topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday April 26, 2024, 9:29 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - riposa [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1]
1
General Software Discussion / Re: Argus v0.1 First Beta release
« on: March 06, 2007, 09:58 AM »
Where did my other reply end up? Oh well, vaporized I guess, dumb me, but again...

Hello John,

Thanks so much for taking the time to make or add functions for seaching to your utilities!! I will download and give a try. Can't do it today because I must travel but I will save the files to install when I get back. I will try to leave feedback after some testing!

thanks again!

Best,
Bruce

2
Send me an email, when its in beta. If you want, of depending on what your intentions are. I don't know who you would like to share your software with, privately or publicly, for a price, shareware, or freeware I doubt, since of course it might fetch a fair price!

thanks,
Bruce

[email protected]

3
You might also consider the fact to program your editor or utility to treat accent letters like ù, é, ê, Â as regular letters. That way when names contain these accents, they won't be overlooked in the search results. Its because sometimes the names or words are spelled both with and without these accents, depending on who is writing the names. So to include these accents will also bring back results that include the same names spelled sometimes with and sometimes without these accents. Just an idea for you to consider.

Good luck with your software!

thanks,
Bruce

4
I downloaded InfoRapid, so I have two now to try out, but as for regex, I really think for the common users, the function in an editor needs to be as simple as the easy button on the staples commerical!, check marking the box for the function called (exact match), but this box would say (clostest match) or (nearest match)! Or perhaps (exact match and near match together) That takes all the tedium out, which also leaves common users completely in the dark. I have to edit thousands of pages of results from 30 years of bicycle racing with some riders names being mispelled over the years many times. If I miss a name that is mispelled, then I might miss the results for that race, not acceptable. So instead of Luperini, the saftest might be just (Lup) which will bring back probably much more then what I want in the search results. These archives are on my hard drive, so its extremely and fast to search, if I have the right utility.

Some riders names like Pucinskaite, I have heard pronounced like this, Pushing-Sky-Ah and some pronounce it as Pushing-Scooty. So when Euro journalists and writers, editors write names, they guess sometimes and write them as to how they sound either to them, or what they think it would sound like in the native language if they do not have the correct spelling in hand. So for instance, the Bela Russian champion Zinaida Stahurskaia, who was recently busted for selling steriods has always had her name spelled two different ways, and no one seems to know really how its spelled, as its always Stahurskaia or Stahurskaya on the Interent. This name is literally spelled hunreds of times both ways on Google, so its impossible to know, and no one seems to know.

Now the professional rider Jeannie Longo would be a good example. Of course I could just use her last name, Longo. But for the sake of shining some light on this, if I use the first name, sometimes its spelled Jeannie, Jeanie, Jeanne, and so on.

Add to that, many Euro names use there own accents marks on certain letters which wrecks havoc on search function like these French characters. Like Magali Le Floc'h, migh just be spelled Magali Le Floch, or LeFloch and some letters like ù, é, ê, Â, are used in French names, and other accents are used in other languages, but often when editors write the names in English, they just use regular letters, but sometimes they don't, and what you are left with is sometimes not only mispelled, but they contain these little devils which really throw a wrench in the works, so what is needed is for the editor to bring back close matches that include these little devils, as well as without. Otherwise I will miss their names! It should not ignore the accents in close matches!

Some of these names are mispelled many ways, but usually close, because the names are complex like Polikeviciute, Zabelinskaya, Polkhanova, Vzesniauskaite, now add some accent marks, with mispelling and you have alphabet soup!

Now the final wrench in the works! When I scan with OCR Omnipage Pro, it does a good job, but also mispells names, which adds to the fog of war here. So if an editor can be cleaver enough to bring back close matches, or even gross matches as a last result but still would be better then the nonsense I am going through now!

So you can see the need for an easy button like Staples! The easy button is besides, the box for exact match, a box that says close match! (mispellings, accents and all!)

thanks,
Bruce

5
With Textpad, using (find in files) does indeed built a list of all the instances of a (specific word) searched for in not only one file, but any number of files, including subdirectories if you wish, allowing for Sky's the limit, which is great. Also the results list what files and what lines the instance occurs. Extremely effective and efficient, but the problem of course with Textpad, is it cannot bring back close matches. There is no option for that. I am only mildly familiar with boonlee, regex, and such, for instance, Webseeker by Blue Squirrel goes out on the search engines and bring back results of close matches for its search queries. This is exactly what needs to be an option in Textpad, but perhaps soundex or something along those lines might work. Otherwise, I was also aware of GREP in perl, which can be used to built a perl utility to do just such a task, and perhaps such a utility exists already, I don't know without searching the web au nausium in hundreds of utility libraries to find just such a jewel.

Bruce

6
Someone posted this elsewhere. It is an editor that claims to do something along these lines. I downloaded it, but yet to try it.

Bruce

--------------------------------

A text editor that supports soundex (an English-oriented phonetic matching algorithm) searches. 

Power Edit ($30): http://www.galcott.com/pe.htm


7
Best Text Editor / Re: Pre-review discussion of "BEST TEXT EDITOR"
« on: February 13, 2007, 10:52 PM »
Thanks,

I downloaded a trial version. Wait and see how it goes!

Bruce

8
General Software Discussion / Brillant Text Editor (search functions)
« on: February 13, 2007, 10:36 PM »
Hello,

I posted this elsewhere, but the manager told me to post it here, as he also thought it was a good question, and he was also interested in replies. Here is the question...

What editor will search for a name in a file where the name is misspelled, and the editor will give the results of both when the name is spelled correctly, and  also list results of where the name is also not spelled correctly but the software editor is smart enough to make a good guess of the name you wanted along with all the instances where it was misspelled. This would be of great value to me, since I deal with lots of misspelled names, and now with Textpad, all I can do is search twice separately using both the first and last name or only using the first few letters, or clumps of letters in the name that stand out, so it becomes very time consuming and tedious. For instance below, the same name might be misspelled 3 times, 3 different ways. Also some names, like Bella Russian are spelled by sound, like Stahurskaia or Stahurskaya, thus, depending on the original editor, spells names by guessing when such names are not available according to or depending on the word is transliterated from Cyrillic characters.

Is that a brilliant editor out there for this?

For instance, if I search for Luperini, it will bring back, Luporini, Luperin, Loperoni, and so on, it guesses and brings back everything close, or even customize the search more.
When I seach race results to cycling in a given year, there might be 600 times a certain name is listed, but from past years, names are often misspelled, so therefore, I miss all those instances with Textpad. What I need if for the editor to bring back everything that is a reasonable match, close proximity.

thanks,
Bruce

9
Best Text Editor / Re: Pre-review discussion of "BEST TEXT EDITOR"
« on: February 13, 2007, 02:25 PM »
What editor will seach for a name in files where the name is mispelled, and the editor will give the results of both the name spelled correctly, and also list results of where the name is also not spelled correctly but the software editor is smart enough to make a good guess that the name you wanted along without all the instances where it was mispelled. This would be of great value to me, since I deal with lots of mispelled names, and now with Textpad, all I can do is seach twice using both the first and last name or only using the first few letters, or clumps of letters in the name that stand out, so it becomes very time consuming and tedious.

Is that a briallant editor out there for this?

For instance, if search for Luperini, It will bring back, Luporini, Luperin, Loperoni, and so on, it guesses and brings back everything close, or even customize the search more.

thanks,
Bruce

Pages: [1]