Home | Blog | Software | Reviews and Features | Forum | Help | Donate | About us
topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • September 04, 2015, 12:54:16 AM
  • Proudly celebrating 10 years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005  (Read 18483 times)

mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,012
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Donate to Member
The latest version of Jibz's Dina Font, for programmers, is now available:

http://www.donationc...ther/Dina/index.html

Changes in this version:
Full bitmap fonts now included for bold and italics, at 8pt and 10pt.



ps. If you do any form of coding or html writing, you owe it to yourself to check out Dina.

Carol Haynes

  • Waffles for England (patent pending)
  • Global Moderator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,969
    • View Profile
    • Dales Computer Services
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2005, 08:10:11 AM »
This is great - Jibz you are working really hard on this: I know how long all this stuff takes having tried and given up !!!

Jibz

  • Moderator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,035
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2005, 05:13:24 AM »
Thanks a lot :up:.

It has been more work than I had expected, but I am really quite happy about the result myself.

zhichao

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2005, 09:55:45 AM »
The font is great.  However, my windows 2K treated as italic font by default.  The Vim, Emacs editors are fine and display the font gracefully.  When I use Visual Studio 6.0, the default font for Dina is italic and consistent with the default style in Windows 2K.  Can anyone help?

mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,012
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2005, 10:00:35 AM »
i don't know the answer but i'll make sure jibz sees this and replies asap.

zhichao

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2005, 02:32:06 PM »
I have fixed the problem using softy.  Basically, you need to repackage different styles.  Make sure the regular is displayed before regular,italic  ;D

I have attached the modified copy.

mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,012
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2005, 12:15:03 AM »
thanks a lot zhichao!

Jibz

  • Moderator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,035
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2005, 04:01:18 AM »
I think I managed to create a version that also works with Visual Studio on Win2K now. I've sent a new package to mouser, and to zhichao to test.

Thanks a lot for the bug report and help with fixing it! :Thmbsup:.

mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,012
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2005, 04:47:48 AM »
new version is now available on jibz's Dina page:
http://www.donationc...Jibz/Dina/index.html

jkr11222

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2006
  • *
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2006, 09:11:30 AM »
Just registered because I wanted to thank you for your hard work on this font. I've been looking for a font to use with Emacs on X11/Unix, and this is by far the best. The oblique and bolds are great as well.

Anyway, after trying almost every other available bitmap font out there, I'm glad I found this one. Thanks again.

StevenC

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2006
  • *
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #10 on: February 22, 2006, 04:59:39 AM »
Just got a glimps of the font and I already love it.

One problem though: I can't get it to work in Macromedia Dreamweaver 8.
When I go to Preferences>Fonts the font won't show up in the dropdownlist with the available fonts...

Got any idea how to fix this?

ojuice

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2006
  • *
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #11 on: August 02, 2006, 12:27:11 PM »
jkr11222: Could you point me to where you found the version for X11?  Thanks.

Ekleipsis

  • Participant
  • Joined in 2006
  • *
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2006, 11:21:46 AM »
I myself have been wanting to make a bitmap font of my own stylistic preference, but I've been unable to find an application capable of completing the task.

Softy is the only program I've found that saves .FON files that can be read by Windows, but there's a problem: that whole packaging order zhichao mentioned above. For me, no matter what order I save new styles to the file, Softy always automagically reorders them Regular Italic, Regular, Bold Italic, Bold, which is wrong and causes Windows to display italic for regular, etc.

What I'd like to know is how to go about reordering the styles in the font file--Softy apparently doesn't even allow an existing style to be deleted from a file, and the listing doesn't respond to mouse dragging or anything else. zhichao seems to have succeeded where I have failed, so what might I be missing in Softy itself?

Moreover, does anyone know of an application better suited to the task of making bitmap fonts? I feel it's worth sharing that FontForge has a far more competent interface that makes creation a breeze, making it more than worth installing Cygwin to use, but it fails at actually saving a readable .FON file. While Softy can repair the damage, I still can't get it to save in order, so I'm still stuck.

mouser

  • First Author
  • Administrator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,012
    • View Profile
    • Mouser's Software Zone on DonationCoder.com
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2006, 11:34:36 AM »
let's see if we can't get jibz to come post some tips for us!

Jibz

  • Moderator
  • Joined in 2005
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,035
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DINA FONT - v2.88, October 30, 2005
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2006, 03:42:08 AM »
If you are using Softy, I would suggest saving each font (i.e. each size of regular, bold, italic, bold+italic) into a separate file while working on them, and then when you want to create your final file, load them all into one font.

You have to get the order in which you load styles correct, or the font will not work in certain programs. I think it's reverse order, but you'll probably have to experiment a little :Thmbsup:.