Messages

3126

Living Room / Beware of YouTubeDownloader 3!

« on: July 18, 2011, 10:12 PM »

I have been using YouTubeDownloader to get local copies of YouTube videos. I have been using v 2.7.2. Last night I checked, downloaded v 3.2 and installed it. It didn't use Orbit Downloader to download the test video and downloaded slowly, I put it down to a congested Internet connection. I tried again this morning, still slow. I checked the BienneSoft website, saw the Pro version there, read about it and found out that it does have download acceleration(but only 4x, I believe my Orbit uses 8 threads). It has a multi-download function, the license is $19.95 and doesn't expire. Do they really need to remove download acceleration to get  people to buy the Pro version? After complaining and using the uninstall, I wasn't able to reinstall the 2.7.2 version. I got a message saying "You can't install an older version."  I didn't take that lying down. I set a restore point before installing v3.2, so I used it and after Windows was finished re-booting, I was able to re-install v 2.7.2. I then found a v3.0 download and after sandboxing Windows Explorer using Sandboxie I tried installing v 3.0. I got the same message, so I dumped the sandbox. V 2.7.2 still worked fine and used Orbit. This is my warning:
Don't update to YouTubeDownloader v3.* unless you want to pay for the Pro vesion.

3127

Living Room / Update for Windows XP (KB2541763)

« on: June 29, 2011, 10:30 AM »

This morning my computer was frozen while rebooting after the latest Windows Update. I had to manually shut down and reboot it. Has anyone else had a problem with this update? The descripion of the update is: A update that enables Internet Explorer in Windows XP, in Windows Vista, or in Windows Server 2008 to parse fragmented TLS/SSL handshake messages is available.

3128

Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window

« on: June 14, 2011, 01:51 PM »

Ughhh, my mom works out in Lichfield Park (about 15 miles west of here, not far at all!) and both Qwest and Cox refuse to run lines from the north side of the road (newly populated over the last couple of years with housing) to the south side (ranch she works at) so she went from AOL (ughhhh ) to HughesNet, against my IMMENSE amount of criticism of them, their crappy service, and insane pricing scheme (instead of my recommendation of a 3G dongle with a cell service provider). She complains all the time.

</topic de-railing>

-wreckedcarzz (June 14, 2011, 01:07 PM)

Steven complains about HughesNet also. He said he can send email only sporadically and is always getting disconnected.

3129

Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window

« on: June 14, 2011, 01:14 PM »

This is the result of my trial of Adobe Photoshop. It's a view of the road up to here(or very long driveway) and the valley below. It's not as big as the original 17 megabyte panaorama because I only have 1 gigabyte of RAM(300 megabytes free). Photoshop said I didn't have enough RAM for a Content-aware fill of the edges of the original panorama. That panorama looked much worse than I remembered it in Photoshop. This cut-down version of the original will have to do.

3130

Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window

« on: June 14, 2011, 01:02 PM »

I'm on the Members map. I think that would tell you more than anything I could say.

-Arizona Hot (June 14, 2011, 12:47 PM)

Jeez, you're way out there O_O


I'm glad that there is a internet provider which enables me to have a broadband connection here. Otherwise, I would have to use HughesNet like my brother Steven.

-wreckedcarzz (June 14, 2011, 12:48 PM)

3131

Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window

« on: June 14, 2011, 12:59 PM »

That's right. The clock says 11:36 PM! I guess that's why they call it the Land of the Midnight Sun

-Deozaan (June 14, 2011, 03:02 AM)

Yes, and in the winter it's the Land of the Noon Stars.

3132

Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window

« on: June 14, 2011, 12:47 PM »

I'm on the Members map. I think that would tell you more than anything I could say.

3133

Living Room / It's A Small World lyric translations

« on: June 06, 2011, 01:06 AM »

"It's A Small World" is a Disney boat ride where you listen to animatronic children dolls singing the title song in various languages. There are translations of the lyrics at two sites:  It's A Small World After All lyrics and International Lyrics Playground. Since we have members who speak these languages natively, I thought they might enjoy looking at the translations and let us know what they think of them. Wikipedia has an article here on the subject. Here are Asian girls singing the song.

3134

Living Room / Anybody seen many pictures with sound?

« on: May 30, 2011, 01:27 AM »

I have a HP 525 camera which can take still pictures with an embedded sound recording. Nice idea, but aside from HP Photosmart software and the SoundPix Plug-in, there doesn't seem to be much of anything which does something with it or can use it. Also, the SoundPix plugin only works with Internet Explorer(is there something like this for other browsers?). I know other manufacturer's cameras offer this also(it uses EXIF 2.2). Has anyone seen much that uses this or is this something like animated gifs, unused mostly in favor of something more elaborate?

3135

Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window

« on: May 25, 2011, 05:29 PM »

I don't think you want to see my view. This IS Arizona!

If you think this panorama is BIG, you should see the picture from which it was reduced to fit in the size limit here. That picture is 17 megabytes in size(17068 x 3883).
 (see attachment in previous post)

-Arizona Hot (May 23, 2011, 06:17 PM)

Is there any way you can get rid of that huge black border around it? That makes it take up a lot more space than is necessary.

-Deozaan (May 23, 2011, 07:28 PM)

Maybe, but I would have to use a different editing program to do that. It was easier than I thought and I was able to use the original program. Still a very big picture.

3136

Living Room / Re: Show us the View Outside Your Window

« on: May 23, 2011, 06:17 PM »

I don't think you want to see my view. This IS Arizona!

If you think this panorama is BIG, you should see the picture from which it was reduced to fit in the size limit here. That picture is 17 megabytes in size(17068 x 3883).

3137

Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Micro-mini Review of Lipsum text generator

« on: May 04, 2011, 06:56 PM »

I got into this recently when trying to get the LibreOffice extension to work(I couldn't). I found the original Latin text of  "De finibus bonorum et malorum " by Cicero" (all 5 sections). I prefer the Latin text to lipsum's gibberish. I found a few other things also. I know there is a Wikipedia article, but it is longer and this is a Quick Reply.

3138

Living Room / Re: DC T-Shirts idea.

« on: January 23, 2011, 11:19 PM »

2housetier
Hm, it looks like semacode is not very popular. There are many applications (online / desktop / mobile) which can read QR but I can't find anything valuable for semacode*. Two or three midlets but nothing for desktop. The only online reader is "facebook app". I don't have F. account so I don't even know what such term means

*) This might not be completely true. You can find generators at least.

-fenixproductions (January 08, 2009, 08:01 PM)

Really, I was able to find only 2(the one by P2 Labs described here is a 3rd one), which QR code readers for PCs have you found? The QuickMark one requires you to register with an ID and password and you have to give an email address for verification. They produce this QR code for DonationCoder:



These are the ones I found:

Free QR Code Reader & Generator Software for Windows

QuickMark Mobile Barcode - QuickMark for PC

3139

General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos

« on: January 05, 2011, 12:32 PM »

Cyberdiva:

I used Inpaint. There is a download link to get it in another thread. Look for it. I was able to get a better version of the apples by zooming in much more, shrinking the red brush to 5 and making multiple inpaint passes.  But, it still looks bad (see below), the beefsteak looks ok and the carrots might be acceptable. As in Renegade's example and my test using Inpaint, you can get good results removing objects from the main body of pictures(see pictures below). Kalo's pictures just don't give good results many times. Forget about the beer and other such pictures.

3140

General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos

« on: January 04, 2011, 10:26 PM »

My test of using Inpaint on Kalo's images(second image below) was a disaster. I don't know what the problem was. Maybe there wasn't enough background.  I got the best results using Microsoft Paint and a background-colored brush. Given the previous example, Photoshop's content-aware fill might do better. But given the result below, I am doubtful. I did try using Inpaint to duplicate Renegade's results. (I got a screenshot of the first image) The results below aren't quite as good as Renegade's, but close in my opinion. So, I think that even Photoshop couldn't remove the items from those pictures.

3141

General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos

« on: January 03, 2011, 04:22 PM »

Has anyone already found a way for Kalos to get the  pictures they want? If so, I won't try to produce them using Inpaint.

3142

General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos

« on: November 23, 2010, 10:07 PM »

This is my best result from trying the free version of Instant Mask 1.4:

       

3143

General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos

« on: November 11, 2010, 09:06 PM »

If you don't need Photoshop CS5, you can get Photoshop & Adobe Elements 9 together from Adobe for $149 with $30 mail-in rebate. You can get just the Photoshop Elements 9 at eBay for $95 maybe less(see attached files). It seems that only one has content-aware fill, so be sure to consult the comparison before buying. Below are links to the sites, if you want to buy one of these.

ADOBE Photoshop Elements 9 here

Amazon.com photoshop elements 9 Software  here

NEW Photoshop Elements 9 Win Mac Adobe - eBay  here

3144

General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos

« on: November 06, 2010, 10:47 AM »

There are auctions on Ebay and you may be able to get it for much less here.
There are also "Buy it now" listings for around $200 I believe.

3145

General Software Discussion / Re: remove objects from photos

« on: November 05, 2010, 12:12 AM »

Is the content-aware feature in the Adobe Photoshop CS5 video on Youtube (here) bogus?  If not, this would seem to be the ideal tool for that. Is it available yet?

3146

Living Room / Re: prevent my kids from downloading files from the Internet

« on: November 04, 2010, 10:20 PM »

Does anyone here have any experience with PowerShadow? I have it and have used it a few times on sites I deemed risky.

3147

General Software Discussion / Re: Photo panorama creation

« on: January 01, 2010, 06:59 PM »

I got 2 panoramas of the South Pole station made in 2008 before the Dome was dismantled. Both are 360 degree *.swf files, one is spherical. You scan them by moving the mouse's cursor in the picture. Here is a link to them:Panorama  Adventure Antarctica. Thank you Tomos for that help, I will edit that post.

3148

General Software Discussion / Re: Photo panorama creation

« on: December 30, 2009, 11:46 PM »

Microsoft ICE was a minor part of some other, bigger project, and has not been updated for more than a year. Might never be.

I wanted to warn people about the problem so that they could avoid the time and effort of installing and uninstalling it.

3149

General Software Discussion / MS ICE vs. AutoStitch

« on: December 29, 2009, 06:48 PM »

I tried creating panoramas using Microsoft Image Composite Editor 1.2 recently. See below how it sliced objects:



When I tried the AutoStitch v2.2 demo, using the same set of pictures, I got this:



Does anyone else use the Microsoft program and have this happen to them also? I am going to use AutoStitch for any future panoramas. If you can't see the difference and can't download the attached panoramas, let me know and I will try to provide downloadable pictures.

3150

Living Room / Apollo conspiracy's doom

« on: July 19, 2009, 07:48 PM »

I read a news item   (   http://www.newscient...o-landing-sites.html) about the LRO images showing the Apollo landers. If later more high-resolution images show a recognizable lander and other equipment, will this mean the end of stories that we never really went to the moon?