Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site June 19, 2013, 03:24:02 PM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.

You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
The N.A.N.Y. Challenge 2012! Download dozens of custom programs!
   
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
+  DonationCoder.com Forum
|-+  Main Area and Open Discussion
| |-+  General Software Discussion
| | |-+  Should a software app be allowed to change the user's settings?
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Should a software app be allowed to change the user's settings?  (Read 2548 times)
zridling
Friend of the Site
Charter Member
***
Posts: 3,280


Linux captive

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« on: October 12, 2007, 09:50:55 PM »
[via Mary Jo Foley]:
Windows Update seems to be automatically changing user settings (again).  —  After Patch Tuesday this week (October 9), some Windows Vista users noticed something strange: Windows Update had changed their Automatic Update settings and rebooted their machines automatically without their consent.
________________________________________________
Microsoft responded with a "Who me?" statement Friday. This kind of behavior — or rather not fixing it — is what drove me away from Vista. Is there any circumstance where a software application or company should change a user's settings and reboot without their approval? This ain't right. I don't mind applying the changes, but it seems half the time that we find a few days after updating that the latest Windows Update broke something else.
Logged
- zaine (on Google+)
Renegade
Charter Member
***
Posts: 8,568



Tell me something you don't know...

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2007, 09:58:43 PM »
The update there has caused me some significant pain... Not happy about it...

This is the second such instance where MS has forced something... They aren't behaving very well at the moment. I expect this sort of thing should stop fairly soon as it's bound to cause an outcry in the professional sector. You can't just reboot a machine. You need to plan for that.
Logged
Slow Down Music - Super Simple - Where I commit thought crimes...

Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. - John Diefenbaker
cybernetnews
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 42


Ryan - a CyberNet News Editor

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2007, 10:42:25 PM »
I voluntarily restarted my computer after the update, and my settings remain unchanged. All five of my computers weren't affected by it, so it must have been isolated incidents?
Logged


[ may-june 2013 ad experiment; click here to learn more about donationcoder.com ]

Josh
Charter Honorary Member
***
Posts: 3,198



View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2007, 07:53:19 AM »
What significant pain did it cause you?
Logged
Strength in Knowledge
Renegade
Charter Member
***
Posts: 8,568



Tell me something you don't know...

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2007, 08:50:00 AM »
I had a false positive on an important piece of software. I was planning to contact the anti-virus vendor about it, but didn't get around to it in time.

The software was marked for deletion by the anti-virus software, but required a reboot to do it. I didn't get to the vendor in time and the reboot screwed the software. Not sure how I'm going to repair it for the moment.

I'm intentionally leaving out the software and anti-virus vendor names above.

And actually, I think I may be mistaken  ohmy - I might have that server set for automatic reboots... My bad there... I can't remember exactly - I have so many computers set differently that I tend to confuse them when I'm not working on them.

Logged
Slow Down Music - Super Simple - Where I commit thought crimes...

Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. - John Diefenbaker
nosh
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 1,338


View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2007, 09:12:43 AM »
I remember setting up my mother's XP machine from scratch and applying Windows Updates, the last thing I intended to do before backing up the whole image. XP just wouldn't start after the WinUpdates reboot.  smiley

Sometimes it may be imperative to reboot immediately so no external app messes things up but even then a soft-shutdown [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop\AutoEndTasks=0] is the least they can do. I doubt if Windows Update ever does a hard shutdown in any case, not that I put anything beyond MS.
Logged
mitzevo
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 448



Control is power

see users location on a map View Profile Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2007, 09:55:00 AM »
Quote
Should a software app be allowed to change the user's settings?
Only if the user agrees to such changes, ofcourse. Otherwise, gtfo.
« Last Edit: October 13, 2007, 10:02:45 AM by mitzevo » Logged
The early bird may get the worm; but the second mouse gets the cheese!
zridling
Friend of the Site
Charter Member
***
Posts: 3,280


Linux captive

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2007, 03:16:37 PM »
Adrian Hughes weighs in with What’s really broken with Windows Update — Trust:

See, here’s the problem. To feel comfortable with having an open channel that allows your OS to be updated at the whim of a third party (even/especially* Microsoft … * delete as applicable) requires that the user trusts the third party not to screw around with the system in question. This means no fiddling on the sly, being clear about what the updates do and trying not to release updates that hose systems. While any and all updates have the potential to hose a system, there’s no excuse for hiding the true nature of updates and absolutely no excuse for pushing sneaky updates down the tubes.
Logged
- zaine (on Google+)
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
« previous next »



[ may-june 2013 ad experiment; click here to learn more about donationcoder.com ]


 
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  

DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.041s | Server load: 0.08 ]