|
1
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: SSD's - How They Work Plus Tips
|
on: May 31, 2013, 01:07:21 AM
|
|
I agree with what f0dder and others have said. I think perhaps the first generations of SSD had issues with wear, but the current ones (third generation I think?) have things in place to handle that and usually break other places.
And the performance gain is big, just make sure you backup.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
News and Reviews / Best Text Editor / Re: Notepad++ has Help file; hex editor plugins
|
on: May 25, 2013, 03:22:02 AM
|
How long are you going to leave the old, outdated reviews for many of the text editor software up, before updating them? I'm sure Ultraedit is quite good & you probably make $ for promoting it - that's fine.
I think you can rest assured nobody was getting money or otherwise being compensated for a positive review on this site. It is simply because it reflects the experience and evaluation of the reviewer at that time, given what the editors available were like back then. If you're not going to be fair & up to date on the reviews, just take them down & only advertise Ultraedit .
The review was last updated seven years ago, and I agree that is showing. It is a huge effort to write a review like that, and I am afraid equally huge keeping it up to date. The official reviews which were a big part of DonationCoder in the first years, have not really been done since then -- instead the forums thrived and became the driving force of the site, and user reviews started to appear here. You could argue that the old reviews should be taken down. On the other hand, they are marked clearly with dates, and point to the forums for further discussion (like these).
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: SSD's - How They Work Plus Tips
|
on: May 14, 2013, 04:22:29 PM
|
Perhaps you are expecting too much technical accuracy from a side argument in a consumer article in a consumer magazine  . Personally, I find the title more misleading -- "proper care and feeding" basically boils down to "it takes care of itself, just buy a big one".
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Goodbye OpenOffice, Hello LibreOffice
|
on: April 25, 2013, 02:20:00 AM
|
|
I've used SoftMaker as well, and it's quite good.
The only problem I had with it was that the user interface is not available in as many languages as the other suites -- for instance there is no Danish translation. That's okay for someone like me who doesn't really care if the user interface is localized as long as the dictionary is, but I can't really recommend it to friends and family who are used to Office in Danish.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: When it comes to EA, it just keeps getting better - or worse...
|
on: April 18, 2013, 01:30:10 AM
|
My sympathies to the people who will be loosing their virtual estate here -- it is never fun when you invest time and/or money in an activity just to see it disappear. On the other hand, I must admit there is a tiny cynic on my shoulder, who thinks that if you invest more time and/or money on pixels than you are comfortable loosing, in a free-to-play, and worst of all on facebook, then perhaps you have been steering towards a disappointment that was not entirely impossible to predict  .
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Recommend free image hosting site?
|
on: April 18, 2013, 01:03:56 AM
|
Simple, clean interface with lots of link options, and all it's meant for is a place to store stuff you want to link to. The free version has ads, a 5MB per image limit and '6 months no views' deletion policy. A pro account costs anywhere from $2.95 monthly to 23.40 per year (1.95/month) with monthly, 3 month, 6 month, and yearly contracts, has no ads, 10MB per image limit and no deletion.
Looks nice, though I can't seem to find a description of the different accounts or the restrictions on the free use anywhere on the site?
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Google Reader gone
|
on: April 15, 2013, 06:12:29 AM
|
I was playing around with some of the alternatives, and noticed something strange in the reviews of the feedly app for chrome on google play -- pretty much all reviews on the first two pages are exactly the same two comments from different people: Feedly has managed to create a visually appealing RSS reader, that also focuses on a clean simple visual style that is intuitive to use. and Since the announcement of Google Reader being discontinued, I have enjoyed this easy app. It also has a simple, attractive interface. Highly recommend. Does anybody know how this happens? I am not saying it's some form of scam, but I wonder if it could be something like a 'feature' in the app that lets you post a review if you like it, and suggests some standard quote like this.
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: thunderbird alternative
|
on: April 04, 2013, 06:00:07 AM
|
|
I switched to Thunderbird from The Bat!, after having paid for upgrades through four versions -- it is a nice program (albeit a bit alternative in some ways), but the past two versions nothing has really happened and you still keep paying.
Basically I found that Thunderbird did what I needed with way better search and without costing anything.
Mozilla stopping development on new features for Thunderbird made me look for alternatives, and I would have no problem paying for a good solution, but I am not going back to paying yearly for nothing but UI tweaks.
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: thunderbird alternative
|
on: April 04, 2013, 05:36:06 AM
|
|
I tried installing PostBox and eM Client and import my Thunderbird mail to check them out.
PostBox imported fine, looks a lot like Thunderbird (for obvious reasons), but the search didn't work until I manually chose to index the mail, and after that I had to manually index the folders I had created myself for backup.
eM Client stopped halfway through the import with an error ("value out of range", no indication of where and what), so I was only able to import two accounts into it. It looked very sleek and the extra functionality it has like calendar seemed nice. But if it can't even import from Thunderbird ...
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Six free security tools from Microsoft
|
on: April 04, 2013, 05:29:30 AM
|
|
I use MSE as well, it's free and lightweight, and like app says, if you are not the type of person who clicks anything that pops up, it works quite well.
I have used various commercial anti-virus and personal firewall products over the years, and most of them have gradually turned from sleek power tools to huge suites that try to do everything, but end up just eating up space and time on your computer.
There was a recent article that described how many of the anti-virus solutions available don't really protect very well against the threats of today, because they try to solve the problem of file viruses from 10 years ago.
I am also using EMET from Microsoft.
|
|
|
|
|