Have a suggestion?
Click here to suggest a blog item.
Catch up with DonationCoder by browsing our past newsletters, which collect the most interesting discussions on our site: here.
DonationCoder does not accept paid promotions. We have a strict policy of not accepting gifts of any kind in exchange for placing content in our blogs or newsletters, or on our forum. The content and recommendations you see on our site reflect our genuine personal interests and nothing more.
Jan 14, 2018
Major Site News
Jan 10, 2018
Take a Deep BreathI could just die!!!! This was so fantastic!! Fabulous set up: with introductions to what it is, why people want it, etc. Incredible, useful, explanations. Shows something is available for everyone. Unbelievable demonstrations. It was just amazing. You must be exhausted, but, I hope, very pleased. [about the screencasting review]
Our daily Blog
This page spotlights the most interesting posts collected from our forum every day.
You are viewing a specific blog item. Click here to return to the main blog page.
We all know that hard drives can and will fail eventually, and often unpredictably and without warning. That's why we make sure we back up regularly.
But here's is a question I've been thinking about lately, and I don't know the answer to:
Should we pre-emptively retire old but perfectly-working hard drives, and migrate data to a new drive? If so, after how many hours?
Or should we just run them into the ground until they fail?
Here's a screenshot of one of my favorite tools (CrystalDiskInfo), showing smart data of my oldest drive, with 39,000 hours powered up:
Is powered-up hours even the right metric to use -- or should we be using the actual years since manufacture?