topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday April 18, 2024, 10:03 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mikiem [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4next
26
General Software Discussion / Re: What's your mouse of choice?
« on: March 05, 2009, 03:21 PM »
FWIW, closest I've ever come to the free-wheeling scroll wheel on my VX Nano was with a trackball -- a Kensington clone I believe I used to pick up at CompUSA. Not that the scroll wheel on the Nano is necessarily a good thing -- more an addiction making conventional wheels with detent near unbearable. :-(

Personally I use the mouse a *lot* for graphics/vid, but more often than not just for a short amount of time... with my right hand constantly going from keyboard to mouse or tablet or cup of coffee/tea, I've developed a rather strong dislike of ergo mice, or mug handles for that matter. ;-) I just want to grab it & let go the easiest, fastest way possible, & the Nano fills the bill. So does the Microsoft Notebook mouse, but the receivers kept dying.

Wireless is a must, because with hi rez mice only wireless is delicate enough -- the reason I like smaller, notebook mice is I can control them exclusively with my fingers, which is nice for detail work. When you give it a slight nudge, any cord has an unfortunate habit of nudging back.

For mousing surface, rather than spend a bunch of money, I use flexible (roll-up type) kitchen cutting boards/surfaces. They're relatively large to stay put, easy to clean, & have just enough texture for tactile feedback -- otherwise it's pretty close to an air hockey table in feel. And finally, because I've been doing this a bunch of years, I use this, which I've padded:
http://www.dealextre...details.dx/sku.10541   [despite the pic, it's really an arm rest]

27
General Software Discussion / Re: making a recovery partition
« on: December 11, 2008, 03:09 PM »
FWIW would it work to 1) create the partitions, 2) create a bootable backup image on the 2nd partition (basically the same as on a DVD, only on hdd), 3) switch to booting from image drive via bios hotkey during post.

The reason for not using a boot menu is someone is going to restore an image when they didn't want to, and complain of lost work, files, etc. If it's there, someone will press it.  :'(  Fact o' life.
The reason for hdd vs other media is loss... If it can be lost, damaged, or misplaced, it will be.

What I don't know is what will be involved in having the 2nd partition fully bootable & not interfering with the primary, bootable partition. I know it's possible - this is a common feature for laptop restores, triggered by a selection in their bios BTW. If you had any problems it might pay to look at setting the 2nd partition with a file system Windows doesn't understand natively - I know some partition mgr type programs provide/use Windows or Linux boot discs for their DOS/Win apps. And/or might be able to use the HP applet for creating bootable USB sticks?

28
FWIW I've had excellent service with Paragon software - IMHO heads & shoulders above Acronis.

Programs like Rollback are perhaps a more complicated solution than disc mirroring when you need that level of redundancy (IMHO you usually don't). You have system and program software that doesn't change that often -- a few times a month depending on updates -- so it's inefficient to expend resources on archiving (or even monitoring) them more often.

I think it pays to use a bit of common sense... When you install random small apps, the cost in resources to archive them is often more than just re-installing if something happens before the next disc image. Some minor updates to Windows (&/or other software) fall into the same category.

I take the opposite approach to software like Rollback: I was taught to design for the usual -- that's where you want your greatest efficiency -- then have procedures in place to treat the exception... I have ample backups if needed, but I don’t force my systems, or myself to constantly work around creating backups. That’s NOT the primary purpose of either.

Data of course changes - some critical, some not. For the critical stuff there are all sorts of programs that maintain sync (of folders you select) with another storage device/location, and back things up manually, on a timer, or by watching for changes. This puts the focus where you need it.

If you want/need access to replace just damaged or missing files, like ShadowProtect advertises, & assuming you know just what's damaged or missing, a good image backup program will let you restore at the individual file level. Of course it’s still smart to ask: “Is it worth it”? If you can restore an image faster than you can determine what’s wrong, by restoring individual files you’re shooting yourself in the foot. I've also found nothing beats a simple zip archive for quick & easy access of individual files. However I’ve found backup programs storing compressed versions of your files much less efficient overall than the image type... they take much longer to compress &/or restore, & they usually don't perform as well with *hot* files (those in use). Boot restore discs are also more common with image backup programs.

Restoring files is a matter of copying them from one place to another, unless you’re using something like MS Shadow Copy in Vista, where theoretically you may just have to rename. Copying files isn’t necessarily going to be faster with one product versus another, so I take ShadowProtect’s ad copy with a large grain of salt.

According to the mini-review on DonationCoder, FirstDefense-ISR is very roughly the same thing as having several Windows installs - you choose your system via the boot loader when your PC (re) starts. The main cost is disc space [I don’t know if there are any performance hits], with a secondary loss in defrag times I’m imagine - the savings is however long it takes to restore a disc image (less than 20 minutes for a compressed 18 GB image using Paragon software on this PC - the only restore I’ve done in memory). I’ve restored a disc image once this year, & that because I intentionally butchered my Windows install trying to get an Adobe product installed & working. IMHO it’s a better choice to store a backup image on another drive (& remotely), use profiles in Windows as necessary, & if needed have a multi-boot PC. If your environment can’t wait 20 minutes or so to restore an image, have a copy of the system drive on the shelf... plan for the everyday, be prepared for the exception.

Putting backup archives on DVD is great for cheap, off-site storage, but you'll take a performance hit restoring, have to worry about poor quality media, & if there's a writing problem, often have to restart the entire backup -- I normally split my image archive files into chunks that can be burned to DVD for remote storage (I actually only burn maybe every 5th or 6th image), but leave the originals on the back-up drive. If I have to restore a drive & need to use the DVD copies I take a hit, but the odds of that happening are much less, & the backups I don't burn go much faster. Using a single drive for everything -- windows, software, & backups -- is risky, since hard drive failure is more likely to bite you than most anything else.

IMHO... & in a nutshell... while we all need to realize that problems happen, & plan accordingly, you can focus too strongly on what *might* go wrong, to the point that you’re robbing resources that should/could be spent on getting things right, improving on success.

29
FWIW...
1 thing to remember when talking about, rating, trying PDF conversion &/or editing software, is that there are several ways, programs to create PDFs now days -- the PDFs created are not always the same internally. What works for PDFs created in one program might fail miserably on the output of another. There are quite a few cheaper PDF conversion programs out, but in my experience how well they work, or if they work at all depends on what created the PDF you feed them. A few examples with ratings/comments for Quick-PDF [http://www.quick-pdf.com/] can be found here [http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/category/quick-pdfcom/].

FWIW RE: Serif...
AFAIK -- & from what I can recall (which may not be *totally* accurate) -- Serif was started years & years ago by Russian coders going up against Adobe & quite possibly Aldus (it was that long ago) (assuming anyone else is old enough to remember Aldus). They had excellent products, but not a lot of marketing clout in a then very closed-minded publishing & graphics arts community, where it was felt your professional credibility rested on the price of your tools, not your results. I think they then started licensing code or collaborating on niche products like a vector-based Dinosaur Drawing program one of my boys used back in a grade school project, eventually I believe turning over marketing (or selling themselves?) to one of the mass marketers similar to Broderbund. Their initial DTP program was dumbed down a little to compete with the brand new Microsoft Publisher, over the years becoming the PagePlus discussed here. You'll usually find deals on their software on various shareware &/or PC magazine sites like vnunet, at software surplus sites, at discount PC parts & accessory sites, & sometimes in the cheap software racks in retail stores.

30
Entirely FWIW, & you might check out Electronics Frontier Foundation etc...

AFAIK a successful lawsuit has to show intent to knowingly defraud or whatever - Video sharing got off for a while claiming they'd remove anything on request, & I've seen a lot of software disclaimers that say please contact us if we've used any (c) code.

31
Living Room / Re: Things your kids will never know - old school tech!
« on: November 05, 2008, 07:11 PM »
The Mimeo's impressive...

1) When 8-tracks 1st came out, there was no cheap/easy separate FM stereo, so tape adapters were popular.

2) Keypunch & related... Tape drives... Ancient teletype terminals [thunka thunka thunka] & early basic... Decolaters... Bursters...

3) Pushmowers... Hand-powered grass trimmers...Manual drills... Manual mixers for that matter.

4) V8 engines... Carburetors... Generators... 6 volt electrical... Lead for body filler... Bias ply car tires...

32
Living Room / Re: Help me build my new Home Theater PC
« on: November 05, 2008, 06:53 PM »
FWIW, more of an overclocking, gaming machine from the board & CPU, plus many of the 9950s aren't doing as well - quality seems to vary - plus you've got smaller Phenoms out in 2 months, consuming less power & needing less cooling (quieter). I've also has some quality issues on an early Gigabyte AM2+ board if that matters - 2nd RMA board received today. If you do stick with the 9950, might well want to point separate fans at the PWM heatsink & NB areas. Also, check memory compatibility, paying attention to voltages. I didn't check specs etc on your 1st choice, but my gig board likes lower voltage RAM.

2nd, don't rely on on-board graphics!!! For an HTPC get a mid range ATI card if you're using a board with ATI chipset. Forget about hybrid crossfire - go regular crossfire if needed for gaming, but make sure you have the power for it. Mid range cards have both needed power & separate avivo chip for video processing, which is cool for HDTV. Bear in mind you'll often loose a slot with current video cards due to cooling.

3rd, check out your power supply, & alternatives at jonny gurus's site & similar, where they actually check specs.

4th, not sure how relevant sound card will be if you hook up HTPC to HDTV via HDMI, assuming you get audio over HDMI working - doesn't always...  :-[
---
At any rate check over at the AVS & green button forums for info on various cards & how well they work, maybe even with the same brand/model TV. Check out the various forums to compare boards - FWIW I'm impressed with Biostar over at Rebels Haven. Looking at the pwr supply site is self explanatory, & they do rate noise BTW. For gaming, rage3d has some decent info on ATI cards... not a lot out there on on-board chips or hybrid crossfire.

33
Living Room / Re: Media Extenders (SageTV)
« on: November 05, 2008, 06:26 PM »
There are several alternatives, many of them free, depending on the functions/features you want/need... a lot of software you'd never expect also allows sharing either video or a video feed, like VLC. Check out Videohelp.com. Performance also varies with your hardware, if you're planning on using tuners etc. live from within the app.

GB-PVR is interesting, but a bit more hassle to set up. Cyberlink had a decent setup, but they're going to start charging for it. Beyond TV is more popular I think than Sage if you're going to pay. The easiest may be a downloadable, bootable, Linux disk image (forgot the name - sorry), where you just boot into an HTPC eviron.

34
I *think* at least portions of the registry are loaded with windows -- otherwise certain changes wouldn't require a re-boot to take effect.

[a case in point if someone's curious, ATI's CCC applet. Editing the reg entries for CCC is routine for me after a driver update in XP Pro 32 SP3, in order to get some of the Avivo controls visible... It's then nec. to restart for changes to occur -- stopping everything to do with CCC & restarting just those apps & services has no effect. Therefore I'd assume that at least portions of the registry were loaded once, on startup.]

That said, if you start up Sys Internals' reg monitoring program you'll see hundreds of constant entries - I wonder whether defragging the registry files themselves could make a major difference with all that going on? Granted not all keys are routinely accessed, but those that are it stands to reason would be the ones that would benefit the most. Kind of a catch 22 IMHO.

RE: ERUNT & NTREGOPT, the latter just rewrites the registry in one go, start to finish in separate files. Assuming it writes these files to free space without fragmentation, the individual files themselves should be faster to read than if they were spread out over your drive surface. The only time or place I've seen it make a real difference, is when there were bad entries in the registry files that re-writing took care of - either by writing them correctly or skipping them altogether, but then I like to boot into Vista to use JKDefrag on my XP drive, so unless I've been lazy they're not too badly fragmented anyways.

AFAIK reg cleaners, optimizers and such can only look for orphans -- references to other keys or files that don't exist. It can't tell you that a .DLL added by a program install, is still on your drive & referenced in the reg, long after the program's been uninstalled. And, I can tell you from experience that some software inserts so-called orphans on installation, & requires those entries to work properly.

I've taken to saving a regshot compare log with any program I'm just trying, along with doing a backup with ERUNT beforehand. In many cases I'm able to save just one or two critical keys, revert the reg to backup, then add just those keys to eliminate hundreds & sometimes thousands of useless registry alterations from the installation program. In fact, I'll often save a zipped file of the installed app with those reg keys, saving a LOT of hassle should I like the software & add it to a 2nd or 3rd PC. I've got loads of stuff installed in XP, & right now the latest ERUNT backup comes in at 47 MB. Vista OTOH with pretty much the same software comes in at just short of 90.

35
RE: Privoxy, I like the TOR/FireFox portable myself, though don't use it for everything. FWIW I also agree, clif_notes, about just ignoring ads etc... I wound up removing, with a big sigh of relief, the CA AV software suite - when you block everything a lot of sites just won't work, so you're forever adding exceptions. While I wish I didn't have to make the choice in the 1st place, & while ads etc are annoying, the extra effort spend circumventing them didn't bring with it real or practical benefits.

Otherwise I've enjoyed the more philosophical arguments so far -- personally I try always to keep it simple. From my perspective, everything on-line may be virtual, but it's still a market driven society. If there's a catch, it's that there are so many kinds and types of currency driving it. One of those is perceived (self or otherwise) power &/or credibility... Some of power's benefits go to ego - some translate into hard cash in the off-line world. Often it's a very long-term investment, and often it's sought simply because others expect you to pursue it. Perceived power helps determine MSRP.

With a free product Google stands to gain more power (in all sorts of ways). It isn't really free, because besides cost for installation time/effort, users contribute to Chrome's popularity, & thus Google's power. Not using another browser takes away power from that browser's owners, increasing Google's relative, perceived worth. With Chrome, it's assumed Google will be able to maximize everything else they do to make money -- even when/if that's not true, perception that it is lets Google max their MSRPs.

RE: Privacy:
Now while power does corrupt, I'm not sure that enters into anything, &/or that we as individuals enter into anything when it comes to Google corporate. We, us individuals, are in a virtual ant farm... We get moved here and there, some live, some die, and we get observed en mass as part of a song & dance (in this case) Google puts on to demonstrate to it's customers why MSRP is in fact quite a good deal. Sure their tracking practices can be subverted, by crooks and lawmen both, but all Google ever sees is one really big ant farm - I'd have to do something like drive into the side of the Google CEO's car at 50 mph before I ever became relevant enough to merit any interest, or be noticed as an individual.

That approach, sort of a privacy by virtue of inconsequence, applies most everywhere. I can undress in front of an open window, & the local PD's going to be concerned about what the neighbors saw rather than the fact that they invaded my privacy by looking in the window to start with. About the only time I, as an individual, warrant attention is when some individual (or small group of individuals) wants to take something from me - precisely what I want to avoid. SO, I have the same concerns about protecting my data, my privacy as the more ardent privacy advocate - just different reasons...

I'm also the guy that carries a laptop in the cheapest looking pack I can find - the nicer the laptop, the nastier the bag. What you can't avoid someone seeing, can be packaged to discourage interest.

36
Living Room / Re: How to achieve High Resolution for Text Reading
« on: August 31, 2008, 12:33 PM »
Maybe this will help &/or be useful understanding LCDs and choosing a monitor...

First off, I strongly believe that noone should choose a LCD monitor without seeing it’s display - I paid a bit more for the LG L1932TQ I use (no longer made), but after comparing it side by side with other brands/models, I’ve never regretted that choice. Online & in ads you don’t get a lot of useful info, & I don’t know the reviewer’s standards when I read a review. You’ll see a figure for brightness, which to me is less useful since most potential choices will be close. You see a figure for contrast ratio, which is very important for weeding out more nasty displays, but at the same time is not a great means of comparing very good models - the figures can reflect the manufacturer’s enhancing technologies... In a way it’s kind of like scanner resolutions, where you have optical & then enhanced or hardware interpolated resolutions - a poor resolution eliminates some products, but it’s hard if not impossible to compare the enhanced figures since the quality at those higher resolutions can vary so much. The third figure commonly given is the response time, which according to this site is often more of a moot point - it also has some very decent info on LCD monitors & design, by someone working in the field.

http://www.techmind.org/lcd/index.html
The link that page gives for basic LCD info (How It Works) should be:
http://www.plasma.co.../what_is_tft_lcd.htm
And you’ll find more on testing here:
http://www.colorwizz...m/lcdtest/index.html
http://www.brouhaha....ic/software/lcdtest/
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/

37
I'd humbly suggest something I didn't see on the mod lists unfortunately... a good example is on the link below, where they have the row of buttons ending in the one for bigger text. The ease their design shows for enlarging text in particular I think might be the sort of touch that helps increase your audience.

I know it can be done in Windows, using several utilities, in the browser, and so on... So yes there really is no need to stick that sort of thing on a web page, except that some folks don't know how or don't want to bother etc... Just a small touch to make their visit hopefully more enjoyable.

38
Living Room / Re: How to achieve High Resolution for Text Reading
« on: August 30, 2008, 11:50 AM »
TO my knowledge, other than things like adjusting the display and using apps like cleartype, it's pretty much up to the display you're using.

Any type of LCD display means the manufacturer using several tricks and compromises to get viewers something resembling a std CRT. Unfortunately, these same tricks and compromises make it less ideal for regular text. My desktop LG display has additional compensation built-in as a separate mode to make plain text more legible, & it is easier to read than many others. I'd assume the Kindle is designed without all those features to make colors look good, with engineers focusing instead on just text.

Since you obviously can't just switch displays, the only other solution I could imagine would be to check out some of the anti-glare &/or privacy filter screens they make for laptop displays... They can make a difference, though I don't know whether or not it'll help, or how much in your situation.

39
Couple of thoughts Totally FWIW...

Tomos, you've mentioned that you don't like the button placement of the left-handed mouse... I've found over the years that choosing symmetrical mice (mouses?) make it much quicker/easier to move your hand from keyboard to mouse. And, a symmetrical design means you can easily assign buttons for right or left hand use with no need for a leftie mouse. I do realize that you're talking about a vert. mouse, but my point is maybe you should focus more on getting hardware that fits you rather than fitting yourself to the hardware?

As far as different button assignments go, have you thought about assigning sets per application? Logitech software for instance can detect the program and recall your custom settings. Don't know if that would work at all for you or not, and is based on the assumption that you wouldn't use both mice in the same program at the same time.

That said, both, current MS Intellipoint & Logitech Setpoint *I think* recognize different devices - maybe what you're after will work if the software you use recognizes both? Maybe they'd both have to be the same brand as the software so as not to show up as generic? Or maybe attaching one via PS2 & the other USB would do the trick, as long as the software had the info built-in to recognize the models? Other than very briefly while setting up a new system (where a PS2 mouse was initially needed at boot), the only time I use 2 devices is with my tablet, so I'm just guessing there - sorry.
---
Off-topic - Please Forgive - for those who are always wanting to be a little bit faster with their mouse...

I've found that the very thin, flexible, (I assume some sort of plastic material) kitchen cutting boards make really very ideal mouse surfaces! I've made more traditional looking pads by sandwiching a printed pic between very thin foam & one of these roll-up cutting boards, cut to size. Then I found a cutting board with a nice image, and a non-slip backing which I've been using for several months. And at $1 or 3, a huge discount if you've priced gaming alternatives. The downside is you have to keep it clean - any grit is immediately apparent, unlike cloth pads. The speed increase & overall feel is well worth it.

Some may also like this - I covered mine in foam backed material (for arm sweating), but even uncovered it's wonderful.
http://www.dealextre...details.dx/sku.10541
Note: do not go by the pictures - the one showing the package has the correct use, as an arm support.

40
FWIW, some might want to try Qi Gong - a sort of toned down Tai Chi is the much simplified way I'd introduce it.

There's a Japanese therapy I just read about that translates into something like Gentle Heat if I remember correctly. Infrared sauna followed by warm blankets, again if I'm remembering correctly.

Promising research is focusing on very, very small (trace) electrical current applied to electrodes attached to the scalp.

Tens units to my knowledge were originally available, targeting muscle development & training. While originally claims were to increase muscle size through electrically stimulated contractions, the real benefit was as an aid in pumping out lactic acid after a workout, and then wasn't all that effective, or as effective as massage. They weren't that expensive at the time - something comparable to the unit pictured was less than $50 - though I haven't any idea if they're still available thru stores selling athletic supplies, supplements and such. I would assume the pricing increased partly from the medical emphasis, & partly if they get away with it.

I'd have to question if the benefits ascribed to Tens were from stimulating the muscles rather than nerves, allegedly interrupting pathways etc, & would strongly suggest getting an un-biased, qualified medical opinion from more than one source if possible.

For neurological pain, with the exception of disorders like FMS or sciatica, there's usually something effecting nerves, and removing that root cause is the preferred way to go AFAIK. Sometimes that takes surgery, other times exercise, massage, stretching etc. Sometimes you can even get away with nutritional supplements &/or diet - there's a lot of new writing out re: vit. D, how most of us are deficient, & how it can cause pain. The hard part is finding a doc or docs who will ferret out the cause, and insurance will not always pay for all the exploring. Holistic medicine can provide some innovative & often worthwhile treatments, but, as their focus is on making your whole body well, you might spend a lot of time and effort without effecting your main issue - pain.

41
I've always found that using the term: "Benevolent" Dictator actually works rather well.  :)

Seriously!  :D

42
FWIW...
For video DVDs, especially dual layer, ImgBurn is *the* way to go.

For simplicity in an app that works, Nero - check OEM CDs online for ~$3.

For best value in a suite, probably Roxio as they're starting their price drops & rebates... probably as they're getting closer to v. 11. They've got $30 & $20 dollar rebates out that I've seen, and dropped the on-sale price to $49.


43
"hear some feedback from donationcoder readers."

IMHO, some of the stuff on/in the Lifehacker blog were right, some wrong, & some depends...  ;D It does do a really great job though of pointing out just how distrusting I've become, along with just why I've had to become so distrusting.  :D

Of note:
Memory optimizers shouldn't improve anything, so there I agree, but I've also read countless reports from people who say one or another has helped them tremendously. Maybe it helps minimize the problems from badly behaving software, or maybe it's totally placebo effect, but either way it's providing a benefit to the user that I just don't feel a need to take away from them.

On services, I disagree wholeheartedly. Many 3rd party services are too often the result of the same mindset that adds entries to autostart with Windows, &/or clutters the tray, needlessly for my purposes. Many of them conflict, &/or are generally a PITA. MS services are *usually* cool, BUT, they can get it wrong, as with SSDP Discovery in XP - they target the average, not my PC - they include services I don't want, like remote registry - and they can conflict with running apps &/or other processes, though that may be the apps' fault. There are & have been documented speed increases, but then you get to what's behind my distrust: is that data honest & reliable, & do I have any reason to believe the author at Lifehacker would even consider changing their opinion if presented with that data?

On the registry I couldn't disagree more strongly!  >:(  Several big name apps have screwed the pooch so-to-speak, as has MS, as have several hardware brands. *If* you never changed anything, there's no reason to touch the registry. Once you do, odds are entries have been left behind, or entered wrong or unnecessarily. I've seen all of the above, regularly. It's sadly a very imperfect world, and, even if you don't have problems directly because of bad reg entries, your Windows install has to deal with any increased size. And even if you discount any delays in Windows, you can't deny the bigger it is, the longer it takes to search. That doesn't mean any reg cleaners, even the impressive CCleaner are perfect. since all they can do is look at references, nor does it mean everyone should use them. But taking the view that the registry should be untouchable is with all due respect lunacy. :P

Comments on System Restore are a mixed bag... Haven't seen a lot of recommendations to disable it, it often should be disabled for data only drives & non-current system discs on a multi-boot system, it's not fool-proof, the auto checkpoints are often useless, Vista's shadow copies go away outside of Vista, in XP it doesn't preserve an exact copy of anything, and it's footprint on disc is adjustable. Any of that & I would have thought that section of the blog useful, though I do give them a half star for including the mention of disc cleanup - then take away 1/4 of a star because they didn't say where it's buried, and if you don't know that it clears all but the latest restore point, you probably don't know where it is.

44
Living Room / Re: The Root of Game Piracy
« on: August 20, 2008, 01:58 PM »
With apologies for slightly changing the subject, since so many developers/coders frequent donation coder, I thought you might find the comments at giveawayoftheday.com interesting, & worth checking out... Basically they give away a license for a different program every day, & the users/visitors leave their blog comments. Since the software is free, I find many of the critiques quite amazing... it presents a look into the user mindset you probably wouldn't see elsewhere. And the user mindset is IMHO what this thread, & the original blog it's based on, are all about.

45
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Mini Review - DeVeDe
« on: August 20, 2008, 01:41 PM »
Hopefully this will be of some use... Rather than try to cram way too much info in here, I thought a minimalist approach would work better - often I find the biggest hurdle to learning something new is figuring out what I want to know and where to look for it.

To start with, video is complicated - very few people “know it all” [& I’m not one of ‘em], so everybody else tailors their learning to accommodate their needs. Nothing wrong with that at all, except it has led to a tremendous amount of white noise online - there is actually much more incomplete & even disinformation re: video & DVDs than anything else, with the moral being you need to fact check almost everything you read, at least until you can build up your own list of trusted sources.

RE: DVDs... If you want to get into the tech aspects, the best source may be the videohelp.com forums, or any place where folks into ripping gather. You will likely never see the real DVD specs, as they come with a steep price tag & NDA; most of the available knowledge comes from reverse engineering. As legality is probably questionable, and a lot of folks simply don’t like those “neighborhoods”, you won’t find too much, real, tech info anyplace else. Authoring program docs will mostly just tell you what they’ll accept, & what they’ll let you do.

In the freeware video, &/or open-source world, most of the software tools are specialized, letting you complete just one of several steps required to get your video (or audio, subs etc) on DVD. There are several front ends for commonly used freeware (including DeVeDe & DVD Styler), most with GUIs that, as Target so eloquently put it, have masochistic tendencies, but they save you from having to learn & execute the individual steps. Learning to use AviSynth can be invaluable for quality conversions, allowing you to work *Accurately* with the different color spaces various formats use, along with loads of optional filtering, sizing etc. The simplest, easiest to use are convertors, almost clones of each other based on ffmpeg, mainly out of China AFAIK, & available regularly from giveawayoftheday.com. There are only a couple of free mpg2 (for DVD) encoders, and none that work as well IMHO as commercial alternatives. 

As far as authoring DVDs goes, most of the skill & effort goes into the menus & scripting, which is hard to do at anything near pro level without spending close to $100 or more on software - with the free DVD Author it’s possible, but much more learning is required. The difference between a bundled app (as in Nero) & higher priced software is almost totally based on menu and script creation. If menus aren’t important, then the free version of Muxman works very well. Figure out what you want to be able to do, what you want the finished DVD to look like, & open up your wallet - or spend a lot of quality time learning about DVDs, how to use DVD Author (and maybe one or more of the front ends), & how to get your content ready. In your situation Target, I’d highly recommend one of the Sony DVDA studio products, which you can often pick up cheap, often after rebate, at outlets like Frys. There is a noticeable difference in the quality of the output.

HD video presents special challenges, often because there are so many format possibilities, plus restrictions if you go to BluRay. For HD content I’d very highly recommend AviSynth for the conversion, but you might also look at the DGIndex programs (one for mpg2, the other for AVC). If you have HDV, keep an eye on the aspect ratios.

46
General Software Discussion / Re: TrueCrypt 6.0 released
« on: July 14, 2008, 12:58 PM »
Interesting... And a bit ironic... The best way to secure a door is to not have a doorway. The best way to hide something is to not put it where someone will, or can easily look. The fact that Truecrypt exists, creates the need to look for it. Then again, most of the world still operates on a combination of naivete & the pragmatic acceptance that locks only keep an honest person honest.

IMHO since if you were trying to get something in or out of a country without prying eyes seeing it, common sense would suggest the very last place to put it would be on a laptop. ;D 1st off I'd imagine you'd transfer it online - if you wanted to be a bit more paranoid, grab a kit so-to-speak & infect your system, having it do the work... Supreme deniability.

If you wanted physical transfer, there's flash cards & mail (ordering often from Hong Kong we've never had a package checked). If you wanted to carry it, got to be thousands (if not more) places to hide flash memory cards, or even chips (from a USB device), maybe added to the board(s) on something like a camera or mp3 player -- couple of screws and you've got access... I can't imagine anyone taking your electronics apart, then matching it to an identical item, then proving you were the one who did the alteration. Or just get one of the dozens & dozens of USB memory storage products, from watches to sunglasses, & remove/mod the way the cord connects.

For everyday hard drive storage, I'd guess it would be harder to detect TC partitions on an external drive, but I'd also guess you could add an LT drive to a external case along with the obvious one - like a false bottom in a suitcase.

47
@4wd: totally FWIW...

I've never used it, but I'd venture a guess that avidemux uses code from DGIndex that's pretty much the std for that sort of thing, used in all sorts of video apps & ft ends. Reason I mention it is you might well be able to do the same thing, without having the restriction of writable media. Since you use it you'd be the best judge of course, whether or not you could incorporate DGIndex d2v files in your avidemux projects. There's also a version for avc streams if that's of any interest.

RE: V/Dub... originally mpg2 codecs were all payware, & not necessarily cheap - then import became a non-issue pairing DGIndex & AviSynth. With Avisynth you can do tons of stuff not possible anywhere else - loads of pros use it - & combined with DGIndex mpg2 import just isn't/wasn't necessary... in fact almost any native import is inferior to the DGIndex methods. Loads of folks prefer to get mpg2 into apps like Prem Pro that way. Only with version 7 did Vegas begin to import mpg2 with quality & performance approaching DGindex on the time line [Vegas requires an extra step, either frameserving from V/Dub or using VFAPI on your .avs file to create a fake avi]

Outputting mpg2 is IMHO best handled with payware like TMPGEnc, CCE, ProCoder, MainConcept code etc, though there are a couple of free alternatives: Qenc & HCenc. V/Dub can either frame-serve to your encoding software, or there are ft ends that handle all of it for you, often incorporating AviSynth, DGIndex, V/Dub, HCenc etc.

Finally, and again if it's of interest, several apps including DGIndex can strip out the audio & video files from a VOB set. PGCDemux is another I often use. TMPGEnc also includes very good muxing in it's Mpeg Tools section [I *believe* everything but the mpg2 encoding is free]. Many programs will only import VOBs, .m2v mpg2 video streams, or muxed mpg mpg2 files, so if you need to convert without re-encoding it's not that much of a hassle.

48
Nothing against avidemux, but IMHO there's a better way...

Use DGIndex on the VOB files to generate an index file (.d2v) - should take just a few minutes. With AviSynth installed Create a simple Avisynth script: line1) loadplugin("[Your Full Path Here] \dgdecode.dll")     line 2) mpeg2source(".\your_d2v.d2v")  -- note that DGIndex can create the .avs file for you... an .avs file is a simple text file with the .avs extension. Last, open that .avs file in video software - I'd recommend VirtualDub.

This will generate full frames from the [usually 14] partials every 1/2 second (NTSC), let you filter, resize etc., save entire or portions of video, including stills & image sequences, dynamically de-interlace and so on -- long story short you can view frame by frame, advancing with the arrow keys on your keyboard, or play the video, or jump anywhere in the video instantly with a click of the mouse.

The programs are free, very small, & DGIndex & VirtualDub have next to zero footprint on your PC. All 3 are also standards in video circles.

49
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Dynamic shortcuts
« on: June 17, 2008, 09:35 PM »
Ummm... not a coder (that part of my brain died long ago) so this is probably a stupid idea, but what popped into my head was why have an app constantly watching &/or polling when it could be activated by an autorun association? Also, instead of a shortcut, updating or otherwise, would a constant sized/placed window work containing your shortcuts? That way you could have several sticks with the icons or shortcuts varying by content?

50
Living Room / Re: Pirating abandoned content?
« on: May 16, 2008, 05:51 PM »
...even if piracy does not in any way hurt the company whose product is being pirated -- it may end up subtlety damaging the free/open source community, by decreasing the demand and support for free/open source alternatives.

I think with biz, maybe -- there are benefits to showing clients you're running the latest, best, hi-$ tools, rather than taking the risk that your client may know or accept that the open source alternative is just as good if not better. 

Otherwise IMHO no... Hang out in the video forums and sure some folks will go after the pirated stuff just to say they use it... The majority though would rather have optimized, open source software that works, even preferring it in many cases to the hi end stuff.

Pages: prev1 [2] 3 4next