things you can do with flash that you can't do otherwise; but doing *everything* with flash isn't prudent.  Text/information is best represented as such, not in a large flash app. Plus, with the growing popularity of mobile web there are even more compelling reasons to go lo-fi, or at least offer low-fi options.  It is much, much easier to maintain a hi-fi and low-fi version of a website that is primarily database/server side scripted, serving two versions of html, than it is to maintain a flash website and a text-only alternative for mobile users.

As for AJAX, most "ajax" web sites that we are familiar about aren't *truly* ajax--that is to say, purely database->xml->javascript->html.  Most popular, interactive websites that are generally lumped in with AJAX are actually using server side scripting to heft most of the heavy lifting, with javascript being the final touch of real time interaction, often serving little more than aesthetics. Some times proper ajax is used in these websites, moderately, to update database info without having to reload the page.  This really is the way to go for things that require a lot of user input/data -- maximal server side processing, relegating the client to less important things--generally aesthetics. It also allows for relatively graceful fallback for mobile devices and other non-standard configurations, if a true mobile version isn't offered. (Example: I can use Kwippy.com via crappy IE on my PPC more intuitively than I can use the *mobile* version of Plurk--and plurks almost entirely javascripted main output? Forget about it on anything but Firefox/IE.) Deny the browser the ability to totally hose your experience. (Google+Opera, hmn?) Of course, this is an altogether different conversation--and there are plenty of people who would disagree, voting for pure AJAX+FIREFOX, screw any heathens worshiping at the alter of an inferior (read:different) browser.

The central flaw with the essay, to me, is that it doesn't seem to acknowledge that there are different tools ideal for different applications.  His mentioning of "rich applications" was a drastic over generalization -- you can't lump gmail, youtube, backpack, twitter into the same category because they're all "web 2.0". If a website is data driven; text--e-mail, blogging, note taking, to-do lists--anywhere where you may at some point want to copy/paste, have a search engine scour the text, view it in a browser that you can't install plugins in -- some form of HTML presentation is ideal. AJAX, purely server side scripted, whatever: Third party plugins aren't the way to go.  For speed, resources, compatibility and a hoard of other reasons.  If what you want to do is stream audio or video, it's a no-brainer, go with a tool designed for multimedia presentation. Flash. Silverlight. et cetera.

As there has been for more than a decade, there will always be room for many options. HTML will continue to evolve, but won't go away. JavaScript will continue to evolve, but it won't go away.  AJAX and its union of html, javascript and xml will continue to evolve but it won't go away.  Server side scripting as a means for preparing the aforementioned technologies for display will continue to evolve, but won't go away. 

As for third party plugin technologies. . . Flash has been with us for a long time, it will continue to evolve and I don't believe it will go away. Not unless google, youtube and a wealth of other big players--not to mention web developers, game developers and the like decide silverlight is worth dropping everything and running with it.  Not likely. Maybe there's even room for Silverlight in the mix, though. Admittedly, I've delved into it very little. As for proprietary browser extensions like BrowserPlus and GoogleGears?  These aren't really competing technologies but additional tools with specific uses -- these have come and gone in droves over the years.  Some stick around, some don't.  While they may impact some users experiences significantly, they really don't impact the Internet as a whole and are by no means integral to our usage in the way HTML is. Many online services offer browser extensions, toolbars, bookmarklets, et cetera to enhance the experience and expand upon it. It doesn't mean they're rewriting every other web app in the near future.

I thought that this essay was too long for what little it really said/concluded, but was much too short for the subject matter.  It over simplified a much larger non-issue.  :P

Flash versus silverlight would be a valid essay--they are two comparable technologies vieing for the same niche. Flash versus silverlight versus gears versus AJAX? Hammer versus torque wrench versus rubber mallet versus can opener. Who wins?

342
Living Room / Re: AINOP Wireless
« on: August 11, 2008, 02:52 PM »
Seriously, though, I'm thrilled that you've finally got this sorted out! Also, as mouser noted, it's re-assuring to know that I'm not the only schlep that this kind of thing happens to!

. . . glad I could suffer for the benefit of your feelings. :D -- it always amazes me when I fall victim to not bad, but utterly horrible customer service.  How does ones conscience allow them fail to deliver so thoroughly?

I'm still baffled/angry/mostlybaffled about that letter... assuring us that we had excellent service and had been given excellent service--and then just a short few hours later it was confirmed, by the very author of that letter, that we had horrible service. WTF!

343
Living Room / Re: AINOP Wireless
« on: August 11, 2008, 02:50 PM »
Though I hate to be a cynic, I can't help but wonder how long it will last.

Yeah, me too... here's to hoping it holds out til we move.

344
Living Room / Re: AINOP Wireless
« on: August 11, 2008, 02:11 PM »
Oh my. . . it took them a year and a half, but they're finally providing the Internet service I've been paying for.  Connecting between 1.4 and 2.0 Mbps. . . all this bandwidth, I don't know what to do with it--I've forgotten how to use a non-mobile-version Internet.

345
Living Room / Re: AINOP Wireless
« on: August 11, 2008, 05:53 AM »
Composed it off line, timed out a few times in so trying but eventually managed to load the pages necessary to post.

I've actually resorted to doing most of my e-mailing, etc., via my smart phone of late.

346
Living Room / Re: DC Social Club Love-In
« on: August 10, 2008, 10:34 PM »
I am offended by the distinct lack of pownce love! It is technically my favorite--no limit to post length, can upload files and add events -- and can do all of that from my mobile as well. Nothing would make me happier than some friends there, so I could *use* it and not feel like a total douche for talking to myself. http://pownce.com/theprawn

Also worth mentioning, Kwippy -- it's not the most technically savvy option--quite the opposite, but I really like the friendly hands on relationship the developers have with the product and their users. http://kwippy.com/allen

I hate to pass my twitter link, as people use it... and nothing else... but, alas, http://twitter.com/jarday

347
Living Room / AINOP Wireless
« on: August 10, 2008, 10:19 PM »
We have been extremely unhappy with our ISP for the last 18 months that we've been with them, and especially tormented over the last 6-8 months. In our defense, we've been with them for this long for lack of other options.  Neither DSL, Satellite nor Cable can provide service to our location, leaving Wireless as our only option. It's costing us USD 40/month -- which is more than we've paid for DSL in the past. The connection is supposed to be a 1Mbps connection however our bandwidth tests usually only go up to 150kbps, 300 rarely.  What's worse, is the connectivity is extremely intermittent--often timing out when doing even basic things like web page loading with only one of us using our systems. If we're both using our computers? Forget about it.

The reason we got the Internet, foregoing our thoughts of going offline for a while, is that my wife needs to be able to VPN for her job... she's, obviously, been unable to and as such we've lost gas money on her having to commute when it shouldn't be necessary.  Additionally, I do a significant amount of free lance web development these days. . . it usually takes me several tries over 20 minutes to upload a 3kb file. Three. The situation has been very frustrating.

For the first several months, we called them at least every couple weeks--often weekly.  Generally, they'd ping our radio and assure us we had an "amazing" connection, tell us to reset our radio and be done with it.  Other times they'd send tech teams out (whose actions and fumbling did not instill me with confidence in their knowledge of the job) to "fix" our connection--which would strangely often lead to even worse connectivity.

Eventually, it got to the point where we'd call and conveniently no techs would be available, but we could leave a message.  Our calls were never, not once returned.  I distinctly remember one incident when the woman answering the phone submitted a ticket on our behalf.  A week later, when we hadn't heard from them, my wife called--and that same woman found the ticket, denied having been the one to submit it, and insisted it had already been closed.  Furiously, we managed to get in touch directly with the owner.

Shortly after sharing our grief with him, late last Autumn, they finally tried moving our radio up higher on the roof--and for a brief time, we had a decent connection.  Still nowhere near the 1Mbps promised, closer to 400 or 500k but at least a reliable connection.  Then the radio suddenly stopped working early on in the winter.  Not wanting to grave our high roof with ice and snow as factors (I cannot fault them for this) they "temporarily" installed another low level radio, reducing our connection to the worst it had been to date.  Our experience has been one that started poorly and systematically was reduced to a service I would honestly qualify as inferior to a middle of the road dial up connection.

We've spent the entirety of this summer calling them to get it fixed. Same old story. No one there to talk to us, no one to return our calls -- we're billed for awful internet, helpless to contact anyone who will help.  We'd already contacted the competing wireless providers but their tight schedules (short summers means high volume, low time to do aloft installs) left us perpetually waiting for a consultation.

With little else we could do, we submitted a petition through the Better Business Bureau.  We know they have no real legal teeth, but we hoped that our provider cared enough about their reputation to resolve the matter in light of our taking these measures.

In the mean time, we did manage to get initial "surveys" from the two competing wireless providers.  The first didn't have a tower near enough to provide us a *satisfactory* connection and wasn't going to do an install. I'd rather be turned down than sold a can of shit.  Amusing note: He saw our dual radios strapped on the house, asked if we were with AINOP, and chuckled saying that they do a *lot* of installs for unhappy customers.  The other company said they could provide us with service, also noticed the radios, and said 3 out of 4 of the houses he visited that day were existing AINOP customers.  Stellar record.

Two weeks passed and we'd heard nothing.  Through random chance, I learned that a man who works at the gas station at the corner works at AINOP and he called them for me.  It not being me who called, they answered the phone! The next day, they sent someone out while we weren't home. They left a note on the door assuring us that moving the antennae higher wouldn't help matters, that the tower was having problems and they'd fix it immediately. Struck us funny that their tower was broken for 8 months and no one noticed... but what do we know?

Not surprisingly, the connection did not improve.  Instead, we were finally greeted with a response:

Mr. and Mrs. Day,
It has come to our attention that you have complained many times about our Internet service being slow and unusable.  However, I have investigated and found that the situation is, in fact the opposite from what you described.  Your IP address is consistently consuming the majority of the bandwidth available from our tower.  From my point of view, your connection to our tower must be excellent, and indeed, you are receiving better service (and more bandwidth) than most of our other customers that are on the same tower.
It is a sad commentary that I need to tell you that we are no longer going to provide you with our service.  As of August 31st 2008, we will be terminating your service and picking up our equipment.  We have providing you with excellent service and tech support.  If we were to move your radio as you requested it would not improve anything, as your speed and connection are both amazing.  I have looked back on your connection and can see huge amounts of traffic passing through.  We don’t feel that you have any reason to complain about what you have received.  Unfortunately we are unable to please you as a customer therefore we are giving you these couple of weeks to find another provider.

[name obfuscated]
Assistant Wireless Manager
Netherland Office Products & Aroostook Internet

Upon receiving this, my wife was livid. It was them who'd told us we'd need to move the radio back up, not us; their "investigation" never came into our home to see what we were enduring. Their "excellent" service consisted of ignoring us and blocking us out constantly.  An altogether false letter of termination their plan to keep the BBB from faulting them?

Unable to contain herself, my wife took time off work. She left the office and came home, picked up the letter from the technician indicating the tower was "broken" (Excellent service or broken tower, what is it?), printed out 5 bandwidth tests, all but one less than 300k, and stormed into their office.  Initially, they put down her printed bandwidth tests saying they wouldn't look at them until they could confirm we weren't doing other things to throttle our bandwidth for those tests. What would we have to gain from such a scam, I don't know! All we want is... Internet for our Money! They confirmed *nothing* else was happening, saying "If this is true, this connection isn't satisfactory"... no shit.

The sender of the above letter then took my wife into another room, to illustrate our excessive bandwidth usage.  My wife admitted to me, she was nervous--afraid my late nights were consumed with some pornography fetish--making her look like a fool when our bandwidth was in fact through the roof--but lo! and behold! Our massive bandwidth amounted to a 300 megabyte download, once, over the course of 2-3 hours -- otherwise, we had almost no throughput.  Did they not check this *before* they sent the letter illustrating our excess? Or are they foolish enough to think that 300 megs is abuse of a *broad band* connection?

After a time of shooting down their baseless claims, they finally asked what exactly we wanted them to do... which was simple... come to our house, look at our connection.

The man in charge, perhaps still not altogether convinced of our authenticity--perhaps in disbelief that they served such a lousy connection for such a long period?  He sent the author of the above letter to my house the same day--I was instructed to unplug my xbox, disconnect my wife's computer from the LAN and let her use a single computer to test our connection.  I obliged.  She immediately came to the conclusion that we had a really lousy Internet connection. Tomorrow, a team of two technicians are coming out and I was strictly instructed not to let them leave until I'm pleased with the bandwidth test--1M being the baseline, but she said up to 4 are possible with a proper signal.  Here's to hoping.  But if the last 18 months have taught me anything, it's don't expect a bit from AINOP.

Supposedly, in the time we've been with them, there has been a complete change of hands and a significant change of bodies in the web providing departments.  So who knows, maybe they're on a path to amend their ways. Stranger things have happened.

What really bothered us wasn't the bad connection. I respect technical limitations and can forgive human error.  But having had this problem for *this* long and never being given the benefit of the doubt, just immediately dismissed as malcontents is offensive.  To spend over a year accusing us of having a stellar connection while I can barely check my gmail is absurd.

Tomorrow is the big day.  Having spent a couple hundred dollars for the initial install and 40 dollars a month for a year and a half... will we finally have padded their pockets sufficiently to be granted proper access to the Interwebs?

348
General Software Discussion / Re: Evernote Beta now Open
« on: August 10, 2008, 05:43 PM »
Yeah, Internet is necessary to open an account and get the software up and running -- but after that, if you so desire, you can keep it all local and never sync again. (In which case... WHY?! Stick with 2.0) I have a really unreliable Internet connection--so I just have Evernote set for manual synchronizing. Use it "offline" most of the time, syncing up a few times a day as necessary.

349
General Software Discussion / Re: Your most used SPECIAL programs
« on: August 02, 2008, 11:59 PM »
Amazon Unbox may be fine and cheap, but is only available to USA residents.

The question was what I enjoyed using, not what the world enjoyed using, right? :D

350
General Software Discussion / Re: Your most used SPECIAL programs
« on: August 01, 2008, 09:16 PM »
Mostly specialized stuff for various web apps. I first learned of air via Pownce, that very early on offered an AIR client to go with their service.  Twhirl is a wildly popular twitter interface.  Pandora has got one, too. Stuff popping up all over. Playing with a few ideas for air apps m'self...

Pages: prev1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 46next