topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday October 31, 2024, 7:59 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tuxman [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 100next
1576
Linux has been having a 64 bit build for years. Win64 builds are available in the "comm-central" branch, Firefox 15 "alpha". :)

1577
Ask the devs? :)

1578
You're still on v11?  ;D :D :P

1579
Buy Nitro PDF instead.  8)

1580
Yep, been using the latter for months. A pity Firefox follows the Chrome design guidelines and Mozilla removes more and more essential features. Good thing there are extensions.

1581
Wrong. "Suse programs" can even run on FreeBSD.  :D
The only thing that might break compatibility are library dependencies. ELF binaries are ELF binaries (like .exe on Windows), but if certain libraries (.dll files) are missing or exist in their wrong versions, you will not be able to execute the application without breakages.

1582
An OpenSUSE-KDE combo runs different programs than a Debian-SUSE combo.
Except for the package management system: Why?

1583
Why don't you wait for the release version before you make your final opinion?

1585
There is no "agreeing" when it comes to things that are either true or false. :P

Good night.

1586
Okay, leaving aside Free-BSD, putting a desktop environment over Linux *almost* does make it a generic desktop operating system.
What is the difference then? Why do you consider Linux a generic desktop OS but BSD not?

As for the drivers, if they are included in the CD's, they "Just Work".
Wrong. Really, really wrong.
If they are included in the CDs, they are primarily outdated.

I know, Linux advocates hate that, but sorry, for new users, that's how it is.
No.
Best example from the real world: Dumbuntu. Try to upgrade it to a new version without failing any driver. Good luck.

If I can't even boot to a desktop, how the blazes will I diagnose which driver is missing and fire up a web browser that didn't load to go find it and somehow install it?
That's why Windows is the better desktop OS.

just get me a basically working system with sound and TV. Not that tough.
From a newbie user's POV, you might be right. Technically, this is horribly wrong.

1587
Hulu does not yet have HTML5? Now that's ancient. :P (OK, not quite serious.)

Unix itself is not a generic desktop solution.
Neither is Linux itself. Putting a desktop environment over it does not make it a desktop operating system yet. Not even if it is called Ubuntu and has funny code names. On my FreeBSD (virtual) machine, KDE runs (theoretically) fine, so how is Unix less of a desktop OS than Linux?

You see?

So I don't need to get all theoretical, if I need 7 drivers, by golly I need 7 drivers, and I'd rather have a distro include them.
How can they be included better than in its repositories?



edit: Can't sleep if I leave that typo in place.

1588
I'm decent on Windows, and I do light helpdesk as part of my official job at work. So I'm clearly no Turbo-Newbie. Yet all the assumptions of Linux break my instincts, so I am a classic mid line Windows user trying Linux for basically the first time. I could have picked any of 5 cores, I tried OpenSuse last year, it was okay. This year I decided to try to stay as close to Debian as I could, but all the pure FSF principles lose out to just getting a working box, even if that means Non-Free Codecs.
Debian has non-free repositories. IMO the FSF philosophy is one of the only reasonable reasons to switch to a "free" (Linux is only partially free) OS, but it's just me, probably. (Hey, a rhyme.)

"Experiences with one or two major Linux distributions" and "knowing Linux" is a bit different by the way...

I believe I am representative of a big untold group of users out there. Get me at least as far as a desktop with Flash and Sound, and I'll slowly learn the other stuff later.
Who still needs Flash? :P

In a sense there's only three OS's, Windows, Mac OS X, and the Linux Family. (I'm skipping the outliers.)
Unix is an "outlier"? WTF?  :huh:
Kids of today...

1589
Well, maybe my terms are up for grabs - what's the difference between a Fork and a Mod?
A fork is developed independently of the code it was initially based on, while a mod is merged with it when it changes.
Ubuntu is not Debian anymore. Not nearly.

So however you term it, I got one that works. Me-As-Typical-New-Linux-User just wants to get to a desktop screen.
So why Linux then?

There is no "typical new Linux user", back in 1998 I started with SuSE Linux 6.0 (and was stuck to Windows-only for years after then), others start with Arch Linux or Slackware. What is "typical"?

Long Haul, I don't know if I can make it to Windows 9 - Win8 with Metro is looking really ugly, even worse than Vista.
Vista was fine, at least it was the last Windows version with a working task bar. I hope Microsoft will get back to the desktop market some day... Windows 8 SP1 or something.

"All I do" 50% of the time is play on the web and make folders and save notes and files. That's cake. Linux can handle that.
So can most other OSs.

So yes one of these years if I really got serious I'd buy a new comp for Linux. This is a test case for now.
I recently did that for my sister, ordered some Linux laptop for her (Fedora 16) and she's happy with it (after some days of "why can't I play my random MMORPGs here?"); but it was more because it was cheap. :D

1590
Srsly, why do you want Linux if you call yourself a Windows user?

Anyway, you tried distributions I had never heard of, nice. Some are supposed to look funny, like Bodhi Linux. ;)

Ubuntu, however, is a fork, not a mod. Too much has changed from Debian, that's why Debian does not have massive driver failures. :D


edit: Oh dear, my spelling has died.

1591
Which ones have you tried so far?

edit: LOL, just looked at the Zorin "OS" site. "Linux for Windows users".
Bazinga!

1592
To be honest, I never gave any Ubuntu edition a run, it is enough to see how it fails - every new *buntu release floods Linux help forums.
I doubt Zorin's version is much better.

So I really wonder why you want reliability and *buntu....

1593
First important thing: Drop anything that includes Ubuntu stuff.
Really, Ubuntu is broken by design in a lot of ways, "full Debian" is the other direction.

If you want Ubuntu, use Ubuntu, but don't expect compatibility to anything aside Ubuntu then.

1594
OK, another proposal: Crunchbang Linux? May be spartanic but features a lightweight Openbox, and aptitude works. :D
(Runs in a VM here. Great IMO.)

1595
Right-click works like a charm in KDE. KDE 4.8 is usable after a couple of quite fucked-up versions before it.
If you want "pure Debian with some codecs", try Linux Mint Debian Edition.  :)

"Pure Debian", however, means Gnome which is bleh. Considering that you like JWM, you really should try IceWM though!

1596
General Software Discussion / Re: free antivirus
« on: April 29, 2012, 05:24 PM »
Precisely. Software does not avoid human stupidity.

1597
Lol, Ubuntu. The Linux for people who want Windows. Stick with Windows, you'll love it.
(Also, Ubuntu is the most-broken distribution I know, every upgrade brings new heavy quirks. I wonder why there are so many masochists around.)

That aside, there is no point in switching to Linux if you want random Windows applications ("Wine", mentioned several times in this thread).
There is a good reason for a dual-boot Linux, like for the lulz or something, but replacing Windows for the sake of replacing Windows is never a good idea.

That said, I currently operate a couple of machines, some Linuxes on them too. My main machine is a Win7/Fedora 16 dual-boot, and Fedora is hardly ever booted at all.

BTW TaoPhoenix, if you come from Windows, try KDE. It is better than people say about it, a lot of eye-candy and widget stuff.

1598
General Software Discussion / Re: free antivirus
« on: April 28, 2012, 10:48 AM »
3) At least as good as any of the alternatives (paid or free)
-Carol Haynes (April 28, 2012, 10:41 AM)
Depends on what you want to do.

The issue that annoys me with MSE is that it gives red alert when a Windows Update is missing.

1599
General Software Discussion / Re: free antivirus
« on: April 28, 2012, 10:07 AM »
Free antivirus applications get less signature updates and (mostly) lack good heuristics. The first point is the worse.

1600
General Software Discussion / Re: free antivirus
« on: April 28, 2012, 09:56 AM »

Pages: prev1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69 ... 100next