topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 26, 2024, 8:51 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - IainB [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 264next
401
Pandora's Box, E1: The Engineers' Plot



An old BBC documentary re the consequences of political and technocratic rationalism in the USSR.

Fascinating documentary - this one traces the history of the evolution of Gosplan - the USSR State Plan.
In the name of "Science", the USSR applied their economic theory to planning, to drive a command and control economy that seemed to succeed at first, but then failed progressively through the '60's and took the economy into crisis and collapse in the mid to late '70s.
A major limitation in the approach was that cost-efficiency and efficient resource utilisation were not imperatives and thus mindless production and ritual ensued as the planners gave up on the impossible/absurd task. There were food and other shortages, rationing ensued.
They had sought to model and plan the entire economy on an absurd basis, but it was too complex for them to understand.

"Why weren't we able to transform our dreams into reality?
Why didn't we succeed in creating a society where everyone could be free and fulfilled?
Who is to blame?
Not science itself, but the men who mistook what science was."

 - Vitalii Semyonovich Lelchuck, USSR Academy of Sciences.

Video: Pandora's Box, E1: The Engineers' Plot.
https://www.youtube..../watch?v=h3gwyHNo7MI
_________________________________________________________

YouTube Published on 28 Apr 2012
Pandora's Box, subtitled A Fable From the Age of Science, is a six part (episode) 1992 BBC documentary television series written and produced by Adam Curtis, which examines the consequences of political and technocratic rationalism.

The episodes deal, in order, with communism in The Soviet Union, systems analysis and game theory during the Cold War, economy in the United Kingdom during the 1970s, the insecticide DDT, Kwame Nkrumah's leadership in Ghana during the 1950s and 1960s and the history of nuclear power.

The series was awarded a BAFTA in the category of "Best Factual Series" in 1993.

The Engineers' Plot
This episode details how the Bolshevik revolutionaries who came into power in 1917 attempted to industrialize and control the Soviet Union with rational scientific methods. The Bolsheviks wanted to turn the Soviet people into scientific beings. Aleksei Gastev used social engineering, including a social engineering machine, to make people more rational. Gastev founded the Central Institute of Labour (TsIT), Soviet think tank dedicated to the improvement of industrial efficiency.

But Bolshevik politicians and bourgeois engineers came into conflict. Lenin said: "The communists are not directing anything, they are being directed." Stalin arrested 2000 engineers in 1930, eight of whom were convicted in the Industrial Party show trial. Engineering schools gave those loyal to the party only limited training in engineering, to minimize their potential political influence. Industrialized America was used as a template to develop the Soviet Union. Magnitogorsk was built to closely replicate the steel mill city Gary, Indiana. A former worker describes how they went so far as to create metal trees since trees could not grow on the steppe.

By the late 1930s, Stalin faithful engineers like Leonid Brezhnev, Alexei Kosygin and Nikita Khrushchev grew in influence, due to Stalin eliminating many earlier Bolshevik engineers. They aimed to use engineering in line with Stalin's policies to plan the entire country. At Gosplan, the head institution of central planning, engineers predicted future rational needs. Vitalii Semyonovich Lelchuk, from the USSR Academy of Sciences, describes the level of detail as absurd: "Even the KGB was told the quota of arrests to be made and the prisons to be used. The demand for coffins, novels and movies was all planned." The seemingly rational benchmarks began to have unexpected results. When the plan measured tonnes carried per kilometers, trains went long distances just to meet the quota. Sofas and chandeliers increased in size to meet measurements of material usage.

When Nikita Khrushchev took over after Stalin he tried to make improvements, including considering prices in the plan. The head of the USSR State Committee for Organization and Methodology of Price Creation is shown with a tall stack of price logbooks declaring that "This shows quite clearly that the system is rational." Academician Victor Glushkov proposed the use of cybernetics to control people as a remedy for the problems of planning. In the 60s computers began being used to process economic data. Consumer demand was calculated by computers from data gathered by surveys. But the time delay in the system meant that items were no longer in demand by the time they had been produced.

When Leonid Brezhnev and Alexei Kosygin took over in the mid 60s, the economy of the Soviet Union was stagnating. By 1978 the country was in full economic crisis. Production had devolved to "pointless, elaborate ritual" and endeavours to improve the plan had been abandoned. Quote the narrator: "What had begun as a grand moral attempt to build a rational society ended by creating a bizarre, bewildering existence for millions of Soviet people".

402
The Chrome extension Bad Ad Johnny is no longer available in the chrome web store, but it works just fine as at 2018-08-16. It is an excellent/better alternative to the default built-in Slimjet Ad-blocker extension.
The BAJ extension installer is in the attached file (below).
Once BAJ has been installed, Slimjet persists in disabling it as a PUP, or something, but that behaviour can be changed in the settings.
NB: BAJ installer file is also attached to the foot of the OP in this discussion thread.

403
The Chrome extension Bad Ad Johnny is no longer available in the chrome web store, but it works just fine as at 2018-08-16. It is an excellent/better alternative to the default built-in Slimjet Ad-blocker extension.
The BAJ extension installer is in the attached file (below).
Once BAJ has been installed, Slimjet persists in disabling it as a PUP, or something, but that behaviour can be changed in the settings.

404
...
  • latest Slimjet (Chrome-based) browser <-- superb with display control NoSquint Plus extension,
...
The reasons that I settled on BazQux Reader (in Slimjet) were mainly:
  • (a) Performance: BazQux emulates and surpasses the excellent Google Reader service that I used and that Google killed off (Curse you, Google!   >:(  ), and
  • (b) Ergonomics: I have a couple of peculiar eyesight problems and need to wear spectacles. To enhance/adjust the perceptual/visual and reading experience in  Slimjet, there is a Chrome browser extension that provides a simple and superb display control NoSquint Plus

405
My motivation for using Slimjet:
Regarding SlimJet:

I wouldn't have even tried it due to all of the "Engrish" on the website if not for the seeming recommendation from multiple folks in this thread.

For a browser that prides itself in automatically stopping tracking and blocking ads, it sure comes with a lot of built-in ads and other prompts to get you to use their referral links and things. :down:

It also wants me to "sign into SlimJet" which as far as I can tell is just signing into my Google Account, which means Google can still track everything I do, but also perhaps SlimJet can as well.

I don't trust it. It seems shady to me. Uninstalled.

@Deozaan: Well, having made the initial investment of your time, you should perhaps have persevered and experimented a little longer before throwing in the towel, and then you might have realised some good returns - as I did, in fact.
I had similar thoughts to you, but persevered and banged in all the extensions that I felt I needed (minus the AdBlock one), taking a suck-it-and-see approach and half-expecting to break the camel's back, but no, the adverts simply never occur and the thing's performance seems just fine - very good in fact. I have some minor criticisms of the software, but I am pretty sure that those will be sorted in due course. Even my 6 y/o son prefers Slimjet now - the acid test.

Conversely, as a FF die-hard and after a great deal of perseverance on my part, and in the continuing hope that things would improve, I had to face up to the reality that Mozilla had pretty much conclusively demonstrated to any sighted observer that they were not going to cease screwing up or killing their formerly excellent Firefox product, and so I reluctantly voted with my feet.

As in a lot of major changes that one sometimes makes in one's life, one wonders afterwards "Now why didn't I do that earlier?"

406
I started this thread as an attempt to capture and collate user feedback on Slimjet, for general use for DC Forum members. A search for references in comments about Slimjet, in the DC Forum, cover about 2 pages worth of related but scattered links (use the search link in the OP to see the latest list).

407
Opening post (summary):
Originally started:2018-08-16
Last updated:2018-11-26

Slimjet is a "fork" - a chrome-based browser.

Extensions:
  • Google Chrome Web Store (for all current extensions).
  • Bad Ad Johnny (see .CRX installer file and FAQ .PDF file, attached below) an excellent/better alternative to the built-in Slimjet Ad-blocker.
    Note: BAJ was withdrawn from Google Store, but still worked fine in Slimjet as at 2018-08-16), however it was apparently deleted from Slimjet and from the Sync (what a ruddy cheek!) by the installation of Slimjet v21.0.2 (2018-11-23) - sjt7z_x86 (Portable).exe.
    No matter, BAJ was easily reinstalled using the .CRX installer file, and kept its rather informative log history of number/type of ads blocked.

General:


408
Living Room / Re: Spectre/Meltdown - now there's Foreshadow/L1TF
« on: August 15, 2018, 10:26 AM »
Interesting post from askwoody.com:
Foreshadow/L1TF: Another highly publicized Intel flaw, complete with its own web site and logo
Posted on August 14th, 2018 at 15:46 woody
Comment on the AskWoody Lounge
You’re going to see a whole bunch of explainers about this, yet another Meltdown/Spectre-class vulnerability in Intel processors.

Intel’s FAQ lists just about every Intel processor.

Microsoft’s FAQ explains how L1TF works.

And, yes, Foreshadow has its own web site. With a free-to-use high quality logo.

Let’s see if we get another crazy round of claims and patches — more sound and fury directed at a potential attack that, while real, hasn’t yet hit the fan.

You can tell it’s a co-ordinated disclosure because it was announced immediately after the Patch Tuesday releases.

Spectre ... Meltdown ... Foreshadow/L1TF ...
Such dramatic names!    :up:

I predict the next one to be announced ... "Paradox/WTF2"

409
A search in Everything of C:\ \wallpaper (type "Picture") could turn up quite a lot of the older/"legacy" Windows wallpaper images. Many might well have the Bing watermark.

410
2018-08-09: Copied from another thread:
I use Microsoft meney plus (USMoneyBizSunset) edition.  I have 14 accounts in it.
Is it possible to selectively backup a few accounts? If so how to do it?
Would be grateful if someone helps me
pscraja
Not sure I understand. Do you mean that:
  • (a) you only have 14 accounts in a given ledger (set of accounts), or
  • (b) that there are 14 accounts in a given ledger containing many accounts and that you want to copy/backup just those 14?

I would suggest that you check the Help file (comes with the software) and all the links to information/help/support sources listed in the opening post at Microsoft Money Plus Sunset - Mini-Review
Those URLs/links that are obsolete or 404 can probably be found at: http://web.archive.org/

It occurred to me that, if you just wanted to copy/backup a selected 14 accounts, then the simplest way might be to copy/paste them into an Excel spreadsheet.    :tellme:

411
General Software Discussion / Re: selective backup of an account
« on: August 09, 2018, 06:40 AM »
I use Microsoft meney plus (USMoneyBizSunset) edition.  I have 14 accounts in it.
Is it possible to selectively backup a few accounts? If so how to do it?
Would be grateful if someone helps me
pscraja
Not sure I understand. Do you mean that:
  • (a) you only have 14 accounts in a given ledger (set of accounts), or
  • (b) that there are 14 accounts in a given ledger containing many accounts and that you want to copy/backup just those 14?

I would suggest that you check the Help file (comes with the software) and all the links to information/help/support sources listed in the opening post at Microsoft Money Plus Sunset - Mini-Review
Those URLs/links that are obsolete or 404 can probably be found at: http://web.archive.org/

It occurred to me that, if you just wanted to copy/backup a selected 14 accounts, then the simplest way might be to copy/paste them into an Excel spreadsheet.    :tellme:

412
  ...nobody ever pays the "full" price?
I think this is repeating myself, but, speaking as an ex-ACDSee user, I can't understand why anybody would want or need to consider paying anything for ACDSee when one can install something far better, in the shape of Picasa (Sunset Version) for $FREE.

Refer: Google Picasa "Sunset" version - Mini-Review and anchor-point

413
Living Room / Re: Privacy (collected references)
« on: August 08, 2018, 04:05 AM »
Some valid points from theregister.co.uk:
Facebook insists it has 'no plans' to exploit your personal banking info for ads – just as we have 'no plans' to trust it
After all, never say never!
By Kieren McCarthy in San Francisco 7 Aug 2018 at 20:4432

Image [Denial]

Analysis: Facebook has denied it is seeking to suck up netizens' bank account details, claiming it just wants to connect bank customers to their bank's chat accounts and give useful financial updates. ...

Copied from: Facebook insists it has 'no plans' to exploit your personal banking info for ads – just as we have 'no plans' to trust it • The Register - <https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/08/07/facebook_banking_data/>

Yeah, right.

414
Hmm:

Malwarebytes
Welcome, Binisoft fans

"We at Malwarebytes are big fans too. ...And not to worry—we will maintain, support, and keep Binisoft products free for everyone in the short term. ..."
Source: https://binisoft.org/
...and another one bites the dust...

415
Living Room / Re: Privacy (collected references)
« on: July 29, 2018, 08:14 PM »
Looks like the Ugandan government  could be in the vanguard when it comes to, uh, privacy...
 ...Uganda orders ISPs to block Ugandans from accessing Pornographic Websites   Nice one!    :Thmbsup:


416
Speaking of leg position.. Today with my empty cabinet, in order to air it out more, I opened all the drawers fully and the doors...
You can guess what almost happened -- I just caught it in  time as it was about to tip over onto me (!) 
I wondered about that! From the photo it looked as though it could be unstable - the oblong box looked to have too narrow a base to be stable. When I looked at the photo, I initially (mistakenly) thought that you must have had the back of the cabinet screwed to the wall, then I read that the front legs had been recessed and wondered how that was working out. Generally speaking, for stability, narrow cabinets need to have the feet extend outwards, to widen the base of the footprint in the direction of potential fall. Of course, then, people may trip over the extended feet...
Probably simplest to screw the back of the thing into the timber wall studs behind the plaster.
As a standard safety precaution we usually do that anyway with anything in the house which has a narrow footprint (e.g., bookcases), so's they don't fall over too easily in an earth tremor (fairly common in NZ) and squash someone's foot or maim a passing toddler in the process.

417
Auto update not working.
I use DCUpdater to check for updates to all the DC apps/plugins as a single batch. Just ran it now. Seems to work just fine.(??)

418
Is it Russia, OR China, or Russia AND China, and how would you know?
Just curious.
It might be North Wales - a lot of agitprop there...    ;)

419
Extracted notes from the Telegram FAQ:
(Copied from: Telegram F.A.Q. - <https://telegram.org/faq#q-how-are-you-going-to-make-money-out-of-this>)
Q: What are your thoughts on internet privacy?
Big internet companies like Facebook or Google have effectively hijacked the privacy discourse in the recent years. Their marketers managed to convince the public that the most important things about privacy are superficial tools that allow hiding your public posts or your profile pictures from the people around you. Adding these superficial tools enables companies to calm down the public and change nothing in how they are turning over private data to marketers and other third parties.

At Telegram we think that the two most important components of Internet privacy should be instead:

Protecting your private conversations from snooping third parties, such as officials, employers, etc.
Protecting your personal data from third parties, such as marketers, advertisers, etc.
This is what everybody should care about, and these are some of our top priorities. Telegram's aim is to create a truly free messenger, without the usual caveats. This means that instead of diverting public attention with low-impact settings, we can afford to focus on the real privacy issues that exist in the modern world.

Q: What about GDPR?
New regulations regarding data privacy called the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force in Europe on May 25, 2018. Since taking back our right to privacy was the reason we made Telegram, there wasn‘t much we had to change. We don’t use your data for ad targeting, we don’t sell it to others, and we’re not part of any mafia family “family of companies.”

Telegram only keeps the information it needs to function as a feature-rich cloud service — for example, your cloud chats so that you can access them from any devices without using third-party backups, or your contacts so that you can rely on your existing social graph when messaging people on Telegram.

We're still working with our lawyers on an update to the Telegram Privacy Policy that will lay this out in even more detail (don‘t expect any dramatic changes there though). We’ll notify you when it's ready.

For now, please feel free to use our new @GDPRbot to:
  • Request a copy of all your data that Telegram stores.
  • Contact Telegram's Data Protection Officer.
Android users got a GDPR update with version 4.8.9 which allows more control over synced contacts and adds other privacy settings. On June, 1, Apple approved Telegram v.4.8.2 for iOS with these features.

Q: There's illegal content on Telegram. How do I take it down?
All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them. ...

Q: A bot or channel is infringing on my copyright. What do I do?
All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them. ...

420
@YannickDa: I'm not absolutely sure, but it seems from the Enikma website and introductory video that the Enikma box is a proprietary "black box" (hardware) approach to the encryption of 2-way traffic between the User PC (Client) and the proprietary designated Enikma VPN DNS node, where the Enikma box provides a WiFi Access Point for devices in range of that Enikma box.

Thus the user's ISP is just acting as a passthrough node to the encrypted traffic, so there can be no "man-in-the-middle" attacks.
The communication path would seem to be:
Client<-->Enikma box<-->modem/router<-->ISP DNS<-->designated Enikma VPN DNS node

 - and where the traffic between the two points Enikma box<-->designated Enikma VPN DNS node is encrypted.
This is actually quite simple, but seems to have been obfuscated in the website and details.

It would also seem to be a deliberate lock-in and rather kludgy/"overheady" alternative to the use of the public domain DNSCrypt software, which does the same thing (but more efficiently) except that:
(a) there is no obligation with DNSCrypt to have a given and/or proprietary VPN, because DNSCrypt is $FREE and works with any OpenDNS node, so the user is free to choose (not locked-in to) any VPN, and
(b) DNSCrypt encrypts traffic all the way from/to the Client (whereas Client Xmit/Receive is in clear with the Enikma box, potentially leaving some room for man-in-the-middle attacks).

If I have it correctly then, I am surprised that Enikma are apparently allowed under local consumer protection laws to get away with such misleading/obfuscated and lock-in practices, and the fact that they are misleading would be no accident - which would seem to be unethical - so I personally wouldn't touch them with a bargepole.
...Never trust it when they use smoke and mirrors.

421
Screenshot Captor / Re: Images pasted into onenote are half size
« on: July 23, 2018, 09:16 PM »
@absoblogginlutely: This sounds rather like a classic state of minor instability in an operational system that is in some form of constant dynamic change. (Not a steady state.)

422
@AzureToad:
I'll follow up once it's arrived and have had a chance to use it a bit.
Have you got any feedback yet for those of us as might be interested, please?
I'd be very interested - studies of work environment design and ergonomic have shown that these factors can have profound effects on the worker's productivity and sense of well-being.
However, some recent research seems to indicate that the supposed benefits of open plan offices are not as straightforward as had been hypothesised/believed: The Open Office Revolution Has Gone Too Far

I don't usually like to quote HBS as it's comment often seems to be biased (e.g., self-serving) or of dubious merit, but the link is about what could be some properly-done - and thus worthwhile - objective research.

Some interesting and salient points:
  • Those [late 20th century open plan office studies] are fine for understanding individual perceptions, but aren’t so good at quantifying real behavioral responses and organizational performance outcomes from open offices. The gap between perceptions and real outcomes has now become the battleground for employees and employers on this issue.
  • Technology—in this case specifically, wearable technology—has enabled us to track individual or dyadic interactions at a really refined level. It’s not just “did you do this?” but “you did X, Y, and Z at this particular time with these other people.” If I was going to dive into researching open offices, I wanted to do it more empirically, tracking variables that were previously unfathomable to measure beyond proxies and guessing.
  • It depends on what you’re trying to achieve with open offices. My understanding, from speaking with real estate managers and architects, is companies’ conversations about the built environment tend to start with cost per square foot. If the question is how to lower costs, the answer is more people per square foot, and open offices will always have the upper hand on that dimension.
  • My hope is that this research throws a bucket of ice water on the idea that there’s no tradeoff—that you will naturally both save in real estate costs and get more collaboration from this kind of design.
  • His colleague then piped up and pointed out that all of the “noise” (as an indication of interactions) actually comes from behind the closed doors of the separate, team-based spaces. That should make us wonder: if all the noise is coming from behind closed doors, isn’t that where people are interacting and working well together? Wouldn’t you maybe want more of that?
  • Here is perhaps one way to summarize the shift in perspective that is suggested by this work. In the past, when it comes to workplaces, office design (and many other artifacts of organizational life) have catered to the observer and not the observed. Unfortunately, it’s the observed who make our organizations successful. So maybe everything, from office design to people analytics, ought to shift slightly in mindset to optimize for their work more often.

423
T-Clock / Re: Uninstalling T-clock
« on: July 23, 2018, 06:14 AM »
The T-Clock process is ...\T-Clock\Clock64.exe

424
Crikey! This OP looks like a cross between a Rant and a Thesis.
I'm not entirely sure I correctly understand all of it, but I'm trying. This OP surely stands out as something quite different - unique even - something which the rest of us mere mortals can only gape at in awe and could probably only strive to achieve something similar in our dreams. I would respectfully suggest up front that this OP arguably deserves some kind of a DCF award, in an entirely new class of its own. Maybe we could call it "Zany 2018" or something?

Has it really been nearly 40 years since the advent of the Apple Mac and PC?
Yes, yes, it has, hasn't it? My goodness, how time flies.
And is @ital2 correct about the dearth of the promised efficiencies arising from computing? Yes, indeed I think he is - where the heck are they? I think it's time that we were told. I've seen far too many examples of people in the workplace having to struggle to use Macs/PCs, without any training at all, left to sink or swim. The ergonomics of the keyboard are shocking, which merely serves to compound the confusion for those luckless computer users. The cost of the consequential inefficiencies would probably be enormous but unknown/unknowable.

Ah, F-Keys - the FUNCTION keys! Yes, it seems like it was only yesterday that I was carefully laying out a self-adhesive printed cardboard label strip above the function keys and which aligned neatly with said function keys (not sure whether it was the 2x6 F-key groups or the 3x4 F-key groups), where each F-Key performed a unique and complex functionality - abbreviated on the label - in that wonderful DOS-based Framework V program - the likes of which we have sadly not seen since (about 1988). Of course, I was only 72 at the time and this was before my gender-change operation, but I recall it well.

And then the amazing Lotus Agenda was launched in the market - again with F-keys being assigned a unique and special functionality - but quite different of course to the functionality of Framework V. This, I feel sure was not intended to be a cruel trick on the user or intended to tax their intellects. No, it was just that the program designers probably thought it was a good idea. However, they took the (to me) novel step of laying out the F-keys in the lower part of the screen display of the application, only showing those F-keys that were relevant in the context of any given application screen display. This turned out to be really a prescient and smart thing to do, and was even ergonomically sound. It did away with having to select a key from amongst all of the F-keys, by limiting the choice of F-keys to only those F-keys that were relevant in the context of a given program display screen. It also saved on paper/cardboard and adhesive costs, so environmentalists and Lotus management would probably have overwhelmingly approved such a brilliant step. But then everything about Lotus Agenda was pretty brilliant - for example the patented design, where the database was actually two databases: DB-A was a sequential database of text records and DB-B was a database of the Category virtual hierarchy in the database, containing pointers to the records in DB-A which had been assigned to those categories in DB-B - and the whole thing was able to be dynamically changed and updated in real time, with selected views of the categorised data being available on-screen and able to be printed out in WYSIWYG fashion on an HP Inkjet printer. It was useful in assembling data and collating relationships of almost any type between data, and in printing/displaying organised data views for reports of for viewing on a screen in a brainstorming session, or writing a book, or writing a contract, etc.
As I said: Brilliant. And the clever use of F-keys was also brilliant.

Coincidentally, only yesterday (before reading this OP), my son (just turned 8 this month) was querying why I only use a few fingers to type with, as opposed to all the digits like he does.
He wasn't being a smart-ass, he just happened to have noticed it at that point. He had instinctively taught himself to use all fingers some time ago and hadn't noticed what a slowcoach I was at typing. So I introduced him to the stand-alone Y-7100 Type-right keyboard device from DSE (Dick Smith Electronics), which I bought years ago for my children to teach themselves to touch-type.

23_3720x1930_90C44DC0.png

It's a full-size QWERTY typing keyboard, with good feedback keys shaded grey and off-white in columns, for each of the fingers, and a label along the top of the keys that tells you which finger is in each column. The keyboard is a hard-coded computer that leads you through the course (9 levels) and has an 8+1 digit LCD display - that's all; just enough room for a single row of characters. What you type comes up in that display, and is to be copied from the training book. It knows what you should be typing, and it checks for accuracy and speed of typing. Progressing up a level is dependent on your passing the test at the end of the previous level.
It's very simple and minimalist and a superbly designed typing training tool.

23_1606x282_D7AC400B.png

The above training book - cover and page 1 shown - that comes with it (Type-right Course Book, ©1988 Video Technology, printed in Hong Kong) is simple and well laid-out and printed in the form of a portrait-oriented shorthand-style typist's notebook, with a ring-binder in the top, so you flip each page over to read it on one side only in one direction, test level-by-level, and when you get to the end you turn it around and read it the other way to the end of the notes. At the end of the notes (and the course), it gives you a test where, if you score sufficiently high, then it reveals a prize code that can get you a prize certificate, or something. I always told my kids that they would get $50 if they unlocked the prize code, but so far no-one has achieved that.

The reason I mention the Type-right in this thread is that I observed, whilst showing it to my son, that the Type-right has no F-keys (or Number pad). It is of course just a typing tutor. So, even if one learns to touch-type, there's still relative chaos and lack of consistent standards when it comes to all the other PC keyboard keys - e.g., including F-keys and NumPad, Windows key, Ctrl, Alt, etc.
The state of keyboard standards is such a mess that one can't even expect the F1 key to consistently do the same thing on different PCs or even within different applications on the same PC. Such chaos cannot be conducive to good ergonomics and.or efficiency.

In writing this, I feel as though I've only scratched the surface of what @ital2 has discussed - even his Edits are longer than what I have written - but it's a start, at least.

425
Well, LBC seems to have been necessarily designed with the objective of making it easy for the user to change/personalise its settings. Thus it would seem to defeat that objective by blocking the settings from being changed.

However, if you still wanted to stop the settings being changed, then it might be simplest to take a backup copy of the "correct" .ini file(s) - i.e., the ones with the settings as you want them to be kept - and keep the backups in a backup folder. Then restore (copy) them back to the LBC folder prior to each relaunching of the LBC proggy. That way, from your perspective, the settings will have effectively and unobtrusively remained unchanged - without your needing to expend unproductive resources/effort in a workaround controlling/blocking other users. This could be handled by (say) a batch file or an AHK script. It could be run from a USB thumb drive.

I already do something similar to this for one excellent proggy that I use a lot. By design, all/most of its settings (which can be changed) are kept in the Registry. I have all manner of nifty setting that I make to it. However, under certain crash and Windows Update conditions, those settings can get completely wiped and it takes quite a while to manually set them all up again exactly as I want them, through the proggy UI. The proggy has a "Save settings now" function. So what I did was get the settings exactly as I wanted them and then saved the resultant "perfect" Registry settings to a .reg file (which becomes my backup of the settings). It is then a matter of seconds for me to restore the settings if they get wiped again - I just run the .reg file, which updates the Registry. I could also use this same process to set up and restore specific settings to suite different circumstances/users.
I can also take the proggy and the .reg settings to another PC and immediately have it all set up just as I want it.

Hope this helps or is of use.

Pages: prev1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 ... 264next