Home | Blog | Software | Reviews and Features | Forum | Help | Donate | About us

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • October 23, 2016, 03:07:52 AM
  • Proudly celebrating 10 years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: Radical Transparency in Web2.0 Publishing - Then+Now / Upsides+Risks  (Read 5134 times)


  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 36,331
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
Chris Anderson's Article on "The Long Tail" and book of the same name was highly influential in taling about non-mainstream markets.

In a two part essay on this blog he talks about issues in transparency and collaborative editing of web 2.0 content:

Although I'm not promising we'll do all or even most of these things, here are some first thoughts on what a truly transparent media organization would do. (Some of these are based on my experience in open-sourcing my book research on this site, which worked great. Why not apply the same lessons to a magazine?)

from http://www.radaronline.com/
« Last Edit: December 15, 2006, 04:24:48 AM by mouser »


  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
    • View Profile
    • Matt Harwood Consultancy
    • Donate to Member
Re: Radical Transparency in Web2.0 Publishing - Then+Now / Upsides+Risks
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2006, 04:22:53 AM »
Looks great - will read soon  :D Thanks mouser  :Thmbsup:

I enjoy articles on 'theory' and 'analysis' of new technologies - even if some writers get a bit too philosophical  8)