topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 19, 2024, 2:41 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - IainB [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16next
27
Context is following on from this post:
...I was thinking about this - how one's mind can confuse itself - when I was helping my daughter with her "computer science" studies homework tonight. She's writing her first computer program - it's in Python 3, with which I was not familiar.    :o
I was having to learn the rules and syntax by implication, as she didn't have a reference manual and was just using an online Python code editor/interpreter on a trial-and-error basis. So it was edit, run, stop on error. It would spit out the errors progressively, incrementally and individually (one at a time), stopping at each error and waiting for you to correct that (edit) before it moved on to the next error (run again from the beginning), and so on. Painfully tedious and confusing, but potentially instructive if one understood the need to  to focus on being pedantic and trying to understand the hidden/implicit logic (grammar) of the language being parsed. ...
____________________________

So, I decided to build a self-contained Python environment for my daughter, on her laptop, to assist her to self-educate (with assistance from me).

I don't have a familiarity with Python, so to get myself and my daughter up to speed, I identifed some potentially useful resources, and downloaded Python 3.0.
These are the main resources I identified:
1. Documentation:

2. System:
  • From the main Python 3 website (), I downloaded and installed Python 3.0 Release:
https://www.python.org/ftp/python/3.0/python-3.0.amd64.msi
  • This was initially installed on my laptop so that I could have a "suck-it-and-see" trial.
    _____________________________________

- but I have a question: Which would arguably be the best or most useful approach:
  • (a) for my 15 y/o daughter (as a complete newcomer to programming)
  • (b) for myself (as a lapsed hacker of the "old school" wanting to assist his daughter's education)?

For example:
  • Would it be "best" to install 32-bit, or 64-bit, and why (under what circumstances) would that be "best"?
  • Are there any other versions/resources that I could probably find useful and should therefore look at, in addition to the main ones I outline above? (Maybe including things such as code snippets or examples in Python 3.)

Many thanks in advance for any help/advice proffered.

28
Disturbing report from Falkvinge.net:
With shock appeals ruling, the United States has effectively outlawed file encryption
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
With shock appeals ruling, the United States has effectively outlawed file encryption

PRIVACY  UNITED STATES   POSTED ON MARCH 28, 2017 • UPDATED MARCH 21, 2017 • BY RICK FALKVINGE 68  3
 Digital key

An appeals court has denied the appeal of a person who is jailed indefinitely for refusing to decrypt files. The man has not been charged with anything, but was ordered to hand over the unencrypted contents on police assertion of what the contents were. When this can result in lifetime imprisonment under “contempt of court”, the United States has effectively outlawed file-level encryption – without even going through Congress.

Last week, a US Appeals Court ruled against the person now detained for almost 18 months for refusing to decrypt a hard drive. The man has not been charged with anything, but authorities assert that the drive contains child pornography, and they want to charge him for it. As this is a toxic subject that easily spins off into threads of its own, for the sake of argument here and for sticking to the 10,000-foot principles, let’s say the authorities instead claim there are documents showing tax evasion on the drive. The principles would be the same.

Authorities are justifying the continued detention of this person – this uncharged person – with two arguments that are seemingly contradictory: First, they say they already know in detail what documents are on the drive, so the person’s guilt is a “foregone conclusion”, and second, they refuse to charge him until they have said documents decrypted. This does not make sense: either they have enough evidence to charge, in which case they should, or they don’t have enough evidence, in which case there’s also not enough evidence to claim with this kind of certainty there are illegal documents on the drive.

In any case, this loss in the Appeals Court effectively means that file- and volume-level encryption is now illegal in the United States.

Without going through Congress, without public debate, without anything, the fuzzy “contempt of court” has been used to outlaw encryption of files. When authorities can jail you indefinitely – indefinitely! – for encrypting files out of their reach, the net effect of this is that file level encryption has been outlawed.

So were there illegal documents on the drive? We don’t know. That’s the whole point. But we do know that you can be sent to prison on a mere assertion of what’s on your drive, without even a charge – effectively for life, even worse than the UK law which will jail you for up to five years for refusing to decrypt and which at least has some semblance of due process.

The point here isn’t that the man “was probably a monster”. The point is that the authorities claimed that there was something on his encrypted drive, and used that assertion as justification to send him to prison for life (unless he complies), with no charges filed. There’s absolutely nothing saying the same US authorities won’t claim the same thing about your drive tomorrow. Falsely, most likely. The point is that, with this ruling, it doesn’t matter.

Syndicated Article
This article has previously appeared at Private Internet Access.

It looks like the report might be correct. File encryption has effectively been outlawed - just like that.
I didn't think that a judicial system could do that.

29
I'm often in the position of needing some help with using an MS Office product, but I don't usually have anyone to quickly ask for assistance, so I have to rely on my own devices and what is available on the Internet.
The Help files/hyperlinks are quite good, but it's not easy to find really useful pointers when you need some ad-hoc guidelines or training in the use of an MS Office product, and it's not really feasible to expect be able to remember all of the functions that one has used anyway in an MS Office product, even for experienced users - there is so much to learn/know.

So, after reading this post: Free Basic Training For MS Office 2016 Users, I went and took a look at: Office training roadmaps

I downloaded the roadmaps (.PDF file) - there are 6 in all:
  • poster_access-web.pdf
  • poster_excel_web.pdf
  • poster_officeBasics_web.pdf
  • poster_outlook_web.pdf
  • poster_PPT_web.pdf
  • poster_word_web.pdf
       
 - and took a look at the Access one - which is an area where I am relatively ignorant.

I found the Access roadmap very handy, as one could visually scan it and decide where one needed to jump in and take a look and then go straight to that hyperlink. It's a bit like having an external mind-map or index to a Wiki on MS Office 2016.

This is potentially very useful. A nice job by Microsoft!    :Thmbsup:

So, for all those other MS Office 2016 users out there, I thought this might be of some help/use, though YMMV, of course.

30
Developer's Corner / TempleOS - A Constructive Look.
« on: March 26, 2017, 05:21 PM »
Thoughtful article by one Richard Mitton in Codersnotes.com. Though it came up in my Hacker News RSS feed only today, it was originally posted June 8th, 2015.
It is about TempleOS, an OS developed by a troubled guy. It looks rather impressive.
A Constructive Look At TempleOS
(Extract copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
...There are many bad things to be said about TempleOS, many aspects of it that seem poorly constructed or wouldn't work in the "real world". I'm going to ignore them here. It's very easy to be negative, but you will never learn anything new by doing so.

Many might consider TempleOS a waste of time, compared to more fully-featured OSs such as Linux, because it will never have the same success. Plan 9, developed by Bell Labs, was a research OS designed to be a successor to Unix. Despite some big names and big ideas, it was never any kind of commercial success. Was Plan 9 therefore a waste of time? Many would argue not, as some of its ideas have since found their way into other products.

Perhaps we should instead look at TempleOS as a research operating system: what can be accomplished if you're not locked into established thinking, backwards compatibility, and market demands.

What can we learn if we are only willing to listen? ...

(Read more at the link.)

31
Developer's Corner / Asshole-Driven Development (ADD)
« on: January 06, 2017, 08:01 AM »
In my bazqux feed-reader, I have a feed from Hacker News (https://news.ycombinator.com/).
They post lots of interesting stuff seemingly randomly-picked from all over the WWW and from different time-periods.
They had this today: Asshole driven development (2007)

The author of the article lists a few ADD approaches, but in the comments people have listed maybe a hundred or so more - from their own experiences - and I was very impressed with both the quality and the humour of the descriptions. Many of the ADD methods described I too have personally experienced in real life - they were usually notable in that they contributed in some way to project delay/failure.

One of the ADD methods listed is something like "CYAD" (Cover Your Ass Development) and that is one which, from memory, I recall was identified in the programming for the development of a nationwide ATM (Automated Teller Machine) network project which was using IBM hardware (ATMs and dumb 3640 network switches) and IBM CICS (a transaction server OS language), driven by an obscure proprietary IBM programming tool/protocol with the acronym CTAM (Customer Transaction Access Method), interfacing with IBM host mainframes. However, the analysts working on the project amusingly used the acronym CTAM as code for Cover The Ass Method, because that was what they observed had been going on.

The project was closed down and restarted with a "refreshed" (i.e., new) design team and the design objectives were expanded to include future-proofing the system with full EFT-POS functionality at the outset. The network was re-designed to be non-proprietary and hardware-agnostic (any manufacturer brand of terminal hardware could connect to it), utilising any old ATMs and replacing the dumb 3640 switches with Tandem Non-Stop computers as distributed intelligence/data network processing nodes, using ACI Base24 applications.

It was super-political. I recall the initial designers who had been unceremoniously dumped from the project kept lobbing grenades into the refreshed project, writing long reports as to why the new design was infeasible - it simply couldn't work, etc.. You'd think they worked for IBM (which I suppose they did, in a way).They only went quiet after the network went online and fully operational, as scheduled. Funny that. Could they have been wrong?    :tellme:

32
Steam Operator Valve Fined $2.1 Million for Refusing Refunds in Australia
(Click on the link to read the article.)
Steam apparently had to pay punitive damages because they showed a total disregard for local Australian consumer rights laws governing refunds.

33
Living Room / Lifehacker: critique - the decline and fall?
« on: December 21, 2016, 08:10 PM »
Time was when I considered the Lifehacker blog to be an essential item in my RSS feed agggregator - formerly Google Reader, now bazqux - but now, alas, not so much.

It's not that my tastes have changed particularly, but I am about to permanently delete Lifehacker blog from my bazqux feed-reader, because, quite frankly, it has become variously boring, useless and insubstantial.
Instead of it being full of seriously clever and useful tips n'tricks to - well, hacking one's life (as it was previously) - it now seems to have become a sort of Pinterest, focused on assorted vacuous, touchy-feely new age junk. In short, nothing like the meaty thing it used to be. Maybe what it used to be was unsustainable? I don't know, but I rather miss it anyway.

So I am disappointed. Yes, as a realist, I do understand that things are in state of perpetual dynamic change, but, from being arguably a leader, Lifehacker seems to have progressively sunk into an irrelevant editorial mediocrity, where its blog seems to be a list of apparently relatively fatuous content. It apparently does seem set on becoming irrelevant - much like the UN seems to be set on becoming (per George Bush).
One wonders: Is this the likely fate of all seemingly "good ideas" that manifest themselves as ideas only - unsustainable, no matter the number of camp-followers?
One suspects that it's all about "monetisation" and the inexorable drive to the bottom.

For example, today (2016-12-22):

22_1020x634_322148FB.png

Sheesh.

34
This request is made on the basis that, for data stores, meta-data integrity is arguably as important as data integrity.
Note:
  • The image below has been sharpened for improved visual clarity.
  • The full text of the image has been copied into the spoiler at the bottom of this post.

12_828x1418_0782B58F.png

Spoiler
Required change to CHS (Clipboard Help & Spell) to maintain meta-data integrity for changed/edited image clips: 2016-12-12 2003hrs
      1. I use CHS to hold image clips captured from screenshots, and then, by clicking the image edit icon in CHS, I edit the images thus saved using SC (ScreenhotCaptor) - having previously set up SC as the default image editor for CHS.
      2. The edited image (AFTER) is then saved over (replacing) the original image (BEFORE), in the CHS database file store.
      3. Below is an example - two images, BEFORE and AFTER.
      4. Notice that the image dimensions and file data size meta-data, as shown in the CHS Memo Title, are the same for both BEFORE and AFTER images: 915x396  (24.16kb), and this same meta-data info is also displayed in the bottom LH side of the Clip Image tab (it is also given in the Clip Text tab for that CHS image clip).
      5. irfanview reports the BEFORE image as being:
             
      
      6. However, the AFTER image is in reality now of different dimensions and data size -  irfanview reports it as being:
             
      
      7. Also, notice that in the bottom RH corner of the Clip Image tab in each screenshot, CHS displays the correct AS-IS file size.
      8. What I would like is for CHS to verify whether the meta-data AS-WAS (recorded)  for each image is the same as the actual AS-IS current meta-data, and update the former to AS-IS if they are not the same. That is, if an image in the CHS database has been changed/edited, then CHS updates the AS-IS meta-data to reflect that change.
      
      BEFORE: This is the original image captured in CHS:
      Clip Text tab: C:\UTIL\Windows utilities\FindAndRunRobot\Plugins\Clipboard Help+Spell\Database\Files\2016\12\12_915x396_1431CF73.png | 915x396  (24.16kb)
      
      Screen clipping taken: 2016-12-12 19:27
      
      AFTER: This is the changed image  in CHS, after it has been edited using SC (SpecialFX2 Splice Deluxe effect):
      Clip Text tab: C:\UTIL\Windows utilities\FindAndRunRobot\Plugins\Clipboard Help+Spell\Database\Files\2016\12\12_915x396_1431CF73.png | 915x396  (24.16kb)
      
      Screen clipping taken: 2016-12-12 19:28


35
For a few years now, and on different laptops with different Windows OSes, I have noticed that, when scrolling down the rows in the Grid area, CHS is very slow - frustratingly so - to display the content of clips in the Memo area.
Having recently migrated to a higher spec laptop with an Intel i7 processor with Win10-64 Pro, 16GB of RAM and with a slightly "pruned" system overhead, this characteristic slowness of CHS has become (relatively) painfully slow - it seems slow-as-molasses by comparison with everything else that is going on. I think I have referred to this CHS sluggishness, on and off, over time, in DC Forum posts relating to CHS, or in comparisons with other Clipboard Managers - e.g., NoteFrog.

Is there a workaround or fix for this CHS characteristic?
I have so far been unable to figure out what is, or might be causing it.

My CHS Clip Database details:
  • The clip database is not especially large, having 566 rows with the majority marked as "Favorite".
  • 92 of the clips are images, with Clip Format=1), the rest are text, most of which are Clip Format=0, but a few are merged Text clips with Clip Format=NULL and displayed in the colour blue in the Grid.
  • There are some older (2010, 2012) text and merged text clips that have Clip Format=NULL, but are displayed in black text in the Grid.
  • (I'm not sure, but I thought that some of the text colour might be due to some Virtual Folder sorting in SQL or dragging and dropping into folders.)
  • Some of the image clips have the image (as usual) in the Clip Image tab, and also have text notes in addition to the text of the clip's image .PNG Path/Filename.
  • The text clips typically range in size between a few bytes to around 48KB.
  • The largest clips are the image clips, which range in size between a few bytes to 1.29MB

To keep things as trim as possible:
  • I have deleted all the clips I don't want to keep, but that seemed to have no discernible effect on making things any quicker.
  • I have used the Options | Backup Maintenance | Verify, Repair, Optimize Database, then I have closed CHS and restarted it, but that seemed to have no discernible effect on making things any quicker.
  • I regularly empty the CHS Recycle Bin, but that seems to have no discernible effect on making things any quicker.

CHS is v2.36.0 (Beta) - Configuration is as "Portable":
  • CHS is installed in: C:\UTIL\Windows utilities\FindAndRunRobot\Plugins\Clipboard Help+Spell
  • The ConfigDir.ini file is installed in that directory also, with the single line PORTABLE=TRUE enabled.
  • There is no other ConfigDir.ini file on the disk, for CHS.
  • The Database folder and Backup folder are currently in the same path as above. I have tried putting them elsewhere, and have checked for any restrictive file security properties in the path, but have been unable to find anything that could account for the slowness. There have been no read/write protection or lock errors or anything like that. Apart from the slowness mentioned, CHS seems to be working just fine, otherwise.

36
I noticed that some spam about opening an online binary options brokerage account had been removed from the DC Forum and this prompted me to share the details of some pranking and research I did recently, regarding online BOT (Binary Options Trading).
If you don't know what BOT is, it doesn't matter, because the scammers typically don't refer to it as such in their introduction to the scam, but you will find it described in the PDF document from https://investor.gov/ - Binary-Options-and-Fraud_0.pdf
If you read through that, then that's probably all you basically need to recognize and protect yourself from this type of scam.
However, for your additional amusement and further edification, I have described below one experience I have had with following up this scam.

The scam bait is usually something like a web advert about "Homeless man buys Ferrari", or similar eye-catching claims, and there's a picture of a dishevelled-looking guy with a long, unkempt beard and wearing a knitted bobble cap and there's a red Ferrari photoshopped in the background, or similar.
When Ï took the bait, I was taken to web pages variously entitled "The Aussie Method" or "The Kiwi Method" (so geographical location is noted or relevant for targetting) and where you are encouraged to find out how the homeless guy managed to do this. Following the line, you are given some brief "testimonial" videos where some very ordinary-looking but genuine-sounding and enthusiastic people say how they "couldn't believe it at first" when this guy (the name varies) told them that he would show them a free, no-cost way to make a lot of money, and if they didn't make money then he'd pay them $10,000 with no strings attached. So you can't lose - right?

Well, of course, it sounds too good to be true - which is precisely the warning signal that should alert one's feeble brain at that point to the likely impossibility of it being true and that it's therefore likely just another scam. But if you've just lobotomised yourself with an overriding sense of greed and "something-for-nothing" fantasy, then you won't get the warning and then at that point you're probably hooked, sucker.
So I followed down this fascinating rabbit burrow into a Wonderland of endless money and all of it to be mine. This entailed sitting through one of those dreary repetitive motivational sales spiels that scammers tend to use to ensure that, if you're not already lobotomised then you will be after following the spiel. It's all interesting stuff and I got excited with thoughts of "Gosh! What if this were really true/possible? My financial problems would be a thing of the past!
I imagined buying one of my older brothers a Ferrari to surprise him on his birthday. How cool would that be!?
Dragging myself back to Terra Firma, I waited for the spiel to end, then clicked through the steps to START this promised marvellous new episode of plenty in my life. I was excited. You know that feeling, deep in the sub-cockles? It's like how you might feel after listening to a presidential candidate's BS speech about how he/she is going to change everything for the better, if you'll only give them your vote, or something. Dammit! We just might be able to do this thing for the whole of Newfoundland! ... Lobotomy.

I arrived at a web page where it seemed I needed to open a secure broker account, or something, so I clicked to do this after giving the necessary details required - for "security", you understand:
  • my name - a dummy persona (name) that I reserve for potential scammers/spammers;
  • my email address - a dummy email account I reserve or use as a fire-bucket for potential scammers/spammers and potential file download viruses;
  • my telephone number - a real prepay phone number that I reserve for use as a fire-bucket for Facebook spam txting and potential scammers/spammers, and I sometimes get my Thai wife to answer it and run through a specially-prepared script.

I should say at this point that only an ignorant and exceedingly naive, gullible and trusting person would be dumb enough to actually provide these very important personal ID details for real. - Don't be that person.

I wondered when the request was going to be made for my credit card number or bank account number (Yes, I know, amazing isn't it? People actually do obligingly give these details out.)
I soon found out.
A cheery new message appeared on-screen: (words to this effect)
"Nearly all done now, we are just setting up our free software that you will be using to give you signals when to make transactions in your account. We'll tell you how to do that, don't worry.
Phew! I needn't worry. They will hold my hand and the software will do all the complex stuff for me. How nice of them to do all this for me so that I can become rich!

Then: (words to this effect)
The last thing we need is to open a secure broker account in your name. For this we will need your credit card to make a deposit (USD250), which is how you open and enable the account. Our software will not work without your having a broker account.
Bingo! The screen appeared for me to enter my credit card details.
Of course one's now lobotomised brain doesn't ask itself the question: "Eh? How is that? I thought this was supposed to be free and at no cost!?"

Unfortunately, my persona is a dishevelled-looking homeless guy with a long unkempt beard and a knitted bobble cap, but who not only doesn't have a home, but also doesn't even have a credit rating, let alone a credit card. Times are tough.

What to do?    :tellme:
Wait.

So I left the screen open in the Edge browser at that point and returned to where I had last left off  playing Fallout3 GOTY...
Spoiler
Using various hacks/cheats (via the console window) I have a really good (max karma) character called Rebecca2 and have elevated her to TGM (Total God Mode) with maxed S.P.E.C.I.A.L. points etc., over a million bottlecaps, a million bobby pins and with player.srm (ability to fix all one's damaged equipment etc. by 100% immediately). I had also hacked her the Alien Atomic Blaster and got the Chinese Stealth Armour - the latter you can't hack and can only tediously obtain one of by going through the whole ruddy Anchorage simulation quest in the simulator pod at the Outcast Brotherhood's HQ. My 6 y/o son loves playing through that one for me, but he keeps getting sidetracked by all the fun blasting of Chinese commies with the Pulse Rifle you can get under-the-counter from the Quartermaster if you speak the right words to him nicely like a boss. He also likes to amuse himself by using tcl (toggles collision mode ON/OFF) so he can sneak up on baddies by passing through intervening objects and materialise beside them before blowing them away.

My son seems to be a natural RPG player and also rather likes to play Skyrim Oblivion (which I have not played yet), and will sit for ages watching his sister play it, offering helpful suggestions from time to time (he also does that with me when I am playing Fallout 3 - he's very good and more sharp-eyed than I).
In Fallout 3 he likes to get/hack the splatter setting, so that when you shoot or strike a baddie their body parts splatter all over the place, a bit of intestine here, an eyeball there, oops- where's my brain?
He prefers the Pulse Rifle to the Atomic Blaster, because the Rifle does a really good splatter but the Blaster only leaves a pile of glowing ashes. My 15 y/o daughter worries that this may be causing him to become too violent, but I reckon that's an unproven fallacy from fusspots who don't like RPGs and that he's just a typical boy, and I'm expecting/hoping he'll grow out of the splatter phase. I also found the splatter effect amusing for a while but I prefer the Blaster (it's quieter with the G930 headset on, and lighter and more powerful than most other weapons, so agility and damage are good), though the ashes are sometimes hard to see/locate and search after you've finished a mêlée and dispatched umpteen baddies.


I digress. Two days later, the dummy phone rang, displaying an apparently local city number, but it could have been spoofed. I answered and an Indian-accented man's voice asked to speak to my dummy persona. I could hear what sounded like chickens clucking and a dog barking in the background and I wondered whether he wasn't actually in India. I cheerfully replied that I was he, and the scammer then asked me if I needed any help setting up the broker account as he'd noticed that my screen had been left open at that point and his job was to support users of the system. How helpful of him, I said, and then said that I didn't have a credit card but could direct transfer the money (USD250). He asked me how old I was. I had a cold and a touch of laryngitis and my voice was a bit croaky, so I figured I could pass for sounding like near 70, so I told him "68". I said that if I knew the account number to transfer the funds to, then I would do that. I asked him could I do that? There was a pause, and I asked him to please email me the account number to send the monies to and I'd do it straightaway. He agreed. I did not receive an email, and I would have been surprised if I had (emails leave tracks).
A couple of days later, the phone rang again, this time displaying a UK (London) number. An Indian-sounding woman's voice asked to speak to my dummy persona. I replied I was he. She also wanted to help me register my trading account. So helpful, these people. I asked her where she was - was it a helpdesk in India? She tartly replied that she was in London. I said I had been awaiting an email from the previous helpful support person with an Indian-accented voice, so I could direct credit the funds. She said she'd follow it up.

For several days after that, the phone rang roughly every day, called from a London code, and I did not answer it. No voicemail messages (no trail). Then it was every couple of days, then about 5 days after that, from an unknown international number. I got my wife to answer that one and she ran The Script:
For this, she puts on her dumbest-sounding halting Asian voice: "Herro? PAUSE... Herro? LISTEN... I solly, I not spik Engrish velly well. There no-one with that name you asking for use this phone - is just only me. I velly solly I no can help you. Maybe you have wrong numbah?" - with a rising inflection at the end. They don't usually call back after one of those.
She had me and my daughter in stitches, listening to her. It was hard to contain ourselves and not burst out laughing, but we are well-disciplined. We like prank calls.

38
After searching the DC Forum for a Win10 tweak today (2016-11-09), I reckoned that a simple collection/index of pointers to such tweaks would have been useful for me and would have saved me some time and might similarly be useful for other forum members too, so here goes: (We may need a Wiki...)
It's a bit of a tedious manual exercise, but if forum members find that it is likely to be of use, then I shall try to maintain/update the index with any pointers - if members could kindly post the links in comments to this thread.
____________________________________________________

Index: (Last updated 2018-12-21.)
General:

Administrator status:

Default Apps.:

Device Drivers:
  • Try temporarily disabling the driver signing verification to enable old (unsigned) device drivers for older devices/peripherals not supported by Win10 - Re: Windows 10 Tips.

Ergonomics/perception/readability:

GUI and Controls:

Multimedia - DVD, CD-ROM, Video/Audio:

Network:
  • Set network type to public or private by Registry hack) - Windows 10 Tips.
  • Get Windows to detect/set network type public or private - Re: Windows 10 Tips
  • Run the appropriate shortcut to set the current connection to Public or Private - see  here.

Privacy:

Settings:

Start Menu and Shell:

System + RAM:

Virtual Machine:
  • Fix for Windows 10 Pro constraint (blocks VirtualBox's ability to run 64-bit VMs) - Re: Windows 10 Tips

Windows Update Control:

________________________________________________
This summary collection has been drawn from DC Forum and other sources, as a quick central reference point.
Relevance: Though the context is Windows 10, some/most of these points could probably variously relate to Win8/8.1, and Win7, and some also to earlier versions of Windows.

39
If this does as it says, then it could be well worth a look:    :Thmbsup:   :Thmbsup:   :Thmbsup:   :Thmbsup:   :Thmbsup:
Windows Update MiniTool: Alternative To Windows Update In Windows 10
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Windows Update MiniTool: Alternative To Windows Update In Windows 10
admin Published on Sep 26th, 2016

In Windows 10, Microsoft has removed the classic Windows Update section from Control Panel, making it a lot more difficult for users to control Windows Update.

The Windows Update section in Settings app offers little to no control over how updates are download and installed, particularly in Home edition of Windows 10.

While this will indirectly force Windows 10 users to automatically upgrade to the latest Windows 10 build and keep their system up-to-date, most users prefer to have control on Windows Update.

There are have been ways out there to completely disable Windows Update and pause Windows Update download but there is no concrete solution out there for Windows 10 Home users.

Windows update minitool for Windows 10    :Thmbsup:
Windows Update MiniTool is an alternative to Windows Update in Windows 10 Home and Pro editions. The Windows Update MiniTool helps you check for updates and install updates only that you want.

Additionally, you can view all installed updates, hidden updates and there is an option to view full update history as well.

Windows Update MiniTool features
As you can see in pictures, you can control how updates are downloaded and installed. You can choose either automatic, disable updates, notification mode (alerts when updates are available), download only (downloads but doesn’t install), scheduled and managed by administrator option to control how updates are downloaded and installed on your PC.

Windows update minitool for Windows 10 pic2

Besides that, like Windows Update in Settings app, it also allows you stop automatic update of device drivers in Windows 10. There is an offline mode, which you can use to install updates on a PC not connected to the internet.

Windows update minitool for Windows 10 pic1

Do you want to download Windows Update to install on another PC? You can do so using Windows Update MiniTool as it gives direct links to .cab, .exe and .psf update files. Select an update, click Copy link to clipboard button and then paste the URL in the address bar of a web browser to download the update.

For those who might be wondering, Windows Update MiniTool downloads updates right from Microsoft servers and saves them in C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\ Download directory.

Overall, Windows Update MiniTool provides all Windows Update controls in an easy-to-understand interface. The program is standalone, meaning no installation is required.    :Thmbsup:

Finally, if you like Windows Update MiniTool, there is another utility called Windows Update Integrator which makes it possible to catch Windows Update notification popup, meaning when you click on Windows Update desktop notification it opens up Windows Update MiniTool instead of Windows Update section of Settings app.    :Thmbsup:

A word of caution. Windows Update MiniTool requires Windows Update service to download updates from Microsoft. So if you have disabled Windows Update, please enable it.

Download Windows Update MiniTool

One suspects that Microsoft might feel obliged to try and kill this new thing.    ;)

40
Related discussion: What's your experience with 3rd party color inkjet ink replacement?

There are lots of reports about this, for example the excellent one from techdirt:
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
HP Launched Delayed DRM Time Bomb To Disable Competing Printer Cartridges
from the innovation! dept

For decades now, consumers have been lured into a sour deal: pay for a relatively inexpensive printer, then spend a lifetime paying an arm and a leg for viciously overpriced printer cartridges. As most have learned first-hand, any attempt to disrupt this obnoxious paradigm via third-party printer cartridges has been met with a swift DRM roundhouse kick to the solar plexus. In fact if there's an area where the printer industry actually innovates, it's most frequently in finding new, creative and obnoxious methods of preventing cartridge competition.

Hoping to bring this parade of awfulness to its customers at scale, HP this week unearthed the atomic bomb of printer cartridge shenanigans. HP Printer owners collectively discovered on September 13 that their printers would no longer even accept budget cartridges. Why? A firmware update pushed by the company effectively prevented HP printers from even detecting alternative cartridges, resulting in HP printer owners getting messages about a "cartridge problem," or errors stating "one or more cartridges are missing or damaged," or that the user was using an "older generation cartridge."

As Cory Doctorow over at Boing Boing notes, this behavior is simply par for the course, with Lexmark engaging in similar behavior back in 2003. By embedding an "I am empty" bit in their cartridges, they were similarly able to ensure that users couldn't use third-party cartridges or they'd be told the cartridge lacked ink. Lexmark leaned heavily on Section 1201 of the DMCA to support its behavior, a tactic HP is likely to mirror but evolve:
"Lexmark invoked Section 1201 of the DMCA, which makes it a criminal and civil offense to bypass an "effective means of access control" for a copyrighted work. The DC Circuit court asked Lexmark which copyrighted work was being protected by its access control, and it argued that the checking routine itself was copyrighted, as well as the "Empty" bit. The court found that the DMCA could only be invoked where there was a copyrighted work apart from the access control, and that a single bit didn't qualify as a copyrightable work. Lexmark lost."
In this case, HP's DRM time bomb firmware update was apparently deployed back in March, but HP didn't activate the "improvement" until this month. And as is usually the case in this space, HP isn't saying much outside of a misleading quote proclaiming the company was simply protecting its "innovations" and intellectual property:
"HP said such updates were rolled out "periodically" but did not comment on the timing of the last instalment.

"The purpose of this update is to protect HP's innovations and intellectual property," it said in a statement."
But rejoice! HP claims that users can still refill cartridges, as long as those cartridges contain an HP-approved security chip:
"These printers will continue to work with refilled or remanufactured cartridges with an original HP security chip. Other cartridges may not function."
Well, at least until HP figures out a way to DRM the printer fluid itself, which surely can't be too far along on the horizon.

The above report was amusingly referred to in Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt:
(Copied below sans embedded hyperlinks/images.)
Next, we've got a small but important anonymous observation about HP disabling third-party ink cartridges with a firmware update:
There is a serious and long-term unintended consequence that MS, HP, et al are not considering here: they are teaching users that *installing security updates is bad.*

Which was coincidentally almost exactly my thought when I first read of this disgraceful example of what rather seems to be - whichever way one looks at it - underhand, sneaky, unprofessional, greedy and user-hostile sharp practice. Hewlett and Packard would be spinning in their graves.

I stopped buying (as in "Will never buy again") HP inkjet printers after they made my last superb HP A3 printer obsolete by deliberately NOT updating the drivers to work in Windows 7.
Similarly, I stopped buying HP scanners after they made my last superb HP scanner obsolete by deliberately NOT updating the drivers to work in Windows 7.
I was a loyal HP customer up to that point. No more. The very idea of buying HP peripherals gives my mouth a bad taste.
I subsequently bought a superb and more portable EPSON A4/letter scanner for smaller documents/photos/negatives, and a very good Brother A3 multi-function (scanner-printer-fax) device to cover all bases.
The only problem I have had is with the printer. I do very little printing and the somewhat underused printhead keeps clogging up (which my HP printer also suffered from, and for the same reason).

Whoever dredged up this latest anachronistic and failed approach to "customer retention" for HP and reworked it, and whoever approved it, will probably be quietly taken out and shot for all the good it has probably NOT done for the company.
It is on a par with, and just as moronic as, that brilliant idea that the Volkwagen engineers apparently had for cheating on the diesel fuel emissions tests: "OK, if we can't do it through honest endeavours, let's just cheat! That way, we make more money and no-one will ever find out!"
Yeah, right.

I find the absolute lack of imagination that was probably required to resurrect this sort of moronic idea and to actually employ it and engage in such shoddy/sharp practice, to be mind-boggling in the extreme.
Well, it certainly sends out a big message to HP's current and potential future buyers/customers. It will be interesting to see what damage control is put in place by HP. Either way, there will likely be repercussions.

41
General Software Discussion / HashTab Shell Extension
« on: September 06, 2016, 08:54 PM »
I couldn't find this version:
Just thought I'd revive this thread to say that I've been using HashTab (v5.1.23) for a while now and am finding it very useful in my file management tasks - e.g., when I am wanting to determine whether two files of the same or different names are in fact the same (duplicated) file.
However, I might dispense with using it on those occasions when the xplorer² Checksum column is likely to be more useful (see below).

Also:
  • HashCheck Shell Extension: Thanks to @PhilB66's mention of it in this thread (above), I am about to trial this.
  • WinMD5sum: I have been using this on occasion.
  • xplorer² Checksum column:: is a column you can invoke in xplorer² to give you a checksum of files in (say) a directory listing. The manual warns that invoking the Checksum column could be a resource hog:
    x² extracts certain information from each file and displays it in different columns of the folder pane (e.g. checksum).
    However, this additional consumes CPU resources and slows down other operations.
    To make the operation more efficient, x² has a provision that it will display the information only if the file-size is below a [settable] threshold value.
    (A very handy feature.)

Current notes are in the (sharpened) image below, and the text is copied in the spoiler below that.

07_602x2396_5A8B8F9F.png

Spoiler
      Notes on HashTab Shell Extension (prepared using MS OneNote).
      (Notes posted to DC Forum as this is such a useful Shell Extension.)
      I wanted to install this very handy shell extension - which I have been using for ages - on an HP Pavilion-15 laptop (Win10-64 PRO), having last used it on the Toshiba-L855D under Win10-64 PRO. However, I could not find the setup proggie in my online Archive.
      I couldn't recall where/when I I originally got this proggie, not could I find any notes in my OneNote Notebooks about this either, so I determined to make some notes (these) this time around.
      I knew the setup proggie would be on my backup, but I thought it would probably be simpler/quicker to download it afresh from the Internet.
      I was wrong.
              • A duckgo search turned up a review (which I took a copy of) from 2010 on freewaregenius.com, which gave the source website  as http://beeblebrox.org/
              • However, that source had gone 404 and the domain was up for sale.
              • I found the 2010 version 3.0 on Wayback: https://web.archive....tp://beeblebrox.org/
              -  (which I also took a copy of) and downloaded the setup file from there:
      https://web.archive..../HashTab%20Setup.exe
      
      Then I took a cursory look over the years after 2010, and didn't find anything useful on Wayback.
      One of the files (.dll) in the installer was dated 2009, so I figured the dl file was the latest version. I saved the setup file into my Archive and these notes, just in case.
      File: HashTab v3.0 Setup (2010-06-20).exe
      (The above links to the file in the Archive, and the file is also inserted
      to the right of this note.)
      
      
      When I ran the setup/installer it proved to be a quick, no-fuss affair.
      The opening panel:
      
      
      The opening panel led to an incredibly verbose licence agreement:
      
      
      Then it wanted to install to C:\Program Files\HashTab Shell Extension
      So I changed that to C:\UTIL\Explorer software\HashTab Shell Extension
       - whereupon it installed 2 files ( a .dll and an .exe) and set itself into the Explorer Shell.
      
       The download page gave MD5 hashes - this one for Windows setup:
                HashTab Setup.exe:   5845F52D425C75E232B1AD5EE3B189A8 (windows)
      So copied that hashkey, right-clicked the setup file, selected Properties-->File Hashes
      and pasted the hashkey into the empty box Hash Comparison
      The big fat green tick signified that HashTab had verified its own setup file's MD5 hashkey.
      (Note the version and date towards the bottom of the box below.)
      
      Screen clipping taken: 2016-09-07 12:20
   


42
I'm not sure how to go about managing this, or even whether it's feasible.
Is there some way of using CHS to suck in several CHS databases one by one, or their backups, or has it got to be done via .CSV file export/import (which would seem a bit constipated)?
One of the things I liked about NoteFrog was its use of separate stacks, and stacks could  be shared around and split up or consolidated according to one's needs.
I see some potential issues, including, for example:
What happens to image clips? Can they be migrated with the database, or do they get left behind?
Once consolidated, how does one filter out any likely duplicate clips? What about the text parts of the image clips?
How can you attach or (say) re-attach an orphaned text clip to an image clip, so that it has those two tabs?

I expect there's more, but that seems good enough for starters. Any ideas/advice?

43
I decided it might help to start this discussion thread for those who - like me - may have been having difficulty reading some of the windows displayed by the Windows OS and by some of the programs/apps, on their their laptop screens.
I realised from reading CHS* and SC**-related discussions that some people had apparently been having similar problems to myself, and that suggesting a discovered workaround or fix could be generally helpful/useful.
*   CHS = Clipboard Help and Spell.
** SC = Screenshot Captor
Causes of the problems:
  • For me, these problems seemed to surface post-Windows 7, coinciding with the OS and the hardware technologies having undergone changes that led to the high-definition laptop displays performing differently and needing to "homogenize" to some extent to cater for tablet displays and PC/laptop/LCD displays. For example, there are even switches in Win10 (Anniversary update edition) settings that distinguish between and/or enable Tablet versus Desktop modes.
  • The colour palette used by the system seems to consist solely of bright "dusty" pastel shades rather than hard bright solid/dense colours - even the colour "black" is affected, for example appearing as dark grey in text. This causes perceptual difficulty and a reduced level of certain and clear distinction/discrimination at the borders between different-coloured objects. The advent of Metro-styles tiles in Win 8 seems to have aggravated this problem. This problem may affect people in different ways - for example, it can be bothersome in the extreme to people who - like me - may have imperfect vision (e.g., require spectacles to read books or their laptop screens.)

So, let's see how it goes...all suggestions/tips welcomed.

44
(The text from the image below has been copied into the spoiler below the image.)

15_523x515_6D3FCE79.png

Spoiler
Notes on compression ratio difference between ZIP and 7-ZIP.
I tend to use the standard Windows ZIP (using the built-in Windows compression tool) to compress old documents into an archive state, but where I still need to have those documents indexed/searchable.  I use an iFilter to enable WDS (Windows Desktop Search) to search within .ZIP files.
Otherwise I tend to use 7-ZIP, which generally has much better file compression.
The HP Support utilities program for the new (refurbished) HP Pavilion I am currently setting up uses several directories of information.  One is a folder holding the User Guides (C:\Program Files\HP\Documentation\platform_guides\ug).
The guides are all PDF documents.
There were 38 PDF files (one file for each of the 38 different languages catered for), each typically of about 2.2MB in size (with some occasional variation).
Wherever possible, I try to avoid littering a PC's hard drive with document files that are not required, because:
a.  They take up client device space on a finite volume - space that could probably be better left empty for something more useful.
b.  They can add to backup process CPU resources and duration and backup storage requirements.
c.  They take up client CPU time - as I have WDS set to index document files (including PDF files).

I initially considered deleting them, but then decided against it.  I reckoned that, if they were all in a single compressed file, then they would not take up too much space and would require less resources as a single file on backup (multiple file handling also takes more time).  So I decided to compress them into a single file.

I only needed the English version - which was a 2.1MB file named 824463-001.pdf (the suffix -001 is apparently the language ID code used by HP for discriminating between languages (I am not familiar with whatever codification method they use for this ID). So, I selected the 37 "unwanted" (non-English) PDF files in the directory, and xplorer² showed me that they were 85.3MB in total volume.

Using Send To, I intended to send them to a 7-ZIP (7z) compressed file - i.e., rather than ZIP, as I didn't need WDS to search/index the documents) - but I was       `a little preoccupied with my 6y/o son.  who wanted me to help him with something and, by mistake, I sent them as a selected group to a ZIP archive.
That resulted in a compressed ZIP file of 61.1MB.
The compression saving was ((85.3-61.1)/85.3)*100=28.3705% I then realised my mistake and at the same time I observed that that compression didn't look like a very significant compression ratio (85.3:61.1).
Curious to see the comparison, I then sent the same files to a 7-ZIP (7z) compressed file.
That resulted in a compressed 7z file of 26.4MB.  The compression saving was ((85.3-26.4)/85.3)*100=69.0504% So, 7-ZIP's compression was 69.1-28.4=40.7% greater for the same set of documents.

This was a timely reminder to me of how significantly more efficient a compression algorithm 7-ZIP had than that of the standard ZIP.
Obviously compression rates could vary depending on the types of file being compressed, but I had forgotten that the differential between ZIP and 7-ZIP could       be that significant!


45
Thought I should report this. Been meaning to for a while.

07_416x198_69B134B5.png

46
I wondered whether any DCF denizens could help to unravel a problem with this unifying process.
Using Win10 the other day, I experimentally took 3 meeces (Logitech M185, M215, M515).
They all worked fine, separately, using their 3 separate, individual/unique dongles. They used the USB device "Logitech HID-compliant cordless mouse".
As M515 was a Unifying dongle, I downloaded the Unifying software from Logitech support.
Then I installed it and, using the unifying software, paired the 3 meece to the M515 dongle. It worked a treat. Very impressive. The UI can display a report of the battery status (if the software can fetch the battery status) and the firmware version of each mouse paired.
Then I unpaired them all. That seemed to work fine too, according to the UI report.
However, when I then tried to use M185 with its own dongle, it simply would not work. Same for M215 and M515.
So I re-installed the unifying software. Made no difference.
I then re-pared the meece (using the Unifying software) to the M515 dongle. It worked a treat, as before.
So, the unification seems to aggregate mice or other devices when it pairs, without discrimination, and it seems that the firmware within each mouse is changed on pairing, so THAT mouse can ONLY work through the unifying dongle, and henceforth THAT mouse cannot work through its original dongle as a "Logitech HID-compliant cordless mouse".

So, it seems that I may have just disabled 3 mice (or 2 at least), in testing out the Logitech pairing functionality.

What I would like to know is, if the mouse firmware has indeed been changed (as would seem to be the case, by deduction), then how can one revert/restore that firmware to its default initial state? Leaving the batteries out of the mouse for a while doesn't seem to do it.
I haven't been able to find any info on this so far, which is why I posted this curiosity here.

47
CHS seem to unfailingly capture the URL of a clip made in Firefox, but not at all in Slimjet (Chrome).
Is there a setting that controls this?

48
In the CHS settings, I had set ScreenshotCaptor as the External image editor (optional) for image clips, by putting C:\UTIL\Windows utilities\FindAndRunRobot\Plugins\ScreenshotCaptor\ScreenshotCaptor.exe into the field provided.
This had been working perfectly for several weeks/months - until today.

Today I wanted to edit an image clip in CHS, and when I selected the Launch image editor to edit clip, up popped a completely foreign image editor, and it was not immediately apparent what this editor was. On investigation it turned out that it was a new (to me) Win10 app - Windows Paint(!?)    >:(
I literally said to myself "How on earth did that get there?".    ;)

On checking the CHS settings, the field for the External image editor (optional) was now blank, so a Win10 update, or something, had presumably removed/hijacked this setting and forced the invisible default to the Windows Paint app.
So I reset it with C:\UTIL\Windows utilities\FindAndRunRobot\Plugins\ScreenshotCaptor\ScreenshotCaptor.exe and it now works fine, but presumably a Win10 update, or something, will hijack the settings again.

Question: How does one make this setting "sticky" and block a similar hijack from recurring?

To avoid this recurring, is it going to be necessary to (say) restore permanent CHS settings from a settings backup file first, each time CHS is started up?

49
Living Room / What Killed the Middle Class?
« on: March 28, 2016, 12:43 AM »
Gary North's newsletter (refer https://www.garynorth.com) had a link to this post on the Of Two Minds blog: What Killed the Middle Class?

I think that blog is usually focused on US affairs, which I am kinda ignorant of, and I didn't know that the middle class had been or were being killed off, but after reading the article posted I consider myself better-educated.
I had wondered why IT salaries had tended to tank since the '80s in the Western economies, and there, amongst the charts was a probable explanation of what had happened:
  • from 1947 to 1979, the earned income for labour had tended to be linked to and closely trailed the growth in productivity, but from 1980 onwards, the link seems to have been dramatically broken.

Not only that, but also earned income measured as a percentage share of GDP (a standard economic measure) seems to have been on a steadily declining trend since at least the 1960s (approx. 50%) becoming approx. 43% today, with earned income hitting a short-term peak (approx. 47%) around 2000 - during the Internet boom.

I hadn't realised or known any of this, having been busy doing other things.

The indication seems to be that as productivity and GDP continue to grow, the demand for labour continues to reduce, hence it's price is falling, thus it seems that labour is becoming progressively redundant (surplus to requirements or no longer needed).
There is too much labour available, competing for work where there is a diminishing demand for labour. International corporations will seek arbitrage over labour-rates to access the lowest per capita labour costs of the labour pool - these typically can be had by means of outsourcing production to countries offering traditionally good production facilities with the most attractively low labour rates (e.g., outsourcing, offshoring).
So it's presumably only going to get worse. It's like a race to the bottom for labour rates.

This is ironic, because, to be able to consume goods and services, people must have the wherewithal (personal disposable income) to pay for them - they need to have the propensity to consume. However, with declining real incomes (QED), fewer potential consumers will be able to afford such consumption.

So who is receiving the income/profit from the sale of the GDP? Well, it seems it must be corporations, and their shareholders and corporate executives - typically high net-worth members of society. That is, people not tied to earned income from their own direct production.
But are there enough of the 1% to consume all that is produced? No, and they probably don't need/want most of it. So what is likely to be happening is that increasingly corporations will focus on the production of luxury goods and services aimed at the growing market targeting the demands of those high net worth individuals - stuff that they want. Boats, planes, cars, houses, toys, etc.

There was an interesting post at Brookings Institution: Make elites compete: Why the 1% earn so much and what to do about it | Brookings Institution
That post points out that the top 1 percent of U.S. residents now earn 21 percent of total national income, up from 10 percent in 1979.
The article discusses the myths that have grown up around wealth and education, and that the key thing about the top 1% is that they don't so much earn their income as get themselves into cartels, closed syndicates, trade associations in restraint of trade, etc. - so that they don't have to compete for getting a large proportion of high-value unearned income.

Interestingly, the author advocates fixing this by opening up the 1% to more free-market enterprise and competition of the classic capitalist religio-political ideology - and he may be right, I don't know. However, I presume that it would have to be done by legislative force, as they could be expected to strenuously resist such a change - and their number may even include those (lawmakers) who would be required to legislate that change.
However, as someone who knows that economic history shows that that ideology has categorically largely been responsible for enabling millions to drag themselves out of poverty, I can't help but think that the current situation is out of control and is reversing the situation, effectively having slowly driven those masses back towards poverty (QED) at the growing enrichment of the 1%, since the '60s. This possibility had never occurred to me before.

If the system is broken now (and that would arguably seem to be the case), then we have been presumably unable to stop this rot since at least the '60s, thus, advocating more of the selfsame capitalist religio-political ideology as a solution doesn't really seem entirely rational to me - I mean, it surely seems to be a non sequitur ("it does not follow") at least.

Now I have no idea what the solution might be - assuming that there is one - and I'm not posting this as a polemic for any given economic religio-political ideology, but merely as something probably worth thinking about and discussing.
I for one don't have any desire to see humanity driven backwards economically into the Middle Ages where serfdom was the norm and the unelected 1%, or something, ruled over people as despotic barons doing the State/King's bidding - much as they seem to have done as economic historians have described in, for example, the Philippines today.

50
Interesting behaviour in CHS:
Attempting to locate in the Grid the exact clip that was being displayed in the Memo panel - CHS does not always display that clip highlighted in the visible Grid pane, so you have to scroll around for it - I copied a partial string from the Title field of the clip in the Memo panel.
The string was "Corporation - psychopathy".

I then pasted that string into the Find/Search box (where the mouseover info says "filter clips using these strings"), and the clip disappeared from the Memo pane, and the Grid was empty. That is, Search could find no clip record in the database that had that string - which was clearly not the case as the string was copied from an existing clip.

However, I had previously thought that CHS Search would unfailingly and almost instantaneously find what you asked it to search for, so I presumed that the string had something in it that was causing Search to be "blind".
Thinking that maybe it was the dash/minus character in the string ("-") that could be causing the problem, I experimented with the string. The results (hits) from CHS were interesting, though somewhat confusing:
  • "Corporation - psychopathy" - CHS fails to find it (no hits), even though that is the exact string as copied from the Memo pane.
  • "Corporation psychopathy" - (with just 1 space or n spaces between the two words) CHS hits show that it consistently finds the clip(s) with those words in.
  • "Corporation -psychopathy" - CHS had several hits, which seemed to be only those clips with "corporation" in it, but I'm not sure about the consistency. I suspect that there may well be more to it, as I didn't go through all the hits.
  • "-psychopathy" - CHS had lots of hits, but I couldn't figure out what was a consistent reason (there will be one) for selecting those hits. However, it didn't seem to be the word "psychopathy" anyway.
  • "Corporation- psychopathy" - CHS had no hits.

What this would seem to indicate is that, whilst we might take it as a given (or I had, anyway) that CHS will consistently find clips in its database, and thus we might rely on CHS to do just that, the reality could be somewhat different.
I am now unsure of the rules governing this CHS search function.

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16next