Home | Blog | Software | Reviews and Features | Forum | Help | Donate | About us

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • November 18, 2017, 10:48 PM
  • Proudly celebrating 10 years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: Tighter integration?  (Read 4264 times)


  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • **
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Tighter integration?
« on: December 13, 2006, 11:21 AM »
My only complaint with the site so far would be that everything is not tightly integrated and tends to look odd. This leads to the navigation structure being difficult for new members. I do not know how to approach this problem, but it seems as if you have done a great job so far.


  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 110
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: Tighter integration?
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2007, 02:33 PM »
these are strictly *my* preferences,
1) a treeview pane like in windows explorer on the left
2) a no-images view to remove the possible clunky/heavy loading? I would call the present look very "buttony" - to some its the best (everyone on the web seems to dig the XP-style buttons and toolbars ), to people like me, its awkward - I prefer the look of http://zope.org or geeklog @ http://www.geeklog.net/

Simple machines has a couple minimalist themes here:

(screenshot: http://www.remorse.g...index.php?topic=19.0 )

Also a wiki-like theme:

and there's also a theme switcher (!!) at :

« Last Edit: March 05, 2007, 02:44 PM by 2stepsback »